Bacteroides and related species: The keystone taxa of the human gut microbiota.

Microbial communities play a significant role in maintaining ecosystems in a healthy homeostasis. Presently, in the human gastrointestinal tract, there are certain taxonomic groups of importance, though there is no single species that plays a keystone role. Bacteroides spp. are known to be major players in the maintenance of eubiosis in the human gastrointestinal tract. Here we review the critical role that Bacteroides play in the human gut, their potential pathogenic role outside of the gut, and their various methods of adapting to the environment, with a focus on data for B. fragilis and B. thetaiotaomicron. Bacteroides are anaerobic non-sporing Gram negative organisms that are also resistant to bile acids, generally thriving in the gut and having a beneficial relationship with the host. While they are generally commensal organisms, some Bacteroides spp. can be opportunistic pathogens in scenarios of GI disease, trauma, cancer, or GI surgery, and cause infection, most commonly intra-abdominal infection. B. fragilis can develop antimicrobial resistance through multiple mechanisms in large part due to its plasticity and fluid genome. Bacteroidota (formerly, Bacteroidetes) have a very broad metabolic potential in the GI microbiota and can rapidly adapt their carbohydrate metabolism to the available nutrients. Gastrointestinal Bacteroidota species produce short-chain fatty acids such as succinate, acetate, butyrate, and occasionally propionate, as the major end-products, which have wide-ranging and many beneficial influences on the host. Bacteroidota, via bile acid metabolism, also play a role in in colonization-resistance of other organisms, including Clostridioides difficile, and maintenance of gut integrity.

Recommendations to Improve Quality of Probiotic Systematic Reviews With Meta-Analyses.

Importance: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses often report conflicting results when assessing evidence for probiotic efficacy, partially because of the lack of understanding of the unique features of probiotic trials. As a consequence, clinical decisions on the use of probiotics have been confusing. Objective: To provide recommendations to improve the quality and consistency of systematic reviews with meta-analyses on probiotics, so evidence-based clinical decisions can be made with more clarity. Evidence Review: For this consensus statement, an updated literature review was conducted (January 1, 2020, to June 30, 2022) to supplement a previously published 2018 literature search to identify areas where probiotic systematic reviews with meta-analyses might be improved. An expert panel of 21 scientists and physicians with experience on writing and reviewing probiotic reviews and meta-analyses was convened and used a modified Delphi method to develop recommendations for future probiotic reviews. Findings: A total of 206 systematic reviews with meta-analysis components on probiotics were screened and representative examples discussed to determine areas for improvement. The expert panel initially identified 36 items that were inconsistently reported or were considered important to consider in probiotic meta-analyses. Of these, a consensus was reached for 9 recommendations to improve the quality of future probiotic meta-analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the expert panel reached a consensus on 9 recommendations that should promote improved reporting of probiotic systematic reviews with meta-analyses and, thereby, assist in clinical decisions regarding the use of probiotics.

Microbiome-Related and Infection Control Approaches to Primary and Secondary Prevention of Clostridioides difficile Infections.

Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) have decreased in the past years, but since 2021, some hospitals have reported an increase in CDI rates. CDI remains a global concern and has been identified as an urgent threat to healthcare. Although multiple treatment options are available, prevention strategies are more limited. As CDI is an opportunistic infection that arises after the normally protective microbiome has been disrupted, preventive measures aimed at restoring the microbiome have been tested. Our aim is to update the present knowledge on these various preventive strategies published in the past five years (2018-2023) to guide clinicians and healthcare systems on how to best prevent CDI. A literature search was conducted using databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, and clinicaltrials.gov) for phase 2-3 clinical trials for the primary or secondary prevention of CDI and microbiome and probiotics. As the main factor for Clostridium difficile infections is the disruption of the normally protective intestinal microbiome, strategies aimed at restoring the microbiome seem most rational. Some strains of probiotics, the use of fecal microbial therapy, and live biotherapeutic products offer promise to fill this niche; although, more large randomized controlled trials are needed that document the shifts in the microbiome population.

Lactobacillus Bacteremia and Probiotics: A Review.

Lactobacilli are widely found in nature, are commensal microbes in humans, and are commonly used as probiotics. Concerns about probiotic safety have arisen due to reports of bacteremia and other Lactobacillus-associated infections. We reviewed the literature for articles on the pathogenicity of Lactobacillus spp. bacteremia and reports of probiotics in these patients. Our aim is to review these articles and update the present knowledge on the epidemiology of Lactobacillus spp. bacteremia and determine the role of probiotics in Lactobacillus bacteremia. Lactobacillus bacteremia is infrequent but has a higher risk of mortality and risk factors, including severe underlying diseases, immune system suppression, admission to intensive care units, and use of central venous catheters. A variety of Lactobacillus species may cause bacteremia and may or may not be associated with probiotic exposure. To determine if oral probiotics are the source of these infections, the blood isolates and the oral probiotic strain(s) must be compared by sensitive identification methods. The prevalence of Lactobacillus bacteremia is infrequent but is more common in patients taking probiotics compared to those not taking probiotics. Three probiotics (Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, and Lacticaseibacillus paracasei) were directly linked with blood isolates from bacteremia patients using molecular identification assays.

Fusobacteria behaving badly: Masquerading strains of strictly anaerobic Escherichiacoli misidentified due to the deletion of the hemB gene.

Three strictly anaerobic strains of Escherichia coli were misidentified as Fusobacterium mortiferum, due to a deletion of the hemB gene which is involved in anaerobic respiration. An unusual antimicrobial susceptibility pattern sparked the further diagnostic strategies that eventually identified these strains as true anaerobic E. coli This phenomenon is more common than appreciated and can have an impact on clinical practice including persistent and relapsing infections.

Characterization of resistance to newer antimicrobials among carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in the post-acute-care setting.

We assessed susceptibility patterns to newer antimicrobial agents among clinical carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) isolates from patients in long-term acute-care hospitals (LTACHs) from 2014 to 2015. Meropenem-vaborbactam and imipenem-relebactam nonsusceptibility were observed among 9.9% and 9.1% of isolates, respectively. Nonsusceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam (1.1%) and plazomicin (0.8%) were uncommon.

Risk Factors for Colistin-Resistant Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in the Postacute Care Setting.

We assessed risk factors for colistin resistance among carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) from 375 patients in long-term acute care hospitals. Recent colistin or polymyxin B exposure was associated with increased odds of colistin resistance (adjusted odds ratio = 1.11 per day of exposure, 95% confidence interval = 1.03-1.19, P = .007).

Overcoming Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Resistance for a More Rational Therapeutic Approach.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an underappreciated source of morbidity and mortality among gram-negative pathogens. Effective treatment options with acceptable toxicity profiles are limited. Phenotypic susceptibility testing via commercial automated test systems is problematic and no Food and Drug Administration breakpoints are approved for any of the first-line treatment options for S maltophilia. The lack of modern pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data for many agents impedes dose optimization, and the lack of robust efficacy and safety data limits their clinical utility. Levofloxacin has demonstrated similar efficacy to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, although rapid development of resistance is a concern. Minocycline demonstrates the highest rate of in vitro susceptibility, however, evidence to support its clinical use are scant. Novel agents such as cefiderocol have exhibited promising activity in preclinical investigations, though additional outcomes data are needed to determine its place in therapy for S maltophilia. Combination therapy is often employed despite the dearth of adequate supporting data.

Coccidioidal Peritonitis: A Review of 17 Cases.

Coccidioidomycosis is the second most common endemic fungal infection in the United States. Prior descriptions of coccidioidal peritonitis include only single cases. We describe 17 new cases previously unreported from healthcare institutions in California. The majority of cases presented with nonspecific abdominal complaints. PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for additional case series and only single case reports and reviews of single cases were found. The diagnosis was confirmed by culture or histopathology and/or serology in each patient. All patients were treated with anti-fungal therapy. This case series demonstrates that coccidioidal peritonitis may be asymptomatic or present with only subtle abdominal symptoms. In a minority of our patients, the diagnosis was established incidentally during surgery. Based on this series, the overall outcome of coccidioidal peritonitis is favorable with long-term triazole treatment. The term cure is not usually used in disseminated coccidioidal disease because of the risk of late relapse.

Enhanced Clostridioides difficile Infection Prevention With a Pharmacy-Controlled Policy That Adds a 3-Strain Lactobacillus Probiotic Concomitantly to Antibiotic Therapy.

When 70% of antibiotic users took a 3-strain Lactobacillus probiotic preparation the hospital-wide rate of healthcare-associated Clostridioides difficile infection improved significantly. The incidence of C. difficile infection for those taking the probiotic along with multiple antibiotics or a single high-risk antibiotic was decreased by at least half.

Potential Roles for Probiotics in the Treatment of COVID-19 Patients and Prevention of Complications Associated with Increased Antibiotic Use.

Medical care for patients hospitalized with COVID-19 is an evolving process. Most COVID-19 inpatients (58-95%) received empiric antibiotics to prevent the increased mortality due to ventilator-associated pneumonia and other secondary infections observed in COVID-19 patients. The expected consequences of increased antibiotic use include antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) and Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI). We reviewed the literature (January 2020-March 2021) to explore strategies to reduce these consequences. Antimicrobial stewardship programs were effective in controlling antibiotic use during past influenza epidemics and have also been shown to reduce healthcare-associated rates of CDI. Another potential strategy is the use of specific strains of probiotics shown to be effective for the prevention of AAD and CDI prior to the pandemic. During 2020, there was a paucity of published trials using these two strategies in COVID-19 patients, but trials are currently ongoing. A multi-strain probiotic mixture was found to be effective in reducing COVID-19-associated diarrhea in one trial. These strategies are promising but need further evidence from trials in COVID-19 patients.

Patient and Microbial Genomic Factors Associated with Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Extraintestinal Colonization and Infection.

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) is a critical-priority antibiotic resistance threat that has emerged over the past several decades, spread across the globe, and accumulated resistance to last-line antibiotic agents. While CRKP infections are associated with high mortality, only a subset of patients acquiring CRKP extraintestinal colonization will develop clinical infection. Here, we sought to ascertain the relative importance of patient characteristics and CRKP genetic background in determining patient risk of infection. Machine learning models classifying colonization versus infection were built using whole-genome sequences and clinical metadata from a comprehensive set of 331 CRKP extraintestinal isolates collected across 21 long-term acute-care hospitals over the course of a year. Model performance was evaluated based on area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) on held-out test data. We found that patient and genomic features were predictive of clinical CRKP infection to similar extents (AUROC interquartile ranges [IQRs]: patient = 0.59 to 0.68, genomic = 0.55 to 0.61, combined = 0.62 to 0.68). Patient predictors of infection included the presence of indwelling devices, kidney disease, and length of stay. Genomic predictors of infection included presence of the ICEKp10 mobile genetic element carrying the yersiniabactin iron acquisition system and disruption of an O-antigen biosynthetic gene in a sublineage of the epidemic ST258 clone. Altered O-antigen biosynthesis increased association with the respiratory tract, and subsequent ICEKp10 acquisition was associated with increased virulence. These results highlight the potential of integrated models including both patient and microbial features to provide a more holistic understanding of patient clinical trajectories and ongoing within-lineage pathogen adaptation.IMPORTANCE Multidrug-resistant organisms, such as carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP), colonize alarmingly large fractions of patients in regions of endemicity, but only a subset of patients develop life-threatening infections. While patient characteristics influence risk for infection, the relative contribution of microbial genetic background to patient risk remains unclear. We used machine learning to determine whether patient and/or microbial characteristics can discriminate between CRKP extraintestinal colonization and infection across multiple health care facilities and found that both patient and microbial factors were predictive. Examination of informative microbial genetic features revealed variation within the ST258 epidemic lineage that was associated with respiratory tract colonization and increased rates of infection. These findings indicate that circulating genetic variation within a highly prevalent epidemic lineage of CRKP influences patient clinical trajectories. In addition, this work supports the need for future studies examining the microbial genetic determinants of clinical outcomes in human populations, as well as epidemiologic and experimental follow-ups of identified features to discern generalizability and biological mechanisms.

Efficacy of Bezlotoxumab in Trial Participants Infected With Clostridioides difficile Strain BI Associated With Poor Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Bezlotoxumab reduced rates of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) vs placebo in Monoclonal Antibodies for C. difficile Therapy (MODIFY) I/II trial participants receiving antibacterial drug treatment for CDI. A secondary objective of MODIFY I/II was to assess bezlotoxumab's efficacy against C. difficile strains associated with increased rates of morbidity and mortality. METHODS: In this post-hoc analysis of pooled MODIFY I/II data, efficacy endpoints were assessed in participants infected with restriction endonuclease analysis BI and non-BI strains of C. difficile at study entry. Treatment outcomes were compared between participants receiving bezlotoxumab (alone or with actoxumab [B, B+A]) and those receiving no bezlotoxumab (placebo or actoxumab [P, A]). RESULTS: From 2559 randomized participants, C. difficile was isolated from 1588 (67.2%) baseline stool samples. Participants with BI strains (n = 328) were older and had more risk factors for rCDI than non-BI strain participants (n = 1260). There were no differences in initial clinical cure rate between BI and non-BI strains in either group. The rCDI rate for BI strains treated with bezlotoxumab was lower than for the no bezlotoxumab group (B, B+A vs P, A: 23.6% vs 43.9%) and was also lower for the non-BI strains (B, B+A vs P, A: 21.4% vs 36.1%). Rates of 30-day CDI-associated rehospitalization were greater with BI vs non-BI strains in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Infection with BI strains of C. difficile predicted poor outcomes in the MODIFY I/II trials. Bezlotoxumab (alone or with actoxumab) treatment was effective both in BI and non-BI subpopulations.

Antimicrobial Management of Respiratory Infections in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Patients: Clinical and Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs Conundrums.

The role of empirical and even directed antimicrobial management of patients hospitalized with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is problematic; antibiotics are used frequently among these patients to treat confirmed or suspected coinfection or just the symptoms. In the rapidly changing clinical landscape of SARS-CoV-2, there is minimal guidance for selecting appropriate treatment versus non-antimicrobial treatment, and clinicians are pressed to make daily decisions under the stress of absence of data while watching patients deteriorate. We review current data and patterns of antimicrobial use and the potential approach for antimicrobial stewardship in the context of SARS-CoV-2.

Investigational Treatment Agents for Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection (rCDI).

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a major cause of nosocomial diarrhea that is deemed a global health threat. C. difficile strain BI/NAP1/027 has contributed to the increase in the mortality, severity of CDI outbreaks and recurrence rates (rCDI). Updated CDI treatment guidelines suggest vancomycin and fidaxomicin as initial first-line therapies that have initial clinical cure rates of over 80%. Unacceptably high recurrence rates of 15-30% in patients for the first episode and 40% for the second recurrent episode are reported. Alternative treatments for rCDI include fecal microbiota transplant and a human monoclonal antibody, bezlotoxumab, that can be used in patients with high risk of rCDI. Various emerging potential therapies with narrow spectrum of activity and little systemic absorption that are in development include 1) Ibezapolstat (formerly ACX-362E), MGB-BP-3, and DS-2969b-targeting bacterial DNA replication, 2) CRS3213 (REP3123)-inhibiting toxin production and spore formation, 3) ramizol and ramoplanin-affecting bacterial cell wall, 4) LFF-571-blocking protein synthesis, 5) Alanyl-L-Glutamine (alanylglutamine)-inhibiting damage caused by C. difficile by protecting intestinal mucosa, and 6) DNV3837 (MCB3681)-prodrug consisting of an oxazolidinone-quinolone combination that converts to the active form DNV3681 that has activity in vitro against C. difficile. This review article provides an overview of these developing drugs that can have potential role in the treatment of rCDI and in lowering recurrence rates.

In Vitro Activity of Tedizolid Compared to Linezolid and Five Other Antimicrobial Agents against 332 Anaerobic Isolates, Including Bacteroides fragilis Group, Prevotella, Porphyromonas, and Veillonella Species.

Tedizolid's anaerobic activity is unappreciated. In this study, it was active against all 332 anaerobic isolates tested at ≤2 µg/ml except Bilophila wadsworthia and was more active than linezolid against Bacteroides fragilis group species (MIC90, 1 µg/ml versus 2 to 4 µg/ml). Tedizolid was active against Gram-positive anaerobes (MIC90 for clostridia, 0.25 to 1 µg/ml; MIC90 for anaerobic cocci, ≤0.06 to 0.25 µg/ml). Our data coupled with clinical reports indicate that clinicians should consider its use in mixed infections where Staphylococcus aureus and anaerobes are involved.