Clinical validation of the VIPUN™ gastric monitoring system versus manometry for the evaluation of gastric motility.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal dysmotility is frequently suspected in patients with gastroparesis, functional dyspepsia, and ileus, and in the intensive care unit. Monitoring of gastric motility in clinical practice remains challenging. A novel technology was developed to meet the medical need for a widely available bedside tool to monitor gastric motility continuously. The VIPUN™ Gastric Monitoring System (GMS) comprises a nasogastric feeding tube with intragastric balloon to allow for measuring gastric contractions. AIMS: To compare the performance of the VIPUN GMS versus a reference technique (manometry). METHODS: In this validation study in healthy subjects, the investigational catheter and a solid-state manometry catheter were placed in the stomach concomitantly. Motility was recorded for 2.5 h: 2 h in a fasting state, followed by a 400-kcal liquid meal, and monitoring of the fed state for the remaining half hour. The performance of both systems was compared by automated recognition and manual identification of the contractile activity. Data are presented as mean (standard deviation). KEY RESULTS: The analysis set comprised 13 healthy subjects (6 women, age: 27.5 (8.1) years, BMI: 22.2 (2.46) kg/m2 ). Automatically-recognized contractility was strongly correlated between the two techniques (endpoint: contraction duration; Spearman ρ = 0.96, p < 0.001). A correlation was also observed between the number of individual contractions identified by expert gastroenterologists on both technologies independently (ρ = 0.71, p = .007) and between the contractions identified by the experts and by the GMS software (ρ = 0.87, p = 0.001). No serious or unanticipated adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The observed strong correlations with the gold standard, manometry, validate the performance of the VIPUN GMS as a gastric monitoring system.

Do prokinetic agents provide symptom relief through acceleration of gastric emptying? An update and revision of the existing evidence.

BACKGROUND: Gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia are disorders characterized by upper gastrointestinal symptoms and multifaceted etiologies. One of the main therapeutic approaches is accelerating gastric emptying (GE) by means of prokinetic agents. Their efficacy has been demonstrated, although the association between symptom improvement and acceleration of emptying is less clear. Meta-analyses have found contradictory results. Differences in applied methodology and included trials might drive these contradictions. OBJECTIVE: To provide a transparent meta-analysis update to elucidate the association between symptom improvement and acceleration of GE due to gastroprokinetic agents available for long-term use in patients with gastroparesis. DESIGN: Two approaches from earlier meta-analyses were executed and compared. One analyzed the relative changes on active treatment versus baseline, the other compared the change from baseline on active treatment versus the change from baseline on placebo. Papers that reported sufficient numerical data for both analyses were selected. Both analyses included the same trials. RESULTS: Overall, both approaches yield the same positive direction of association between symptom improvement and acceleration of emptying (0.291 (-0.391, 0.972), p = 0.4 and 0.453 (0.123, 0.782), p = 0.007 for the active-only and placebo-controlled analysis respectively). The association between symptom improvement and GE acceleration for studies using optimal GE tests was either 0.028 (p > 0.9) or 0.463 (p = 0.007), and for sub-optimal GE tests was either 0.370 (p = 0.4) or 0.052 (p > 0.9) depending on the used meta-analysis methodology. CONCLUSIONS: The applied methodology for GE testing, and the meta-analysis substantially impacts the conclusion. When considering the clinically relevant outcome of improvement from baseline, symptoms and emptying improve with prokinetics, but no correlation is found between both aspects. When the change over placebo is considered, limiting the analysis to scientifically more rigorous study approaches, changes in emptying rate and symptom improvement are positively associated.

Relationship Between Gastric Emptying Rate and Simultaneously Assessed Symptoms in Functional Dyspepsia.

METHODS: During a GE test (breath test with 13C-octanoic acid labelled 250 kcal solid meal), the severity of 6 symptoms (postprandial fullness, epigastric pain and burning, bloating, nausea and belching) was assessed, every 15 min, before meal-intake and 4h postprandially. The sum of individual symptom scores generated the meal-related symptoms score; the sum of all symptoms generated overall meal-related symptom severity (OSS). Data were compared in patients with normal and delayed GE (cut-off T1/2≥ 109 min). Data are shown as mean±SEM. RESULTS: 504 patients were included, of which 382 patients (67% female, age 43.8±0.8 years, BMI 23.3±0.2 kg/m2) had normal and 122 patients (77% female, age 42.7±1.5 years, BMI 23.2±0.6 kg/m2) had delayed GE. OSS tended to be higher in patients with delayed GE (81.8±3.4 vs. 99.5±7.1, p=.05). Only nausea was significantly higher in patients with delayed GE (11±0.8 vs. 16±1.6, p=.01). No correlations were observed between GE rate and any of the symptoms (OSS: r=0.06, p=.2; nausea: r=0.06, p=.1). The symptom severity time course showed a significant difference only for nausea, with increased severity ratings 90 min after the meal (p<.01) in delayed GE compared to normal GE patients. CONCLUSION: The severity of symptoms in functional dyspepsia and idiopathic gastroparesis, even when assessed during the GE test meal, is not correlated to gastric emptying rate. (Ethics committee University Hospital of Leuven study number S55426).

Effect of protein composition of enteral formula on gastric content volume during continuous feeding: A randomized controlled cross-over study in healthy adults.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Enteral nutrition with polymeric intact protein formula is the preferred medical nutrition strategy in critically ill patients when oral intake is insufficient. Enteral nutrition formulas are often rich in casein protein, which has coagulating properties. Coagulation in the stomach impedes gastric emptying and might result in high gastric residual volumes which are a clinical sign of gastrointestinal intolerance and a major reason to decrease or to discontinue enteral feeding. In this study the impact of protein composition of enteral formula on gastric content volume (GCV) during and after continuous feeding was tested in healthy volunteers in whom gastrointestinal conditions of critically ill patients were mimicked. METHODS: An enteral formula including 4 proteins (P4) with non-coagulating properties was compared to a casein-dominant formula (Cas) with coagulating properties. Esomeprazole and codeine were administered to mimic stress ulcer prophylaxis and induce gastroduodenal motor dysfunction, both being hallmarks of critically ill patients. GCV was measured with magnetic resonance imaging during and after continuous enteral feeding (100 mL/h for 4h) in a randomized single-center cross-over study. Results are provided as mean (SD). Significance level of p < 0.05 was applied. RESULTS: Twenty subjects completed the study (14 women, 6 men, 25.8 (4.6) years old, BMI: 22.5 (1.5) kg/m2). The GCV as change from baseline at T = 240 (primary endpoint) did not differ between study products (P4: 124.3 (83.4) vs. Cas: 137.1 (102.0) mL, 95% CI: -57.4, 27.0, p = 0.457). During feeding and after cessation of feeding, the area under the GCV-curve (AUC0-360 GCV) for P4 and Cas was 44631.1 (15546.1) and 52822.2 (19686.1) mL∗min, respectively (p = 0.061). During feeding the GCV was lower at T = 180 min (175.4 (64.8) vs. 205.2 (75.4) mL, p = 0.038) and after cessation of feeding at T = 300 min (81.3 (71.1) vs. 116.3 (84.3) mL, p = 0.004) and T = 330 min (39.9 (53.9) vs. 73.6 (81.1) mL, p = 0.031). With P4 it took less time to reach half of the GCV at T = 240 min compared to Cas (52.8 (27.6) vs. 65.4 (29.9) min, p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: In this study in which healthy volunteers received esomeprazole and codeine to mimic gastrointestinal conditions of critically ill patients, observations of secondary endpoints suggest faster gastric emptying with P4 compared to Cas, and less gastric accumulation, possibly due to the non-coagulating properties of the P4 protein blend. Considering the small effect and the possible clinical relevance of reduced intragastric accumulation of enteral nutrition, the potential impact of protein coagulation should be further investigated in relevant study populations. Registered under Netherlands Trial Register identifier no. NTR6423.

Gastric accumulation of enteral nutrition reduces pressure changes induced by phasic contractility in an isovolumetric intragastric balloon.

BACKGROUND: An isovolumetric intragastric balloon to continuously measure gastric phasic contractility was recently developed by us. We aimed to investigate the readout of this technique in relation to gastric content and gastric emptying. METHODS: In this crossover investigation, the VIPUNTM Gastric Monitoring System, which comprises a double lumen nasogastric feeding tube with integrated intragastric balloon, was used to assess phasic gastric contractility by interpretation of the pressure in an isovolumetric balloon in 10 healthy subjects. Balloon pressure was recorded in fasted state, during a 2-hour intragastric nutrient infusion (1 kcal/ml at 25, 75, or 250 ml/h) and 4 hours post-infusion, and quantified as Gastric Balloon Motility Index (GBMI), ranging from 0 (no contractility) to 1 (maximal contractility). Gastric accumulation was quantified with magnetic resonance imaging and gastric emptying with a13 C-breath test. Results are expressed as mean(SD). KEY RESULTS: GBMI was significantly lower during infusion at 250 ml/h compared to baseline (0.13(0.05) versus 0.46(0.12)) and compared to infusion at 25 (0.54(0.21)) and 75 ml/h (0.43(0.20)), all P < 0.005. Gastric content volume was larger after infusion at 250 versus 75 ml/h (P < 0.001). Half-emptying time and accumulation were both negatively correlated with postprandial contractility. Postprandial GBMI was significantly lower when GCV>0 ml compared to when the stomach was empty. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Enteral nutrition dose-dependently decreased the contractility readout. This decrease was linked to gastric accumulation of enteral nutrition.

Impact of joint hypermobility syndrome on gastric accommodation and nutrient tolerance in functional dyspepsia.

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is defined as the presence of gastroduodenal symptoms in the absence of organic disease that is likely to explain the symptoms. Joint hypermobility (JH) refers to the increased passive or active movement of a joint beyond its normal range and is characteristically present in patients with joint hypermobility syndrome (JHS), which is a hypermobile subtype of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS). Recent reports have highlighted the co-existence of FD with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Our aim was to study the prevalence of JHS in FD compared with healthy subjects and to study the impact of co-existing JHS on gastric motility, nutrient tolerance, and dyspeptic symptoms in FD. METHODS: FD patients filled out a dyspepsia symptom severity score. Intragastric pressure (IGP) was measured with high-resolution manometry (HRM) during the intragastric infusion of nutrition drink (ND, 1.5 Kcal/ml, 60 ml/min) until maximal satiation in healthy subjects and FD. We compared IGP profiles and nutrient tolerance in HS and FD with or without JHS. RESULTS: JHS was present in 54% of FD patients (n = 39, 41.2 ± 2.2 years old) and 7% of healthy subjects (n = 15, 27.3 ± 2.3 years old). IGP drop and nutrient tolerance were lower in non-JHS-FD compared with JHS-FD and HS (AUC JHS-FD: -17.9 ± 2.5 vs. non-JHS-FD: -13.0 ± 3.3 mmHg min, p = 0.2, HS:-19.6 ± 2.9 mmHg min; ND tolerance non-JHS-FD: 671.0 ± 96.0 vs. JHS-FD: 842.7 ± 105.7 Kcal, p = 0.25, HS: 980.0 ± 108.1 Kcal). CONCLUSION: JHS often co-exists with FD. Non-JHS-FD was characterized by decreased accommodation and lower nutrient tolerance characterized compared with JHS-FD. Clinicaltrials.gov, reference number NCT04279990.

Effects of Rome IV Definitions of Functional Dyspepsia Subgroups in Secondary Care.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is subdivided into postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) and epigastric pain syndrome (EPS) according to the Rome III consensus. In clinical practice, there is a major overlap between these subgroups. The Rome IV criteria included postprandially occurring symptoms in the PDS subgroup. We aimed to analyze the effects of the Rome IV criteria, compared with Rome III, on FD subgroups in patients recruited from secondary care. METHODS: Patients with FD (n = 224; mean age, 43 ± 1 y; 77% women) were recruited from secondary-care units in Belgium and filled out symptom questionnaires, allowing subdivision according to Rome III and Rome IV criteria and identification of postprandial symptoms. Symptom patterns and demographics were compared between the subgroups. Statistical analysis was performed using the t test and the Fisher exact test. RESULTS: According to the Rome III criteria, 25% of participants had PDS, 8% had EPS, and 67% had an overlap. Postprandial fullness, early satiation, and bloating were present in significantly more patients in the PDS and overlap groups than the EPS group (P < .0001). A higher proportion of patients in the overlap group showed symptoms such as postprandial epigastric pain and nausea than in the EPS group (both P ≤ .02). With the Rome IV criteria, the overlap group was reduced to 35%; 57% of patients were considered to have PDS and 8% to have EPS. Postprandial pain was significantly more prevalent in the PDS than in the EPS group (P ≤ .002), and postprandial nausea was significantly more prevalent in the PDS group than the overlap group (P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with Rome III criteria, the Rome IV criteria significantly reduces the overlap between PDS and EPS groups. Studies are needed to determine if Rome IV subgroups are associated differently with psychological comorbidities and treatment responses.

Continuous Assessment of Gastric Motility and Its Relation to Gastric Emptying in Adult Critically Ill Patients.

BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients frequently develop feeding intolerance, which is difficult to predict. In healthy subjects, gastric motility, assessed by nasogastric balloon tube, correlated with gastric emptying. We now investigated this correlation in critically ill patients, as well as the feasibility and safety of such application in a pilot study. METHODS: Endotracheally intubated adults scheduled to receive enteral nutrition (EN) were included. After insertion of a double-lumen nasogastric balloon tube and radiographic confirmation of position, balloon pressure was recorded for 10 hours after inflation (4 hours fasted, 2 hours during administration of 13 C-labeled EN, and 4 hours postprandially). Gastric motility was expressed as Gastric Balloon Motility Index (GBMI), reflecting the fraction of time in which phasic gastric contractions occurred. Gastric emptying was assessed by 13 C-octanoate breath test and expressed as gastric half-emptying time (GET½). Correlation between GBMI (assessed in different time intervals) and GET½ was investigated by Pearson/Spearman correlation. Feasibility was defined as the success of tube placement and pressure recording. Safety was assessed based on adverse device effects. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled, of whom 19 had paired GBMI and GET½ data. There was no correlation between GBMI and GET½. The tube was successfully placed in 28/30 (93.3%) patients. In 3/28 (10.7%) patients, balloon leakage precluded analysis. Two safety events were directly linked to the device. CONCLUSION: This pilot study showed no significant correlation between balloon-assessed gastric motility and emptying in critically ill patients. The feasibility/safety profile of the balloon tube appears similar to that of standard nasogastric tubes.

Erythromycin stimulates phasic gastric contractility as assessed with an isovolumetric intragastric balloon pressure measurement.

BACKGROUND: A novel technique to assess gastric motility by measuring the pressure in a low-volume intragastric balloon was developed to monitor (disordered) motility. We previously showed that this technique allows measuring pharmacologically induced inhibition of motility. In this study, we assessed whether it is possible to measure pharmacologically induced stimulation of gastric motility using 200 mg erythromycin. Erythromycin is a highly effective stimulator of gastric emptying and contractility. METHODS: After an overnight fast, a nasogastric balloon catheter was introduced in healthy subjects. After inflation with 120 ml of air, the catheter was connected to a pressure sensor. Intraballoon pressure was continuously recorded for 4 h. After a baseline recording of 2 h, 200 mg erythromycin was infused intravenously over 20 min while the recording continued for 2 h. Epigastric symptoms were surveyed on 100-mm visual analogue scales. Motility was quantified from the pressure recording as a gastric balloon motility index. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed. Data are shown as median (interquartile range). KEY RESULTS: Six subjects were enrolled and five completed the procedures (age: 28 (25-29) years, body mass index: 24.0 (23.8-24.5) kg m-2 ). One subject could not tolerate tube placement. Bloating, nausea, and epigastric sensation scores were 0 (0-3), 0 (0-1), and 1 (0-1) mm, respectively. Erythromycin significantly increased the motility index from 0.48 (0.41-0.51) to 0.79 (0.70-0.82) (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Gastric motility assessed via pressure measurement in a low-volume intragastric balloon is able to detect pharmacologically stimulated motility in healthy subjects, which further validates this technique.

Repeated Gastric Motility Measurement Affects Gastric Motility and Epigastric Symptom Sensation.

Background: Gastric motility is an important determinant of gastric emptying, epigastric symptom generation, and intolerance to food. Motility is classically assessed directly using manometry or an intragastric balloon. These diagnostic methods are perceived as stressful and invasive, which, by itself might influence the readout of these assessments. Our hypothesis was that with repeated exposure to an invasive motility test the outcome would be different. Methods: Gastric motility was assessed with a custom-made orogastric balloon catheter in 10 healthy subjects naive to intubation. A motility index ranging from 0 (no motility) to 1 (maximum motility) was calculated in the fasted state for 3.5 h. Symptoms were surveyed with visual analog scales of 100 mm. Results are presented as median (interquartile range). Results: Motility index during visit 1 [0.40 (0.37-0.59)] was lower compared to visit 2 [0.50 (0.45-0.66); not significant] and 3 [0.63 (0.50-0.71); p = 0.016]. Nausea and pain scores were significantly higher during visit 1 (35 (2.8-126) and 103 (88-125) mm, respectively) compared with visit 3 [1 (2.8-26) mm (p = 0.016) and 75 (30-100) mm (p = 0.008), respectively]. No adverse events were observed. Conclusions: Repeated exposure to an invasive method to assess motility resulted in more vigorous motility and lower symptom scores. Caution is warranted when interpreting functional assessments, as prior exposure to invasive tests might confound the obtained results through habituation.

Codeine delays gastric emptying through inhibition of gastric motility as assessed with a novel diagnostic intragastric balloon catheter.

BACKGROUND: The use of opioids as analgesic is on the rise, despite their inhibitory effect on gastric emptying. A novel feeding catheter with integrated intragastric balloon was developed to continuously assess gastric motility, enabling to investigate the effect of opioids on motility and emptying simultaneously. We aimed to discriminate normal and pharmacologically impaired gastric motility and its impact on gastric emptying in healthy adults. METHODS: The VIPUN Gastric Monitoring System comprises a nasogastric balloon catheter and a monitoring unit. In a four-way randomized, single-blinded, cross-over study, subjects received either placebo or 58.8 mg codeine phosphate in combination with either an uninflated or an inflated (180 mL) balloon catheter. Motility-induced pressure changes were recorded for 6 hours. During the first 2 hours, nutrients were infused (225 kcal, 75 mL/h). Gastric emptying was assessed with a 13 C-octanoate breath test and expressed as gastric half-emptying time (GET½). An algorithm, designed to detect phasic contractility, converted pressure changes to a gastric balloon motility index (GBMI). Results are presented as mean(SD). KEY RESULTS: Eighteen subjects completed the investigation (32(13) years, 22(2) kg/m2 ). After codeine, GBMI was lower (0.31(0.16)) and GET½ was longer (233(57) minutes) compared with placebo (GBMI: 0.48(0.15), P < .01 and GET½: 172(12) minutes, P < .001). Within-subject ΔGET½ correlated significantly with ΔGBMI (r = -0.77 and P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: The VIPUN Gastric Monitoring System allowed to assess gastric motility safely and continuously. The correlation between pharmacologically decreased gastric emptying and motility indicates a strong link between both. Gastric motility, measured with this innovative device, can be an indicator for gastrointestinal intolerance.

Effect of citalopram on esophageal motility in healthy subjects-Implications for reflux episodes, dysphagia, and globus.

BACKGROUND: Drugs such as citalopram, "targeting" the serotonin pathway, can alter esophageal mechano-chemical sensitivity and gastrointestinal motility. The aim of this study was to clarify the effect of citalopram on esophageal motility and sphincter function, transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs), and reflux events. METHODS: Sixteen healthy volunteers (HV) receiving 20 mg citalopram or placebo intravenously, in a randomized cross-over fashion, underwent two high-resolution impedance manometry studies involving liquid swallows and a high-fat, high-caloric meal. Manometric, reflux, and symptom-related parameters were studied. KEY RESULTS: A lower distal contractile integral was recorded under citalopram, compared with placebo (P = 0.026). Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) resting pressure was significantly higher after citalopram administration throughout the study (P < 0.05, all periods). Similarly, the UES postswallow mean and maximum pressures were higher in the citalopram condition (P < 0.0001, in both cases) and this was also the case for the 0.2 s integrated relaxation pressure (P = 0.04). Esophagogastric junction resting pressures in the citalopram visit were significantly higher during swallow protocol, preprandial period, and the first postprandial hour (P < 0.05, in all cases). TLESRs and total reflux events were both reduced after citalopram infusion (P = 0.01, in both cases). During treatment with citalopram, five participants complained about globus sensation (P = 0.06). This citalopram-induced globus was associated with higher UES postswallow mean and maximum pressure values (P = 0.01 and P = 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Administration of citalopram exerts a diversified response on esophageal motility and sphincter function, linked to clinically relevant phenomena: a reduction in postprandial TLESRs and the induction of drug-induced globus.

A comparison of various intragastric balloons for the assessment of gastric motility.

BACKGROUND: There is a clear need for a novel method to readily assess gastric motility in daily clinical practice. METHODS: In a crossover design, 10 noncompliant balloons of different shape and volume (25-350 mL), attached to a classic feeding tube, were introduced in the stomach of eight healthy volunteers. In the same experiment, a High-Resolution Manometry (HRM) catheter was positioned throughout the stomach. Gastric motility was recorded during fasting (2 hours) and liquid nutrient administration (30 minutes). Motility was quantified using a peak detection algorithm. Symptoms were recorded throughout the experiment using visual analog scales (100 mm). Results are presented as mean ± SD. KEY RESULTS: The % time during which motility-induced pressure increments could be detected with HRM but not by the balloon varied from 42 ± 24% in the smallest (25 mL) balloon to 1 ± 1% in the 330 mL balloon. On the other hand, bloating, discomfort and nausea scores were 0 ± 0, 0 ± 0 and 2 ± 5 mm, respectively, for the smallest balloon (25 mL) while these scores were 28 ± 38, 13 ± 30, and 38 ± 30 mm, respectively, for the largest balloon (350 mL). A phase III contraction pattern was consistently evoked in balloons with a volume >200 mL. CONCLUSION: Gastric motility could be assessed more accurately with larger volume balloons, while epigastric symptoms were evoked with increasing balloon volume. The optimal balloon to measure gastric motility has a 5 cm diameter and is 11 cm long (210 mL). A nasogastric balloon catheter can now be developed that enables relatively easy monitoring of gastric motility in patients with epigastric symptoms.