Single-Strand "Short Isometric Construct" Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Restores Valgus and Rotational Stability While Isolated Deep MCL and Superficial MCL Reconstruction Do Not.

BACKGROUND: Historical MCL (medial collateral ligament) reconstruction (MCLR) techniques have focused on the superficial MCL (sMCL) to restore valgus stability while frequently ignoring the importance of the deep MCL (dMCL) in controlling tibial external rotation. The recent recognition of the medial ligament complex importance has multiple studies revisiting medial anatomy and questioning contemporary MCLR techniques. PURPOSE: To assess whether (1) an isolated sMCL reconstruction (sMCLR), (2) an isolated dMCL reconstruction (dMCLR), or (3) a novel single-strand short isometric construct (SIC) would restore translational and rotational stability to a knee with a dMCL and sMCL injury. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Biomechanical testing was performed on 14 fresh-frozen cadaveric knee specimens using a custom multiaxial knee activity simulator. The specimens were divided into 2 groups. The first group was tested in 4 states: intact, after sectioning the sMCL and dMCL, isolated sMCLR, and isolated dMCLR. The second group was tested in 3 states: intact, after sectioning the sMCL and dMCL, and after single-strand SIC reconstruction (SICR). In each state, 4 loading conditions were applied at 0°, 20°, 40°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion: 8-N·m valgus torque, 5-N·m external rotation torque, 90-N anterior drawer, and combined 90-N anterior drawer plus 5-N·m tibial external rotation torque. Anterior translation, valgus rotation, and external rotation of the knee were measured for each state and loading condition using an optical motion capture system. RESULTS: sMCL and dMCL transection resulted in increased laxity for all loading conditions at all flexion angles. Isolated dMCLR restored external rotation stability to intact levels throughout all degrees of flexion, yet valgus stability was restored only at 0° of flexion. Isolated sMCLR restored valgus and external rotation stability at 0°, 20°, and 40° of flexion but not at 60° or 90° of flexion. Single-strand SICR restored valgus and external rotation stability at all flexion angles. In the combined anterior drawer plus external rotation test, isolated dMCL and single-strand SICR restored stability to the intact level at all flexion angles, while the isolated sMCL restored stability at 20° and 40° of flexion but not at 60° or 90° of flexion. CONCLUSION: In the cadaveric model, single-strand SICR restored valgus and rotational stability throughout the range of motion. dMCLR restored rotational stability to the knee throughout the range of motion but did not restore valgus stability. Isolated sMCLR restored external rotation and valgus stability in early flexion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In patients with anteromedial rotatory instability in the knee, neither an sMCLR nor a dMCLR is sufficient to restore stability.

The Stability of Fixation of Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: Effect of Implantation Technique.

BACKGROUND: Due to increasing volume of total hip arthroplasties, periprosthetic femoral fractures have become a common complication with increased revision burden and perioperative morbidity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the fixation stability of Vancouver B2 fractures treated with 2 techniques. METHODS: A common B2 fracture was created by reviewing 30 type B2 cases. The fracture was then reproduced in 7 pairs of cadaveric femora. The specimens were divided into 2 groups. In Group I ("reduce-first"), the fragments were reduced first, followed by implantation of a tapered fluted stem. In Group II ("ream-first"), the stem was implanted in the distal femur first, followed by fragment reduction and fixation. Each specimen was loaded in a multiaxial testing frame with 70% of peak load during walking. A motion capture system was used to track the motion of the stem and fragments. RESULTS: The average stem diameter in Group II was 16.1 ± 0.4 mm, versus 15.4 ± 0.5 mm in Group I. The fixation stability was not significantly different in the 2 groups. After the testing, the average stem subsidence was 0.36 ± 0.31 mm and 0.19 ± 0.14 mm (P = .17) and the average rotation was 1.67 ± 1.30° and 0.91 ± 1.11° (P = .16) in Groups I and II, respectively. Compared to the stem, there was less motion of the fragments and there was no difference between the 2 groups (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: When tapered fluted stems were used in combination with cerclage cables for treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures, both the "reduce-first" and "ream-first" techniques showed adequate stem and fracture stability.

Micromotion and Migration of Cementless Tibial Trays Under Functional Loading Conditions.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) relies on successful bony ingrowth into the implant surfaces. Failures due to aseptic loosening are still reported, especially in younger and more active patients. The objective of this study is to quantify the micromotion of a commercially available design of cementless tibial tray under loading conditions simulating walking and stair descent. METHOD: A commercially available design of cementless total knee arthroplasty was implanted in 7 cadaveric knees which were preconditioned with 500 cycles of 0°-100° flexion under a vertical load of 1050 N in a custom-built, multiaxial functional activity simulator. This was followed by application of the peak forces and moments occurring during walking and stair descent. During each loading procedure, 3-dimensional motion at the bone-prosthesis interface was measured using digital image correlation. RESULTS: The tray migrated 101 ± 25 µm on average during preconditioning, which was dominated by rotation in the sagittal plane (92% of total migration), combined with posterior translation (28%) and minimal rotation in the transverse plane (14%). The migration varied 2.7-fold (61-167 µm) between the 6 measurement zones. Stair descent produced significantly higher total micromotion than walking in zone #5 (62 ± 9 vs 51 ± 10 µm, P < .05) and zone #6 (68 ± 17 vs 37 ± 10 µm, P < .05). In addition, during stair descent, the tray exhibited significantly more tilting (anterior zones: 31 ± 17 vs -16 ± 20 µm, P < .05; posterior zones: -60 ± 8 vs -40 ± 7 µm, P < .05) and more anteroposterior displacement in the anterior zones (-25 ± 3 vs -13 ± 2 µm, P < .05) when compared to walking. CONCLUSION: The relative motion at the bone-prosthesis interface varied substantially around the periphery of the cementless tray. Under the loading conditions evaluated, the tray primarily underwent a rocking motion in the sagittal plane. Compared with walking, stair descent produced significantly more micromotion, especially in the posterior zones.

Will New Metal Heads Restore Mechanical Integrity of Corroded Trunnions?

BACKGROUND: Metal wear and corrosion from modular junctions in total hip arthroplasty can lead to further unwanted surgery. Trunnion tribocorrosion is recognized as an important contributor to failure. This study was performed to determine if new metal heads restore mechanical integrity of the original modular junction after impaction on corroded trunnions, and assess which variables affect stability of the new interface created at revision total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: Twenty-two trunnions, cobalt-chromium (CoCr) and titanium alloy (TiAIV), (CoCr, n = 12; TiAIV, n = 10) and new metal heads were used, 10 trunnions in pristine condition and 12 with corrosion damage. Test states were performed using an MTS Machine and included the following: 1, Assembly; 2, Disassembly; 3, Assembly; 4, Toggling; and 5, Disassembly. During loading, three-dimensional motion of the head-trunnion junction was measured using a custom jig. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in the tested mechanical properties between corroded and pristine trunnions implanted with a new metal femoral head. Average micromotion of the head versus trunnion interface was greatest at the start of loading, stabilizing after approximately 50 loading cycles at an average of 30.6 ± 3.2 µm. CONCLUSION: Corrosion at the trunnion does not disrupt mechanical integrity of the junction when a CoCr head is replaced with a CoCr trunnion. However, increased interface motion of a new metal head on a corroded titanium trunnion requires additional study. The evaluation of ball head size on mechanical integrity of trunnions would also be a potential subject of future investigation, as increasing the ball head size at the time of revision is not uncommon in revisions today.

Does simulated walking cause gapping of meniscal repairs?

BACKGROUND: The objective of rehabilitation following meniscal repair is to promote healing by limiting stresses on repairs, while simultaneously preserving muscle strength and joint motion. Both protective protocols limiting weight bearing and accelerated which do not, have shown clinical success. This study assesses the effects of physiologic gait loading on the kinematic behavior of a repaired medial meniscus. METHODS: The medial menisci of eight fresh cadaveric knees were implanted with arrays of six 0.8-1.0 mm beads. Pneumatic actuators delivered muscle loads and forces on the knee as each specimen was subjected to a simulated stance phase of gait. Meniscus motion was measured at loading response, mid stance, and toe-off positions. Measurements were performed using biplanar radiography and RSA, with each knee: (a) intact, (b) with posterior longitudinal tear, and (c) after inside-out repair. RESULTS: The tissue spanning the site of the longitudinal tear underwent compression rather than gapping open in all states (intact [I], torn [T] and repaired [R] states). Average compression at three sites along the posterior half of the meniscus was: posterior horn -0.20 ± 0.08 mm [I], -0.39 ± 0.10 mm [T], and -0.20 ± 0.06 mm [R] (p = 0.15); junction of posterior horn and body -0.11 ± 0.12 mm [I], -0.21 ± 12 mm [T], -0.17 ± 0.09 mm [R] (p = 0.87); and adjacent to the medial collateral ligament -0.07 ± 0.06 mm [I], -0.29 ± 0.13 mm [T], -0.07 ± 0.17 mm [R] (p = 0.35). The entire meniscus translated posteriorly from mid-stance to toe off. Displacement was greatest in the torn state compared to intact, but was not restored to normal levels after repair. CONCLUSION: The edges of a repaired longitudinal medial meniscal tear undergo compression, not gapping, during simulated gait.

Anteroposterior Knee Stability During Stair Descent.

This study examined the influence of tibio-femoral conformity on anteroposterior (AP) knee stability during stair descent, particularly with a dished cruciate sacrificing (CS) design. A joint simulator simulated stair descent of cadaveric knees. Tibio-femoral displacement was measured. Knees were tested in intact, ACL-deficient, and TKA with cruciate-retaining (CR), CS and posterior-stabilizing (PS) inserts. Loading during stair descent simulation caused femur displacement anteriorly prior to quadriceps contraction. Quadriceps contraction reestablished the initial femoral AP position. During simulated stair descent, AP stability was restored using PS, CR or CS inserts with an intact PCL. The CS design without the PCL did not provide AP stability. Increasing quadriceps force to restore AP stability may explain the clinical findings of pain and fatigue experienced by some patients after TKA.

Does acetabular retroversion affect range of motion after total hip arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, acetabular retroversion is recognized in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. Although prosthetic component positioning is not determined solely by native acetabular anatomy, acetabular retroversion presents a dilemma for component positioning if the surgeon implants the device in the anatomic position. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked (1) whether there is a difference in ROM between surface replacement arthroplasty (SRA) and THA in the retroverted acetabulum, and (2) does increased femoral anteversion improve ROM in the retroverted acetabulum? METHODS: Using a motion analysis tracking system, we determined the ROM of eight cadaveric hips and then created virtual CT-reconstructed bone models of each specimen. ROM was determined with THA and SRA systems virtually implanted with (1) the acetabular component placed in 45° abduction and matching the acetabular anteversion (average 23° ± 4°); (2) virtually retroverting the bony acetabulum 10°; and (3) after anteverting the THA femoral stem 10°. RESULTS: SRA resulted in ROM deficiencies in four of six maneuvers, averaging 25% to 29% in the normal and retroverted acetabular positions. THA restored ROM in all six positions in the normal acetabulum and in four of the six retroverted acetabula. The two deficient positions averaged 5% deficiency. THA with increased femoral stem anteversion restored ROM in five positions and showed only a 2% deficiency in the sixth position. Compared with the intact hip, ROM deficits were seen after SRA in the normal and retroverted acetabular positions and to a lesser extent for THA which can be improved with increased femoral stem anteversion. CONCLUSION: Poor ROM may result after SRA if acetabular retroversion is present.

Which procedure better restores intact hip range of motion: total hip arthroplasty or resurfacing? A combined cadaveric and computer simulation study.

Previous comparisons of hip range of motion (ROM) after THA and surface replacement arthroplasty (SRA) are inconclusive due to the lack of soft tissue considerations and dissimilar control groups. The normal ROMs of 8 intact cadaveric hips were determined by placing specimens in 6 discrete, predefined positions of rotation at a standard torque. In each position, the limiting factor of ROM, either bony impingement or soft tissue restriction, could be determined. Total hip arthroplasty and SRA components were virtually implanted, and ROM until impingement was determined. With a THA, the ROM was comparable to that of the intact hip. With an SRA, flexion (111° ± 13°) was less than for the intact hip (131° ± 6°). Surface replacement arthroplasty, but not THA, significantly decreases the ROM compared to intact hips.

Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: kinematics and knee flexion angle-graft tension relation.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the bundle tension curves and resultant knee kinematics between 2 tensioning protocols in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction was performed in 7 male cadaveric knees. Each graft was tensioned to 22 N under 2 conditions: (1) both bundles tensioned at 20 degrees of knee flexion (20/20 protocol) or (2) posterolateral (PL) bundle tensioned at 15 degrees and anteromedial (AM) bundle at 45 degrees (45/15 protocol). Knee kinematics were recorded in response to anterior and combined rotatory loads in the intact, ACL-deficient, and reconstructed states. Bundle tension was recorded dynamically with knee motion and during each loading test. RESULTS: Tensioning both bundles at 20 degrees of knee flexion resulted in a reciprocal bundle tension pattern that was not statistically different; the PL bundle tension was greater than the AM bundle tension in full extension, and the AM bundle tension was greater than the PL bundle tension from 25 degrees to 120 degrees. In the second tensioning protocol, the AM bundle tension was significantly greater than the PL bundle tension at all flexion angles. Both tensioning protocols restored normal knee kinematics. CONCLUSIONS: Bundle-tensioning protocol is a variable that has a significant effect on the bundle-loading patterns in double-bundle ACL reconstruction. The 20/20 protocol resulted in AM and PL bundle-loading patterns that were equivalent during dynamic testing, whereas the 45/15 protocol led to excessive tension in the AM bundle in full extension. We recommend equal tensioning of both bundles with the knee at 20 degrees of flexion to restore relatively normal tension curves in each bundle and to avoid excessive stress on the AM bundle. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In double-bundle ACL reconstruction, there is no consensus regarding bundle-tensioning protocols. This study provides data on the individual bundle tension curves that result from 2 commonly used tensioning protocols. These data will assist clinicians as the technique and application of double-bundle ACL reconstruction move forward.