Outcomes of the First Generation Locking Plate and Minimally Invasive Techniques Used for Fractures About the Knee.

Background: Locking plate technology was developed approximately 25-years-ago and has been successfully used since. Newer designs and material properties have been used to modify the original design, but these changes have yet to be correlated to improved patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of first-generation locking plate (FGLP) and screw systems at our institution over an 18 year period. Methods: Between 2001 to 2018, 76 patients with 82 proximal tibia and distal femur fractures (both acute fracture and nonunions) who were treated with a first-generation titanium, uniaxial locking plate with unicortical screws (FGLP), also known as a LISS plate (Synthes Paoli Pa), were identified and compared to 198 patients with 203 similar fracture patterns treated with 2nd and 3rd generation locking plates, or Later Generation Locking Plates (LGLP). Inclusion criteria was a minimum of 1-year follow-up. At latest follow-up, outcomes were assessed using radiographic analysis, Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA), VAS pain scores, and knee ROM. All descriptive statistics were calculated using IBM SPSS (Armonk, NY). Results: A total of 76 patients with 82 fractures had a mean 4-year follow-up available for analysis. There were 76 patients with 82 fractures fixed with a First-generation locking plate. The mean age at time of injury for all patients was 59.2 and 61.0% were female. Mean time to union for fractures about the knee fixed with FGLP was by 5.3 months for acute fractures and 6.1 months for nonunions. At final follow-up, the mean standardized SMFA for all patients was 19.9, mean knee range of motion was 1.6°-111.9°, and mean VAS pain score was 2.7. When compared to a group of similar patients with similar fractures and nonunions treated with LGLPs there were no differences in outcomes assessed. Conclusion: Longer-term outcomes of first-generation locking plates (FGLP) demonstrate that this construct provides for a high rate of union and low incidence of complications, as well as good clinical and functional results. Level of Evidence: III.

A Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes and Functional Status after Knee Fracture and Knee Fracture Dislocation.

The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of tibial plateau fracture dislocations (FD) with tibial plateau fractures alone. This study was an analysis of a series of tibial plateau fractures, in which FD was defined as a fracture of the tibial plateau with an associated loss of congruent joint reduction and stability of the knee, and classified by the Moore system. Patient data collected included demographics, injury information, and functional outcomes (short musculoskeletal function assessment [SMFA] score and Pain by the visual analog scale). Clinical outcomes at follow-up were recorded including knee range of motion, knee stability and development of complications. There were a total of 325 tibial plateau fracture patients treated operatively, of which 22.2% were identified as FD (n = 72). At injury presentation there was no difference with regard to nerve injury or compartment syndrome (both p > 0.05). FD patients had a higher incidence of arterial injury and acute ligament repair (both p < 0.005). At a mean follow-up of 17.5 months, FD patients were similar with regard to pain, total SMFA scores, and return to sports than their non-FD counterparts (p = 0.884, p = 0.531, p = 0.802). FD patients were found to have decreased knee flexion compared with non-FD patients by 5 degrees (mean: 120 and 125 degrees) (p < 0.05). FD patients also had a higher incidence of late knee instability and subsequent surgery for ligament reconstruction (p < 0.005 & p < 0.05). However, there was no difference in neurological function between groups at follow-up (p = 0.102). Despite the higher incidence of ligamentous instability and decreased range of motion, FD patients appear to have similar long-term functional outcomes compared with non-FD of the tibial plateau. While FD patients initially presented with a higher incidence of arterial injury, neurovascular outcomes at final follow-up were similar to those without a dislocation.

Fracture-Dislocations of the Elbow: A Comparison of Monteggia and Terrible Triad Fracture Patterns.

Fracture-dislocations of the elbow are a spectrum of injuries that have varying outcomes and complications, such as limited range of motion and long-term pain. The Monteggia fracture-dislocation and terrible triad fracture-dislocation are 2 such injury patterns that occur secondary to different mechanisms. This study sought to compare complication profiles and patient outcomes associated with these 2 distinct injury patterns. A retrospective chart review of all adult patients treated by 1 of 3 orthopedic traumatologists at a major academic center for operative fixation for either a Monteggia fracture-dislocation or a terrible triad elbow fracture-dislocation over a 12-year period was performed. Data collected included demographics, surgical data, patient-reported pain and elbow stiffness, elbow range of motion, presence of elbow joint contracture, nerve injuries, healing complications, and need for reoperation. The review included 105 patients, 58 with Monteggia injury and 47 with terrible triad injury, who had complete follow-up and radiographic imaging available. At latest follow-up, the 2 groups had similar rates of pain, reoperation, and ultimate elbow range of motion in flexion, extension, pronation, and supination. Elbow contractures requiring operative release were more commonly associated with terrible triad injury, and the incidence of nonunion was significantly greater in Monteggia fractures. A Monteggia fracture-dislocation portends a higher risk of ulna nonunion, whereas terrible triad injury is associated with elbow contracture. Despite their unique complications, both patterns ultimately have high rates of reoperation as their unique complications are both indications for operative repair. Patients should be appropriately counseled on the complication profile of their unique injury pattern. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(3):158-163.].

Outpatient lower extremity fracture surgery: should we be concerned?

PURPOSE: With rising healthcare costs and insurance push against non-emergent hospital admission, lower extremity fracture treatment is shifting toward outpatient procedures over inpatient hospitalizations. This study compares outcomes for fractures treated as inpatient versus outpatient. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of lower extremity fracture patients. We collected demographics, injury information, hospital course, and complication data. Length of stay was categorized as "inpatient" and "outpatient" based a 24-h hospital stay cutoff. Data analysis included differences between cohorts with regards to readmissions and complications. RESULTS: We identified 229 patients who met inclusion criteria. Inpatient versus outpatient status was predictive of in-hospital complications; however, inpatient versus outpatient status did not predict 1-year readmission. CONCLUSION: Outpatient surgery is safe and effective. As the population increases and ages, low-risk surgeries should be considered for outpatient rather than inpatient stays to lower costs, save resources, and reduce complications.

The Fifth Metatarsal Shaft Fracture Is Well Treated With Benign Neglect.

Background. Spiral fifth metatarsal fractures have been studied previously in professional dancers. However, little has been reported about outcomes of these injuries in the general population. The objective of this study was to examine patient demographics of those who sustain this injury and their functional outcomes, as stratified by treatment type. Methods. A total of 186 "nonprofessional dancer" patients with a fifth metatarsal fracture who were treated by one orthopaedic surgeon at our academic medical center were identified through chart review. All patients were allowed to weight bearing as tolerated (WBAT). Time to healing, persistence of pain, range of motion, and complications were recorded. Independent samples t tests, 1-way analysis of variance, and Fisher exact tests were used for analysis. Results. Thirty-seven of the 186 patients with fifth metatarsal fractures reviewed were identified as having a spiral fifth metatarsal fracture with appropriate follow-up. The cohort was 78.4% female with a mean age of 50.3 years. Twenty-two were initially treated in a controlled ankle motion (CAM) boot, 14 in a postoperative shoe, and 1 continued in their own shoes. All patients were allowed to WBAT. All fractures healed by a mean of 3.1 months. By the end of the follow-up period, 67.6% of patients had full range of ankle motion, with 5.4% reporting feeling stiff, 27.0% reporting mild persistent pain, and 2.7% reporting significant persistent pain. Conclusion. Fifth metatarsal shaft ("Dancer's") fractures occur within the general population, not only among professional dancers. Without operative fixation and regardless of nonoperative treatment selected, these fractures heal reliably and do so without clinically relevant complication.Level of Evidence: Level III: Retrospective comparative study.

Fascial Hernia After Traumatic Tibial Shaft Fractures: A Cause of Chronic Leg Pain: A Report of 2 Cases.

CASE: This report reviews 2 cases of chronic lower extremity pain after traumatic tibial shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nail fixation. After examination and radiographic evaluation, clinical suspicion and pressure manometry were used to identify fascial herniation and indicate patients for fasciotomy, which ultimately relieved pain. CONCLUSIONS: Lower extremity fascial hernias typically present with nonspecific chronic pain. Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to confirm diagnosis. However, in patients with implanted hardware, MRI may be ineffective in detecting hernias because of artifact. Clinical suspicion and pressure manometry are effective ways of identifying patients with this etiology of chronic pain.

Marriage Status Predicts Hospital Outcomes Following Orthopedic Trauma.

INTRODUCTION: Rising costs of post-acute care facilities for both the patient and payers make discharge home after hospital stay, with or without home help, a favorable alternative for all parties. Our objectives were to assess the effect of marital status, a large source of social support for many, on disposition following hospital stay. METHODS: Patients were prospectively entered into an institutional review board-approved, trauma database at a large, academic medical center. Patients aged 55 years or older with any fracture injury between 2014 and 2017 were included. Retrospectively, their relationship status was recorded through review of patient records. A status of "married" was separated from those with a status self-reported as "single," "divorced," or "widowed." Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess whether discharge location differs by marital status while controlling for demographics and injury characteristics. RESULTS: Of 1931 patients, 8.3% were divorced, 29.9% were single, 20.0% were widowed, and 41.8% were married. There was a significant correlation between discharge disposition and marital status. Single patients had 1.71 times, and widowed patients had 1.80 times, the odds of being discharged to a nursing home, long-term care facility, or skilled nursing facility compared to married patients after controlling for age, gender, Score for Trauma Triage in the Geriatric and Middle-Aged score, and insurance type. Additionally, single and widowed patients experienced 1.36 and 1.30 times longer length of hospital stay than their married counterparts, respectively. DISCUSSION: Patients who are identified as "single" or "widowed" should have early social work intervention to establish clear discharge expectations. Early intervention in this way would allow time for contact with close, living relatives or friends who may be able to provide sufficient support so that patients can return home. Increasing home discharge rates for these patients would reduce lengths of hospital stay and reduce post-acute care costs for both patient and payers without materially altering unplanned readmission rates.

Men Receive Three Times More Industry Payments than Women Academic Orthopaedic Surgeons, Even After Controlling for Confounding Variables.

BACKGROUND: In 2016, orthopaedic surgeons received nearly USD 300 million from industry, with the top 10% of recipients making more than 95% of the total amount. The degree to which gender may be associated with industry compensation has not been well explored; however, this may be confounded by a number of variables, including academic productivity, experience, and other factors. We wished to explore the variability in payment distribution by gender after controlling for these factors. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do men or women academic orthopaedic surgeons receive more payments from industry? (2) To what degree do any observed differences between the genders persist, even after accounting for identifiable factors, including academic rank, scholarly productivity, regional location of university, subspecialty selection as identified by fellowships completed, and years since completion of residency? METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional retrospective analysis of surgeons practicing in orthopaedic surgery academic departments in the United States. Academic orthopaedic surgery departments were identified using the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database. Publicly available data on gender, academic rank, scholarly productivity, regional location of university, fellowships completed, and years since residency graduation were collected from institutional websites. Industry funding data for 2016 were obtained from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments Database, and scholarly productivity data through 2017 were collected from Scopus. A total of 2939 academic orthopaedic surgeons, 2620 (89%) men and 319 (11%) women from 126 programs were identified. Men and women surgeons were different in most of the variables collected, and all except region of university were associated with differences in industry payments. RESULTS: The median payment for men surgeons was greater than that for women (USD 1027 [interquartile range USD 125-USD 9616] versus USD 177 [IQR USD 47-USD 1486]; difference of medians, USD 850; p < 0.001]. After accounting for potentially confounding variables like faculty rank, years since residency, H-index and subspecialty choice, women faculty members still received only 29% of payments received by otherwise comparable men orthopaedists (beta coefficient for gender = 0.29 [95% CI 0.20 to 0.44; p < 0.001]). CONCLUSIONS: Women academic orthopaedic surgeons received only 29% of the industry payments received by men, even after controlling for faculty rank, years since residency, H-index, and subspecialty selection. This gender-related disparity may hinder the career advancement of women orthopaedic surgeons. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Increased transparency by companies can help guide orthopaedic surgeons who wish to receive industry funding.

Readmissions Are Not What They Seem: Incidence and Classification of 30-Day Readmissions After Orthopedic Trauma Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the causes of 30-day readmissions after orthopedic trauma surgery and classify them based on their relation to the index admission. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: One large, academic, medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients admitted to a large, academic, medical center for a traumatic fracture injury over a 9-year period. INTERVENTION: Assignment of readmission classification. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Readmissions within 30 days of discharge were identified and classified into orthopedic complications, medical complications, and noncomplications. A χ test was performed to assess any difference in the proportion of readmissions between the hospital-reported readmission rate and the orthopedic complication readmission rate. RESULTS: One thousand nine hundred fifty-five patients who were admitted between 2011 and 2018 for an acute orthopedic trauma fracture injury were identified. Eighty-nine patients were readmitted within 30 days of discharge with an overall readmission rate of 4.55%. Within the 30-day readmission cohort, 30 (33.7%) were the direct result of orthopedic treatment complications, 36 (40.4%) were unrelated medical conditions, and 23 (25.8%) were noncomplications. Thus, the readmission rate directly due to orthopedic treatment complications was 1.53%. A χ test of homogeneity revealed a statistically significant difference between the hospital-reported readmission rate and the orthopedic-treatment complication readmission rate (P < 0.0005). CONCLUSION: The use of 30-day readmissions as a measure of hospital quality of care overreports the number of preventable readmissions and penalizes surgeons and hospitals for caring for patients with less optimal health. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Repair of Tibial Plateau Fracture (Schatzker II).

Tibial plateau fracture is an injury commonly seen by those who treat trauma around the knee and/or sports-related injuries. In this video article, we present our protocol for surgical treatment of a tibial plateau fracture, which includes definitive fixation with use of a plate-and-screw construct, addressing of all associated soft-tissue injuries at the time of the surgical procedure, filling of any residual voids with bone cement, and early rehabilitation with weight-bearing beginning at 10 to 12 weeks postoperatively. The major steps of the procedure are (1) preoperative planning with digitally templated plates and screws, (2) patient positioning and setup, (3) anterolateral approach toward the proximal aspect of the tibia, (4) submeniscal arthrotomy, (5) booking open of the proximal aspect of the tibia at the fracture site, (6) tagging of the meniscus, (7) fracture reduction and placement of the Kirschner wire, (8) confirmation of reduction with C-arm image intensification, (9) internal fixation with a plate-and-screw construct, and (10) closure.

The Hyperextension Tibial Plateau Fracture Pattern: A Predictor of Poor Outcome.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the outcome of patients with hyperextension bicondylar tibial plateau fractures (HEBTPs) and those with other complex tibial plateau fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort design. SETTING: Academic Medical Center. PATIENTS: A total of 84 patients were included in the study. There were 69 patients with 69 knees (82%) that had sustained non-HEBTPs and 15 patients with 15 knees (18%) that had HEBTPs. INTERVENTION: Surgical repair of bicondylar tibial plateau fracture. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical and functional outcomes included knee range of motion, postoperative alignment, numerical rating scale pain scores, and Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) scores at long-term follow-up. Complications were recorded for both cohorts including infection and posttraumatic osteoarthritis. RESULTS: There was no difference in knee range of motion at 1-year follow-up between hyperextension and nonhypertension patients. Patients with hyperextension mechanisms did however have higher functional (SMFA) scores and a trend of higher pain scores, indicating worsened functional outcomes and were more likely than their nonhyperextension mechanism counterparts to have associated soft-tissue damage and to develop posttraumatic osteoarthritis. CONCLUSIONS: Non-HEBTP and HEBTP fracture patients have similar outcomes in terms of range of motion at approximately 1 year of follow-up, however, differ significantly in terms of functional recovery and the types of complications associated with their injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.