Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase I trial of co-administered pyronaridine and piperaquine in healthy adults of sub-Saharan origin.

Drug resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and amodiaquine threatens the efficacy of malaria chemoprevention interventions in children and pregnant women. Combining pyronaridine (PYR) and piperaquine (PQP), both components of approved antimalarial therapies, has the potential to protect vulnerable populations from severe malaria. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (double-dummy), parallel-group, single site phase I study in healthy adult males or females of Black sub-Saharan African ancestry investigated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of PYR + PQP (n = 15), PYR + placebo (n = 8), PQP + placebo (n = 8), and double placebo (n = 6) administered orally once daily for 3 days at the registered dose for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria. All participants completed the study. Forty-five adverse events were reported in 26 participants, most (41/45) were mild/moderate in severity, with no serious adverse events, deaths, or study withdrawals. Adverse events were reported in 66.7% (10/15) of participants administered PYR + PQP, 87.5% (7/8) with PYR + placebo, 50.0% (4/8) with PQP + placebo, and 83.3% (5/6) with placebo. For PYR containing regimens, five of 23 participants had asymptomatic transient increases in alanine and/or aspartate aminotransferase. With PQP containing regimens, four of 23 participants had mild Fridericia-corrected QT interval prolongation. Liver enzyme elevations and prolonged QTc interval were consistent with observations for PYR-artesunate and dihydroartemisinin-PQP, respectively, administered to healthy adults and malaria patients. Increases in PYR and PQP exposures were observed following co-administration versus placebo, with substantial interparticipant variability. The findings suggest that PYR + PQP may have potential in chemoprevention strategies. Further studies are needed in the target populations to assess chemoprotective efficacy and define the benefit-risk profile, with special considerations regarding hepatic and cardiac safety.

SDI-118, a novel procognitive SV2A modulator: First-in-human randomized controlled trial including PET/fMRI assessment of target engagement.

Background: Current treatments for progressive neurodegenerative disorders characterized by cognitive impairment either have limited efficacy or are lacking altogether. SDI-118 is a small molecule which modulates the activity of synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A) in the brain and shows cognitive enhancing effects in a range of animal models of cognitive deficit. Methods: This first-in-human study evaluated safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of SDI-118 in single ascending oral doses up to 80 mg administered to 32 healthy male subjects. Brain target occupancy was measured in eight subjects using positron emission tomography with PET-ligand [11C]-UCB-J. Food effect was assessed in seven subjects. Mood state was regularly evaluated using standardized questionnaires, and resting state fMRI data were analyzed as exploratory objectives. Key Results: At all doses tested, SDI-118 was well tolerated and appeared safe. Adverse events were mainly dizziness, hypersomnia, and somnolence. All were mild in intensity and increased in frequency with increasing administered dose. No dose-limiting adverse reactions were observed at any dose. SDI-118 displayed a linear pharmacokinetic profile with no significant food effect. Brain penetration and target engagement were demonstrated by a dose-proportional SV2A occupancy. Conclusion: Single oral doses of SDI-118 up to 80 mg were very well tolerated in healthy male subjects. Dose-proportional SV2A occupancy in the brain was demonstrated with brain imaging. Adverse effects in humans mainly occurred in higher dose ranges, with high occupancy levels, and were all mild and self-limiting. These data support further clinical exploration of the compound in patients with cognitive disorders. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT05486195.

Influence of fluoxetine on olanzapine pharmacokinetics.

Conventional antidepressant treatment fails for up to 30% of patients with major depression. When there are concomitant psychotic symptoms, response rates are even worse. Thus, subsequent treatment often includes combinations of antidepressants or augmentation with antipsychotic agents. Atypical antipsychotic agents such as olanzapine cause fewer extrapyramidal adverse effects than conventional antipsychotics; for that reason, they are an advantageous augmentation strategy for treatment-resistant and psychotic depression. The purpose of this study was to assess the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction between olanzapine and fluoxetine, a popular antidepressant that is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. The pharmacokinetics of 3 identical single therapeutic doses of olanzapine (5 mg) were determined in 15 healthy nonsmoking volunteers. The first dose of olanzapine was taken alone, the second given after a single oral dose of fluoxetine (60 mg), and the third given after 8 days of treatment with fluoxetine 60 mg, qd. Olanzapine mean Cmax was slightly higher (by about 18%) and mean CL/F was slightly lower (by about 15%) when olanzapine was coadministered with fluoxetine in single or multiple doses. Olanzapine mean t((1/2)) and median t(max) did not change. Although the pharmacokinetic effects of fluoxetine on olanzapine were statistically significant, the effects were small and are unlikely to modify olanzapine's safety profile. The mechanism of influence is consistent with an inhibition of CYP2D6, which is known to control a minor pathway of olanzapine metabolism.