Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol Combined with a Foley Catheter among Individuals with Obesity Undergoing Induction.

BACKGROUND: Combining pharmacologic agents with mechanical ripening achieves the shortest labor duration, yet there is no clear evidence on route of drug administration in obese individuals. The use of buccal misoprostol has shown greater patient acceptance but remains understudied. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the difference in time to delivery of buccal compared with vaginal misoprostol in combination with a Foley catheter (FC) for induction of labor (IOL) in the obese population. STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial comparing identical dosages (25 µg) of buccal and vaginal misoprostol in combination with a FC. The parent trial was an institutional review board-approved, randomized clinical trial conducted from June 2019 through January 2020. Labor management was standardized among participants. Women undergoing IOL at ≥37 weeks with a singleton gestation and cervical dilation ≤2 cm were included. Body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) was stratified. The primary outcome was time to delivery. RESULTS: A total of 215 participants were included. Demographic characteristics were similar between the three groups. Vaginal drug administration achieved a faster median time to delivery than the buccal route among patients with a body mass index greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2 (vaginal misoprostol-FC: 21.3 hours vs. buccal misoprostol-FC: 25.2 hours, p = 0.006). There was no difference in the cesarean delivery rate between the two groups. Furthermore, patients with a BMI greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2 receiving vaginal misoprostol delivered 1.2 times faster than women who received buccal misoprostol after censoring for cesarean delivery and adjusting for parity (hazard ratio: 1.2, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-1.7). There were no significant differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: We found that vaginal misoprostol was superior to buccal misoprostol when combined with a FC among individuals with a BMI greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2. Vaginal misoprostol should be the preferred route of drug administration for term IOL in this population. KEY POINTS: · Vaginal misoprostol was superior to buccal route among patients with obesity.. · There was no difference in the cesarean delivery rate between the two groups.. · Vaginal misoprostol should be the preferred route of administration among patients with obesity..

Combination Foley Catheter-Oxytocin versus Oxytocin Alone following Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes.

OBJECTIVE: The benefit of mechanical ripening agents following preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) has not been established. We sought to compare the time to delivery in women who received transcervical Foley catheter plus oxytocin infusion versus oxytocin infusion alone in patients with unfavorable cervices and PPROM. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients presenting with PPROM of a live, singleton gestation between 240/7 and 366/7 weeks' gestation from January 2005 to October 2018 at a single, tertiary care institution. Patients with an unfavorable cervical examination (≤2-cm dilation), no contraindication to labor and undergoing labor induction were analyzed. Time to delivery was analyzed using multivariable linear regression adjusting for cervical dilation at induction and nulliparity. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used where appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 260 participants were included: 109 who received a Foley catheter and oxytocin (Foley/oxytocin) and 151 who had oxytocin alone. Demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups. Unadjusted time to delivery was significantly shorter in the oxytocin only group (Foley/oxytocin: 20.35 hours vs. oxytocin alone: 14.7 hours, p < 0.001). No differences in length of labor were detected after adjusting for cervical dilation at induction and nulliparity (p = 0.5). The unadjusted rate of cesarean delivery was higher in the combination Foley/oxytocin group (Foley/oxytocin: 16.5% vs. oxytocin alone: 7.3%, p = 0.03), but no differences were found in the adjusted analysis (p = 0.06). There were no differences in clinical chorioamnionitis rates between the two groups (Foley/oxytocin: 8.3% vs. oxytocin alone: 9.3%, p = 0.83). Furthermore, no significant differences were found in maternal and neonatal outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with PROM, the use of a transcervical Foley catheter in addition to oxytocin is not associated with a shorter time to delivery compared with oxytocin alone. KEY POINTS: · Transcervical Foley catheter did not shorten length of labor in PPROM.. · Transcervical Foley catheter did not increase infection risk.. · Pitocin alone can be used in PPROM population..

Validation of a novel mobile phone application for type 2 diabetes screening following gestational diabetes mellitus.

Background: We sought to determine if using fasting blood glucose (FBG) through text-based care is an effective screening tool for type 2 diabetes in the postpartum period compared to in-person, 2-hour oral glucose tolerance testing (2hr OGTT). Methods: This was a single-center interventional study that included individuals diagnosed with gestational diabetes. Patients were enrolled in standard, office-based 2hr OGTT in combination with text-based remote diabetes screening. Study participants were instructed to record FBG for 3 consecutive days using a mobile application. We assessed agreement with 2hr OGTT using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value with exact binomial 95% confidence intervals. Results: A total of 446 individuals diagnosed with gestational diabetes met inclusion criteria, 239 of which were enrolled in standard office-based screening and 207 were enrolled in dual screening using standard 2hr OGTT testing combined with text-based remote FBG screening. A FBG value less than 100 mg/dL had 100% sensitivity (86-100%), 86% specificity (77-93%) with a 100% (94-100%) negative predictive value and 71% (54-85%) positive predictive value. Follow-up was significantly higher among individuals enrolled in remote text-based screening compared to standard in-office screening (48% vs. 25%, respectively; P<0.001). Conclusions: Text-based screening may be a feasible alternative to in-office screening. A mobile-based system using FBG successfully screened all patients with type 2 diabetes in the postpartum period with 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value. Remote telehealth screening significantly increased follow-up with type 2 diabetes screening.

Early vs expectant artificial rupture of membranes following Foley catheter ripening: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Early amniotomy shortens the duration of spontaneous labor, yet there is no clear evidence on the optimal timing of amniotomy following cervical ripening. There are limited high-quality studies on the use of early amniotomy intervention following labor induction. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether amniotomy within 1 hour of Foley catheter expulsion reduces the duration of labor among individuals undergoing combined misoprostol and Foley catheter labor induction at term. STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized clinical trial conducted from November 2020 to May 2021 comparing amniotomy within 1 hour of Foley catheter expulsion (early artificial rupture of membranes) with expectant management. Randomization was stratified by parity. Labor management was standardized among participants. Individuals undergoing induction at ≥37 weeks with a singleton gestation and needing cervical ripening were eligible. Our primary outcome was time to delivery. Wilcoxon rank sum, Pearson chi-square, and Cox survival analyses with intent-to-treat principles were performed adjusting for age, body mass index, parity, mode of delivery, Bishop score, and the interaction between randomization group and parity. A sample size of 160 was planned to detect a 4-hour reduction in delivery time. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients (79 early artificial rupture of membranes, 81 expectant management) were randomized. Early artificial rupture of membranes achieved a faster median time to delivery than expectant management (early artificial rupture of membranes: 11.1 hours; interquartile range, 6.25-17.1 vs expectant management: 19.8 hours; interquartile range, 13.2-26.2; P<.001). A greater percentage of individuals in the early artificial rupture of membranes group delivered within 24 hours (86% vs 70%; P=.03). There was no difference in the cesarean delivery rate between the 2 groups (22% vs 31%; P=.25). Individuals delivered 2.3 times faster following early artificial rupture of membranes (hazard ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-3.4; P<.001). There were no significant differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Amniotomy within 1 hour of Foley catheter expulsion resulted in 2.3 times faster delivery than expectant management. Therefore, early artificial rupture of membranes should be considered in individuals undergoing mechanical cervical ripening at term.

Incremental risk of clinical chorioamnionitis associated with cervical examination.

BACKGROUND: Clinical chorioamnionitis is associated with significant maternal and neonatal morbidity, yet there is no clear evidence on the association between cervical examinations and infection. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the association between the number of cervical examinations performed during term labor management and the risk of clinical chorioamnionitis. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of term (≥37 weeks of gestation), singleton pregnancies who labored at our tertiary care center from 2014 to 2018. The primary outcome of clinical chorioamnionitis was defined as maternal intrapartum fever (single oral temperature of >39°C or 38°C-38.9°C for 30 minutes) and 1 or more of the following: maternal leukocytosis, purulent cervical drainage, or fetal tachycardia. The primary exposure was the number of digital cervical exams documented in the medical record. Log-binomial regression was used to model the effect of cervical examinations on the risk of clinical chorioamnionitis while adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 20,029 individuals met the inclusion criteria and 1028 (5%) patients experienced clinical chorioamnionitis. The number of cervical exams was associated with increased risk of developing infection after adjusting for potential confounders. Individuals with ≥8 cervical exams had 1.7 times the risk of developing clinical chorioamnionitis compared with those with 1 to 3 exams. Prolonged rupture time, nulliparity, Black race, Medicaid insurance, higher gestational age, and higher body mass index were associated with increased risk of clinical chorioamnionitis, whereas smoking and group B Streptococcus colonization were associated with a lower risk. CONCLUSION: Our study found that the number of cervical exams performed during labor is an independent risk factor for developing clinical chorioamnionitis. Unnecessary cervical exams should be avoided during labor management at term.