Assessing Restoration Effects on River Hydromorphology Using the Process-based Morphological Quality Index in Eight European River Reaches.

The Morphological Quality Index (MQI) and the Morphological Quality Index for monitoring (MQIm) have been applied to eight case studies across Europe with the objective of analyzing the hydromorphological response to various restoration measures and of comparing the results of the MQI and MQIm as a morphological assessment applied at the reach scale, with a conventional site scale physical-habitat assessment method. For each restored reach, the two indices were applied to the pre-restoration and post-restoration conditions. The restored reach was also compared to an adjacent, degraded reach. Results show that in all cases the restoration measures improved the morphological quality of the reach, but that the degree of improvement depends on many factors, including the initial morphological conditions, the length of the restored portion in relation to the reach length, and on the type of intervention. The comparison with a conventional site scale physical-habitat assessment method shows that the MQI and MQIm are best suited for the evaluation of restoration effects on river hydromorphology at the geomorphologically-relevant scale of the river reach.

New tools for the hydromorphological assessment and monitoring of European streams.

Hydromorphological stream assessment has significantly expanded over the last years, but a need has emerged from recent reviews for more comprehensive, process-based methods that consider the character and dynamics of the river with greater accuracy. With this as a focus, a series of hydromorphological tools have been developed and/or further extended in Europe within the context of the REFORM (REstoring rivers FOR effective catchment Management) project. The aim of this paper is to present the set of REFORM hydromorphological assessment methods and, based on some examples of their application, to illustrate and discuss their synergic use, specific features, limitations and strengths. This assessment and monitoring includes three tools: the Morphological Quality Index (MQI), the Morphological Quality Index for monitoring (MQIm), and the Geomorphic Units survey and classification System (GUS). These tools constitute the assessment phase of an overall multi-scale, process-based hydromorphological framework developed in REFORM. The MQI is aimed at an assessment, classification and monitoring of the current morphological state; the MQIm aims at monitoring the tendency of morphological conditions (enhancement or deterioration); the GUS provides a characterization, classification and monitoring of geomorphic units. A series of examples are used to illustrate the potential range of application, including: (i) an assessment of morphological conditions; (ii) an assessment of the morphological effects of restoration projects; (iii) an evaluation of the geomorphic impacts of interventions for risk mitigation; and (iv) an integrated use of MQI and GUS to assess and characterise morphological conditions. Finally, some of the main features, strengths and peculiarities of the three hydromorphological tools are discussed with the support of examples of their application.

The relevance of continuous blood pressure monitoring in examining the relationship of memory efficiency with blood pressure characteristics.

The study of the relationship between hypertension and cognitive decline is characterized by various difficulties of realization and, as a consequence, by incongruent results. One of the reasons for these difficulties may be explained by the occasional method of measurement of blood pressure (once a day). This study presents the results obtained in 27 normotensive and mild hypertensive subjects of both sexes (ages between 20 and 77 years) with a continuous blood pressure monitoring for 24 h. A noninvasive sphygmomanometric technique was used employing a portable recorder programmed to take a measure every 30 min. Both objective and subjective measures of memory, measures of attention efficiency, and IQ were correlated to the blood pressure measures. Continuous monitoring data of blood pressure were analyzed according to a model that included a macroscopic descriptive analysis, a microscopic rhythmometric analysis, and a microscopic integrative analyses where the effects of the interaction between level and duration of excess and the time of the day when the excess eventually appeared were considered. Results evidenced no differences in cognitive efficiency between those subjects identified with the traditional occasional measurement of blood pressure as hypertensives of mild severity and the normal subjects. Cognitive efficiency of our subjects was found correlated, independently from the clinical diagnosis, with the time of peak and with the duration of excess of their blood pressure when the results of the analyses on the continuous monitoring of blood pressure were considered.