Does Preoperative Testosterone Administration Decrease Complications in Distal Hypospadias Repair With Urethroplasty?

PURPOSE: Testosterone administration prior to hypospadias repair is common practice among pediatric urologists; however, its impact on surgical outcomes remains controversial. We hypothesize that testosterone administration prior to distal hypospadias repair with urethroplasty significantly decreases postoperative complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We queried our hypospadias database for primary distal hypospadias repairs with urethroplasty from 2015 to 2021. Patients undergoing repair without urethroplasty were excluded. We collected information on patient age, procedure type, testosterone administration status, initial visit and intraoperative glans width, urethroplasty length, and postoperative complications. To determine the role of testosterone administration on incidence of complications, a logistic regression adjusting for initial visit glans width, urethroplasty length, and age was performed. RESULTS: A total of 368 patients underwent distal hypospadias repair with urethroplasty. One hundred thirty-three patients received testosterone and 235 did not. Initial visit glans width was significantly larger in the no-testosterone vs testosterone group (14.5 mm vs 13.1 mm, P = .001). Testosterone patients had significantly larger glans width at the time of surgery (17.1 mm vs 14.6 mm [no-testosterone group], P = .001). On multivariable logistic regression analysis after controlling for age at surgery, preoperative glans width, testosterone status, and urethroplasty length, testosterone administration did show significant association with reduced odds of postoperative complications (OR 0.4, P = .039). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective review of patients shows that on multivariable analysis there is significant association between testosterone administration and decreased incidence of complications in patients undergoing distal hypospadias repair with urethroplasty. Future studies on testosterone administration should focus on specific cohorts of patients with hypospadias as benefits of testosterone may be more evident in some subgroups than others.

Quantification of risk factors in 500 patients with postoperative urinary retention.

INTRODUCTION: An Institutional Quality and Safety Initiative to reduce postoperative urinary retention (POUR) and improve patient safety indicators (PSIs) was undertaken after a nurse driven protocol for catheter removal lead to an increase in POUR. The aim of this study was to identify the number of risk factors present in patients with POUR while examining the prevalence of those risk factors individually. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of our institution's surgical database was performed to identify 500 consecutive cases of POUR between July 1, 2013 and July 1, 2014. POUR was defined as the inability to void postoperatively with bladder scan volumes greater than 450 mL and subsequent need for catheterization with an output greater than 450 mL. These records were individually reviewed for 15 known independent risk factors for urinary retention. Patients with incomplete records or preoperative baseline urinary retention requiring catheterization were excluded. RESULTS: Of the 500 consecutive patients with POUR, 288 (57.6%) were male and 212 (42.4%) were female. At the time of voiding trial, all 500 patients with POUR (100%) had at least one perioperative risk factor identified and over 75% had six or more (mean 6.88, median 7, range 1-12). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple perioperative risk factors are present in the vast majority of patients with POUR. Many of the risk factors are modifiable and represent an opportunity for intervention. This could ultimately lead to a risk profile which could be used to optimize timing of postoperative voiding trials, thus improving patient care (improve PSIs and patient comfort, reduce trauma) while maintaining low rates of CAUTI.

Pharmacologic therapy for Peyronie's disease: what should we prescribe?

INTRODUCTION: Peyronie's disease (PD) is a wound healing disorder of the penis with a myriad of proposed treatment options reported in the literature. Evaluating the available data and therapeutic management of PD can be challenging and confusing, even for the most experienced treating physician. This review provides a comprehensive overview of pharmacologic treatment options for PD, focusing on the best available evidence. AREAS COVERED: A comprehensive literature search for published articles evaluating oral, topical, and injectable pharmacologic agents for PD was completed. Prospective, controlled trials were given precedence for inclusion. EXPERT OPINION: Although a multitude of oral agents have been proposed and evaluated in PD patients, results vary widely and a reproducible objective benefit has not yet been strongly established for any single oral agent. Well-designed, large-scale, randomized controlled trials evaluating oral agents in PD patients are lacking. Consistent objective benefit from injectable agents has been supported for years by various non-controlled trials. Recently, injectable collagenase Clostridium histolyticum became the first pharmacologic agent to obtain FDA approval for use in PD patients, supported by data from a large-scale, Phase III randomized controlled trial. Further elucidation of the genetic and mechanistic pathways involved in the development and progression of PD will help define future therapeutic targets.