Consensus on Social Determinants of Health Knowledge Topics and Behavior Learning Goals Across Primary Care Residencies: Results of a Delphi Study.

PURPOSE: Social determinants of health (SDH) are a substantial contributor to health outcomes and health inequities across populations. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education has called for the incorporation of SDH into graduate medical education (GME), yet there is no consensus on what SDH knowledge or skills residents in primary care specialties should have on completion of training. The aim of this study was to develop expert consensus on the most important SDH knowledge topics and behavior learning goals for residents in 4 primary care fields. METHOD: The authors used a modified Delphi technique to develop consensus among experts in internal medicine, pediatrics, family medicine, and obstetrics and gynecology across the United States via a survey administered between February and October 2021. They conducted a literature review on SDH in GME to develop an initial set of topics and learning goals and recruited experts who published about SDH and GME or led an SDH curriculum in GME. Consensus was determined a priori as 80% agreement that a topic or learning goal was very or extremely important. RESULTS: Forty-one experts participated in the first round of the survey and 33 participated in the second round (80% retention). Experts reached consensus on the importance of 22/51 (43%) topics and 18/47 (38%) learning goals. Topics reaching consensus emphasized structural forces, broad domains of SDH, resources for addressing SDH, and advocacy strategies and resources. Learning goals reaching consensus focused on individual- and interpersonal-level behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: To the authors' knowledge, this study represents the first rigorous evaluation of expert consensus on SDH in GME across 4 primary care specialties. The results could inform curriculum development and implementation and program evaluation, residency program goals, and shared GME milestones. Among other things, future studies can assess expert consensus on SDH in GME across nonprimary care specialties.

Advancing integrated care through cotraining of residents and psychology postdoctoral fellows.

INTRODUCTION: While integrated behavioral health (IBH) is growing as a primary care practice paradigm, there are gaps in developing the workforce needed. In particular, there are few examples of cotraining curricula in IBH for family medicine residents with postdoctoral psychology fellows. Furthermore, even fewer programs incorporate a colearning primary care practice environment featuring a targeted approach to care for patients with chronic illness using panel management and integrated care. METHOD: In this article, the authors describe a cotraining experience in an urban federally qualified health center supported by a 5-year Health Resources and Services Administration Title VII grant, within a social justice mission-driven academic department to prepare both family medicine (FM) residents and primary care psychology (PCP) postdoctoral fellows for IBH practice. The article will discuss the specific components of the shared/parallel curriculum, integration of social justice and population health principles and practices, and a structured approach for resident/fellow partnership. RESULTS: The authors share the clinical and educational impacts of this integrated cotraining curriculum model as described by the FM residents and PCP fellows. The article describes workforce results measuring the diversity of the trainees and their postprogram jobs serving vulnerable populations. DISCUSSION: The interdisciplinary cotraining between FM residents and PCP fellows presents an innovative approach to developing workforce capacity for integrated practice in medically underserved settings. This article describes the creation and implementation of a cotraining curriculum and provides recommendations for other programs and residencies preparing their residents and future PCP psychologists to practice and teach skills in integrated care. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Using Reflections to Evaluate the STFM Behavioral Science/Family Systems Educator Fellowship.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A group of family medicine educators identified a need and developed a 1-year fellowship for early career behavioral science educators. This occurred in response to a reduction in previous opportunities and resources. The program was designed to shape and mentor new behavioral science faculty teaching in family medicine departments and programs. Quantitative data analysis from pre- and post-fellowship survey data from years 1-4 confirmed fellowship objectives were met. METHODS: The 1-year fellowship, developed by senior faculty in STFM features a blend of classroom style learning, mentored small-group interactions, reflective writing and a scholarly project requirement. As one aspect of program evaluation, reflective writings submitted by fellows and faculty were analyzed using qualitative methodology for themes related to curricular objectives. RESULTS: From 2010-2013, 44 fellows completed the program. Authors analyzed reflective writings from 15 fellows and 6 small-group mentors. Four overarching themes emerged: emerging professional competence, evolving professional identity, connectedness, and generativity. An unexpected finding was that the fellowship mentors benefited in ways parallel to that of the fellows. CONCLUSIONS: A qualitative analytical approach to examining the reflective writings of fellowship participants yielded confirmation that program goals were achieved. In addition, a commitment to "paying it forward" as ongoing and future leaders in family medicine education resulted for both fellows and faculty mentors.

STFM Behavioral Science/Family Systems Educator Fellowship: Evaluation of the First 4 Years.

BACKGROUND: The discipline of family medicine has long valued the behavioral sciences. Most residency training programs employ a clinical psychologist, social worker, or family therapist to deliver behavioral science curriculum to their residents. However, the cultures and content of training for behavioral sciences and medical professions are quite different, leaving the lone behavioral scientist feeling professionally isolated and unprepared to translate knowledge and skills into tools for the family physician. In response to this need, a group of family medicine educators developed an STFM-sponsored fellowship for behavioral science faculty. The goals of the program were to improve fellows' understanding of the culture of family medicine, provide a curricular toolbox for the behavioral sciences, promote scholarship, and develop a supportive professional network. METHODS: Senior behavioral science faculty at STFM developed a 1-year fellowship program, featuring "classroom learning" at relevant conferences, mentored small-group interactions, and scholarly project requirements. Achievement of program goals was evaluated annually with pre- and post-fellowship surveys. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2014, 59 fellows completed the program; most were psychologists or social workers; two thirds were women. One month after graduation, fellows reported significant increases in understanding the culture of medicine, improved confidence in their curricula and scholarship, and expanded professional networks, compared to pre-fellowship levels. The program required many hours of volunteer time by leaders, faculty, and mentors plus modest support from STFM staff. CONCLUSIONS: Leaders in family medicine education, confronted by the need for inter-professional development, designed and implemented a successful training program for behavioral science faculty.

Exploring the spiritual/religious dimension of patients: a timely opportunity for personal and professional reflection for graduating medical students.

Teaching about spirituality in medical school training is lacking. Spirituality is a dimension of humanity that can put experiences of health and illness into a meaningful context. Medical students might benefit from understanding how spirituality is an important element in learning to care for patients. Spirituality also provides a context for medical students to explore their own motivations for doctoring. This article describes a longitudinal senior elective course at the end of their medical school training to delve into matters of religion/spirituality surrounding patient care. The authors pose their own perspectives on what both students and faculty gained from the experience.

The residency program in social medicine of Montefiore Medical Center: 37 years of mission-driven, interdisciplinary training in primary care, population health, and social medicine.

Founded in 1970 to train physicians to practice in community health centers and underserved areas, the Residency Program in Social Medicine (RPSM) of Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, has graduated 562 board-eligible family physicians, general internists, and pediatricians whose careers fulfill this mission. The RPSM was a model for federal funding for primary care residency programs and has received Title VII grants during most of its history. The RPSM has tailored its mission and structured its curriculum to promote a community and population orientation and to provide the requisite knowledge and skills for integrating social medicine into clinical practice. Six unique hallmarks of RPSM training are (1) mission-oriented resident recruitment/selection and self-management, (2) interdisciplinary collaborative training among primary care professionals, (3) community-health-center-based and community-oriented primary care education, (4) biopsychosocial and ecological family systems curriculum, (5) the social medicine core curriculum and projects, and (6) grant support through Title VII. These hallmark curricular, training, and funding elements, in which population health is deeply embedded, have been carefully evaluated, regularly revised, and empirically validated since the program's inception. Practice outcomes for RPSM graduates as leaders in and advocates for population health and the care of underserved communities are described and discussed in this case study.

Medical residents' perceptions of end-of-life care training in a large urban teaching hospital.

BACKGROUND: Contemporary medicine has begun to reemphasize the importance of palliative and end-of-life-care. This shift requires a commensurate change in physician education to provide adequate palliative care training. The present research assessed medical residents' perceptions of their clinical and educational experiences in palliative care training as provided by a large urban teaching hospital. METHODS: All graduating third-year residents in internal medicine, family medicine, and social pediatrics at Montefiore Medical Center were asked to participate in a brief telephone survey. The survey assessed residents' experiences in caring for patients who were dying or had died, and their evaluation of faculty supervision, clinical rotations, and academic activities. RESULTS: Fifty-five residents (90%) were surveyed. They reported caring for few patients at the end of life over their 3 years of training (median of 10 inpatients who died, one outpatient who died, and three outpatients who were potentially terminally ill). Furthermore, the majority of residents gave poor ratings to clinical supervision and to clinical rotations where they were likely to evaluate dying patients (intensive care units and oncology), with only 16% of residents reporting that they had received very good or outstanding palliative care training. IMPLICATIONS: In order to provide adequate palliative care education to future physicians, residency programs must strategically target hospital training units, enhance the quality of palliative care supervision and training that residents receive, and increase the number of dying patients they care for in ambulatory care and nonhospital settings. Recommendations for change are discussed.