Clinical research and drug regulation in the challenging times of individualized therapies: A pivotal role of clinical pharmacology.

Since the 1980s, medical specialists in Clinical Pharmacology have been playing a crucial role in the development of drug regulation in Spain. In this article we report on the activities carried out and the prospects for development in three very relevant areas from the regulatory perspective: 1) the development of stable public infrastructures to facilitate non-commercial clinical research with medicines, 2) the regulatory aspects of individual access to medicines in special situations, beyond their regular access after marketing approval and funding by the National Health System, and 3) the challenges of development and access to advanced therapies, with special reference to the figure of the hospital exemption.

GEMA 5.3. Spanish Guideline on the Management of Asthma.

The Spanish Guideline on the Management of Asthma, better known by its acronym in Spanish GEMA, has been available for more than 20 years. Twenty-one scientific societies or related groups both from Spain and internationally have participated in the preparation and development of the updated edition of GEMA, which in fact has been currently positioned as the reference guide on asthma in the Spanish language worldwide. Its objective is to prevent and improve the clinical situation of people with asthma by increasing the knowledge of healthcare professionals involved in their care. Its purpose is to convert scientific evidence into simple and easy-to-follow practical recommendations. Therefore, it is not a monograph that brings together all the scientific knowledge about the disease, but rather a brief document with the essentials, designed to be applied quickly in routine clinical practice. The guidelines are necessarily multidisciplinary, developed to be useful and an indispensable tool for physicians of different specialties, as well as nurses and pharmacists. Probably the most outstanding aspects of the guide are the recommendations to: establish the diagnosis of asthma using a sequential algorithm based on objective diagnostic tests; the follow-up of patients, preferably based on the strategy of achieving and maintaining control of the disease; treatment according to the level of severity of asthma, using six steps from least to greatest need of pharmaceutical drugs, and the treatment algorithm for the indication of biologics in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma based on phenotypes. And now, in addition to that, there is a novelty for easy use and follow-up through a computer application based on the chatbot-type conversational artificial intelligence (ia-GEMA).

La Guía Española para el Manejo del Asma, mejor conocida por su acrónimo en español, GEMA, está a nuestra disposición desde hace más de veinte años. Veintiuna sociedades científicas o grupos relacionados, tanto de España como de otros países, han participado en la preparación y desarrollo de la edición actualizada de GEMA que, de hecho, se ha posicionado en la actualidad a nivel mundial como la guía de referencia sobre asma en lengua española.Su objetivo es prevenir y mejorar la situación clínica de las personas con asma, aumentando el conocimiento de los profesionales sanitarios involucrados en su cuidado. Su propósito es convertir la evidencia científica en recomendaciones prácticas sencillas y fáciles de seguir. Por lo tanto, no se trata de una monografía que reúna todo el conocimiento científico sobre la enfermedad, sino más bien de un documento conciso con lo esencial, diseñado para ser aplicado rápidamente en la práctica clínica de rutina. Las recomendaciones son necesariamente multidisciplinares, están desarrolladas para ser útiles y una herramienta indispensable para médicos de diferentes especialidades, así como para profesionales de enfermería y farmacia.Seguramente, los aspectos más destacados de la guía son las recomendaciones para: establecer el diagnóstico del asma utilizando un algoritmo secuencial basado en pruebas diagnósticas objetivas; el seguimiento de los pacientes, preferentemente basado en la estrategia de lograr y mantener el control de la enfermedad; el tratamiento según el nivel de gravedad del asma utilizando seis escalones, desde la menor hasta la mayor necesidad de medicamentos, y el algoritmo de tratamiento basado en fenotipos para la indicación de biológicos en pacientes con asma grave no controlada. A esto se suma ahora una novedad para su fácil uso y seguimiento a través de una aplicación informática basada en la inteligencia artificial conversacional de tipo chatbot (ia-GEMA).

When and How to Use Reversal Agents for Direct Oral Anticoagulants?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Our objective is to describe currently available reversal agents for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), their target population, the available clinical practice recommendations and future directions. RECENT FINDINGS: Specific (idarucizumab for dabigatran and andexanet alfa for direct factor Xa inhibitors) and non-specific (prothrombin complex concentrates) reversal agents are effective in neutralizing the anticoagulant effect of DOACs. New investigational antidotes such as ciraparantag and VMX-C001 offer an alternative to andexanet alfa in reversing the anticoagulant activity of direct oral factor Xa inhibitors, but more clinical data are needed before they could be licensed for use. Specific reversal agents are recommended for use in clinical situations within their licensed indications (i.e.: reversal of DOACs in patients with severe uncontrolled or life-threatening bleeding or in need of emergency surgery or other invasive procedures), while non-specific reversal agents may be used when specific antidotes are not available or indicated.

Pharmacotherapy for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: current strategies and future directions.

INTRODUCTION: Cardioembolic stroke, associated to nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), accounts for approximately one in every four strokes. Cardioembolic stroke has a bad prognosis and is associated with a significant rate of recurrence. AREAS COVERED: This article reviews current pharmacotherapeutic options for prevention of stroke in NVAF, paying special attention to their use in particular clinical settings (e.g. cardioversion, catheter ablation). We also aim to review new drug candidates that have entered clinical studies in this indication. EXPERT OPINION: Oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) remains the mainstay for ischemic stroke prophylaxis in NVAF in patients at risk. Several oral (asundexian, milvexian) and parenteral (abelacimab, osocimab, xisomab, IONIS-FXIRX, fesomersen) factor XIa inhibitors are under development. These new compounds appear to be associated with a low bleeding tendency and have the potential to complement current existing alternatives for anticoagulation. However, it is also of paramount importance to implement interventions to improve adherence to available anticoagulants, which is currently suboptimal. Non-anticoagulant drugs, such as colchicine, metformin and dronedarone, also being investigated to reduce the burden of NVAF and cardioembolic stroke. Additional clinical data are needed to more clearly define the role of these drugs for stroke prevention in NVAF.

[Translated article] Spanish Asthma Management Guidelines (GEMA) v.5.1. Highlights and Controversies.

In this fifth phase of development, the contents of the Spanish Asthma Management Guidelines (GEMA), which include versions 5.0 and 5.1, have undergone a thorough review. The aim here is to set the main changes in context. These could be summarized as follows: DIAGNOSIS: new FENO cut-off and severity classification based on treatment needed to maintain control; INTERMITTENT ASTHMA: a more restrictive concept and treatment extended to include a glucocorticoid/adrenergic combination as needed; MILD ASTHMA: glucocorticoid/adrenergic therapy as needed as an alternative in case of low therapeutic adherence to conventional fixed-dose steroids; SEVERE ASTHMA: readjustment of phenotypes, incorporation of triple therapy in a single inhaler, and criteria for selection of a biologic in severe uncontrolled asthma; OTHERS: specific scoring in childhood asthma, incorporation of certain organizational aspects (care circuits, asthma units, telemedicine), new sections on COVID-19 and nasal polyposis.

Spanish Asthma Management Guidelines (GEMA) VERSION 5.1. Highlights and Controversies. / Guía española para el manejo del asma (GEMA) versión 5.1. Aspectos destacados y controversias.

In this fifth phase of development, the contents of the Spanish Asthma Management Guidelines (GEMA), which include versions 5.0 and 5.1, have undergone a thorough review. The aim here is to set the main changes in context. These could be summarized as follows: DIAGNOSIS: new FENO cut-off and severity classification based on treatment needed to maintain control; INTERMITTENT ASTHMA: a more restrictive concept and treatment extended to include a glucocorticoid/adrenergic combination as needed; MILD ASTHMA: glucocorticoid/adrenergic therapy as needed as an alternative in case of low therapeutic adherence to conventional fixed-dose steroids; SEVERE ASTHMA: readjustment of phenotypes, incorporation of triple therapy in a single inhaler, and criteria for selection of a biologic in severe uncontrolled asthma; OTHERS: specific scoring in childhood asthma, incorporation of certain organizational aspects (care circuits, asthma units, telemedicine), new sections on COVID-19 and nasal polyposis.

Meta-Analysis of Reversal Agents for Severe Bleeding Associated With Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown a positive benefit-risk balance in both clinical trials and real-world data, but approximately 2% to 3.5% of patients experience major bleeding annually. Many of these patients require hospitalization, and the administration of reversal agents may be required to control bleeding. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate clinical outcomes associated with the use of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrates, idarucizumab, or andexanet for reversal of severe DOAC-associated bleeding. METHODS: The investigators systematically searched for studies of reversal agents for the treatment of severe bleeding associated with DOAC. Mortality rates, thromboembolic events, and hemostatic efficacy were meta-analyzed using a random effects model. RESULTS: The investigators evaluated 60 studies in 4,735 patients with severe DOAC-related bleeding who were treated with 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (n = 2,688), idarucizumab (n = 1,111), or andexanet (n = 936). The mortality rate was 17.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.1% to 20.4%), and it was higher in patients with intracranial bleedings (20.2%) than in patients with extracranial hemorrhages (15.4%). The thromboembolism rate was 4.6% (95% CI: 3.3% to 6.0%), being particularly high with andexanet (10.7%; 95% CI: 6.5% to 15.7%). The effective hemostasis rate was 78.5% (95% CI: 75.1% to 81.8%) and was similar regardless of the reversal agent considered. The rebleeding rate was 13.2% (95% CI: 5.5% to 23.1%) and 78% of rebleeds occurred after resumption of anticoagulation. The risk of death was markedly and significantly associated with failure to achieve effective hemostasis (relative risk: 3.63; 95% CI: 2.56 to 5.16). The results were robust regardless of the type of study or the hemostatic scale used. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of death after severe DOAC-related bleeding remains significant despite a high rate of effective hemostasis with reversal agents. Failure to achieve effective hemostasis strongly correlated with a fatal outcome. Thromboembolism rates are particularly high with andexanet. Comparative clinical trials are needed.

When are the cardiovascular and stroke risks too high? Pharmacotherapy for stroke prophylaxis.

INTRODUCTION: Stroke is a significant source of morbidity and mortality in developed countries. Cardioembolic strokes represent approximately 15-30% of all ischemic strokes. They are frequently related to atrial fibrillation (AF) and have a worse prognosis and high recurrence rates when compared to other causes (e.g. atherosclerosis). AREAS COVERED: This review includes a summary of general and specific scores to assess cardiovascular and stroke risks, with a focus on specific scores available in AF. Recommendations for antithrombotic therapy are also reviewed. EXPERT OPINION: Several scores are available for the evaluation of stroke risk. They are useful to identify the risk factors that trigger the need for medical interventions. Integrated risk scores with visual interfaces showing the risk of events, with and without the proposed interventions, can aid decision-making. The risk of stroke can definitely be considered too high in those patients with a history of stroke/transient ischemic attack, who need antiplatelet therapy (after a non-cardioembolic stroke) or anticoagulant therapy (after a cardioembolic stroke). For primary prevention of stroke, antiplatelet therapy is not usually recommended, while anticoagulation should be considered if the patient has concomitant AF and at least one additional risk factor unrelated to sex.

Causes of Death in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism Anticoagulated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Death is more frequent than nonfatal recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding after acute VTE. The analysis of the causes of death is fundamental to explore new strategies to reduce mortality rates in these patients. The authors performed a meta-analysis to analyze mortality and independently adjudicated causes of death in anticoagulated patients due to VTE, and to evaluate potential differences between different anticoagulant schemes. They searched MEDLINE and CENTRAL, from January 1, 2000, to January 31, 2017, and performed additional searches in Web sites of regulatory agencies, clinical trial registers, and conference proceedings. Two investigators independently selected studies and extracted the data. Study quality was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized studies. Seven prospective randomized trials in 29,844 patients (22,025 patient-year follow-up) were included, comparing dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban with the standard anticoagulant treatment of VTE. A total of 718 patients died during the follow-up (3.4% per year; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.3-4.8). The most frequent causes of death were cancer (42%), followed by VTE (20%), infections (13%), hemorrhage (6%), heart disease (4%), and stroke (2%). There were no differences in the overall survival and causes of death according to the anticoagulant type. Concomitant active cancer during the study was significantly associated with death (odds ratio: 15.2; 95% CI: 9.2-25.1). Cancer is the leading cause of death in contemporary VTE trials. Interventions beyond anticoagulation, particularly in patients with active cancer, are needed.

Discovery methods of coagulation-inhibiting drugs.

INTRODUCTION: In the last decade, several direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) targeting thrombin (dabigatran) or activated factor X (FXa) (rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban) have been marketed for a number of indications related to prophylaxis and treatment of thrombotic diseases. All these drugs are effective in preventing thrombosis, but are associated with an increased bleeding risk. Areas covered: This review includes a summary of new targets for anticoagulation (e.g.: FXIa, FXIIa, protein disulfide isomerase, polyphosphates, etc.), the discovery process and pharmacological features of new anticoagulant compounds and the available results from non-clinical and clinical studies. A significant number of new anticoagulant compounds are currently in development. These compounds were developed using different technologies like SELEX (aptamers), antisense technology (ASOs), hybridoma (MAB) and structure based drug design. Compounds like ichorcumab (a parenteral thrombin inhibitor), BMS-986177 (oral FXIa inhibitor), BAY-1213790 and xisomab (parenteral FXIa inhibitors) are currently in the clinical development stage. Expert opinion: It's important to be cautious when interpreting preliminary findings of new compounds showing a good antithrombotic effect without altering haemostasis. That being said, the anticoagulants in development have the potential to provide a safer alternative to the currently available anticoagulants in patients at high risk of bleeding, but further investigation is warranted.

Causes of death in atrial fibrillation: Challenges and opportunities.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an age-related arrhythmia associated with several co-morbidities and significant mortality. Most AF patients are in need of anticoagulation due to increased risk of stroke. Despite anticoagulation, AF patients still have a significant risk of death (about 5%/y). Approximately half of deaths in AF are due to heart-related causes (i.e., sudden death, heart failure, and myocardial infarction), one-third of deaths are due to non-vascular causes (i.e., cancer, respiratory diseases, and infections) and the remaining AF patients die from stroke or hemorrhage (about 6% each), or other causes. This review describes current situations related to causes of death in AF, the challenges in the management of AF (e.g., frequent presence of cardiovascular risk factors and co-morbidities, physicians adherence to clinical guidelines and patients adherence to cardiovascular medications in AF) as well as the opportunities for intervention.

Causes of Death in Anticoagulated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation reduces the risk of mortality in atrial fibrillation (AF), but examination of the causes of death is essential to design new strategies to further reduce the high mortality rates observed in this population. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to analyze and compare causes of death in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) or warfarin for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism (SE) in AF. METHODS: The authors systematically searched for randomized trials of DOAC versus warfarin for prevention of stroke/SE in AF. The main outcome was mortality and independently adjudicated specific causes of death. The authors used the random effects model of meta-analysis to combine the studies. RESULTS: 71,683 patients from 4 trials were included (134,046 patient-years of follow-up). A total of 6,206 patients (9%) died during follow-up. Adjusted mortality rate was 4.72%/year (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.19 to 5.28). Cardiac deaths accounted for 46% of all deaths, whereas nonhemorrhagic stroke/SE and hemorrhage-related deaths represented 5.7% and 5.6% of the total mortality, respectively. Compared with patients who were alive, those who died had more frequent history of heart failure (odds ratio [OR]: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.25 to 2.44), permanent/persistent AF (OR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.25 to 1.52) and diabetes (OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.68); were more frequently male (OR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.13 to 1.37) and older (mean difference 3.2 years; 95% CI: 1.6 to 4.8); and had a lower creatinine clearance (-9.9 ml/min; 95% CI: -11.3 to -8.4). There was a small, but significant, reduction in all-cause mortality with the DOAC versus warfarin (difference -0.42%/year; 95% CI: -0.66 to -0.18), mainly driven by a reduction in fatal bleedings. CONCLUSIONS: In contemporary AF trials, most deaths were cardiac-related, whereas stroke and bleeding represented only a small subset of deaths. Interventions beyond anticoagulation are needed to further reduce mortality in AF.

Direct oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: meta-analysis by geographic region with a focus on European patients.

AIMS: To analyse clinical outcomes with direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation according to geographic region. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, websites of regulatory agencies, clinical trials registers and conference proceedings for randomized controlled trials of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC: dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban or edoxaban) against warfarin for prophylaxis of stroke and systemic embolic events (SEE) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Two investigators independently extracted data. Relative risks of stroke and SEE as well as major bleeding depending on geographic region were estimated using a random effect meta-analysis. RESULTS: Five trials in 72 963 patients were analysed; 32 089 (44%) patients were recruited in Europe (Western Europe: 13 676; Eastern Europe: 18 413). We found significant subgroup differences for stroke/SEE depending on the geographic region (interaction P = 0.003; I(2) 88.5%), with a neutral effect of the DOAC vs. warfarin in Europe [relative risk (RR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85-1.11, I(2) 0%] and a significant reduction of stroke/SEE in other regions including North America, Latin America and Asia-Pacific/other (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.63-0.83, I(2) 33%). There was a similar reduction in risk of major bleeding in Europe (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73-0.92, I(2) 0%) and in other regions (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.72-1.02, I(2) 78%). CONCLUSION: The DOAC did not provide additional benefit in reducing the risk of stroke/SEE compared with warfarin in European patients with AF, but were generally associated with a lower bleeding tendency than warfarin regardless of geographic region.

Direct-acting oral anticoagulants: pharmacology, indications, management, and future perspectives.

In recent years, several direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have become available for use in Europe and other regions in indications related to prophylaxis and treatment of venous and arterial thromboembolism. They include the oral direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate (Pradaxa, Boehringer Ingelheim) and the oral direct FXa inhibitors rivaroxaban (Xarelto, Bayer HealthCare), apixaban (Eliquis, Bristol-Myers Squibb), and edoxaban (Lixiana/Savaysa, Daiichi-Sankyo). The new compounds have a predictable dose response and few drug-drug interactions (unlike vitamin k antagonists), and they do not require parenteral administration (unlike heparins). However, they accumulate in patients with renal impairment, lack widely available monitoring tests for measuring its anticoagulant activity, and no specific antidotes for neutralization in case of overdose and/or severe bleeding are currently available. In this review, we describe the pharmacology of the DOAC, the efficacy, and safety data from pivotal studies that support their currently approved indications and discuss the postmarketing experience available. We also summarize practical recommendations to ensure an appropriate use of the DOAC according to existing data. Finally, we discuss relevant ongoing studies and future perspectives.

Case Fatality Rates of Recurrent Thromboembolism and Bleeding in Patients Receiving Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Initial and Extended Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: In patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), the study of the case fatality rate (CFR) of VTE recurrences and bleeding complications may be of help to balance the risks and benefits of anticoagulant therapy. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the CFR with the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs; dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) in patients with VTE. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials testing the DOACs versus standard initial treatment of VTE (parenteral anticoagulant for ≥5 days plus vitamin K antagonists [VKAs] for ≥3 months) and DOACs versus placebo or VKA for extended treatment. Two investigators independently extracted the data. A random effects meta-analysis was conducted using StatsDirect software. RESULTS: Overall, 10 trials in 35 029 patients were included. During initial treatment, the rate of recurrent VTE per 100 patient-years (%/yr) and CFR (%) was similar in patients receiving DOACs or standard therapy (4.1%/yr vs 4.4%/yr; P = .21 and 16% vs 13%; P = .61, respectively). However, major bleeding (1.8%/yr vs 3.1%/yr; P = .003), fatal bleeding (0.1%/yr vs 0.3%/yr; P = .02), and CFR (6% vs 10%; P = .18) were lower with DOACs than with standard therapy. During extended treatment, both all-cause mortality and recurrent VTE per 100 patient-years were lower with DOACs than with placebo (0.6%/yr vs 1.1%/yr; P = .01 and 1.9%/yr vs 10.9%/yr; P < .0001, respectively), but there were no statistical differences between treatments on CFR of VTE recurrences (P = .17). No fatal bleeding events were reported during extended treatment. CONCLUSION: The use of DOACs was associated with fewer major and fatal bleedings and corresponding CFR than standard initial treatment of VTE, and fewer recurrent VTEs and mortality than placebo during extended therapy, although the CFR of recurrent VTE was not reduced.