Sepsis incidence, suspicion, prediction and mortality in emergency medical services: a cohort study related to the current international sepsis guideline.

PURPOSE: Sepsis suspicion by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is associated with improved patient outcomes. This study assessed sepsis incidence and recognition by EMS and analyzed which of the screening tools recommended by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign best facilitates sepsis prediction. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of claims data from health insurances (n = 221,429 EMS cases), and paramedics' and emergency physicians' EMS documentation (n = 110,419); analyzed outcomes were: sepsis incidence and case fatality compared to stroke and myocardial infarction, the extent of documentation for screening-relevant variables and sepsis suspicion, tools' intersections for screening positive in identical EMS cases and their predictive ability for an inpatient sepsis diagnosis. RESULTS: Incidence of sepsis (1.6%) was similar to myocardial infarction (2.6%) and stroke (2.7%); however, 30-day case fatality rate was almost threefold higher (31.7% vs. 13.4%; 11.8%). Complete vital sign documentation was achieved in 8.2% of all cases. Paramedics never, emergency physicians rarely (0.1%) documented a sepsis suspicion, respectively septic shock. NEWS2 had the highest sensitivity (73.1%; Specificity:81.6%) compared to qSOFA (23.1%; Sp:96.6%), SIRS (28.2%; Sp:94.3%) and MEWS (48.7%; Sp:88.1%). Depending on the tool, 3.7% to 19.4% of all cases screened positive; only 0.8% in all tools simultaneously. CONCLUSION: Incidence and mortality underline the need for better sepsis awareness, documentation of vital signs and use of screening tools. Guidelines may omit MEWS and SIRS as recommendations for prehospital providers since they were inferior in all accuracy measures. Though no tool performed ideally, NEWS2 qualifies as the best tool to predict the highest proportion of septic patients and to rule out cases that are likely non-septic.

Understanding health care pathways of patients with sepsis: protocol of a mixed-methods analysis of health care utilization, experiences, and needs of patients with and after sepsis.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is associated with about 20% of deaths worldwide. It often presents with non-specific initial symptoms, making its emergency treatment an interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral challenge. Three in four sepsis survivors suffers from new cognitive, psychological, or physical sequelae for which specific treatment concepts are scarce. The AVENIR project aims to improve the understanding of patient pathways, and subjective care experiences and needs along the entire healthcare pathway before, with and after sepsis. Based on this, concrete recommendations for the organization of care and patient information materials will be developed with close patient participation. METHODS: Mixed-methods study including (1) analysis of anonymized nationwide health claims data from Germany, (2) linkage of health claims data with patient care reports (PCR) of emergency medical services from study regions in two federal states within Germany, and (3) qualitative exploration of the patient, relative, and care provider perspective on sepsis care. In (1), we analyze inpatient and outpatient health care utilization until 30 days pre-sepsis; clinical sepsis care including intra- and inter-hospital transfers; and rehabilitation, inpatient and outpatient aftercare of sepsis survivors as well as costs for health care utilization until 24 months post-sepsis. We attempt to identify survivor classes with similar health care utilization by Latent Class Analyses. In (2), PCR are linked with health claims data to establish a comprehensive database outlining care pathways for sepsis patients from pre-hospital to follow-up. We investigate e.g., whether correct initial assessment is associated with acute (e.g., same-day lethality) and long-term (e.g., new need for care, long-term mortality) outcomes of patients. We compare the performance of sepsis-specific screening tools such as qSOFA, NEWS-2 or PRESEP in the pre-clinical setting. In (3), semi-structured interviews as well as synchronous and asynchronous online focus groups are conducted and analyzed using qualitative content analyses techniques. DISCUSSION: The results of the AVENIR study will contribute to a deeper understanding of sepsis care pathways in Germany. They may serve as a base for improvements and innovations in sepsis care, that in the long-term can contribute to reduce the personal, medical, and societal burden of sepsis and its sepsis sequelae. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at German Clinical Trial Register (ID: DRKS00031302, date of registration: 5th May 2023).

[Linking Health Claims Data and Records of Emergency Medical Services: Building a Bridge via Patient's Health Insurance Number?] / Verknüpfung von Abrechnungsdaten gesetzlicher Krankenkassen und Einsatzprotokollen des Rettungsdienstes: Brückenschlag durch Krankenversichertennummer?

INTRODUCTION: In Germany, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) were involved in a total of 7.3 million emergency cases in 2016/2017. Information on prehospital care is stored in several secondary data sources, yet combined analysis of these data at the level of individual patients or EMS cases happens rarely. Research is needed on which methods and variables are suitable for the linkage of these data sources. METHODS: We linked EMS records from five Bavarian emergency service districts to health claims data belonging to ten statutory health insurers (data from 2016). Two linkage approaches at the level of individual patient's EMS case/reimbursement case were demonstrated. First, a deterministic linkage was conducted based on the patient's unique identifying health insurance number. The second linkage was probabilistic. As linkage variables, it comprised the only partially available health insurance number plus several non-unique key variables, the latter being a patient's health insurance provider, sex, year of birth and distance travelled. In order to verify the deterministic and the probabilistic linkages' quality, rates of accordance of several variables present in both data sources were calculated. RESULTS: The starting point for our data linkage were 106,371 EMS records (independent of certain health insurance companies) and 432,693 EMS services reimbursed by health insurers (independent of specific EMS providers). 4,327 EMS records could be linked to health claims data - out of 5,921 EMS records that coded a health insurance company contributing claims data to Inno_RD. With a probabilistic linkage, it was possible to increase this number to a total of 5,379 linked EMS records. All checks carried out indicated a high linkage quality for both the deterministic and the probabilistic approach. CONCLUSION: A linkage of EMS records with health claims data is possible. In Inno_RD, a probabilistic approach has proven a valuable alternative to deterministic linkage via health insurance number since EMS records can be linked meaningfully even if the health insurance number is unavailable or where a minority of non-unique key variables show non-accordance or missing values.