Provider Perspectives and Access to Palliative Care: An American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) Survey.

BACKGROUND: To explore provider perspectives about palliative care (PC) in head and neck cancer (HNC) care. METHODS: A 25-question electronic survey was disseminated to the membership of the American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) from April 10, 2023, through June 13, 2023. RESULTS: Respondents were most likely to refer to PC at symptomatic disease progression (52%) or terminal diagnosis (29%) rather than at initial diagnosis (17%). Participants less likely to refer to PC were less likely to refer to symptomatic progression (8% vs. 39%, p = 0.0006) or address advance directives (62% vs. 87%, p = 0.0406). Symptom burden questionnaires were used by only 29% of respondents. Discordance was identified between self-reported and actual access to local inpatient and outpatient PC services. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to PC identified include a lack of established optimal timing of PC referral, a perceived lack of local access to PC, and a lack of uniform standardized assessment of symptom burden.

Lower survival for surgical treatment of HPV-related oropharynx cancer at community cancer centers.

BACKGROUND: The rate of primary surgery for human papillomavirus-related oropharynx cancer (HPVOPC) has recently declined, while utilization of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has lagged at community cancer centers (CCs). We hypothesize that differences in overall survival (OS) exist between patients undergoing surgery for HPVOPC at CCs and low (<15 TORS/year; LVACs) and high (≥15 TORS/year; HVACS) TORS volume academic centers. METHODS: Cases from the US National Cancer Database with a diagnosis of HPVOPC from 2010-2019 that underwent primary surgical treatment were included. Trends in TORS utilization, rates of positive surgical margins (PMs), quality of adjuvant treatment and 5-year OS were compared between CCs, LVACs and HVACs. RESULTS: 5,406 cases met study criteria. A significantly lower proportion of cases at CCs utilized TORS than at LVACs or HVACs (26.2% vs 44.0% vs 73.9%, respectively, p < .001). The rate of PMs was significantly higher at CCs than at LVACs or HVACs (25.7% vs 15.3% vs 9.2%, p < .001). A greater proportion of cases undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) received prolonged courses (23.6% vs 13.1% vs 8.8%, p < .001) or excessive doses (16.5% vs 11.5% vs 8.7%, p < .001) of RT at CCs than at LVACs or HVACs, respectively. 5-year OS was lowest at CCs (85.2%, 95%CI: 81.7-88.2%), intermediate at LVACs (88.9%, 95%CI: 87.2-90.4%), and highest at HVACs (91.4%, 95%CI: 89.5-92.9%; pLR<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in the type and quality of surgical and adjuvant treatment for HPVOPC exist between facility types based on TORS volume. Overall survival was lowest at CCs, intermediate at LVACs and highest at HVACs.

Palliative care outcome measures used in head and neck cancer: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: The palliative care (PC) needs of patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) are complex, due to high and unique symptom burdens. Uniform outcome measures are critical to assessing the impact of PC interventions in HNC. METHODS: A scoping review of outcome measures used in patients with HNC receiving PC was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from 1980 to 2022. RESULTS: Of 20 eligible studies, 19 unique instruments were identified which assessed 22 physical, 5 mental, 4 social, 7 related quality of life, and 9 advanced care planning outcomes. Instruments were underutilized, with a larger number of outcomes measurable for instruments used than were reported. The average instrument assessed three domains whereas the average study only reported outcomes from two domains. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison across studies is limited due to heterogeneity in outcome measures. Future work is needed to develop core PC outcome measures for use in HNC care.

Concentration of High-Cost Head and Neck Cancer Surgical Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Health care costs are disproportionately concentrated among a small number of patients. We sought to identify variables associated with high-cost patients and high hospital concentration of high-cost patients and to examine associations with short-term outcomes in head and neck cancer (HNCA) surgery. STUDY DESIGN: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify 170,577 patients who underwent HNCA surgery in 2001-2011. High-cost patients were defined as patients whose costs of care were in the top decile, and high-concentration hospitals were defined as those whose percentage of high-cost patients was in the top decile. METHODS: Multivariable regression was used to evaluate associations between cost and patient and hospital variables, postoperative complications, and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Costs associated with high-cost patients were 4.47-fold greater than the remaining 90% of patients. High-concentration hospitals treated 36% of all high-cost patients. High-cost patients were more likely to be non-white (OR = 2.08 [1.45-2.97]), have oral cavity cancer (OR = 1.21 [1.05-1.39]), advanced comorbidity (OR = 1.53 [1.31-1.77]), Medicaid (OR = 1.93 [1.62-2.31]) or self-pay payor status (OR = 1.72 [1.38-2.14]), income>50th percentile (OR = 1.25 [1.05-1.51]), undergo major procedures (OR = 3.52 [3.07-4.05]) and have non-routine discharge (OR = 7.50 [6.01-9.35]). High-concentration hospitals were more likely to be teaching hospitals (OR = 3.14 [1.64-6.05]) and less likely to be urban (OR = 0.20 [0.04-0.93]). After controlling for all other variables, high-cost patients were associated with an increased odds of mortality (OR = 8.00 [5.89-10.85]) and postoperative complications (OR = 5.88 [5.18-6.68]). High-concentration hospitals were associated with an increased odds of postoperative complications (OR = 1.31 [1.08-1.61]) but were not associated with increased mortality (OR = 0.98 [0.67-1.44]). CONCLUSIONS: High-cost HNCA surgical patients are associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality, and are disproportionately concentrated at teaching hospitals. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing in-office posterior nasal nerve ablation to surgical therapies.

BACKGROUND: Recently, in-office posterior nasal nerve ablation (PNA) devices have offered a new tool to treat refractory chronic rhinitis, but their cost-effectiveness relative to traditional interventions such as vidian neurectomy (VN) and posterior nasal neurectomy (PNN) remains unexplored. OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of these interventions in patients with refractory chronic rhinitis. METHODS: A decision tree with embedded Markov models was created to compare the cost-effectiveness of PNN, VN, and PNA, measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over a 30-year time horizon with a $100,000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold. One- and two-way sensitivity analyses were completed. RESULTS: Sensitivity analysis found that in-office PNA became cost-effective compared to VN when patients undergoing PNA were less than 20 % more likely than VN to have symptoms recur; this value was assumed to be twice as likely in the base case. In the base case, however, VN and in-office PNA were more effective and less expensive than PNN, while VN was cost-effective when compared to in-office PNA (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio $11,616.24/QALY). Other assumptions were not found to considerably impact incremental cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Although highly limited by currently available data, PNA may be cost-effective compared to VN as long-term outcomes on the durability of its effects emerge. These data should not be used by payers considering coverage or utilization since long-term data is still nascent. However, that as new technologies emerge for rhinitis, it will be important to monitor longer-term outcomes to identify high value care, but based on limited data PNA devices may meet this standard.

Surgeon Volume and Laryngectomy Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between surgeon volume and operative morbidity and mortality for laryngectomy. DATA SOURCES: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify 45,156 patients who underwent laryngectomy procedures for laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer between 2001 and 2011. Hospital and surgeon laryngectomy volume were modeled as categorical variables. METHODS: Relationships between hospital and surgeon volume and mortality, surgical complications, and acute medical complications were examined using multivariable regression. RESULTS: Higher-volume surgeons were more likely to operate at large, teaching, nonprofit hospitals and were more likely to treat patients who were white, had private insurance, hypopharyngeal cancer, low comorbidity, admitted electively, and to perform partial laryngectomy, concurrent neck dissection, and flap reconstruction. Surgeons treating more than 5 cases per year were associated with lower odds of medical and surgical complications, with a greater reduction in the odds of complications with increasing surgical volume. Surgeons in the top volume quintile (>9 cases/year) were associated with a decreased odds of in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.09 [0.01-0.74]), postoperative surgical complications (OR = 0.58 [0.45-0.74]), and acute medical complications (OR = 0.49 [0.37-0.64]). Surgeon volume accounted for 95% of the effect of hospital volume on mortality and 16%-47% of the effect of hospital volume on postoperative morbidity. CONCLUSION: There is a strong volume-outcome relationship for laryngectomy, with reduced mortality and morbidity associated with higher surgeon and higher hospital volumes. Observed associations between hospital volume and operative morbidity and mortality are mediated by surgeon volume, suggesting that surgeon volume is an important component of the favorable outcomes of high-volume hospital care. Laryngoscope, 133:834-840, 2023.

Node Count as a Quality Indicator in Surgically Treated Mucosal Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: A yield of ≥18 nodes from neck dissection has been shown to be associated with improved locoregional recurrence rates and survival. We sought to determine factors associated with lymph node yields below this threshold. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent neck dissection as part of definitive surgical treatment for mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) between January 2015 and December 2018 at an academic tertiary referral center was performed. Patients with a history of prior radiation or neck dissection were excluded. RESULTS: There were 412 neck dissections performed in 323 patients. Specimens containing <18 nodes decreased from 16.2% in 2015-2016 to 7.4% of neck dissections in 2017-2018. The proportion of neck dissections removing <3 levels decreased from 9.1% of neck dissections in 2015-2016 to 4.0% in 2017-2018. Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that dissection of ≥3 levels (OR = 0.2 [0.1-0.4]) and neck dissection in 2017-2018 compared to 2015-2016 (OR = 0.4 [0.2-0.8]) were significantly associated with a lower odds of <18 nodes. Stage, site, race, sex, human papillomavirus status, positive nodes, surgeon volume, and pathologist volume were not associated with neck dissection specimens with <18 nodes, after controlling for all other variables. CONCLUSIONS: Increased recognition of the importance of node count as a quality indicator, and the extent of neck dissection is associated with increased nodal yield from neck dissection. These data suggest that node count can be used as a quality measure of neck dissection for mucosal SCC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 133:2160-2165, 2023.

Hospital Markup in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery in the US.

Importance: Marked variation in hospital costs and payments is a target for health care reform efforts. Limited data exist to explain variability in prices for head and neck surgical procedures. Objective: To characterize variations in hospital price markup for head and neck cancer surgery, and examine associations with market concentration and hospital for-profit status. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study, the Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify 150 275 patients who underwent head and neck cancer surgery for a malignant upper aerodigestive tract neoplasm from 2001 to 2011. The markup ratio (charges to costs) was modeled as a continuous and categorical variable. Hospital market concentration was evaluated using a variable-radius Herfindahl-Hirschman Index from the 2000, 2003, 2006, and 2009 Hospital Market Structure files. Data were analyzed from May 2019 to July 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Multivariable regression was used to evaluate associations between hospital and patient variables and hospital markup. Results: There were 150 275 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.8 [12.6] years; 104 974 [70.0%] male) from 2001 to 2011 for whom hospital market information was available. Hospital markup ratios ranged from 0.8 to 8.7, with a mean markup ratio of 2.8 (95% CI, 2.7-2.9). Hospitals in the lowest markup ratio quartile had a mean markup ratio of 1.8 (95% CI, 1.8-1.9), while hospitals in the top markup ratio quartile (extreme markup) had a mean markup ratio of 4.1 (95% CI, 4.0-4.2). Extreme markup hospitals were more often large (77.5% vs 66.6%), private for-profit hospitals (19.0% vs 1.3%), and were less likely to be high-volume hospitals (21.0% vs 9.4%) or in competitive markets (64.4% vs 82.0%). Postoperative complications occurred more often in extreme markup hospitals (22.7% vs 17.1%). On multivariate analysis, a significantly higher markup was associated with private, for-profit hospitals (47.9%; 95% CI, 33.3%-64.2%), hospitals in the West (25.5%; 95% CI, 12.6%-39.8%), Hispanic race (9.8%; 95% CI, 4.4%-15.5%), prior radiation therapy (5.3%; 95% CI, 1.3%-9.4%), comorbidity (3.5%; 95% CI, 1.7%-5.4%), and complications (2.8%; 95% CI, 0.3%-5.4%). Hospital market concentration modified the association between hospital for-profit status and markup, with higher markups in for-profit hospitals in moderately concentrated and concentrated (less competitive) markets. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, there was wide variation in hospital markup for head and neck cancer surgery, with a 4-fold increase in charges relative to costs in 25% of hospitals. Variations in surgical price were primarily associated with hospital profit status. These data suggest that greater transparency is needed to address disparities in hospital pricing.

Peri-Operative Pain and Opioid Use in Opioid-Naïve Patients Following Inpatient Head and Neck Surgery.

Pain management is an important consideration for Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) patients as they are at an increased risk of developing chronic opioid use, which can negatively impact both quality of life and survival outcomes. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate pain, opioid use and opioid prescriptions following HNC surgery. Participants included patients undergoing resection of a head and neck tumor from 2019-2020 at a single academic center with a length of admission (LOA) of at least 24 h. Exclusion criteria were a history of chronic pain, substance-use disorder, inability to tolerate multimodal analgesia or a significant post-operative complication. Subjects were compared by primary surgical site: Neck (neck dissection, thyroidectomy or parotidectomy), Mucosal (resection of tumor of upper aerodigestive tract, excluding oropharynx), Oropharyngeal (OP) and Free flap (FF). Average daily pain and total daily opioid consumption (as morphine milligram equivalents, MME) and quantity of opioids prescribed at discharge were compared. A total of 216 patients met criteria. Pain severity and daily opioid consumption were comparable across groups on post-operative day 1, but both metrics were significantly greater in the OP group on the day prior to discharge (DpDC) (5.6 (1.9-8.6), p < 0.05; 49 ± 44 MME/day, p < 0.01). The quantity of opioids prescribed at discharge was associated with opioid consumption on the DpDC only in the Mucosal and FF groups, which had longer LOA (6-7 days) than the Neck and OP groups (1 day, p < 0.001). Overall, 65% of patients required at least one dose of an opioid on the DpDC, yet 76% of patients received a prescription for an opioid medication at discharge. A longer LOA (aOR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.63-0.98) and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (aOR = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.01-0.48) were negatively associated with receiving an opioid prescription at the time of discharge despite no opioid use on the DpDC, respectively. HNC patients, particularly those with shorter LOA, may be prescribed opioids in excess of their post-operative needs, highlighting the need the for improved pain management algorithms in this patient population. Future work aims to use prospective surveys to better define post-operative and outpatient pain and opioid requirements following HNC surgery.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy prior to surgery for mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review.

Given the recent successes of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy, many clinical trials have sought to assess the safety and efficacy of this treatment modality in the neoadjuvant setting. This systematic review provides a comprehensive summary of findings from neoadjuvant head and neck cancer immunotherapy clinical trials with a focus on PD-1/PD-L1 axis blockade. Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and clinicaltrials.gov were systematically searched for all eligible neoadjuvant head and neck cancer immunotherapy clinical trials. Eight clinical trials met the inclusion criteria comprising a total of 260 patients. Study drugs included nivolumab, pembrolizumab, ipilimumab, durvalumab, and tremelimumab. The overall mean objective response rate (ORR) was 45.9 ± 5.7% with a 41.5 ± 5.6% single agent mean ORR. There were no deaths due to immune-related toxicities. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for mucosal head and neck squamous cell cancer has demonstrated favorable response rates with no unexpected immune-related toxicities in phase I/II clinical trials.

Association of Tumor Site With the Prognosis and Immunogenomic Landscape of Human Papillomavirus-Related Head and Neck and Cervical Cancers.

Importance: Human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive status in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is associated with improved survival compared with HPV-negative status. However, it remains controversial whether HPV is associated with improved survival among patients with nonoropharyngeal and cervical squamous cell tumors. Objective: To investigate differences in the immunogenomic landscapes of HPV-associated tumors across anatomical sites (the head and neck and the cervix) and their association with survival. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used genomic and transcriptomic data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for 79 patients with OPSCC, 435 with nonoropharyngeal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (non-OP HNSCC), and 254 with cervical squamous cell carcinoma and/or endocervical adenocarcinoma (CESC) along with matched clinical data from TCGA. The data were analyzed from November 2020 to March 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Positivity for HPV was classified by RNA-sequencing reads aligned with the HPV reference genome. Gene expression profiles, immune cell phenotypes, cytolytic activity scores, and overall survival were compared by HPV tumor status across multiple anatomical sites. Results: The study comprised 768 patients, including 514 (66.9%) with HNSCC (380 male [73.9%]; mean [SD] age, 59.5 [10.8] years) and 254 (33.1%) with CESC (mean [SD] age, 48.7 [14.1] years). Human papillomavirus positivity was associated with a statistically significant improvement in overall survival for patients with OPSCC (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.06; 95% CI, 0.02-0.17; P < .001) but not for those with non-OP HNSCC (aHR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.31-1.27; P = .20) or CESC (aHR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.15-1.67; P = .30). The HPV-positive OPSCCs had increased tumor immune infiltration and immunomodulatory receptor expression compared with HPV-negative OPSCCs. Compared with HPV-positive non-OP HNSCCs, HPV-positive OPSCCs showed greater expression of immune-related metrics including B cells, T cells, CD8+ T cells, T-cell receptor diversity, B-cell receptor diversity, and cytolytic activity scores, independent of tumor variant burden. The immune-related metrics were similar when comparing HPV-positive non-OP HNSCCs and HPV-positive CESCs with their HPV-negative counterparts. The 2-year overall survival rate was significantly higher for patients with HPV-positive OPSCC compared with patients with HPV-negative OPSCC (92.0% [95% CI, 84.8%-99.9%] vs 45.8% [95% CI, 28.3%-74.1%]; HR, 0.10 [95% CI, 0.03-0.30]; P = .009). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, tumor site was associated with the immune landscape and survival among patients with HPV-related tumors despite presumed similar biologic characteristics. These tumor site-related findings provide insight on possible outcomes of HPV positivity for tumors in oropharyngeal and nonoropharyngeal sites and a rationale for the stratification of HPV-associated tumors by site and the subsequent development of strategies targeting immune exclusion in HPV-positive nonoropharyngeal cancer.

Melanoma metastatic to the hyoid bone.

Metastatic melanoma may be included in the differential diagnosis of hyoid masses in patients with a history of melanoma. Hyoid resection is well tolerated and of diagnostic and therapeutic benefit in patients with tumors metastatic to the hyoid bone.

Timing, number, and type of sexual partners associated with risk of oropharyngeal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Case-control studies from the early 2000s demonstrated that human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal cancer (HPV-OPC) is a distinct entity associated with number of oral sex partners. Using contemporary data, we investigated novel risk factors (sexual debut behaviors, exposure intensity, and relationship dynamics) and serological markers on odds of HPV-OPC. METHODS: HPV-OPC patients and frequency-matched controls were enrolled in a multicenter study from 2013 to 2018. Participants completed a behavioral survey. Characteristics were compared using a chi-square test for categorical variables and a t test for continuous variables. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were calculated using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 163 HPV-OPC patients and 345 controls were included. Lifetime number of oral sex partners was associated with significantly increased odds of HPV-OPC (>10 partners: odds ratio [OR], 4.3 [95% CI, 2.8-6.7]). After adjustment for number of oral sex partners and smoking, younger age at first oral sex (<18 vs >20 years: aOR, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.1-3.2]) and oral sex intensity (>5 sex-years: aOR, 2.8 [95% CI, 1.1-7.5]) remained associated with significantly increased odds of HPV-OPC. Type of sexual partner such as older partners when a case was younger (OR, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.1-2.6]) or having a partner who had extramarital sex (OR, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.1-2.4]) was associated with HPV-OPC. Seropositivity for antibodies to HPV16 E6 (OR, 286 [95% CI, 122-670]) and any HPV16 E protein (E1, E2, E6, E7; OR, 163 [95% CI, 70-378]) was associated with increased odds of HPV-OPC. CONCLUSION: Number of oral sex partners remains a strong risk factor for HPV-OPC; however, timing and intensity of oral sex are novel independent risk factors. These behaviors suggest additional nuances of how and why some individuals develop HPV-OPC.