Rational Design of Topical Semi-Solid Dosage Forms-How Far Are We?

Specific aspects of semi-solid dosage forms for topical application include the nature of the barrier to be overcome, aspects of susceptibility to physical and chemical instability, and a greater influence of sensory perception. Advances in understanding the driving forces of skin penetration as well as the design principles and inner structure of formulations, provide a good basis for the more rational design of such dosage forms, which still often follow more traditional design approaches. This review analyses the opportunities and constraints of rational formulation design approaches in the industrial development of new topical drugs. As the selection of drug candidates with favorable physicochemical properties increases the speed and probability of success, models for drug selection based on theoretical and experimental approaches are discussed. This paper reviews how progress in the scientific understanding of mechanisms and vehicle-influence of skin penetration can be used for rational formulation design. The characterization of semi-solid formulations is discussed with a special focus on modern rheological approaches and analytical methods for investigating and optimizing the chemical stability of active ingredients in consideration of applicable guidelines. In conclusion, the combination of a good understanding of scientific principles combined with early consideration of regulatory requirements for product quality are enablers for the successful development of innovative and robust semi-solid formulations for topical application.

Investigation of the Compatibility of the Skin PAMPA Model with Topical Formulation and Acceptor Media Additives Using Different Assay Setups.

The Skin Parallel Artificial Membrane Permeability Assay (PAMPA) is a 96-well plate-based skin model with an artificial membrane containing free fatty acid, cholesterol, and synthetic ceramide analogs to mimic the stratum corneum (SC) barrier. The current study evaluates the compatibility of lipophilic solvents/penetration enhancer, topical emulsions containing different emulsifier systems, and organic acceptor media additives with the artificial membrane of the assay. Additionally, different assay setups (standard setup: donor in bottom plate versus modified setup: donor in top plate) were compared. Methylparaben (MP), ethylparaben (EP), and propylparaben (PP) were used as model permeants and internal standards for proper assay execution. The permeation order of the parabens (MP > EP > PP) remained the same with different lipophilic solvents, and the ranking of lipophilic solvents was comparable under standard and modified conditions (isopropyl myristate, IPM > dimethyl isosorbide, DMI ≥ propylene glycol, PG > diisopropyl adipate, DIPA). Pre-incubation of the Skin PAMPA plates with IPM, DIPA, and DMI, as well as with formulations that contain non-ionic emulsifiers, and acceptor solutions containing DMSO or EtOH (≤ 50%) for 4 h did not increase the percentage of permeated parabens in the main experiment, suggesting that those compounds do not make the artificial membrane more permeable. High-resolution mass spectrometry confirmed that acceptor solutions with ≤ 50% DMSO or EtOH do not extract stearic acid, cholesterol, and certramides at standard assay conditions. Hence, if certain constraints are considered, the Skin PAMPA model can be used as a pre-screening tool for topical formulation selection.

A custom tailored model to investigate skin penetration in porcine skin and its comparison with human skin.

Reliable models for the determination of skin penetration and permeation are important for the development of new drugs and formulations. The intention of our study was to develop a skin penetration model which (1) is viable and well supplied with nutrients during the period of the experiment (2) is mimicking human skin as far as possible, but still is independent from the problems of supply and heterogeneity, (3) can give information about the penetration into different compartments of the skin and (4) considers specific inter-individual differences in skin thickness. In addition, it should be quick and inexpensive (5) and without ethical implications (6). Using a chemically divers set of four topically approved active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), namely diclofenac, metronidazole, tazarotene, and terbinafine, we demonstrated that the model allows reliable determination of drug concentrations in different layers of the viable epidermis and dermis. For APIs susceptible for skin metabolism, the extent of metabolic transformation in epidermis and dermis can be monitored. Furthermore, a high degree of accordance in the ability for discrimination of skin concentrations of the substances in different layers was found in models derived from porcine and human skin. Viability, proliferation, differentiation and markers for skin barrier function were surveyed in the model. This model, which we call 'Hamburg model of skin penetration' is particularly suited to support a rational ranking and selection of dermatological formulations within drug development projects.