Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
ACS Omega ; 9(22): 24025-24038, 2024 Jun 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38854530

RESUMO

In this study, the heat transfer characteristics within the heat exchanger using water-based GO nanofluids were comprehensively assessed. An apparatus was constructed by scaling down an industrial heat exchanger. The nanofluid's thermal conductivity, specific heat capacity, viscosity, density, Prandtl number, and Nusselt number were examined at varying temperatures and GO nanoparticle concentrations. The results revealed that the thermal conductivity of the nanofluid increased with both temperature and nanoparticle concentration, reaching a peak value of 0.380 W m-1 K-1 at 85 °C and 0.1 wt %, leading to enhanced heat transfer rates through conduction and convection mechanisms. The specific heat capacity increased with temperature but decreased with higher GO nanoparticle contents with a maximum value of 3403.821 J kg-1 K-1 recorded at 40 °C and 0.01 wt %. The viscosity of the nanofluid increased with higher concentrations of GO nanoparticles, and the minimum value of 0.83 mPa s was observed at 85 °C and 0.01 wt %. The Prandtl number decreased with the temperature but increased with increasing GO nanoparticle concentration, suggesting a transition from convective to conductive heat transfer. A newly derived correlation equation for the Nusselt number, Nu = 0.0059(1 + 7.62ϕ0.6886)Pe 0.001 Re 0.9238 Pr 0.4, allows predicting heat transfer enhancement in nanofluids. The findings emphasize the potential of nanofluids for improving heat exchanger performance and offer valuable insights into optimizing nanofluid applications in thermal systems.

2.
Heliyon ; 10(1): e23373, 2024 Jan 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38170060

RESUMO

Cooling of electronic components is one of the most important concerns of manufacturers. Using heatsinks with different models is one of the recommended methods for cooling. To compare 12 types of heatsinks, including 3 types of fin-pin heatsinks with rectangular pins, 3 types of fin-pin heatsinks with circular pins, 3 types of fin-pin heatsinks with conical pins, and 3 types of simple fin heatsinks in 5, 7, and 9 fin types regarding forced displacement heat transfer, an experiment was conducted. A special setup designed and built for these types of heatsinks was used to conduct the test. The setup had dimensions of 100 cm × 12 cm x 3 cm with an opening of 120 cm × 120 cm for placing a fan to create airflow with variable speeds and a place for placing the heatsink at the end of the wind tunnel under variable temperatures. The test results showed that the maximum error in the two experimental tests was 6 %. Also, the results showed that in all 4 types of heatsinks, 7-fin pin types had 4 to 20% lower thermal resistance and 20 to 100% higher convection heat transfer coefficient compared to the 5- and 9-fin pin types respectively. When comparing the heatsinks with the same number of fins, it was observed that the 7 and 9-fin types of heatsinks with conical fins have lower thermal resistance and higher convection heat transfer coefficient than other types of heatsinks with the same number of fins, The conical fins having more than 81 % convection heat transfer coefficient compared to the plate fin heatsink. It was also observed that in the 5-pin fin heatsink design, the plate-fin heat sink had the lowest amount of heat resistance due to its higher surface area with the flowing air current.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA