RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: In this study, 345 patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC) were selected to investigate the correlation between ER/PR status and the EC disease-free survival (DFS) rate. METHODS: The intensity and proportion of tumor cell expression of estrogen receptors and progesterone receptors (ER/PR) status of 345 postoperative tumor specimens in ECs were independently assessed semi-quantitatively by two pathologists using immunohistochemistry, the summed score ranged from 0 to 8 points was worked out by adding proportion score and intensity score based on the breast cancer hormone receptor immunohistochemical Allred scoring system. The association between DFS in ECs and ER/PR expression (intensity, proportion and summed score) was assessed using Cox regression analysis. Gene expression data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas research network (TCGA). RESULTS: According to inclusion criteria, 201 type I and 144 type II EC patients were enrolled in this study. In the univariate analysis of type I endometrial carcinoma, the intensity, proportion and summed score of ER/PR status were significantly correlated with DFS. After adjusting for factors known to significantly impact survival, the influence of ER/PR status on DFS is generally decreased but the correlation is still significant. In the univariate analysis of type II endometrial carcinoma, the intensity, proportion and summed score of ER/PR status were significantly correlated with DFS. After adjusting for factors known to significantly impact survival, the influence of ER status on DFS is generally decreased, but the correlation is still significant, the effect of PR expression on DFS is not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Higher ER/PR expression status was associated with better DFS in patients with type I endometrial cancer after adjusting for known factors that significantly affect survival. In patients with type II endometrial cancer, patients with positive ER expression were significantly associated with better DFS. However, the effect of PR expression on DFS was not statistically significant.