RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Stepwise endoscopic circumferential and focal radiofrequency ablation is safe and effective for the eradication of Barrett's esophagus. In contrast to other techniques, radiofrequency ablation appears to avoid significant esophageal scarring or stenosis. Our aim was to evaluate whether radiofrequency ablation has an adverse effect on esophageal function in patients treated for Barrett's esophagus containing intramucosal cancer and/or high-grade dysplasia. METHODS: Twelve patients with Barrett's esophagus containing intramucosal cancer or high-grade dysplasia were included in the study. After endoscopic resection of visible abnormalities, stepwise circumferential and focal ablation were performed every 2 months up to a maximum of five sessions. Measurement of the inner diameter was performed at 1-cm intervals in the distal esophagus. Manometry was performed using a water-perfused sleeve catheter. Compliance was evaluated using the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP), measuring eight cross-sectional areas within a saline-filled bag with two pressure side holes, one proximal to and one inside the bag. Esophageal sizing, manometry, and compliance were recorded in patients at baseline and at least 2 months after the final ablation session. In addition, FLIP and manometry measurements were performed in 10 healthy volunteers. RESULTS: All patients achieved complete eradication of dysplasia and Barrett's esophagus, without severe complications or ablation-related stenoses. The esophageal diameter was unchanged by the ablation. Lower esophageal sphincter pressure and length and esophageal contraction amplitude before and after ablation were not significantly different. Baseline compliance was significantly different between healthy volunteers and Barrett's esophagus patients. Compliance was not, however, significantly changed by ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Stepwise circumferential and focal ablation of Barrett's esophagus is an effective and safe treatment modality for early Barrett's neoplasia that appears to preserve the functional characteristics of the esophagus.
Assuntos
Esôfago de Barrett/terapia , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Esôfago/anatomia & histologia , Adulto , Idoso , Esôfago de Barrett/patologia , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Complacência (Medida de Distensibilidade) , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Esofagoscopia , Esôfago/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Manometria , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Stepwise circumferential and focal ablation of nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus has proven safe and effective. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of ablation for Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and residual Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia after prior endoscopic resection for visible lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study. All visible abnormalities were resected prior to ablation. Persistence of dysplasia and absence of invasive cancer was confirmed with biopsies after endoscopic resection. A balloon-based electrode was used for primary circumferential ablation and an endoscope-mounted electrode was used for secondary focal ablation. Eradication of dysplasia and Barrett's esophagus was the main outcome measure. RESULTS: Eleven patients (eight men; median age 60 years) were treated (median Barrett's length 5 cm). Visible abnormalities were removed with endoscopic resection in six patients. The worst pathological grade of residual Barrett's esophagus after endoscopic resection and prior to ablation was LGD (n = 2) and HGD (n = 9). Patients underwent a median of two circumferential and two focal ablation sessions. Complete remission of dysplasia and complete endoscopic and histological removal of Barrett's esophagus was achieved in 11/11 patients (100%). There were no adverse events or strictures, and in none of the 473 biopsies of neo-squamous mucosa was subsquamous Barrett's esophagus ("buried Barrett's") observed. During a median follow-up period of 14 months after the last treatment session and a median number of two follow-up endoscopies, none of the patients showed recurrence of dysplasia or endoscopic signs of recurrent Barrett's mucosa. CONCLUSIONS: Stepwise circumferential and focal ablation appears to be a safe and effective treatment for complete removal of Barrett's esophagus containing HGD, and can be safely performed after prior endoscopic resection for endoscopically visible abnormalities.
Assuntos
Esôfago de Barrett/cirurgia , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório , Idoso , Esôfago de Barrett/patologia , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasia Residual , Estudos Prospectivos , Reoperação , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
STUDY AIMS: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of stepwise circumferential and focal ablation using the HALO system for Barrett's esophagus containing flat, high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or residual dysplasia after endoscopic resection for HGD or intramucosal cancer (IMC). METHODS: Visible abnormalities were removed with endoscopic resection prior to ablation. Persistence of dysplasia and absence of IMC were confirmed with biopsy after endoscopic resection. A balloon-based electrode was used for primary circumferential ablation and an endoscope-mounted electrode was used for secondary focal ablation. RESULTS: Twelve patients (nine men; median age 70 years) were treated (median Barrett's length 7 cm). Visible abnormalities were removed by endoscopic resection in seven patients. The worst pathological grade of residual Barrett's esophagus after resection and prior to ablation was low-grade dysplasia (LGD) (n = 1) and HGD (n = 11). Patients underwent a median of one circumferential and two focal ablation sessions. Complete remission of dysplasia was achieved in 12/12 patients (100%). Complete endoscopic and histological removal of Barrett's esophagus was achieved in 12/12 patients (100%). There were no ablation-related stenoses, and no subsquamous Barrett's esophagus was observed in 363 biopsies obtained from post-ablation neo-squamous mucosa. Protocolized cleaning of the ablation zone and electrode in between ablations resulted in superior regression of Barrett's esophagus compared with previous studies. During a median follow-up of 14 months no recurrence of dysplasia or Barrett's esophagus was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Stepwise circumferential and focal ablation for Barrett's esophagus with flat HGD or for Barrett's with residual dysplasia after endoscopic resection for HGD/IMC is a safe and effective treatment modality. Its success rate and safety profile compare favorably with alternatives such as esophagectomy, widespread endoscopic resection or photodynamic therapy.