Prospective observational study comparing the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy with or without epidural anesthesia: the Kanagawa Yokohama Colorectal Cancer Study Group (KYCC) 1806.

PURPOSE: There have been no adequate comparisons of the efficacy, safety, and efficiency of analgesia after laparoscopic colorectal resection (LAC), with and without epidural anesthesia (EDA). METHODS: This was a multicenter prospective observational study of patients undergoing LAC. The primary end point was the mean visual analog scale (VAS) score on postoperative days (PODs) 1-7. The secondary end points were the highest VAS, complication rate, days to first ambulation and fatigue, length of hospital stay, and time to commencement of surgery. RESULTS: We compared an EDA group (Group E, n = 48) and a no-EDA group (Group O, n = 48) after matching. The mean VAS was not significantly different between the groups (28.7 vs. 30.1, p = 0.288). On assessing the secondary end points, the highest VAS was not significantly different between the groups. In fact, the VAS was lower in Group E only on POD 2. There was no difference in the incidence of complications, the time to first postoperative evacuation was shorter in Group E, and postoperative hospitalization was similar. The time to surgery was shorter in Group O. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that LAC without EDA is a feasible option, but with the early and regular use of adjunctive measures to provide more stable analgesia.

Short- and long-term outcomes of transanal decompression tube and self-expandable metallic stent for obstructive colorectal cancer based on a multicenter database (KYCC2110).

AIM: There are well-known methods for decompressing the colorectal tract before surgery, including transanal decompression tubes (TDT) and self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS). This study aimed to compare the short and long-term results in patients with malignant large bowel obstruction in whom TDT or SEMS were placed before surgery. METHODS: This retrospective observational study enrolled 225 patients with malignant large bowel obstruction in whom TDT or SEMS were placed preoperatively and underwent R0 resection between 2008 and 2020. One-to-two propensity score matching was performed according to patient characteristics. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS). The secondary endpoints were the overall survival (OS) and postoperative complication rate. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients in the TDT group and 114 in the SEMS group were matched. The 3-year RFS rates were 66.7% in the TDT group and 69.9% in the SEMS group (p = 0.54), and the 3-year OS rates were 90.5% in the TDT group and 87.1% in the SEMS group (p = 0.52). No significant differences in the long-term results were observed between the two groups. Regarding short-term results, the SEMS group had significantly fewer stoma construction (p = 0.007) and shorter postoperative hospitalization (p < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative complications (grade ≥ 2) was significantly lower in the SEMS group (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: No significant differences in the long-term results were observed between the TDT and SEMS group. The SEMS showed significant usefulness in terms of improving short-term outcomes.

Analysis of surgical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for locally advanced mid-transverse colon cancer.

PURPOSE: This study compared the surgical outcomes between laparoscopic colectomy (LC) and open colectomy (OC) for mid-transverse colon cancer (MTC). METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study compared the short- and long-term surgical outcomes for patients with advanced MTC (T3 and T4 with or without nodal involvement) who underwent LC or OC between January 2008 and December 2019 using a propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS: A total of 177 patients with advanced MTC were enrolled. After matching, 58 cases for the OC and LC groups were selected. No significant differences in age, sex, tumor progression, or procedure type (extended resection or segmental resection) existed between groups. The LC group had significantly less blood loss (20 mL vs. 50 mL, p=0.048) and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (8 days vs. 12 days, p<0.001) than the OC group. Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2) occurred in 27.6% and 25.9% of the OC and LC groups respectively (p=1). Three patients (5.2%) and one patient (1.7%) of the OC and LC groups respectively developed anastomotic leakage (p=0.62). Re-operation was required in five patients (8.6%) in the OC group and one patient (1.7%) in the LC group (p=0.21). No surgery-related deaths occurred in either group. The 3-year overall survival rates (stage II: LC 100% vs. OC 92.8%, p=0.15; stage III: 88.9% vs. 84.3%, p=0.88, respectively) were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: LC is a minimally invasive technique with lesser blood loss, shorter postoperative hospital stays, and oncologic equivalence to OC. Hence, LC is useful for MTC treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000042676.

Laparoscopic-assisted surgery versus open surgery for transverse colon cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.

Introduction: Previous randomized controlled trials demonstrated similar oncological outcomes between laparoscopic-assisted (LA) and open (OP) colectomy; however, patients with transverse colon cancer were not analyzed. The aim of this study was to confirm the oncological safety and the advantages of the short- and long-term results of LA surgery for transverse colon cancer in comparison to OP surgery. Materials and Methods: The study data were retrospectively collected from the databases of four hospitals. Patients with transverse colon cancer who underwent LA or OP R0 or R1 resection were registered. Results: Among the 204 patients, 149 underwent OP colectomy and 55 underwent LA colectomy. The median follow-up period was 43 months. The rate of conversion to OP resection was 7.3%. The 5-year overall survival rate of the LA group was higher than that of the OP surgery group for all-stage patients (97.5% vs. 91.1%, P = 0.108), and it was similar in Stage II and Stage III patients (94.1% vs. 94.2%, P = 0.510). The LA group had significantly lower blood loss and a significantly longer operative time in comparison to the OP surgery group. Furthermore, the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter (9 vs. 13 days, P = 0.001) and the incidence of Grade ≥III complications was lower in the LA group (3.7% vs. 14.8%, P = 0.031). Conclusion: We concluded that LA surgery for transverse colon cancer is oncologically safe and yields better short-term results in comparison to OP surgery.

Impact of Infectious Complications on Survival and Recurrence of Patients With Stage II/III Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Postoperative complications are associated with increased recurrence in colorectal cancer (CRC). We investigated the impact of infectious complications on the recurrence of CRC and overall survival after curative surgery in a single study group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 1,668 patients who underwent radical resection for CRC in Yokohama City University, Yokohama Minami Kyosai Hospital, and Kanagawa Cancer Center between 2011 and 2019 were reviewed. Patients were classified into those with infectious complications (IC group) and those without infectious complications (Non-IC group). The risk factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. RESULTS: Postoperative complications were found in 560 of the 1,668 patients (33.5%), and IC, which occurred in 312 patients (18.7%), included pneumonia, anastomotic leakage, and intraperitoneal abscess. The 5-year OS rates in the Non-IC and IC groups were 95.5% and 90.4%, respectively, while the 5-year RFS rates were 74.4% and 68.1%, respectively. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that postoperative IC were significant independent risk factors for OS and RFS. CONCLUSION: The presence of postoperative IC after CRC resection is associated with decreased long-term survival. The surgical procedure, surgical strategy, and perioperative care should be carefully planned in order to avoid causing IC.

A Case of Robotic Posterior Rectopexy for Full-thickness Rectal Prolapse.

We describe our experience with robotic posterior rectopexy for a patient with full-thickness rectal prolapse. To our knowledge, this is the first report of such a case in the literature. A 94-year-old woman presented with a history of gradually worsening rectal prolapse. On examination, we found that the rectum was completely prolapsed, and we observed a prolapsed intestinal tract. Surgery was indicated and robotic rectopexy was performed without intraoperative complications. The postoperative course was uneventful, and she was discharged 10 days after the operation. One year later, there were no signs of recurrence. Robotic surgery has become common in recent years. We used robotic surgery for rectopexy, including the suturing procedure. Suturing in robotic surgery is easier than that in laparoscopic surgery, and we demonstrated that robotic rectopexy could be safely and easily performed. The trial was registered in the UMIN clinical trial registry (number 000040378).

Prediction of lateral lymph node metastasis using OSNA method for mesorectal lymph nodes in low rectal cancer: A prospective study by the Kanagawa Yokohama Colorectal Cancer Study Group (KYCC1801).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Contrary to the Japanese guidelines recommendations regarding lateral lymph node dissection (LatLND) for rectal cancer, its omission is common in clinical practice without reliable omission criteria. Negative pathological mesorectal lymph node metastasis (MesLNM) is reportedly highly correlated with negative pathological lateral lymph node metastasis (p-LatLNM); however, this cannot be used as a criterion because pathological features are revealed postoperatively. Herein, we prospectively evaluated the negative predictive value (NPV) of MesLNM diagnosed via the one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) method for p-LatLNM. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted at a single academic study group in Japan. The key eligibility criterion was mid-to-low rectal cancer planned to be treated using mesorectal excision with LatLND. According to the study protocol, the OSNA method was considered useful if the point estimate of the NPV exceeded 95%. RESULTS: Preoperative case registration was conducted between 2018 and 2020; 34 patients were registered. Among these, 16 were negative for OSNA-MesLNM, and negative p-LatLNM was confirmed in all cases. The point estimate of the NPV was 100%, with the 95% confidence interval ranging from 79.4% to 100.0%. CONCLUSIONS: The OSNA method is useful in selecting patients in whom LatLND can be omitted in real-world clinical practice.

Can D3 Lymph Node Dissection for Patients With Colon Cancer With a Poor C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio Improve Survival Outcomes?

AIM: D3 lymph node dissection (LND) for stage II and III colon cancer has been shown to improve prognosis, however, it generally increases surgical stress. Studies have reported that the C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) may be a useful inflammatory-nutritional biomarker to predict postoperative complications and poor prognosis for with various types of cancer. Our purposes were to assess the short- and long-term outcomes of D3 LND in patients with a high preoperative CAR (≥ 0.04). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis reviewing a prospectively collected database of Yokohama City University and three affiliated hospitals. A total of 449 patients with stage II or III colon cancer with high CAR who underwent primary resection with D2 or D3 LND were identified between 2008 and 2020. The primary and secondary outcomes of interests were the 3-year recurrence-free survival and postoperative complication rates. RESULTS: After propensity matching, 230 patients were evaluated. There was no significant difference between the D3 and D2 groups in the rate of postoperative complications overall (14.8% versus 11.3%, p=0.558), however, the incidence of anastomotic leakage tended to be greater in the D3 group (9.6% versus 2.6%, p=0.050). The long-term findings showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups (3-year recurrence-free survival rate: 77.2% versus 77.2%, p=0.880). CONCLUSION: D3 LND did not improve survival outcomes for patients with colon cancer with a poor CAR in this study. D2 LND may be a treatment option for patients with stage II-III colon cancer with a high preoperative CAR.

Impact of Intraoperative Blood Loss on the Survival of Patients With Stage II/III Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Resection of the primary lesion with radical lymph node dissection is the most promising treatment avenue for patients with cancer. On the other hand, these procedures often induce excessive intraoperative blood loss (IBL) and require perioperative blood transfusion. The influence of IBL on the long-term postoperative outcomes of patients with digestive cancer is controversial. We investigated the impact of IBL on survival and recurrence after curative surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) in a single study group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 1,597 patients who underwent radical resection for CRC at three group hospitals between 2000 and 2019 were reviewed. Patients were classified into a group with high IBL (≥200 ml) or low IBL (<200 ml). The risk factors for disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 489 and 1,108 patients were classified into the high and low IBL groups, respectively. The OS and DFS rates at 5 years after surgery were 89.3% and 63.4%, respectively, for the high IBL group and 96.9% and 77.8% for the low IBL group; these differences were statistically significantly (p<0.001). The multivariate analysis demonstrated that IBL was a significant independent risk factor for OS and DFS. CONCLUSION: The amount of IBL was associated with significant differences in the OS and DFS of patients with stage II/III CRC who received curative resection. The surgical procedure, surgical strategy, and perioperative care should be carefully planned to avoid causing IBL.

Potential Benefits of Minimally Invasive Laparoscopy in Reducing Local Recurrence After Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer.

AIM: To compare the mid-term oncological results between patients with low rectal cancer who underwent minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery (MILS) and those who underwent open surgery (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall, 262 matched patients who underwent primary resection for low rectal cancer between 2000 and 2019 were divided into MILS (n=131; n=107, conventional laparoscopic surgery; n=24, robotic surgery) and OS (n=131) groups. The short- and mid-term outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Similar baseline characteristics were noted. The operative time was longer and blood loss was lesser in the MILS group; the conversion rate was 3.8%. The incidence of postoperative complications was similar. The 2-year cumulative incidence of local recurrence was noted to be much lower in the MILS group (1.9%) than in the OS group (8.4%). MILS had a significantly low hazard ratio (0.208, p=0.036). CONCLUSION: MILS has potential benefits in reducing local recurrence of low rectal cancer.

Does the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System improve patients' outcome following laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer? A multicentre, retrospective analysis with propensity score matching.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the short-term and oncological impact of the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery on the operator performing laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was based on medical records from a multicentre database. A total of 417 patients diagnosed with stage II/III colon and rectosigmoid cancer treated with curative resection were divided into two groups according to whether they were operated on by qualified surgeons (Q group, n=352) or not (NQ group, n=65). Through strict propensity score matching, 98 cases (49 in each group) were assessed. RESULTS: Operative time was significantly longer in the NQ group than in the Q group (199 vs. 168 min, p=0.029). The amount of blood loss, post-operative complications, and duration of hospitalisation were similar between both groups. No mortality was observed. One conversion case was seen in the NQ group. The 3-year recurrence-free survival rate was 86.6% in the NQ group and 88.2% in the Q group, which was not statistically significant (log-rank p=0.966). CONCLUSION: Direct operation by ESSQS-qualified surgeons contributed to a shortened operation time. Under an organised educational environment, almost equivalent safety and oncological outcomes are expected regardless of the surgeon's qualifications.

Lateral lymph node dissection for mid-to-low rectal cancer: is it safe and effective in a practice-based cohort?

BACKGROUND: Most evidence regarding lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer is from expert settings. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this procedure in a practice-based cohort. METHODS: A total of 383 patients who were diagnosed with stage II-III mid-to-low rectal cancer between 2010 and 2019 and underwent primary resection with curative intent at a general surgery unit were retrospectively reviewed. After propensity matching, 144 patients were divided into the following groups for short- and long-term outcome evaluation: mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection (n = 72) and mesorectal excision (n = 72). RESULTS: This practice-based cohort was characterized by a high pT4 (41.6%) and R1 resection (10.4%) rate. Although the operative time was longer in the lateral dissection group (349 min vs. 237 min, p < 0.001), postoperative complications (19.4% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.829), and hospital stay (18 days vs. 22 days, p = 0.059) did not significantly differ; 5-year relapse-free survival (62.5% vs. 66.4%, p = 0.378), and cumulative local recurrence (9.7% vs. 15.3%, p = 0.451) were also in the same range in both groups. In the seven locally recurrent cases in the lateral dissection group, four had undergone R1 resection. CONCLUSIONS: Lateral lymph node dissection was found to be safe in this practice-based cohort; however, the local control effect was not obvious. To maximize the potential merits of lateral lymph node dissection, strategies need to be urgently established to avoid R1 resection in clinical practice.

A Comparison of Open and Laparoscopic-assisted Colectomy for Obstructive Colon Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: We performed a retrospective multi-center cohort analysis to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery vs. open surgery for obstructive colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 455 patients with colon cancer with ileus underwent surgery at Yokohama City University Hospital and four related institutions from April 2000 to March 2016. RESULTS: There were 414 cases in the open surgery group and 41 cases in the laparoscopic surgery group with no marked differences in the gender or age. The postoperative complication rate, according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, was lower in the laparoscopic group compared to the open surgery group. The postoperative hospital stay was 16 days in the open surgery group and 9 days in the laparoscopic surgery group (p=0.004). Among the various factors examined, the operation approach was identified as a statistically significant independent risk factor for postoperative complications (p=0.015). CONCLUSION: Preoperative treatment for colon cancer with ileus and elective laparoscopic surgery are thought to be useful for achieving curative treatment, avoiding colostomy, and shortening the length of hospital stay.

Laparoscopic vs. Open Surgery for Stage II/III Colon Cancer Patients With Body Mass Index >25 kg/m2.

AIM: To compare long- and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery with those of open surgery for patients with colorectal cancer and body mass index over 25 kg/m2 Patients and Methods: This multicentre, retrospective study analysed clinical records and identified 178 patients with body mass index over 25 kg/m2 who underwent surgery for colon and rectosigmoid cancer between 2000 and 2016. After applying propensity score matching, 96 patients were finally included. The primary outcome was the 3-year recurrence-free survival rate, and the secondary outcomes were short-term results during and after surgery. RESULTS: The 3-year recurrence-free survival rates were similar for the laparoscopic and open surgery groups. The laparoscopic surgery group had longer operative times but less blood loss and shorter periods of hospital stay. There were no differences in incidence of postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic and open surgeries had similar long-term outcomes for obese patients. Laparoscopic surgery is an effective option for this population.

Short-term Outcomes Following Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Technically Demanding Rectal Cancer.

AIM: To clarify the benefits of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) regarding short-term outcomes in patients with technically demanding rectal cancer (TDRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 2015 and September 2019, 88 TDRC cases were identified from our database, and divided into the RALS (n=32) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) (n=56) groups. TDRC was defined as mid-rectal tumors presenting at least one of the following risk factors: Male sex, high body mass index, T4 stage, bulky tumor, or low rectal tumor. RESULTS: Patient baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. One and 15 patients developed anastomotic leakage in the RALS and CLS groups (3% vs. 27%, p<0.01), respectively. The postoperative complication rate was lower in the RALS group (19% vs. 43%, p=0.03). Multivariate analysis showed the surgical approach to be an independent predictor for anastomotic leakage. CONCLUSION: RALS has potential advantages to prevent anastomotic leakage complications in patients with TDRC.

[A Case of Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma Resected Four Times in Five Years].

We report a long-surviving case of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma requiring 4 operations in 5 years. A 63-year-old man was diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor(GIST)that was excised for the first time in June 2011. The pathological diagnosis was malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. Thereafter, we excised recurrences of the tumor in the hepatic hilum in December 2011. Similar operations were performed in March 2012 and August 2015 because of tumors in the small bowel mesentery and the segment 8 of the liver. The pathological diagnosis was malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. It is an extremely rare variant of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. There is no record of multiple excision of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma for recurrences. In this case, the cause of long survival was considered to be the excision of recurrent tumors.

[Eight Cases of Primary Carcinoma of the Vermiform Appendix].

Primary carcinoma of the vermiform appendix is a rare neoplasm, and its treatment strategy has not yet been established. We retrospectively analyzed 8 cases of primary carcinoma of the vermiform appendix from 2007 to 2017. Six cases were male and two were female, with a median age of 60.5 years. Ileocecal resection and right hemicolectomy were performed in 7 cases and 1 case, respectively. Regarding pathological staging, 5 cases were of pStage Ⅱ, 2 were of pStage Ⅲa, and 1 was of pStage Ⅳ. Three cases had recurrences after curative resection. The postoperative median overall survival time was 45 months. Three cases with a tumor diameter of 20mm were alive without any recurrence; however, 3 of 5 cases with a tumor diameter of B21mm had recurrences. Although only 1 of 3 cases with adjuvant chemotherapy(pStage Ⅲa case)had recurrence, 2 of 4 cases without adjuvant chemotherapy, including a pStage Ⅱ case, had recurrences. Early diagnosis, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy could improve the long-term outcomes of patients with primary carcinoma of the vermiform appendix.

Laparoscopic surgery in patients diagnosed with clinical N2 colon cancer.

PURPOSE: The benefits of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer have been well established. Several randomized controlled trials have demonstrated similar oncological outcomes between laparoscopic and open surgery for colon cancer. However, whether or not laparoscopic surgery is acceptable in patients with clinical N2 colon cancer is unclear. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the safety and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for clinical N2 colon cancer. METHODS: This retrospective study assessed a prospective database and identified 262 consecutive patients with clinical N2 colon cancer who underwent either laparoscopic or open primary resection between 2000 and 2016. After propensity-score matching, 162 patients were analyzed. The primary outcome of interest was the 3-year recurrence-free survival rate, and the secondary outcome of interest was the postoperative complication rate. RESULTS: The 3-year recurrence-free survival rate did not differ markedly between the laparoscopic and open surgery groups (77.4% vs. 76.5%, p = 0.620). In addition, the incidence of postoperative complications did not differ markedly between the laparoscopic and open surgery groups (16.6% vs. 24.0%, p = 0.317). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that laparoscopic surgery is safe and effective for clinical N2 colon cancer. Laparoscopic resection can be considered in patients diagnosed with clinical N2 colon cancer.

Combining the Glasgow Prognostic Score and Serum Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Level Improves the Ability to Predict Early Recurrence in Resected Pancreatic Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Gemcitabine.

AIM: The aim of this study was to confirm the predictive/prognostic value of the preadjuvant Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 level in pancreatic cancer patients receiving adjuvant gemcitabine (GEM) after surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 67 resected pancreatic cancer patients, treated with adjuvant GEM, were included. The GPS and CA19-9 level were calculated prior to administration of adjuvant therapy and were found to correlate with the outcomes and rate of early recurrence. RESULTS: An elevated preadjuvant GPS or CA19-9 level was significantly associated with a shorter overall survival (OS) (p=0.003 and p<0.001, respectively). Either an elevated GPS or CA19-9 level predicted early recurrence and the combined use of these two factors improved the ability to predict early recurrence, with a specificity and accuracy up to 0.958 and 0.821, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both an elevated preadjuvant GPS and CA19-9 level, when used alone, are significant predictors of poor outcomes in pancreatic cancer patients receiving adjuvant GEM. The combined use of these parameters improves the ability to predict early recurrence in such patients.

Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor of the rectum: report of a case and review of the literature.

We report a case of perivascular epithelioid cell tumor arising in the rectum of a 55-year-old woman. The tumor was treated by transanal endoscopic microsurgery. After 1 year follow-up, the patient is alive with no radiologic or endoscopic evidence of recurrence. Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor is a rare mesenchymal tumor characterized by co-expression of melanocytic and smooth muscle markers. This rare tumor can arise in various organs, including the falciform ligament, uterus, uterine cervix, liver, kidney, lung, breast, cardiac septum, pancreas, prostate, thigh, and gastrointestinal tract. Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor of the gastrointestinal tract is very rare, with only 23 previously reported cases. We review the literature on perivascular epithelioid cell tumors arising in the gastrointestinal tract.