Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 6870, 2024 Aug 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39127809

RESUMO

Current treatment outcome of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) remains poor. Following standard therapy, recurrence is universal with limited survival. Tumors from 173 GBM patients are analysed for somatic mutations to generate a personalized peptide vaccine targeting tumor-specific neoantigens. All patients were treated within the scope of an individual healing attempt. Among all vaccinated patients, including 70 treated prior to progression (primary) and 103 treated after progression (recurrent), the median overall survival from first diagnosis is 31.9 months (95% CI: 25.0-36.5). Adverse events are infrequent and are predominantly grade 1 or 2. A vaccine-induced immune response to at least one of the vaccinated peptides is detected in blood samples of 87 of 97 (90%) monitored patients. Vaccine-specific T-cell responses are durable in most patients. Significantly prolonged survival is observed for patients with multiple vaccine-induced T-cell responses (53 months) compared to those with no/low induced responses (27 months; P = 0.03). Altogether, our results highlight that the application of personalized neoantigen-targeting peptide vaccine is feasible and represents a promising potential treatment option for GBM patients.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Vacinas Anticâncer , Glioblastoma , Medicina de Precisão , Vacinas de Subunidades Proteicas , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antígenos de Neoplasias/imunologia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/imunologia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Vacinas Anticâncer/imunologia , Vacinas Anticâncer/uso terapêutico , Glioblastoma/imunologia , Glioblastoma/terapia , Medicina de Precisão/métodos , Vacinas de Subunidades Proteicas/imunologia , Vacinas de Subunidades Proteicas/uso terapêutico , Linfócitos T/imunologia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 12(4)2024 Apr 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38675779

RESUMO

Ovarian cancer is one of the most common cancers among women and the most lethal malignancy of all gynecological cancers. Surgery is promising in the early stages; however, most patients are first diagnosed in the advanced stages, where treatment options are limited. Here, we present a 49-year-old patient who was first diagnosed with stage III ovarian cancer. After the tumor progressed several times under guideline therapies with no more treatment options available at that time, the patient received a fully individualized neoantigen-derived peptide vaccine in the setting of an individual healing attempt. The tumor was analyzed for somatic mutations via whole exome sequencing and potential neoepitopes were vaccinated over a period of 50 months. During vaccination, the patient additionally received anti-PD-1 therapy to prevent further disease progression. Vaccine-induced T-cell responses were detected using intracellular cytokine staining. After eleven days of in vitro expansion, four T-cell activation markers (namely IFN-É£, TNF-α, IL-2, and CD154) were measured. The proliferation capacity of neoantigen-specific T-cells was determined using a CFSE proliferation assay. Immune monitoring revealed a very strong CD4+ T-cell response against one of the vaccinated peptides. The vaccine-induced T-cells simultaneously expressed CD154, TNF, IL-2, and IFN-É£ and showed a strong proliferation capacity upon neoantigen stimulation. Next-generation sequencing, as well as immunohistochemical analysis, revealed a loss of Beta-2 microglobulin (B2M), which is essential for MHC class I presentation. The results presented here implicate that the application of neoantigen-derived peptide vaccines might be considered for those cancer stages, where promising therapeutic options are lacking. Furthermore, we provide more data that endorse the intensive investigation of B2M loss as a tumor escape mechanism in clinical trials using anti-cancer vaccines together with immune-checkpoint inhibitors.

3.
Front Immunol ; 14: 1271449, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37920460

RESUMO

Localized prostate cancer is curable, but metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer has a low 5-year survival rate, while broad treatment options are lacking. Here we present an mCSPC patient under remission receiving individualized neoantigen-derived peptide vaccination as recurrence prophylaxis in the setting of an individual treatment attempt. The patient was initially analyzed for somatic tumor mutations and then consecutively treated with two different peptide vaccines over a period of 33 months. The first vaccine contained predicted HLA class I binding peptides only whereas the second vaccine contained both predicted HLA class I and II binding peptides. Intracellular cytokine staining after 12 day in-vitro expansion measuring four T-cell activation markers (IFNg, TNF-α, IL-2, CD154) was used to determine vaccine-induced T-cell responses. While the first vaccine induced only one robust CD4+ T-cell response after 21 vaccinations, co-vaccination of HLA class I and II peptides induced multiple strong and durable CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses already after sixth vaccinations. The vaccine-induced immune responses were robust and polyfunctional. PSA remained undetectable for 51 months. The results presented here implicate that neoantigen-targeting vaccines might be considered for those cancer subtypes where therapeutic options are limited. Furthermore, our findings suggest that both HLA class I and II restricted peptides should be considered for future peptide vaccination trials.


Assuntos
Vacinas Anticâncer , Neoplasias da Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Vacinas de Subunidades Antigênicas , Linfócitos T CD8-Positivos , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Peptídeos , Antígenos de Neoplasias , Vacinação , Castração , Mutação
4.
J Clin Oncol ; 41(11): 1999-2006, 2023 04 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36735893

RESUMO

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.We report 5-year efficacy and safety outcomes from the phase III KEYNOTE-407 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02775435). Eligible patients with previously untreated, metastatic squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomly assigned 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo plus carboplatin and paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel once every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by pembrolizumab or placebo for up to 35 cycles. Primary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST version 1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR). Five hundred fifty-nine patients were randomly assigned in the intention-to-treat population (pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, n = 278; placebo plus chemotherapy, n = 281). The median time from random assignment to data cutoff was 56.9 (range, 49.9-66.2) months. OS and PFS were improved with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy (hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.71 [0.59 to 0.85] and 0.62 [0.52 to 0.74]), with 5-year OS rates of 18.4% versus 9.7%, respectively. Toxicity was manageable. Among 55 patients who completed 35 cycles of pembrolizumab, the objective response rate was 90.9% and the 3-year OS rate after completion of 35 cycles (approximately 5 years after random assignment) was 69.5%. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy maintained an OS and PFS benefit versus placebo plus chemotherapy in previously untreated, metastatic squamous NSCLC and is a standard-of-care first-line treatment option for metastatic squamous NSCLC regardless of programmed death ligand 1 expression.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico
5.
Radiat Oncol ; 17(1): 210, 2022 Dec 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36544149

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Standard therapy for localized high-risk soft tissue sarcoma includes surgical resection and neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation therapy (± chemotherapy and locoregional hyperthermia). No difference in oncologic outcomes for patients treated with neoadjuvant and adjuvant radiation therapy was reported, whereas side effect profiles differ. The aim of this analysis was to analyse oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications in patients treated with multimodal treatment. METHODS: Oncologic outcomes and major wound complications (MWC, subclassified as wound healing disorder, infection, abscess, fistula, seroma and hematoma) were evaluated in 74 patients with localized high-risk soft tissue sarcoma of extremities and trunk undergoing multimodal treatment, and also separately for the subgroup of lower extremity tumors. Clinical factors and treatment modalities (especially neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant radiotherapy) were evaluated regarding their prognostic value and impact on postoperative wound complications. RESULTS: Oncologic outcomes were dependent on number of high risk features (tumor size, depth to superficial fascia and grading), but not on therapy sequencing (however with higher risk patients in the neoadjuvant group). Different risk factors influenced different subclasses of wound healing complications. Slightly higher MWC-rates were observed in patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy, compared to adjuvant radiotherapy, although only with a trend to statistical significance (31.8% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.059). However, except for wound infections, no significant difference for other subclasses of postoperative complications was observed between neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy. Diabetes was confirmed as a major risk factor for immune-related wound complications. CONCLUSION: Rates of major wound complications in this cohort are comparable to published data, higher rates of wound infections were observed after neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Tumor localization, patient age and diabetes seem to be major risk factors. The number of risk factors for high risk soft tissue sarcoma seem to influence DMFS. Neoadjuvant treatment increases the risk only for wound infection treated with oral or intravenous antibiotic therapy and appears to be a safe option at an experienced tertiary center in absence of other risk factors.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Sarcoma , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles , Infecção dos Ferimentos , Humanos , Cicatrização/efeitos da radiação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/patologia , Terapia Combinada , Radioterapia Adjuvante/efeitos adversos , Terapia Neoadjuvante/efeitos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus/etiologia , Extremidades/patologia , Sarcoma/patologia , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/patologia , Infecção dos Ferimentos/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
Front Oncol ; 12: 995744, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36387105

RESUMO

NUT carcinoma (NC) is a rare and extremely aggressive form of cancer, usually presenting with intrathoracic or neck manifestations in adolescents and young adults. With no established standard therapy regimen and a median overall survival of only 6.5 months, there is a huge need for innovative treatment options. As NC is genetically driven by a single aberrant fusion oncoprotein, it is generally characterized by a low tumor mutational burden, thus making it immunologically cold and insusceptible to conventional immunotherapy. Recently, we have demonstrated that oncolytic viruses (OVs) are able to specifically infect and lyse NC cells, thereby turning an immunologically cold tumor microenvironment into a hot one. Here, we report an intensive multimodal treatment approach employing for the first time an OV (talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC); IMLYGIC®) together with the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab as an add-on to a basic NC therapy (cytostatic chemotherapy, radiation therapy, epigenetic therapy) in a patient suffering from a large thoracic NC tumor which exhibits an aberrant, unique BRD3:NUTM1 fusion. This case demonstrates for the first time the feasibility of this innovative add-on immunovirotherapy regimen with a profound, repetitive and durable replication of T-VEC that is instrumental in achieving tumor stabilization and improvement in the patient´s quality of life. Further, a previously unknown BRD3:NUTM1 fusion gene was discovered that lacks the extraterminal domain of BRD3.

7.
Oncology ; 73(3-4): 221-7, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18424886

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To date, no standard regimen for salvage chemotherapy after gemcitabine (Gem) failure has been defined for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). Oral capecitabine (Cap) has shown promising activity in first-line chemotherapy trials in PC patients. METHODS: Within a prospective single-center study, Cap was offered to patients who had already received at least 1 previous treatment regimen containing full-dose Gem (as a single agent, as part of a combination chemotherapy regimen or sequentially within a chemoradiotherapy protocol). Cap was administered orally at a dose of 1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily for 14 days followed by 7 days of rest. Study endpoints were objective tumor response rate by imaging criteria (according to RECIST), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) tumor marker response, time to progression, overall survival and toxicity. RESULTS: A median of 3 treatment cycles (range 1-36) was given to 39 patients. After a median follow-up of 6.6 months, 27 patients were evaluable for response: no complete or partial responses were observed, but 15 patients (39%) had stable disease. A CA19-9 reduction of >20% after 2 cycles of Cap was documented in 6 patients (15%). Median time to progression was 2.3 months (range 0.5-45.1) and median overall survival (since start of Cap treatment) was 7.6 months (range 0.7-45.1). Predominant grade 2 and 3 toxicities (per patient analysis) were hand-foot syndrome 28% (13% grade 3); anemia 23%; leg edema 15%; diarrhea 13%; nausea/vomiting 10%, and leukocytopenia 10%. CONCLUSION: Single-agent Cap is a safe treatment option for Gem-pretreated patients with advanced PC. Further evaluation of Cap in controlled clinical trials of Gem-pretreated patients with advanced PC is recommended.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Fluoruracila/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/secundário , Administração Oral , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ósseas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Antígeno CA-19-9/metabolismo , Capecitabina , Desoxicitidina/uso terapêutico , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Feminino , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundário , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Terapia de Salvação , Taxa de Sobrevida , Gencitabina
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA