RESUMO
ABSTRACT: Although CD20×CD3 bispecific antibodies are effective against systemic B-cell lymphomas, their efficacy in central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma is unknown. Here, we report the CD20×CD3 bispecific glofitamab penetrates the blood-brain barrier, stimulates immune-cell infiltration of CNS tumors, and induces clinical responses in patients with secondary CNS.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Biespecíficos , Neoplasias do Sistema Nervoso Central , Humanos , Neoplasias do Sistema Nervoso Central/imunologia , Neoplasias do Sistema Nervoso Central/patologia , Neoplasias do Sistema Nervoso Central/tratamento farmacológico , Anticorpos Biespecíficos/uso terapêutico , Barreira Hematoencefálica/patologia , Antígenos CD20/imunologia , Complexo CD3/imunologia , Feminino , Masculino , Linfoma de Células B/imunologia , Linfoma de Células B/patologia , Linfoma de Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma/imunologia , Linfoma/patologia , Linfoma/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
Most diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients treated with bispecific antibodies (BsAb) or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells fail to achieve durable treatment responses, underscoring the need for a deeper understanding of mechanisms that regulate the immune environment and response to treatment. Here, an integrative, multi-omic approach was employed to characterize DLBCL immune environments, which effectively segregated DLBCLs into four quadrants - termed DLBCL-immune quadrants (IQ) - defined by cell-of-origin and immune-related gene set expression scores. Recurrent genomic alterations were enriched in each IQ, suggesting that lymphoma cell-intrinsic alterations contribute to orchestrating unique DLBCL immune environments. In relapsed/refractory DLBCL patients, DLBCL-IQ assignment correlated significantly with clinical benefit with the CD20 x CD3 BsAb, mosunetuzumab, but not with CD19-directed CAR T cells. DLBCL-IQ provides a new framework to conceptualize the DLBCL immune landscape and uncovers the differential impact of the endogenous immune environment on outcomes to BsAb and CAR T cell treatment.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: A genetic classifier termed LymphGen accurately identifies diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) subtypes vulnerable to Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis), but is challenging to implement in the clinic and fails to capture all DLBCLs that benefit from BTKi-based therapy. Here, we developed a novel CD5 gene expression signature as a biomarker of response to BTKi-based therapy in DLBCL. METHODS: CD5 immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on 404 DLBCLs to identify CD5 IHC+ and CD5 IHC- cases, which were subsequently characterized at the molecular level through mutational and transcriptional analyses. A 60-gene CD5 gene expression signature (CD5sig) was constructed using genes differentially expressed between CD5 IHC+ and CD5 IHC- non-germinal center B-cell-like (non-GCB DLBCL) DLBCLs. This CD5sig was applied to external DLBCL data sets, including pretreatment biopsies from patients enrolled in the PHOENIX study (n = 584) to define the extent to which the CD5sig could identify non-GCB DLBCLs that benefited from the addition of ibrutinib to rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). RESULTS: CD5 expression was observed in 12% of non-GCB DLBCLs. CD5+ DLBCLs displayed transcriptional features of B-cell receptor (BCR) activation and were enriched for BCR-activating mutations known to correlate with BTKi sensitivity. However, most CD5+ DLBCLs lacked canonical BCR-activating mutations or were LymphGen-unclassifiable (LymphGen-Other). The CD5sig recapitulated these findings in multiple independent data sets, indicating its utility in identifying DLBCLs with genetic and nongenetic bases for BCR dependence. Supporting this notion, CD5sig+ DLBCLs derived a selective survival advantage from the addition of ibrutinib to R-CHOP in the PHOENIX study, independent of LymphGen classification. CONCLUSION: CD5sig is a useful biomarker to identify DLBCLs vulnerable to BTKi-based therapies and complements current biomarker approaches by identifying DLBCLs with genetic and nongenetic bases for BTKi sensitivity.
Assuntos
Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B , Humanos , Tirosina Quinase da Agamaglobulinemia/genética , Tirosina Quinase da Agamaglobulinemia/metabolismo , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/genética , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/patologia , Linfócitos B/patologia , Rituximab/uso terapêutico , Vincristina/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores , Doxorrubicina/uso terapêutico , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapêutico , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , PrognósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Dual translocation of MYC and BCL2 or the dual overexpression of these proteins in patients with aggressive B-cell lymphomas (termed double-hit lymphoma [DHL] and double-expressor lymphoma [DEL], respectively) have poor outcomes after chemoimmunotherapy with the combination of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). Retrospective reports have suggested improved outcomes with dose-intensified regimens. In the current study, the authors conducted a phase 1 study to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity, and preliminary efficacy of adding lenalidomide to dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin with rituximab (DA-EPOCH-R) in patients with DHL and DEL. METHODS: The primary objective of the current study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of lenalidomide in combination with DA-EPOCH-R. A standard 3+3 design was used with lenalidomide administered on days 1 to 14 of each 21-day cycle (dose levels of 10 mg, 15 mg, and 20 mg). Patients attaining a complete response after 6 cycles of induction therapy proceeded to maintenance lenalidomide (10 mg daily for 14 days every 21 days) for 12 additional cycles. RESULTS: A total of 15 patients were enrolled, 10 of whom had DEL and 5 of whom had DHL. Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities at a lenalidomide dose of 20 mg, consisting of grade 4 sepsis. The maximum tolerated dose of lenalidomide was determined to be 15 mg. The most common nonhematologic grade ≥3 adverse events included thromboembolism (4 patients; 27%) and hypokalemia (2 patients; 13%) (toxicities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 4.0]). The preliminary efficacy of the regimen was encouraging, especially in the DEL cohort, in which all 10 patients achieved durable and complete metabolic responses with a median follow-up of 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of lenalidomide with DA-EPOCH-R appears to be safe and feasible in patients with DHL and DEL. These encouraging results have prompted an ongoing phase 2 multicenter study.