Hepatocellular carcinoma with atrial tumor thrombus presenting as myxoma: Resection under cardiopulmonary bypass.

Surgical resection for Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with atrial tumor thrombus is a rare life saving procedure. A case of left lateral segment liver tumor (HCC) with atrial tumor thrombus resected with use of cardio-pulmonary bypass is presented.

Good outcome of living donor liver transplantation for severe alcoholic hepatitis not responding to medical management: A single center experience of 39 patients.

INTRODUCTION: There are limited data on outcomes of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis. METHODS: The study included LDLT recipients for severe alcoholic hepatitis (n = 39) who did not improve with medical treatment and compared their outcomes with patients who underwent LDLT for alcoholic liver disease (n = 461). The diagnosis of severe alcoholic hepatitis was based on both clinical and explants data. No patients had psychiatric contraindications for liver transplant and all had good family support. The data are shown as number, mean (SD), or median (25-75 interquartile range). RESULTS: All transplant recipients were males, aged 42 ± 8 years. The patients with alcoholic hepatitis were abstinent for a duration of 4 ± 1.8 months at the time of LDLT. All patients underwent LDLT with a graft to recipient weight ratio of 0.95 ± 0.17. The post-transplant ICU and hospital stay were 5.4 ± 1.3 and 17.6 ± 8.4 days, respectively. When patients with alcoholic hepatitis (n = 39) were compared to patients who underwent LDLT for alcoholic liver disease without alcoholic hepatitis (n = 461), patients with alcoholic hepatitis were significantly younger (43.2 ± 8.5 vs. 48.2 ± 9.1 years, p = 0.001) and had higher Child's (10.9 ± 1.5 vs. 9.8 ± 1.8) and MELD scores (22.1 ± 4.5 vs. 18.4 ± 5.9, p = 0.000). Post-operative infections were also significantly more common in the alcoholic hepatitis group (71.7% vs. 51.6%, p = 0.018). Fungal infections developed in 23% of alcoholic hepatitis patients as compared to 14% in the rest of the alcoholic patients (p = 0.247). Six recipients (15.7%) died at a median follow-up of 28 (6-37) months due to infections, and five (12.8%) patients had relapse of alcohol drinking. Survival was not different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Living donor liver transplantation can be successfully performed with good survival for patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis.

Readdressing the Middle Hepatic Vein in Right Lobe Liver Donation: Triangle of Safety.

For equipoising donor safety and optimal recipient outcomes, we adopted an algorithmic "triangle of safety" approach to retrieve 3 types of right lobe liver grafts (RLGs), namely, the modified extended right lobe graft (MERLG), the partial right lobe graft (PRLG), and the modified right lobe graft (MRLG). Reconstruction to achieve a single wide anterior sector outflow was ensured in all patients. We present donor and recipient outcomes based on our approach in 665 right lobe (RL) living donor liver transplantations (LDLTs) performed from January 2013 to August 2015. There were 347 patients who received a MERLG, 117 who received a PRLG, and 201 who received a MRLG. A right lobe graft (RLG) with a middle hepatic vein was retrieved only in 3 out of 18 donors with steatosis >10%. Cold ischemia time was significantly more and remnant volume was less in the MRLG group. Of the donors, 29.3% had complications (26% Clavien-Dindo grade I, II) with no statistically significant difference among the groups. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was higher in the MERLG group. There were 34 out of 39 with a graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) of <0.7% who received a MERLG with inflow modulation. Out of 4 patients who developed small-for-size syndrome in this group, 2 died. The 90-day patient survival rate was similar among different GRWRs and types of RLG. In conclusion, a selective and tailored approach for RL donor hepatectomy based on optimal functional volume and metabolic demands not only addresses the key issue of double equipoise in LDLT but also creates a safe path for extending the limits.

Surgical approaches to hepatic hydatidosis ranging from partial cystectomy to liver transplantation.

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: A wide range of surgical approaches has been described for hepatic hydatidosis aiming primarily at the reduction of disease recurrence and minimization of postoperative morbidity. METHODS: A database analysis of patients with liver hydatidosis who underwent different surgical procedures between March 2010 and May 2016 was performed. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients with cystic echinococcosis (CE) and four cases of alveolar echinococcosis (AED) were detected. Nine patients manifested recurrent disease at presentation. Among CE cases, 5 underwent partial cystectomy (2 laparoscopic and 3 open), 9 cysto-pericystectomy (7 open and 2 robotic) and 7 hepatectomies (1 central, 4 right, 1 left and 1 right trisectionectomy). Living donor liver transplantation was performed in 3 patients with AED and the fourth patient underwent right trisectionectomy with en bloc resection of hepatic flexure and right diaphragm. Seven developed Clavien grade II and three grade III complications. The mean follow-up of CE was 34.19±19.75 months. One patient of laparoscopic partial cystectomy developed disease recurrence at 14 months. No recurrence was detected at a mean follow-up of 34±4.58 months following LDLT and at 24 months following multivisceral resection for AED. CONCLUSIONS: The whole spectrum of tailored surgical approaches ranging from minimally invasive to open and extended liver resections represents safe, effective and recurrence-free treatment of hepatic hydatidosis.

Accuracy of preoperative CT liver volumetry in living donor hepatectomy and its clinical implications.

BACKGROUND: An accurate preoperative volumetric assessment of donor liver is essential for successful living donor liver transplant by ensuring adequate remnant and graft recipient weight ratio (GRWR). METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 744 right lobe (RL), 65 left lobe (LL) and 33 left lateral sector (LLS) grafts from July 2010 to January 2014. A semi-automated interactive commercial software called AW Volume share 6 was used for volumetry. Bland Altman plot was used for assessing the agreement between estimated graft weight (EGW) and actual graft weight (AGW). RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between EGW and AGW for RL graft weight (722±134 vs. 717±126 gm; P=0.06). Although Bland Altman graph showed that 95% limits of agreement was more in LL (-164 to +110) than RL (-156 to +147) and LLS grafts (-137 to +239), CT scan significantly overestimated LL graft weight (EGW =460±118 gm vs. AGW =433±102 gm; P=0.003) and underestimated LLS graft weight (EGW =203±48 gm vs. AGW =254±49 gm; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CT volumetry overestimate LL graft and underestimate LLS graft weight. This should be factored in when selecting LL graft by taking higher GRWR.

A retrospective comparative study of venous vs nonringed expanded polytetrafluoroethylene extension grafts for anterior sector outflow reconstruction in right lobe living donor liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic vessel grafts are increasingly being used for anterior sector (AS) outflow reconstruction in right lobe living donor liver transplantation (RL-LDLT) in view of easy availability and proper fit. The aim of the study was to analyze technique and outcomes of AS reconstruction using nonringed expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) grafts and compare outcomes with venous extension grafts. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 437 consecutive RL-LDLTs from January 2014 to August 2015. Vein (V) and ePTFE (alone or composite) were used alternatively or best fit for particular right lobe graft. RESULT: V graft was used in 200 recipients and ePTFE in 237 recipients with comparable preoperative donor and recipient characteristics. Cold ischemia time was significantly high in the ePTFE group. Postoperative recipient outcomes were comparable between the groups. The graft patency rate was comparable between the groups at different time intervals of follow-up. However, 12-month patency was low in those with multiple venous tributaries than with single outflow reconstruction ([V 90%, ePTFE 86.7%] vs [V 97.4%, ePTFE 95.2%]). No patient was re-explored for graft blockage. There was no significant difference in 30-day (V 92%, ePTFE 94.5%, P = 0.34), 90-day (V 90%, ePTFE 90.7%, P = 0.87) and one-year (V 87.5%, ePTFE 89%, P = 0.66) patient survival between the groups. CONCLUSION: Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene gives equivalent patency and recipient outcomes with the added advantage of proper size match fit, allowing more complex AS reconstruction with ease without increased infection rate or associated complications.

Efficacy And Safety of Sofosbuvir Based Regimens For Treatment of Hepatitis C Recurrence After Living Donor Liver Transplantation: An Experience From India.

INTRODUCTION: Results of Sofosbuvir based regimens for hepatitis C (HCV) recurrence after liver transplantation are available from well-designed clinical trials. Most of the data is from deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) setting, and data on "real world" experience for HCV recurrence after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is limited. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive 78 patients who completed Sofosbuvir based HCV treatment after liver transplantation were included. Following Sofosbuvir based regimens were used; Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin (n = 58), Sofosbuvir + Ledipasvir ± Ribavirin (n = 5), Sofosbuvir + Daclatasvir ± Ribavirin (n = 15). Treatment was given for 12 weeks (triple therapy) or 24 weeks (dual therapy). RESULTS: A total of 74/78 (94.8%) patients achieved end of treatment response (ETR) while 4 did not achieve ETR. A total of 68/76 (89.4%) patients achieved sustained virological response at 12 weeks (SVR12). while 2 are waiting for 12 weeks follow up after ETR. Twelve patients had history of failed previous treatment with Peginterferon and Ribavirin after LDLT, all these patients achieved ETR and 11/12 had SVR12. There was no statistical difference in response rates between genotype 1 or 3. Eighteen patients (16 on Ribavirin) had hemoglobin < 8 g/dl; two patients complained fatigue in absence of anemia. CONCLUSION: Sofosbuvir based regimens are safe and highly effective in treatment of HCV recurrence after LDLT.

Outcome of Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Wilson's Disease in Adults: A Single Center Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Although liver transplantation is a definitive cure for Wilson's disease (WD), there is limited data about results of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in adults. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 18 adults underwent LDLT for WD. The presentations before LDLT were decompensated cirrhosis (n = 16), acute on chronic liver failure (n = 1) and acute liver failure (n = 1). The donors were parents (n = 2), siblings (n = 3), cousin (n = 1), daughter (n = 1), nephew (n = 1), spouse or relatives of spouse (n = 9) and from swap transplantation (n = 1). All genetically related donors were negative for screening of WD. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised of 15 males and 3 females, aged 32 ± 10 years. Severity of liver disease (excluding acute liver failure patient) was as follows; Child's score 10 ± 2, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score 18 ± 6. The graft to recipient weight ratio was 1 ± 0.2. The ICU and hospital stay were 5.5 ± 0.9 and 15 ± 5 days. Two patients died in first month after liver transplantation, rest of patients are doing well at median 15 (8-38 months). Two patients had acute cellular rejection that responded to steroids, one had hepatic artery thrombosis and 2 had biliary strictures. Three patients had neurological symptoms; 2 of these patients had partial recovery while one had complete recovery. There was no significant difference between LDLT from genetically related or unrelated donors. CONCLUSION: LDLT for WD in adults is associated with good outcomes.

Cytomegalovirus infection in living donor liver transplant recipients significantly impacts the early post-transplant outcome: A single center experience.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common viral infection in liver transplant recipients that influences the outcomes of liver transplantation. However, its impact on early outcomes following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is not fully defined in the Indian subcontinent. This study was done to assess the impact of CMV infection on early post-transplant outcomes in LDLT recipients. METHODS: Out of 272 LDLTs performed from January 2012 to April 2013, 151 recipients underwent CMV viral load analysis in plasma within 90 days post LDLT based on clinical suspicion. Patients with CMV infection (n = 55) were compared with those without CMV infection (n = 96). RESULTS: The median time interval of CMV infection from LDLT was 25 days (range 2-90 days). The mean age of study population was 48.92 years. About 116 (76.8%) of the patients were male. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) (39.1%)-related chronic liver disease (CLD) was most common indication for liver transplant. No statistically significant difference was observed in etiology of liver disease (P = .38), Chid-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) (P = .41), and Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) (P = .12) scores between the groups. Patients with CMV infection had significantly higher incidence of acute cellular rejection (16.1% vs 5.4%, P = .02); longer ICU stay (P = .01); and a higher overall 90-day mortality (24.2% vs 6.7%, P = .001). Bacteremia and fungemia were significantly more common in the CMV infection group. CONCLUSION: Cytomegalovirus infection significantly influences the early post LDLT outcomes and contributes to increased overall mortality.

Revisiting chronic rejection following living donor liver transplantation in the tacrolimus era: A single center experience.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Chronic rejection (CR) is an uncommon but important cause of graft dysfunction, leading to graft loss and often requires retransplantation. This study evaluates the incidence and outcome of the patients with CR at a large living donor liver transplant (LDLT) center. METHODS: Data of patients with CR were retrospectively analyzed in 1232 adult (age >18 years) LDLT on tacrolimus (mainly)-based immunosuppression. Sirolimus/everolimus (mammalian target of rapamycin [mTOR] inhibitors) was added to baseline immunosuppression as rescue therapy in patients with CR. Data are shown as median (interquartile range [IQR]). RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (22 males), aged 42 (IQR 45-56) years, had biopsy-proven chronic rejection at 21 (8-44) months after liver transplantation. The incidence of chronic rejection was 1.9% in this cohort. The patients with CR (n = 23) had a significantly higher incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia, acute cellular rejection, and history of anastomotic biliary strictures as compared to patients without CR. Five patients were noncompliant with immunosuppression before the diagnosis of CR. Twelve patients (52%) responded to addition of mTOR inhibitors, whereas 11 did not respond and had poor outcome. CONCLUSION: The incidence of chronic rejection is low in LDLT. Treatment with mTOR inhibitors can reverse graft dysfunction in approximately half of the patients.

Right lobe donor hepatectomy: is it safe? A retrospective study.

Donor safety is utmost important in Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Small for size syndrome in some recipients with left lobe donors led to the evolution of right lobe LDLT. The aim of the study was to analyze the safety of large series of right lobe (RL) donor hepatectomies and compare outcomes with left lobe (LL) and left lateral segment (LLS) donations. A consecutive cohort of 726 donors from January 2011 to January 2014 were studied; RL (n = 641, 88.3%), LL (n = 36, 4.9%) or LLS (n = 49, 6.8%) depending on the type of donation. The mean age was 34.6 ± 10 years. The overall complication rate was 22.3%. Most were Clavien grade I and II. Clavien grade IIIa, IIIb, IV and V were noted in 4.2% donors. The incidence of these major complications were comparable among RL (n = 28, 4.2%), LL (n = 1, 2.7%) and LLS (n = 2, 4.08%) (P = 0.89). Bile leak was seen in 20 donors (2.7%) and 13 were managed conservatively with prolonged or additional intra-abdominal drainage. Seven underwent re-exploration for bile leak. In centres experienced in right lobe LDLT, morbidity after RL donation is similar to that of LL donation; and with adequate GRWR, same 1-year recipient outcomes.

Robotic Roux-en-Y Bilioenteric Reconstruction.

The authors report technical details of robotic bilioenteric reconstruction done for variable indications: choledochal cyst and biliary stricture. Robotic bilioenteric anastomosis as alternative to open reconstruction, offers advantages of minimal access surgery without compromising the precision of open surgery for hilar dissection and reconstruction. Both patients recovered uneventfully and remain symptom-free 18 and 15 months after surgery.

Nutritional status using subjective global assessment independently predicts outcome of patients waiting for living donor liver transplant.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is an important risk factor for adverse outcomes in patients awaiting liver transplant. Living donor liver transplant, being an elective procedure, allows nutritional rehabilitation and optimization of these patients before transplant. AIM: This paper aimed to evaluate the outcome of end-stage liver disease (ESLD) patients with various degrees of malnutrition waiting for living donor liver transplant. METHODS: Nutritional status was assessed using subjective global assessment (SGA) in patients who were evaluated for a liver transplant at our center from January 2015 to September 2015. All the data were collected prospectively. Predictive factors for mortality were analyzed using logistic regression and survival was obtained using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: One hundred and seventeen patients were grouped based on their nutrition status into normal, mild-moderate, and severe malnutrition. The groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, etiology of liver disease except alcoholic liver disease. Graft recipient weight ratio was comparable among groups. There was no significant difference in hospital stay. However, severe malnourished patients had higher incidence of sepsis (p=0.005) and death due to sepsis (p=0.01). Nutritional status was the only independent predictor of mortality on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Nutritional status measured with SGA independently predicts short-term outcome of ESLD patients waiting and after living donor liver transplant.

Outcome of 200 Pediatric Living Donor Liver Transplantations in India.

OBJECTIVE: To describe our experience of pediatric living donor liver transplantation from India over a period of 12 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 200 living donor liver transplantation in children (18 years or younger) was done for demographic features, indications, donor and graft profile and outcome. RESULTS: Between September 2004 and July 2016, 200 liver transplants were performed on 197 children. Fifty transplants were done in initial 6 years and 150 in next 6 years. All donors (51% mothers) were discharged with a mean stay of 7 days. The leading indications of liver transplants were cholestatic liver disease (46%) followed by metabolic liver disease (33%) and acute liver failure/acute on chronic liver failure (28.5%). Biliary leakage (8.5%), biliary stricture (9%), hepatic artery thrombosis (4.5%) and portal vein thrombosis (4%) were the most common surgical complications; all could be managed by surgical or interventional radiological measures, except in one child who died. Sepsis, acute rejection and CMV hepatitis in first 6 months were seen in 14.5%, 25% and 17% cases, respectively. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease was seen in only 1.5%. Re-transplant rate was 1.5%. The overall 1 year survival rate was 94% and 5 year actuarial survival was 87% with no statistically significant difference between children weight <10 kg vs. >10 kg. Outcome in acute liver failure did not differ significantly between those with acute on chronic liver failure vs. those with chronic liver disease. CONCLUSIONS: Advances in medical and surgical techniques associated with multidisciplinary teams including skilled pediatric liver transplant surgeons, anesthetists, dedicated pediatric hepatologists, pediatric intensivists, interventional radiologists and pathologists resulted in an excellent outcome of living related liver transplants in children. Low age and weight of the baby does not seem to be a contraindication for liver transplantation as outcome were comparable in our experience.

Robotic-assisted right hepatectomy via anterior approach for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Major hepatic resection, especially right hepatectomy, has been successfully performed by specialized hepatobiliary centers using the robotic platform with low morbidity, conversion rates and outcomes comparable to laparoscopic and open surgery. The authors report a case of robotic-assisted right hepatectomy done for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using anterior approach, after right portal vein embolisation for future liver remnant volume enhancement.

High MELD score does not adversely affect outcome of living donor liver transplantation: Experience in 1000 recipients.

In countries where deceased organ donation is scarce, there is a big gap between demand and supply of organs and living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) plays an important role in meeting this unmet need. This study was conducted to analyze the effect of pretransplant Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score on outcomes following LDLT. The outcome of 1000 patients who underwent LDLT from July 2010 to March 2015 was analyzed retrospectively. Patients were grouped into low MELD<25 and high MELD ≥25 score to compare short-term outcomes. Cumulative overall survival rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. A total of 849 recipients were in low MELD group (Mean MELD=16.90±9.2) and 151 were in high MELD group (Mean MELD=28.77±7.2). No significant difference in etiology of CLD was observed between groups except for a higher prevalence of hepatitis C virus (29.6% vs 19.9%, P=.01) in low MELD patients. No significant difference was observed in 1-year survival (88.5% vs 84.1%, P=.12) between the groups. The multivariate analysis showed that pretransplant MELD score does not predict survival of recipients. Pretransplant high MELD score does not adversely affect outcomes after LDLT. In view of shortage of deceased organs, LDLT can be a good option in high MELD recipients.

(D+10) MELD as a novel predictor of patient and graft survival after adult to adult living donor liver transplantation.

We modified the previously described D-MELD score in deceased donor liver transplant, to (D+10)MELD to account for living donors being about 10 years younger than deceased donors, and tested it on living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients. Five hundred consecutive LDLT, between July 2010 and December 2012, were retrospectively analyzed to see the effect of (D+10)MELD on patient and graft survival. Donor age alone did not influence survival. Recipients were divided into six classes based on the (D+10)MELD score: Class 1 (0-399), Class 2 (400-799), Class 3 (800-1199), Class 4 (1200-1599), Class 5 (1600-1999), and Class 6 (>2000). The 1 year patient survival (97.1, 88.8, 87.6, 76.9, and 75% across Class 1-5, P=.03) and graft survival (97.1, 87.9, 82.3, 76.9, and 75%; P=.04) was significantly different among the classes. The study population was divided into two groups at (D+10)MELD cut off at 860. Group 1 had a significantly better 1 year patient (90.4% vs 83.4%; P=.02) and graft survival (88.6% vs 80.2%; P=.01). While donor age alone does not predict recipient outcome, (D+10)MELD score is a strong predictor of recipient and graft survival, and may help in better recipient/donor selection and matching in LDLT.

Good outcome of living donor liver transplantation in drug-induced acute liver failure: A single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Drug-induced acute liver failure (ALF) is associated with high mortality. There is limited literature on results of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted at a tertiary care center in North India. All patients who received LDLT for drug-induced ALF were included. The data are shown as median (IQR). RESULTS: A total of 18 patients (15 females and three males), aged 34 (25-45) years, underwent LDLT for drug-induced liver injury (DILI)-related ALF. Etiology of ALF was antitubercular medications (n=14), orlistat (n=1), flutamide (n=1), and complementary alternative medications (n=2). The baseline parameters were as following: bilirubin 17.7 (16.3-23.8) mg/dL, INR 3.3 (2.5-4.0), jaundice encephalopathy interval 6 (3-17.5) days, arterial ammonia 109 µmol/L (73-215), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) 24 (18-33), grade of encephalopathy 2 (1-4), which progressed to grade 3 (3-4) before transplantation. All patients underwent right lobe LDLT; hospital stay was 17 (13-22) days, and ICU stay was 5 (5-7) days. Two patients died in the first month after liver transplantation due to sepsis and multi-organ failure; the rest of the patients are alive and doing well at a follow-up of 50 (4-82 months). CONCLUSION: Good outcomes can be obtained by LDLT for drug-induced ALF.

Prediction of nonalcoholic fatty liver in prospective liver donors.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic risk factors should be important in addition to imaging for prediction of steatosis in prospective liver donors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group included all prospective liver donors who had a liver biopsy during workup. Risk factors of metabolic syndrome were analyzed, and body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2 was used in place of waist circumference. Three BMI cutoffs (25, 28, and 30 kg/m2 ) and two CT-measured liver attenuation index (LAI) cutoffs (<5 and ≤10) were used for steatosis assessment of ≥5%, ≥10%, and ≥20%. RESULTS: Of the 573 prospective donors (307 females), 282 (49.2%) donors had nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL). When donors with NAFL were compared with donors having normal histology, multivariate analysis showed BMI, ALT, triglycerides, and LAI as significant predictors of NAFL. BMI ≥25 kg/m2 and LAI <10 were better cutoffs. The presence of ≥2 metabolic risk factors had better sensitivity than CT-LAI for the presence of NAFL and ≥20% steatosis (58% and 54% vs 47% and 22%, respectively, for CT-LAI ≤10). The presence of LAI >10 and <2 metabolic risk factors predicted <10% steatosis with 96% specificity and 92% positive predictive value. CONCLUSION: The presence of ≥2 metabolic risk factors improves sensitivity of CT-LAI for prediction of donor steatosis.