Evaluation of the basophil activation test and skin prick testing for the diagnosis of sesame food allergy.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of sesame food allergy (SFA) has increased over recent years, with the potential of anaphylactic reactions upon exposure. Oral food challenge (OFC) remains the diagnostic standard, yet its implementation may be risky. Commercial skin prick tests (SPT) have a low sensitivity. Investigation of alternate diagnostic methods is warranted. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of SPT and the basophil activation test (BAT) for SFA diagnosis. METHODS: Eighty-two patients with suspected SFA completed an open OFC to sesame or reported a recent confirmed reaction. Patients were administered skin prick tests (SPT) with commercial sesame seed extract (CSSE) and a high protein concentration sesame extract (HPSE) (100 mg/mL protein). Whole blood from 80 patients was stimulated with sesame seed extract (40-10 000 ng/mL protein) for BAT), assessing CD63 and CD203c as activation markers. RESULTS: Sixty patients (73%) had IgE-mediated reactions to sesame, and 22 (27%) did not react. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87 for HPSE-SPT and 0.66 for CSSE-SPT. At 1000 ng/mL of sesame protein, induction of CD63 and CD203c was weakly but significantly associated with OFC eliciting dose by rank (Spearman's rho = -.42 (P < .01) and -.35 (P < .05) for CD63 and CD203c, respectively). By ROC analysis, the AUC was 0.86 for CD63 and was 0.81 for CD203c sesame-induced basophil expression. Using HPSE-SPT as a first test to definitively diagnose (n = 24) or rule-out (n = 5) SFA and BAT as a second test to diagnose the remainder results in the correct classification of 73 of 80 (91%) patients, leaving one false negative and 4 false positive patients. Two BAT non-responders remain unclassified by this algorithm. CONCLUSIONS & CLINICAL RELEVANCE: While prospective cohort validation is necessary, joint utilization of BAT and SPT with HPSE extract may obviate the need for OFC in most SFA patients.

NUT Co Reactivity - ACquiring Knowledge for Elimination Recommendations (NUT CRACKER) study.

BACKGROUND: Ambiguities exist regarding the diagnosis of tree-nut allergy, necessitating either their elimination or the performance of oral food challenges (OFCs). OBJECTIVE: To examine the coincidences of allergies among tree-nuts and improve diagnostic testing to minimize the need for OFC. METHODS: Eighty-three patients prospectively evaluated for walnut, pecan, cashew, pistachio, hazelnut, and almond allergy. A history of previous reactions was obtained, and standardized skin prick tests (SPTs) using finely ground tree-nut solution and basophil activation tests (BAT) were performed. Patients underwent OFC for each tree-nut they eliminated and to which a reaction in the previous 2 years was not documented. RESULTS: While most patients were sensitized to 5-6 tree-nuts, over 50% were allergic to only 1-2 tree-nuts. The highest rate of allergy in sensitized patients was observed for walnut (74.6%) and cashew (65.6%). The rate of co-allergy for most tree-nuts was <30%. Two-thirds of walnut- and cashew-allergic patients were also allergic to pecan and pistachio, respectively, while all pecan- and pistachio-allergic patients were allergic to walnut and cashew, respectively. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis for SPT and BAT was tree-nut dependent and yielded area under the curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.75 to 0.94. Knowledge of coincident allergies in these pairs along with the combination of SPT and BAT correctly distinguished allergic from tolerant patients for walnut (87%), pecan (66%), cashew (71%), and pistachio (79%). CONCLUSION: The data presented here should assist in differentiating between allergic and tolerant patients, decrease the need for OFC, and allow for appropriate elimination recommendations.

Changes in patient quality of life during oral immunotherapy for food allergy.

BACKGROUND: Quality of life (QOL) is impaired in patients with food allergy and improves following oral immunotherapy (OIT). However, the treatment itself is prolonged and demanding. We examined changes in patient QOL during OIT for food allergy. METHODS: The FAQLQ-PF was administered to children aged 4-12 years undergoing OIT for milk, peanut, or egg allergy, at the beginning and after 4 months of treatment. Patients were categorized as improved, unchanged, or diminished FAQLQ-PF (>0.5 point decrease, a change of ≤0.5 points, or >0.5 increase, respectively) and compared. Food-allergic patients not undergoing OIT served as controls. RESULTS: The Food Anxiety, Social and Dietary Limitation, and total FAQLQ-PF scores improved significantly during the study period (P=.001, P=.018, and P=.01, respectively) in treated but not in control patients, while the Emotional Impact did not. The change in the FAQLQ-PF was independent of the maximal tolerated dose at baseline or following four months of treatment, the pace of dose increase, or the number or severity of reactions experienced. The total FAQLQ-PF score was inversely associated with the score at baseline on multivariate analysis (regression coefficient=-0.56, P<.001). That was driven primarily by improvement in QOL scores in patients with high score (worse QOL) at baseline. Some patients with low FAQLQ-PF score (better QOL) at baseline deteriorated. CONCLUSIONS: QOL of patients with food allergy improves in some but deteriorates in others during OIT. Patients with impaired QOL at baseline improve significantly despite the treatment burden. Some patients with better QOL at baseline might deteriorate during OIT.

Clinical and laboratory 2-year outcome of oral immunotherapy in patients with cow's milk allergy.

Studies examining the long-term effect of oral immunotherapy in food-allergic patients are limited. We investigated cow's milk-allergic patients, >6 months after the completion of oral immunotherapy (n = 197). Questionnaires, skin prick tests, and basophil activation assays were performed. Of the 195 patients contacted, 180 (92.3%) were consuming milk protein regularly. Half experienced adverse reactions, mostly mild. Thirteen patients (6.7%) required injectable epinephrine. Higher reaction rate after immunotherapy was associated with more anaphylactic episodes before treatment and a lower starting dose (OR = 2.1, P = 0.035 and OR = 2.3, P = 0.035, respectively). Reaction rate in patients who were 6-15 months, 15-30 months, or >30 months post-treatment decreased from 0.28/month to 0.21/month to 0.15/month, respectively (P < 0.01). Milk-induced %CD63 and %CD203c expression was significantly lower in patients >24 months vs in patients <24 months post-treatment (P = 0.038 and P = 0.047, respectively). In conclusion, many patients experience mild adverse reactions after completing oral immunotherapy and some require injectable epinephrine. Progressive desensitization, both clinically and in basophil reactivity, occurs over time.

Effects of telavancin on coagulation test results.

BACKGROUND: The lipoglycopeptide antibiotic, telavancin, may interfere with some laboratory coagulation tests including prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of telavancin on PT and aPTT assays in common use. METHODS: Pooled normal human plasma was spiked with telavancin 10, 20, 100 or 200 µg/ml (equivalent to trough, 2 × trough, peak and 2 × peak clinical plasma concentrations, respectively) or diluent control (0.9% sodium chloride). Samples were analysed using 16 PT reagents and seven aPTT reagents. RESULTS: Telavancin 200 µg/ml (corresponding to 2 × peak clinical plasma concentration), produced significant PT prolongation (> 9% difference vs. diluent control) with all the 16 PT reagents (range 12% to > 600%). At lower telavancin concentrations, PT prolongation was dose-dependent and varied among reagents, but appeared greatest with preparations containing recombinant tissue factor. With telavancin 10 µg/ml (equivalent to trough), PT prolongation was 10% with HemosIL(®) PT-Fibrinogen Recombinant, while ranging from 5% to -1% with all other reagents. Significant (> 34% difference vs. baseline) and dose-dependent aPTT prolongation was observed with all the seven reagents in samples spiked with telavancin 100 or 200 µg/ml (range 65-142% at 200 µg/ml). aPTT reagents containing a silica activator appeared to be more sensitive to telavancin interference. Telavancin 10 µg/ml was not associated with increased aPTT with any of the reagents tested. CONCLUSIONS: Telavancin has the potential to prolong both PT and aPTT in vitro. It is recommended that samples for PT or aPTT be obtained just prior to a telavancin dose (trough).

Exposure to rizatriptan during pregnancy: post-marketing experience up to 30 June 2004.

Merck & Co., Inc. evaluates outcomes of the use of rizatriptan during pregnancy through a Pregnancy Registry in the United States (US) and spontaneous reports for pregnancies reported from sources outside the US. Review of the outcomes of 25 prospective pregnancy reports in the Pregnancy Registry and reports from other sources does not suggest that treatment with rizatriptan predisposes patients to spontaneous abortions or congenital anomalies. However, the number of reports is small. Healthcare providers in the United States are encouraged to report any prenatal exposure to rizatriptan by calling the Pregnancy Registry at +1 (800) 986 8999 or visiting the Registry's website at http://www.merckpregnancyregistries.com.

Pharmacokinetics of rizatriptan in healthy elderly subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Rizatriptan is a serotonin 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist for acute treatment of migraine. Its pharmacokinetics were assessed in healthy elderly males and females receiving a single 10 mg tablet oral dose. The pharmacokinetic data (AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax) for the elderly in this study were compared with historical data from previous studies for healthy young adults (n = 65). METHODS: In a double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled study, healthy elderly female and male subjects aged 65 or older (n = 8 each) received a single oral dose of 10 mg rizatriptan. Plasma and urine concentrations of drug were determined by HPLC with tandem mass spectrometry detection at several collection time points or intervals starting at predose and postdose over 24 h. RESULTS: In elderly subjects, the geometric mean values for AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were 77.7 ng/h/ml and 21.9 ng/ml; the average values for tmax, half-life (t 1/2), renal clearance (Clr), and percent urinary excretion of dose (Ue) were 1.2 h, 1.8 h, 197 ml/min and 9.3%, respectively. The AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax of rizatriptan were similar in elderly and young subjects. The geometric mean AUC ratio of elderly to young was 0.96 with 90% confidence interval (0.83, 1.11), p > 0.25. The geometric mean Cmax ratio was 0.89 with 90% confidence interval (0.72, 109), p > 0.25. No significant pharmacokinetic differences were observed between elderly males and females. CONCLUSIONS: The plasma pharmacokinetics of rizatriptan appear to be similar in the elderly and young. In the elderly, the pharmacokinetics of rizatriptan do not appear to differ between male and female to a clinically significant extent.

LRP: a new adhesion molecule for endothelial and smooth muscle cells.

We recently generated a monoclonal antibody that disrupted the association of endothelial cells with their target location during kidney development. Here, we purified the antigen of this monoclonal antibody to homogeneity using rat mesangial cell cytosol. Sequence revealed that it is a previously identified protein, termed the "laminin receptor precursor" (LRP). We found that this protein is expressed in most tissues, but immunocytochemistry revealed that it is present largely or entirely in blood vessels where it is located underneath endothelial cells and in between smooth muscle cells of the vascular wall. Vascular smooth muscle cells such as mesangial cells produce and secrete LRP into their extracellular matrix where it is present in several molecular weight forms. Endothelial cells produce very little if any of the protein, but they bind avidly to LRP-coated dishes. Anti-LRP antibodies prevent the binding of smooth muscle cells to uncoated plates, implying that cells that secrete it use it for attachment. In an assay for heterologous cell-to-cell interaction, antibodies to LRP inhibited the binding of smooth muscle cells to endothelial cells. Maturation and differentiation of blood vessels require interaction between endothelial and smooth muscle cells. LRP is a new component of the mesangial matrix, and we propose that it is an adhesion molecule that mediates an interaction between smooth muscle cells and endothelia.

Influence of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists on the pharmacokinetics of rizatriptan, a 5-HT1B/1D agonist: differential effects of propranolol, nadolol and metoprolol.

AIMS: Patients with migraine may receive the 5-HT1B/1D agonist, rizatriptan (5 or 10 mg), to control acute attacks. Patients with frequent attacks may also receive propranolol or other beta-adrenoceptor antagonists for migraine prophylaxis. The present studies investigated the potential for pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction between beta-adrenoceptor blockers and rizatriptan. METHODS: Four double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover investigations were performed in a total of 51 healthy subjects. A single 10 mg dose of rizatriptan was administered after 7 days' administration of propranolol (60 and 120 mg twice daily), nadolol (80 mg twice daily), metoprolol (100 mg twice daily) or placebo. Rizatriptan pharmacokinetics were assessed. In vitro incubations of rizatriptan and sumatriptan with various beta-adrenoceptor blockers were performed in human S9 fraction. Production of the indole-acetic acid-MAO-A metabolite of each triptan was measured. RESULTS: Administration of rizatriptan during propranolol treatment (120 mg twice daily for 7.5 days) increased the AUC(0, infinity) for rizatriptan by approximately 67% and the Cmax by approximately 75%. A reduction in the dose of propranolol (60 mg twice daily) and/or the incorporation of a delay (1 or 2 h) between propranolol and rizatriptan administration did not produce a statistically significant change in the effect of propranolol on rizatriptan pharmacokinetics. Administration of rizatriptan together with nadolol (80 mg twice daily) or metoprolol (100 mg twice daily) for 7 days did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetics of rizatriptan. No untoward adverse experiences attributable to the pharmacokinetic interaction between propranolol and rizatriptan were observed, and no subjects developed serious clinical, laboratory, or other significant adverse experiences during coadministration of rizatriptan with any of the beta-adrenoceptor blockers. In vitro incubations showed that propranolol, but not other beta-adrenoceptor blockers significantly inhibited the production of the indole-acetic acid metabolite of rizatriptan and sumatriptan. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that propranolol increases plasma concentrations of rizatriptan by inhibiting monoamine oxidase-A. When prescribing rizatriptan to migraine patients receiving propranolol for prophylaxis, the 5 mg dose of rizatriptan is recommended. Administration with other beta-adrenoceptor blockers does not require consideration of a dose adjustment.

Experimental and field studies of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in white-tailed deer.

Studies were conducted to evaluate fecal shedding of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in a small group of inoculated deer, determine the prevalence of the bacterium in free-ranging white-tailed deer, and elucidate relationships between E. coli O157:H7 in wild deer and domestic cattle at the same site. Six young, white-tailed deer were orally administered 10(8) CFU of E. coli O157:H7. Inoculated deer were shedding E. coli O157:H7 by 1 day postinoculation (DPI) and continued to shed decreasing numbers of the bacteria throughout the 26-day trial. Horizontal transmission to an uninoculated deer was demonstrated. Although E. coli O157:H7 bacteria were recovered from the gastrointestinal tracts of deer necropsied from 4 to 26 DPI, attaching and effacing lesions were not apparent in any deer. Results are similar to those of inoculation studies in calves and sheep. In field studies, E. coli O157 was not detected in 310 fresh deer fecal samples collected from the ground. It was detected in feces, but not in meat, from 3 of 469 free-ranging deer in 1997. In 1998, E. coli O157 was not detected in 140 deer at the single positive site found in 1997; however, it was recovered from 13 of 305 dairy and beef cattle at the same location. Isolates of E. coli O157:H7 from deer and cattle at this site differed with respect to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns and genes encoding Shiga toxins. The low overall prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 and the identification of only one site with positive deer suggest that wild deer are not a major reservoir of E. coli O157:H7 in the southeastern United States. However, there may be individual locations where deer sporadically harbor the bacterium, and venison should be handled with the same precautions recommended for beef, pork, and poultry.

Prevalence and reversibility of lower airway obstruction in children with sickle cell disease.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and reversibility of lower airway obstruction (LAO) in children and adolescents with hemoglobin SS sickle cell disease (HbSS SCD). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective evaluation of lung function in a cross-section of 35 African American and 28 Hispanic children and adolescents with HbSS SCD. Lung function was evaluated with maximal respiratory flow-volume curves and body plethysmography. Each patient was assigned to 1 of 3 patterns of lung function (normal, obstructive, or restrictive). Airway hyperresponsiveness was assessed by means of a trial with bronchodilator. RESULTS: Normal pattern was detected in 57% of the patients, LAO in 35%, and restrictive lung disease in 8%. Positive response to bronchodilator was documented in 30% of those with normal pattern of lung function, 78% in those with LAO, and 67% of those with restrictive lung disease. The pattern of lung function was not associated with race or with history of vaso-occlusive crises, acute chest syndrome, reactive airways disease/asthma, or long-term transfusion therapy. CONCLUSION: Obstructive lung disease possibly precedes the development of restrictive lung disease, and airway reactivity may be part of the pathogenic mechanism.

Enalapril in RAPIDISC (wafer formulation): pharmacokinetic evaluation of a novel, convenient formulation.

BACKGROUND: Enalapril in RAPIDISC* (wafer), a new easy-to-administer formulation of enalapril, may improve the convenience of enalapril therapy, thereby helping patients adhere to antihypertensive treatment. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: To determine whether 20 mg enalapril wafer is bioequivalent to the conventional 20 mg enalapril tablet, an open-label, two-period crossover study was performed in 16 healthy male volunteers. Cumulative urinary recovery of free enalaprilat (active metabolite of enalapril) and the serum maximum concentration of free enalaprilat (Cmax) were the primary pharmacokinetic parameters used to determine bioequivalence in this study. Bioequivalence was defined as the geometric mean ratio (wafer: tablet) falling within the equivalence limits of 0.80 to 1.25 for both parameters. RESULTS: Cumulative urinary recovery of free enalaprilat (0 - 72 hours) was similar between the wafer and conventional tablet formulations (arithmetic mean 5.13 vs. 5.03 mg, about 36% of dose). The geometric mean ratio of the urinary recovery of free enalaprilat (wafer: tablet) was 1.03 (90% CI: 0.93, 1.15). Cmax of serum enalaprilat was also similar between the wafer and conventional tablet formulations (arithmetic mean 85.7 vs. 76.3 ng/ml). The geometric mean Cmax ratio (wafer: tablet) was 1. 10 (90% CI: 1.00, 1.22). Both enalapril formulations were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that 20 mg enalapril in RAPIDISC is bioequivalent to 20 mg enalapril conventional tablet.

Antiplatelet effects of MK-852, a platelet fibrinogen receptor antagonist, in healthy volunteers.

MK-852, a cyclic heptapeptide, is a potent platelet fibrinogen receptor antagonist. When administered to normal healthy male subjects by 1- and 4-hour constant rate intravenous infusions, it provides a generally well-tolerated and reversible means of inhibition of platelet function. At infusion rates of 1 microgram/kg/min for 1 hour and 0.44 microgram/kg/min for 4 hours, respectively, MK-852 extended baseline bleeding time by greater than 2.2-fold and 2.6-fold, inhibited ADP-induced platelet aggregation by 76% and 69%, and inhibited collagen-induced platelet aggregation by 65% and 67%, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of MK-852 include an elimination half-life of approximately 2 hours, total clearance of about 150 ml/min, and volume of distribution of about 18 liters. Examination of the relationship between MK-852 whole-blood concentration in vitro and inhibition of platelet aggregation showed an EC50 of about 55 ng/ml and a Hill coefficient of 1.55. The infusions were generally well tolerated, with no study drug-related changes in blood counts or biochemical profiles.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of the effect of oral doses of rizatriptan 10 mg on oral contraceptive pharmacokinetics in healthy female volunteers.

Rizatriptan (MAXALT), a potent, oral 5-HT1B/1D agonist with a rapid onset of action, is available now for the acute treatment of migraine. This study examined the pharmacokinetic and clinical interaction between rizatriptan 10 mg and the components (ethinyl estradiol [EE] 35 micrograms and norethindrone [NET] 1.0 mg) of a well-established oral contraceptive combination product, ORTHO-NOVUM 1/35. Levels of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), a protein increased by EE to which NET binds, were also examined. In this two-period crossover study, 20 healthy young female subjects received a coadministration of 8 days of rizatriptan treatment (6 days of single-dose 10 mg rizatriptan and 2 days of multiple-dose rizatriptan, 10 mg q 4 hours for three doses, giving a total daily dose of 30 mg on Days 7 and 8) or matching placebo along with their daily dose (one tablet) of ORTHO-NOVUM 1/35 within their oral contraceptive cycle. Plasma was sampled for EE, NET, and SHBG concentrations. Safety evaluations included routine laboratory safety studies, physical examinations, and monitoring for ECG, vital signs, and adverse events. There were no statistically significant differences in any of the pharmacokinetic parameters of EE or NET between the rizatriptan and placebo treatment periods, thus indicating that rizatriptan had no meaningful effect on the disposition of either the EE or the NET component of ORTHO-NOVUM 1/35. The SHBG concentration did not change throughout the entire study. Clinically, coadministration of rizatriptan with ORTHO-NOVUM 1/35 was well tolerated. Blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature showed no consistent trend or clinically important changes. Adverse events following coadministration of rizatriptan with ORTHO-NOVUM 1/35 were similar to those reported when placebo was given with ORTHO-NOVUM 1/35. The findings of this study indicate that there is little potential for dosages as high as 30 mg/day, the maximum recommended dosing schedule, of rizatriptan to alter the plasma concentrations of oral contraceptives.

Rizatriptan, a novel 5-HT1B/1D agonist for migraine: single- and multiple-dose tolerability and pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects.

Rizatriptan is a novel 5-HT1D/1B agonist for relief of migraine headache. The pharmacokinetics, metabolite profiles, and tolerability of rizatriptan were examined in a multiple-dose study in healthy subjects. Rizatriptan (N = 24) (or placebo, N = 12) was administered as a single 10 mg dose, followed 48 hours later by administration of one 10 mg dose every 2 hours for three doses on 4 consecutive days, corresponding to the maximum daily dose for a migraine attack. The AUC of rizatriptan and its active N-monodesmethyl metabolite after three 10 mg doses was approximately threefold greater than the plasma concentrations following a single 10 mg dose. Metabolite profiles were similar after single and multiple doses. Adverse events during rizatriptan were mild and transient; similar events occurred during placebo, with a somewhat reduced incidence. Diastolic blood pressure tended to increase compared with placebo (approximately 5 mmHg), particularly on the first multiple-dose day (p < .01 vs. placebo). In conclusion, rizatriptan is well tolerated by healthy subjects during multiple-dose administration, with no unexpected accumulation of drug in plasma.

The effects of moclobemide on the pharmacokinetics of the 5-HT1B/1D agonist rizatriptan in healthy volunteers.

AIMS: The new 5-HT1B/1D agonist rizatriptan (MK-0462) has recently been registered for the treatment of migraine. Its primary route of metabolism is via monoamine oxidase-A (MAO-A). Antidepressants such as the MAO-A inhibitor moclobemide may be used in patients with chronic headache syndromes. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the interactions between rizatriptan and moclobemide. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-period cross-over study 12 healthy, young volunteers (six males, six females) were treated with moclobemide (150 mg twice daily) or placebo for 4 days. On the fourth day, a single dose of rizatriptan (10 mg) was administered, and subsequently blood and urine samples were collected for assay of rizatripan and N-monodesmethyl rizatriptan. Plasma concentrates of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG), a marker of MAO-A inhibition, were also assessed. Supine and standing blood pressure were measured regularly. RESULTS: Both treatments were well tolerated. During moclobemide, the increase in supine diastolic blood pressure following rizatriptan administration was augmented. Inhibition of MAO by moclobemide was inferred from a persistent decrease in DHPG level (43% on average). When rizatriptan was coadministered with moclobemide, the area under the plasma drug concentration-time profiles for rizatriptan and its N-monodesmethyl metabolite increased 2.2-fold (90% CI, 1.93-2.47) and 5.3-fold (90% CI, 4.81-5.91), respectively, when compared with placebo. Peak plasma drug concentrations for rizatriptan and its n-monodesmethyl metabolite increased 1.4-fold (90% CI, 1.11-1.80) and 2.6-fold (90% CI, 2.23-3.14), respectively, and half-lives of both were prolonged. CONCLUSIONS: Moclobemide inhibited the metabolism of rizatriptan and its active N-monodesmethyl metabolite through inhibition of MAO-A. Thus, moclobemide may considerably potentiate rizatriptan action. Concurrent administration of moclobemide and rizatriptan is not recommended.

Expression of green fluorescent protein in the ureteric bud of transgenic mice: a new tool for the analysis of ureteric bud morphogenesis.

The growth and branching of the ureteric bud is a complex process that is ultimately responsible for the organization of the collecting duct system as well as the number of nephrons in the metanephric kidney. While the genes involved in the regulation of this process have begun to be elucidated, our understanding of the cellular and molecular basis of ureteric bud morphogenesis remains rudimentary. Furthermore, the timing and sequence of branching and elongation that gives rise to the collecting system of the kidney can only be inferred from retrospective staining or microdissection of fixed preparations. To aid in the investigation of these issues, we developed strains of transgenic mice in which a green fluorescent protein (GFP) is expressed in the ureteric bud under the control of the Hoxb7 promoter. In these mice, GFP is expressed in every branch of the ureteric bud throughout renal development, and in its derivative epithelia in the adult kidney. As GFP fluorescence can be easily visualized in living tissue, this allows the dynamic pattern of ureteric bud growth and branching to be followed over several days when the kidneys are cultured in vitro. Using confocal microscopy, branching of the ureteric bud in all three dimensions can be analyzed. These mice represent an extremely powerful tool to characterize the normal patterns of ureteric bud morphogenesis and to investigate the response of the bud to growth factors, matrix elements, and other agents that regulate its growth and branching.

Lack of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between rizatriptan and paroxetine.

Rizatriptan is a potent, oral 5-HT(1B/1D) agonist with a rapid onset of action being investigated for the acute treatment of migraine. This study examined the clinical and pharmacolinetic interaction between rizatriptan and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, paroxetine. In this two-period crossover study, 12 healthy young subjects (6 males and 6 females) received 1 mg rizatriptan following 14 days of treatment with placebo or paroxetine (20 mg once daily). Plasma was sampled for rizatriptan and N-monodesmethyl rizatriptan, a minor but active metabolite of rizatriptan. Safety evaluations included monitoring for adverse events, vital signs, and visual analog scale assessment of mood. Plasma levels of rizatriptan and N-monodesmethyl rizatriptan were not altered when rizatriptan was administered with paroxetine compared to the placebo. Clinically, coadministration of rizatriptan with paroxetine was well tolerated. Blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature changes during the observation period did not differ to a clinically significant degree when rizatriptan was administered with paroxetine compared to the placebo. No effects on mood occurred following treatment with the combination compared to rizatriptan alone. Adverse events following rizatriptan administration with paroxetine were similar to those reported when rizatriptan was given with the placebo.

Pharmacokinetics of rizatriptan tablets during and between migraine attacks.

Gastric stasis during migraine attacks results in delayed absorption of several orally administered antimigraine agents. This study, as part of a larger trial, was conducted to examine the pharmacokinetics of rizatriptan tablets during and between migraine attacks. Participating patients met IHS criteria for migraine with or without aura, and suffered between one and eight migraines per month for the previous 6 months. In part 1 of the study, 21 patients were randomized to receive a single 5-mg tablet of rizatriptan or placebo in the migraine-free state. In part 2, the same patients were treated during migraine with rizatriptan 5-mg tablets (n=18) or placebo (n=3). Blood samples were obtained before dosing and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours after dosing. The plasma concentration profile (ie, AUC((0-infinity)), C(max), T(max)) of rizatriptan 5-mg tablets administered during and between migraine attacks were comparable. The median T(max) for rizatriptan between and during attacks was 1 hour, indicating rapid absorption even during a migraine attack. Rizatriptan 5 mg was well tolerated and 67% of the patients experienced headache relief 2 hours postdose.