TTP and pregnancy.

Acute thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) may present at any stage of pregnancy and the puerperium. Without prompt diagnosis and therapy, serious maternal and fetal outcomes may result. ADAMTS13 replacement via plasma exchange and immunosuppression are the mainstay of treatment. There may be a role, however, for newer therapies, including caplacizumab and recombinant ADAMTS13. Differentiation of immune TTP and congenital TTP is vital, particularly to guide the management of subsequent pregnancies.

Myositis ossificans in a child athlete: a case study.

Background: A 13-year-old female athlete presented with a painful lesion in her right buttock for which she had been receiving physiotherapy. It was keeping her from participating in sports. Aim: To report on a case of traumatic myositis ossificans in a child athlete - including the presentation, investigations, management, and outcome. Findings: Palpation of the right buttock indicated a tender mass. Investigation by musculoskeletal ultrasound detected a large hypoechoic lesion. An MRI revealed patterns of calcification that were inconclusive in differentiating between a malignant or benign lesion. Macroscopic and microscopic histological examination, as well as immunohistochemistry, were consistent with myositis ossificans (MO), a non-malignant condition. The patient improved remarkably within three months of treatment with rest, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT). Implications: Accurate differentiation of myositis ossificans from other benign and malignant soft tissue lesions may require histological evaluation in addition to a comprehensive radiological workup. Successful treatment with the patient being able to return to a pain-free and active state is achievable. Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy can play an important role in the management of this condition and should be considered when presented with a case of MO.

Review article: acute severe ulcerative colitis - evidence-based consensus statements.

BACKGROUND: Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a potentially life-threatening complication of ulcerative colitis. AIM: To develop consensus statements based on a systematic review of the literature of the management of ASUC to improve patient outcome. METHODS: Following a literature review, the Delphi method was used to develop the consensus statements. A steering committee, based in Australia, generated the statements of interest. Three rounds of anonymous voting were carried out to achieve the final results. Acceptance of statements was pre-determined by ≥80% votes in 'complete agreement' or 'agreement with minor reservation'. RESULTS: Key recommendations include that patients with ASUC should be: hospitalised, undergo unprepared flexible sigmoidoscopy to assess severity and to exclude cytomegalovirus colitis, and be provided with venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and intravenous hydrocortisone 100 mg three or four times daily with close monitoring by a multidisciplinary team. Rescue therapy such as infliximab or ciclosporin should be started if insufficient response by day 3, and colectomy considered if no response to 7 days of rescue therapy or earlier if deterioration. With such an approach, it is expected that colectomy rate during admission will be below 30% and mortality less than 1% in specialist centres. CONCLUSION: These evidenced-based consensus statements on acute severe ulcerative colitis, developed by a multidisciplinary group, provide up-to-date best practice recommendations that improve and harmonise management as well as provide auditable quality assessments.

Nested case-control study: hepatocellular carcinoma risk after hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk after resolving chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is unclear. AIM: To compare HCC risk between Alaska Native (AN) patients with and without hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance. METHODS: We selected persons with (case-patients) and without (control-patients) HBsAg seroclearance from a cohort of 1346 chronically HBV-infected AN patients followed during 1982-2013. We attempted to match two control-patients/case-patient on sex, HBV genotype, and age. Person-years of follow-up for case-patients began on the date of HBsAg resolution and for control-patients began on the date equivalent to the cohort entry date plus the years of HBsAg duration for their corresponding case-patient. We compared HCC risk using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The 238 case-patients (4 with HCC) and 435 control-patients (9 with HCC) were similar in age [P-value (P) = 0.30], sex (P = 0.53) and HBV genotype (P = 0.99). Case-patients had longer person-years of follow-up than control-patients (11.7 vs. 10.1 years; P = 0.04). The HCC rate/100 000 persons was similar between case- (132) and control-patients (178; P = 0.65). The adjusted hazard ratio comparing case- and control-patients was similar for HCC [0.7; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.2-2.4], increased for each 1-year increment for age (1.1; CI: 1.0-1.1; P < 0.01), and was greater if the initial HBeAg was positive (3.5; CI: 1.1-11.0; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance was not associated with reduced HCC risk; the HCC risk estimates are limited by wide 95% confidence intervals. Persons meeting HCC surveillance indications prior to HBsAg seroclearance could benefit from continued surveillance after seroclearance.