Centralization of multisite reagent lot-to-lot validation for Ortho Clinical Vitros chemistry instruments.

OBJECTIVE: Reagent lot-to-lot comparisons are recommended by accreditation bodies to ensure that the performance of each reagent lot meets acceptable standards for quality patient results. The general approach is comprised of performing quality control (QC) and patient comparison between the old and new reagent lots and evaluating against a pre-defined criteria. Reagent lot comparison practices are often variable despite using the same instrument across different laboratories. This is costly, time consuming, and can lead to variability in acceptance criteria. While Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) has a recommended guideline for reagent lot validation, it is often difficult to execute for small and rural laboratories due to limited resources. Defining the analytes required for detailed validation is important to allocate appropriate resources to ensure quality patient results. The goal of this study was to develop a standardized approach to reagent lot validation and optimize lab resources on Vitros chemistry instruments. DESIGN AND METHOD: This study consists of a retrospective and prospective analysis of reagent lot changes in dry slide chemistry analyzers (Ortho Clinical Diagnostics Vitros). Two years of retrospective reagent lot comparison data was obtained at a single site. A prospective study was conducted by assessing aliquots of 10 patient sample pools at 9 sites with Vitros analyzers. RESULTS: Of the 19 chemistry analytes evaluated, albumin, sodium, and total protein showed significant differences between reagent lots and also exceeded the pre-defined acceptance criteria. CONCLUSION: For these analytes, our recommendations are to perform a comprehensive lot validation with QC and patient samples. A simple lot validation with a reflex approach comprised of initially assaying QC can be adapted for the more stable analytes to allow achieving quality patient result in a resource constraint rural environment.

Multi-platform analytical evaluation of the Beckman Coulter Access high-sensitivity troponin I assay across different laboratory sites using Barricor plasma.

OBJECTIVES: Previous analytical evaluations of the Beckman Coulter Access high sensitivity troponin (hsTn) I assay have focused on single platforms and laboratory sites. The purpose of this study was to determine assay robustness across different platforms at multiple sites, platform-specific characteristics, and equivalence to other hsTn methods in a large laboratory network. METHODS: Barricor plasma was used to assess imprecision, linearity, sensitivity (limit of blank and detection, LOB/LOD), and comparability to the conventional AccuTnI+3 and other hsTn assays. Various studies were conducted across a total of 9 laboratories using Beckman DxI800 and Access2 platforms. RESULTS: Within-laboratory precision was <10% across all target patient pool concentrations, however, DxI800 mean values were 20% higher than Access2 in the range of 3.6-44.9 ng/L. LOBs and LODs were lower on DxI800, 0.27 and 0.90 ng/L, respectively, compared to 2.9 and 3.2 ng/L, on Access2. Both showed excellent linearity across the full range. In method comparison to AccuTnI+3, DxI800 had a higher slope (0.9417 versus 0.8495) and positive bias (+18.1% versus -9.9%) compared to Access2, a trend further pronounced at concentrations <150 ng/L. At values <150 ng/L, there was good agreement with Abbott hsTnI (slope = 1.017, r = 0.932), but poor agreement with the Roche hsTnT assay (slope = 1.687, r = 0.589). Inter-laboratory split sample comparisons across 2 DxI800 and 7 Access2 sites showed close agreement, except at low concentrations <10 ng/L where DxI800 was 2.8 ng/L higher (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The Beckman hsTnI assay showed robust analytical performance across different laboratories and platforms. However, discrepancies between platforms were found at low concentrations where rapid acute myocardial infarction (AMI) rule-out decisions occur. These differences have important implications for AMI risk assessment, suggesting that laboratories should develop platform-specific parameters rather than using them interchangibly.

Analytical Concordance of Diverse Point-of-Care and Central Laboratory Troponin I Assays.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) 99th percentile cutoffs, used in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, are not standardized across cTnI assays. We compared 3 point-of-care (POC) and 1 central laboratory contemporary cTnI assays against the Abbott high-sensitivity (hs) cTnI to evaluate the analytical concordance and the feasibility of using a single cutoff value for all assays. METHODS: Fresh blood samples collected from 102 inpatients in the coronary care unit were measured on central laboratory instruments (Beckman Coulter DxI AccuTnI+3 TnI, Abbott Architect hs-TnI) and cTnI POC analyzers (Alere Triage Troponin I, Radiometer AQT90, Abbott i-STAT). Agreement and correlation between the contemporary cTnI assays and hs-cTnI assay were assessed using regression analysis. Proportional bias was assessed using Bland-Altman plots. Concordance between the contemporary cTnI and hs-cTnI assays was determined by diagnostic contingency tables at specific cutoffs. RESULTS: Most POC cTnI assays had excellent correlation with the Abbott hs-cTnI method (r 2 = 0.955-0.970) except for Alere Triage (r 2 = 0.617), while proportional bias is evident between all cTnI assays. Overall concordance between POC contemporary cTnI assays and hs-cTnI assay was 80% to 90% at their respective 99th percentile cutoffs. The concordance increased to 90% to 95% when a fixed cutoff of 0.03 to 0.05 ng/mL was used across the assays. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates poor analytical concordance between cTnI assays at the 99th percentile and supports the notion of a single clinical decision limit for cTnI and consequently standardization of diagnostic protocols despite the analytical differences among these assays.

Barricor blood collection tubes are equivalent to PST for a variety of chemistry and immunoassay analytes except for lactate dehydrogenase.

INTRODUCTION: The BD Barricor tube uses a novel mechanical separator designed to eliminate gel artifacts, decrease cellular contamination, and improve stability. Here, we evaluated the Barricor tube as a possible replacement for PST using Beckman Coulter analyzers under both optimal, alternative, and suboptimal centrifugation conditions based on BD recommendations. METHODS: Paired PST and Barricor samples were collected from 4 local hospitals and processed based on site-specific preanalytical systems involving automated or manual centrifugation. Centrifugation conditions ranged from 1912 ×g for 10 min (suboptimal), 2060 g for 10 min (alternative), and 4000 ×g for 3 or 10 min (optimal). Tube volume (4.5 vs. 5.5 ml) was also assessed. Forty-three chemistry and immunochemistry analytes were measured on Beckman Coulter DxC and DxI analyzers. RESULTS: Using an automated preanlaytical system with suboptimal spin conditions, no bias between PST and Barricor was observed for all analytes tested except lactate dehydrogenase (LD). Further investigation revealed significant increase in LD when Barricor was spun for 10 min at 1912, 2060 and 4000 ×g, ranging from +7.4-19.4% vs. PST across the entire measurement interval (87-493 U/l). Smaller tube volume was also associated with higher LD. Differences in LD occurred despite no change in other hemolysis markers such as potassium, phosphate, and AST. CONCLUSIONS: LD is most sensitive to varying centrifugation conditions (time and speed) in Barricor tubes. We recommend that BD centrifugation protocols should be closely evaluated to determine if Barricor is equivalent to PST under local preanalytical configurations.

Analytical evaluation of the Radiometer AQT90 FLEX ßhCG assay.

OBJECTIVES: Many hospitals cannot afford an hCG assay on a central lab analyzer and turn to point of care testing (POCT) solutions. The Radiometer AQT90 FLEX is a small benchtop immunoareement between the AQT90 and comparator methods for samples with hCG ssay analyzer for use in the laboratory or at the patient bedside. This study evaluated the analytical performance of the AQT90's ßhCG assay. METHODS: Precision was assessed using whole blood patient samples and two levels of quality control. Linearity was assessed by dilution of a high hCG plasma sample. Carryover and hook effect were assessed using high and low hCG samples. Method comparisons were done against Abbott i-STAT Total ßhCG, Beckman Coulter Total ßhCG (5th IS), and Roche hCG+ß. Sample concentrations ranged from<2 IU/L to 4,973 IU/L. RESULTS: Repeatability and within-laboratory precision passed most manufacturer's claims and allowable error criteria. Linearity was validated from<2 IU/L to 4,741 IU/L. Hook effect was not observed up to 2,446,448 IU/L. Carryover was<4.0 ppm. A linear relationship was observed with i-STAT, Beckman and Roche methods. At>20 IU/L, biases were apparent against all three comparator assays (i-STAT: +20%, Roche: +30%, Beckman: +5 to 15%). At ≤20 IU/L, the acceptability of agreement varied according to TAE specifications. Concordance between AQT90 and comparator assays using 5 IU/L as the medical decision level ranged from 69% to 81%. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the AQT90 hCG assay performed well and would be suitable for smaller suburban or rural hospitals. Some limitations have been noted and should be kept in mind during clinical testing.

The BD Barricor blood collection tube is an acceptable and robust alternative to the PST for use with the Beckman AccuTnI+3 assay.

OBJECTIVES: BD Canada recently released a blood collection tube with a novel mechanical separator called the Barricor. We evaluated this tube as an alternate sample type for cardiac troponin I (cTnI) testing using the Beckman Coulter AccuTnI+3 assay. DESIGN AND METHODS: 3014 paired patient specimens (Barricor, plasma separator tube or PST) were obtained from the emergency departments and cardiac care units of nine hospitals in and around Edmonton, Alberta. After centrifugation, each plasma sample was analyzed for cTnI using the Beckman Coulter AccuTnI+3 assay. In addition, selected samples were analyzed multiple times within a single run or over 4-5days to generate imprecision data for the assay. RESULTS: Repeatability and within-laboratory studies revealed an imprecision of <10% at concentrations above 0.025µg/L for the Barricor as well as BD's traditional PST. Paired patient sample comparisons over the full range of the assay yielded linear regression slopes ranging from 0.956 to 1.011 and Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.993 to 0.999. At a lower range of results closer to the manufacturer's 99th percentile cutoffs correlation was slightly worse, but still acceptable, with linear regression slopes ranging from 0.967 to 1.211 and Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.983 to 0.987. Notably, at these lower concentrations the agreement between individual PST and Barricor results worsened with decreasing cTnI concentration. Differences between pairs of results became particularly large (-50 to +400%) at PST cTnI concentrations ≤0.015µg/L. Closer inspection of the data around the 0.02 and 0.04µg/L 99th percentile cutoffs revealed a number of discordances between PST and Barricor results, with at least some of these attributable to false elevations in the PST results. CONCLUSIONS: Together, our results suggest that the Barricor blood collection tube is good alternative to the traditional PST for cTnI testing using the AccuTnI+3 assay. The Barricor appears to minimize spurious, nonreproducible, and false elevations in cTnI results for a subset of patients but additional studies are needed to determine if it reduces overall false elevations. cTnI results below 0.04µg/L may still be of questionable accuracy even with the use of this new tube.