Comparing treatment outcomes in randomized controlled trials of central serous chorioretinopathy.

PURPOSE: To perform a qualitative analysis of outcomes published from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) from 1979 to 2022. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: All RCTs (including both therapeutic and non-therapeutic interventions) on CSCR available online till July 2022 were included after an electronic search in multiple databases such as PubMed, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, Scopus, and Cochrane database. We analyzed and compared the inclusion criteria, imaging modalities, study endpoints, duration, and the results of the study. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 498 potential publications. After excluding duplicate studies and studies that met clear exclusion criteria, 64 were screened for further evaluation, of which 7 were removed due to a lack of necessary inclusion criteria. A total of 57 eligible studies are described in this review. CONCLUSION: This review provides a comparative overview of key outcomes reported between RCTs investigating CSCR. We describe the current landscape of treatment modalities for CSCR and note the discrepancies between results in these published studies. Challenges arise when attempting to compare similar study designs without comparable outcome measures (i.e., clinical vs. structural) which may limit the overall evidence presented. To mitigate this issue, we present the collected data from each study in tables detailing the measures that are and are not assessed in each publication.

Randomized controlled trials in central serous chorioretinopathy: A review.

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR), a common chorioretinal disease, presents with a myriad of manifestations. Acute CSCR presents with localized neurosensory detachment whereas chronic CSCR may show widespread retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) changes, chronic shallow subretinal fluid, and choroidal neovascularization (CNV) suggestive of a variable natural history leading to suboptimal visual outcomes. Even though multiple treatment options including laser photocoagulation, photodynamic therapy, micropulse laser, anti-vascular endothelial growth factors, and systemic drugs (spironolactone, eplerenone, melatonin, mifepristone) are available, there is an absence of any standardized treatment protocol or gold standard treatment modality. Moreover, their performance compared to observation especially in acute CSCR is still debatable. Compared to other chorioretinal diseases such as age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular oedema, and retinal vein occlusion, there is a relative dearth of randomized controlled trials in CSCR. Multiple inconsistencies including reliance on history of disease duration, variable inclusion criteria/disease descriptors/study endpoints, and availability of multiple treatment modalities lead to difficulties in designing RCTs. A consensus-based treatment protocol, therefore, is still elusive. We reviewed the literature and compiled the list of papers published to date, wherein we analyse and compare the inclusion criteria, imaging modalities, study endpoints, study duration, and study results. Correcting these discrepancies and deficiencies will help standardize future study designs, facilitating a next step toward a standardized treatment protocol.