Influence of socioeconomic factors on liver transplant survival outcomes in patients with autoimmune liver disease in the United States.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Autoimmune liver diseases (AILDs): autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) have different survival outcomes after liver transplant (LT). Outcomes are influenced by factors including disease burden, medical comorbidities, and socioeconomic variables. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database (UNOS), we identified 13,702 patients with AILDs listed for LT between 2002 and 2021. Outcomes of interest were waitlist removal, post-LT patient survival, and post- LT graft survival. A stepwise multivariate analysis was performed adjusting for transplant recipient gender, race, diabetes mellitus, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, and additional social determinants including the presence of education, reliance on public insurance, working for income, and U.S. citizenship status. RESULTS: Lack of college education and having public insurance increased the risk of waitlist removal (HR, 1.13; 95 % CI, 1.05-1.23, and HR, 1.09; 95 % CI, 1.00-1.18; respectively), and negatively influenced post-LT patient survival (HR, 1.16; 95 % CI, 1.06-1.26, and HR, 1.15; 95 % CI, 1.06-1.25; respectively) and graft survival (HR, 1.13; 95 % CI, 1.05-1.23, and HR, 1.15; 95 % CI, 1.06-1.25; respectively). Not working for income proved to have the greatest detrimental impact on both patient survival (HR, 1.41; 95 % CI, 1.24-1.6) and graft survival (HR, 1.21; 95 % CI, 1.09-1.35). CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights that lack of college education and public insurance have a detrimental impact on waitlist mortality, patient survival, and graft survival. Not working for income negatively affects post-LT survival outcomes. Not having U.S. citizenship does not affect survival outcomes in AILDs patients.

Two Decades of Liver Transplants for Primary Biliary Cholangitis: A Comparative Study of Living Donors vs. Deceased Donor Liver Transplantations.

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) prompts liver transplantation (LT) due to cholestasis, cirrhosis, and liver failure. Despite lower MELD scores, recent studies highlight higher PBC waitlist mortality, intensifying the need for alternative transplantation strategies. Living donor liver transplant (LDLT) has emerged as a solution to the organ shortage. This study compares LDLT and deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) outcomes in PBC patients via retrospective analysis of the UNOS database (2002-2021). Patient survival, graft failure, and predictors were evaluated through Kaplan-Meier and Cox-proportional analyses. Among 3482 DDLTs and 468 LDLTs, LDLT showed superior patient survival (92.3%, 89.1%, 87.6%, 85.0%, 77.2% vs. 91.5%, 88.3%, 86.3%, 82.2%, 71.0%; respectively; p = 0.02) with no significant graft survival difference at 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-years post-LT (91.0%, 88.0%, 85.7%, 83.0%, 75.4% vs. 90.5%, 87.4%, 85.3%, 81.3%, 70.0%; respectively; p = 0.06). Compared to DCD, LDLT showed superior patient and graft survival (p < 0.05). Younger male PBC recipients with a high BMI, diabetes, and dialysis history were associated with mortality and graft failure (p < 0.05). Our study showed that LDLT had superior patient survival to DDLT. Predictors of poor post-LT outcomes require further validation studies.

Prognostic Models in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure.

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a clinical syndrome characterized by severe hepatic dysfunction leading to multiorgan failure in patients with end-stage liver disease. ACLF is a challenging clinical syndrome with a rapid clinical course and high short-term mortality. There is no single uniform definition of ACLF or consensus in predicting ACLF-related outcomes, which makes comparing studies difficult and standardizing management protocols challenging. This review aims to provide insights into the common prognostic models that define and grade ACLF.

Living-Donor Liver Transplant and Improved Post-Transplant Survival in Patients with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is the leading indication of liver transplantation (LT) among autoimmune liver disease patients. There is a scarcity of studies comparing survival outcomes between living-donor liver transplants (LDLT)s and deceased-donor liver transplants (DDLTs) in this population. Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we compared 4679 DDLTs and 805 LDLTs. Our outcome of interest was post-LT patient survival and post-LT graft survival. A stepwise multivariate analysis was performed, adjusting for recipient age, gender, diabetes mellitus, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, cholangiocarcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, race, and the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score; donor' age and sex were also included to the analysis. According to univariate and multivariate analysis, LDLT had a patient and graft survival benefit compared to DDLT (HR, 0.77, 95% CI 0.65-0.92; p < 0.002). LDLT patient survival (95.2%, 92.6%, 90.1%, and 81.9%) and graft survival (94.1%, 91.1%, 88.5%, and 80.5%) at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years were significantly better than DDLT patient survival (93.2%, 87.6%, 83.3%, and 72.7%) and graft survival (92.1%, 86.5%, 82.1%, and 70.9%) (p < 0.001) in the same interval. Variables including donor and recipient age, male recipient gender, MELD score, diabetes mellitus, hepatocellular carcinoma, and cholangiocarcinoma were associated with mortality and graft failure in PSC patients. Interestingly, Asians were more protected than Whites (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.35-0.99; p < 0.047), and cholangiocarcinoma was associated with the highest hazard of mortality (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.71-2.50; p < 0.001) in multivariate analysis. LDLT in PSC patients were associated with greater post-transplant patient and graft survival compared to DDLT patients.

Management of Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Current Treatment and Future Perspectives.

Primary biliary cholangitis is an autoimmune cholestatic liver disease characterized by progressive destruction of bile ducts, which can ultimately progress to chronic liver disease and cirrhosis. Ursodeoxycholic acid and obeticholic acid are the only 2 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications for primary biliary cholangitis. Unfortunately, up to 40% of patients with primary biliary cholangitis have an incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid, warranting an essential need for additional therapeutics. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists have shown promising data supporting their use as disease-modifying therapies. Fibroblast growth factor-19 agonists, farnesoid X receptor agonists, and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase 3 inhibitors are additional agents under investigation as potential disease-modifying therapy. However, evidence supporting the use of certain novel therapies over others is sparse. There is a need for additional clinical trials as well as research aimed at the underlying pathophysiology of primary biliary cholangitis to discover additional therapeutic targets.

Pharmacological Therapy of Pruritus in Primary Biliary Cholangitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

GOALS: We aim to summarize the current management of pruritus in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) by evaluating the efficacy and safety of pharmacological therapies. BACKGROUND: Pruritus is a common symptom of PBC, and evidence regarding the most effective antipruritic agents available is lacking. New pharmacotherapy for PBC has shown promising antipruritic effects. STUDY: We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis including all available double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy of pharmacotherapy for the symptomatic management of pruritus in PBC. Pruritus was assessed as either a change from baseline or a postintervention score. RESULTS: We included 33 studies and 20 medications. Using the visual analog scale, cholestyramine did not significantly improve pruritus compared with placebo [standardized mean differences (SMD): -0.94, 95% CI: -2.05 to 0.17], whereas rifampin and nalfurafine hydrochloride both significantly improved pruritus (SMD: -3.29, 95% CI: -5.78 to -0.80; n=23 and SMD: -0.58, 95% CI: -1.04 to -0.12). In addition, Bezafibrate and linerixibat significantly improved pruritus (SMD: -1.05, 95% CI: -1.41 to -0.68; n=110 and SMD: -0.31, 95% CI: -0.62 to -0.04, respectively). This effect was also present within the subgroup analysis by pruritus scale, where both bezafibrate and linerixibat significantly improved pruritus compared with placebo (SMD: -1.09, 95% CI: -1.54 to -0.65; P <0.001; visual analog scale; as postintervention score and SMD: -0.31, 95% CI: -0.62 to -0.01; P =0.04; numeric rating scale; as a change from baseline score, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Bezafibrate and Linerixibat are potential second-line antipruritic medications for PBC, particularly those with moderate to severe pruritus.

Anemia Etiology and the Response to a Gluten-Free Diet in Untreated Patients With Celiac Disease: A 2-Year Follow-Up.

INTRODUCTION: Anemia and micronutrient deficiencies are common in newly diagnosed patients with celiac disease (CeD). We aim to determine the prevalence and etiology of anemia in a cohort of patients with CeD in the United States and examine the effect of a gluten-free diet (GFD) on the laboratory parameters related to anemia in CeD. METHODS: We analyzed a prospectively collected cohort of adults with biopsy-proven CeD followed in a specialized CeD center between January 2000 and June 2016. We used the level of hemoglobin (Hb) and micronutrients suggested by the World Health Organization to establish the diagnosis of anemia or deficiencies. Demographic data and laboratory parameters related to anemia and micronutrients were recorded at the time of diagnosis and on a GFD. A celiac expert nutritionist or gastroenterologist evaluated all patients. RESULTS: In 572 patients with laboratory evaluation before starting a GFD, approximately 25% presented with anemia at the time of diagnosis of CeD. Iron deficiency was present in 50.8% of the cohort and in 78.8% of the patients with anemia. Within the anemic population, 84.4% of female patients as compared with 58.3% of male patients ( P = 0.02) showed iron deficiency. Folate deficiency (23.2%), vitamin B12 deficiency (11%), and anemia of chronic diseases (7.8%) were also part of both sexes' anemia etiology. Of the initially anemic patients, 81% and 89% normalized their Hb levels within 1 year and 2 years of beginning a GFD, respectively. All patients received appropriate supplementation when needed. DISCUSSION: Approximately 25% of individuals have anemia at CeD diagnosis. The anemia etiology included iron deficiency, vitamin deficiencies, and anemia of chronic diseases. Most of the patients will normalize their Hb levels and the anemia laboratory parameters 1 year after starting a strict GFD.

Waitlist mortality in patients with autoimmune liver diseases.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Autoimmune liver diseases such as autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cholangitis, and primary sclerosing cholangitis are the primary indication for ∼24% of total liver transplants. The liver transplant allocation system is currently based upon the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and it often underestimates the severity of autoimmune liver diseases. We aim to compare the rate of adverse waitlist removal among patients with all autoimmune liver diseases and other indications for liver transplant in the Model for End-Stage Liver -Na era. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we identified all patients listed for liver transplant from 2016 to 2019. The outcome of interest was waitlist survival defined as the composite outcome of death or removal for clinical deterioration. Competing risk analysis was used to evaluate the waitlist survival. RESULTS: Patients with autoimmune hepatitis had a higher risk of being removed from the waitlist for death or clinical deterioration (SHR 1.37, 95% CI 1.08-1.72; P<0.007), followed by primary biliary cholangitis (SHR 1.34, 95% CI 1.07-1.68; P<0.011). CONCLUSIONS: High waitlist death or removal for clinical deterioration was observed in patients with PBC and AIH when compared to other etiologies. It may be useful to reassess the process of awarding MELD exception points to mitigate such disparity.

Race/Ethnicity Is Not Independently Associated with Risk of Adverse Waitlist Removal among Patients with HCC Exception Points.

(1) Background: Since 2015, exception points have been awarded to appropriate candidates after six months of waitlist time to allow more equitable access to liver transplants regardless of hepatocellular carcinoma status. However, it remains unknown whether racial disparities in outcomes among waitlisted patients remain after the introduction of a 6-month waiting period for exception points. (2) Methods: Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we identified 2311 patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma listed for liver transplant who received exception points from 2015 to 2019. The outcome of interest was waitlist survival defined as the composite outcome of death or removal for clinical deterioration. Competing risk analysis was used to identify factors associated with death or removal for clinical deterioration. The final model adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, blood type, diabetes, obesity, laboratory MELD score, tumor size, AFP, locoregional therapies, UNOS region, and college education. (3) Results: No difference was found in the risk of adverse waitlist removal among ethnic/racial groups.

Waitlist Mortality and Posttransplant Outcomes in African Americans with Autoimmune Liver Diseases.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation is indicated in end-stage liver disease due to autoimmune diseases. The liver allocation system can be affected by disparities such as decreased liver transplant referrals for racial minorities, especially African Americans that negatively impact the pre- and posttransplant outcomes. AIM: To determine differences in waitlist survival and posttransplant graft survival rates between African American and Caucasian patients with autoimmune liver diseases. Study. The United Network for Organ Sharing database was used to identify all patients with autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cholangitis, and primary sclerosing cholangitis who underwent liver transplant from 1988 to 2019. We compared waitlist survival and posttransplant graft survival between Caucasians and African Americans using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models. We also evaluated the cumulative incidence of death or delisting for deterioration and posttransplant incidence of death and retransplantation using competing risk analysis. RESULTS: African Americans were more likely to be removed from the waitlist for death or clinical deterioration (subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) 1.26, 95% CI 1-1.58, P=0.046) using competing risk analysis. On multivariate Cox regression analysis, there was no difference in posttransplant graft survival among the two groups (hazard ratio (HR) 1.10, 95% CI 0.98-1.23, P=0.081). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the current efforts to reduce racial disparities, we found that African Americans are more likely to die on the waitlist for liver transplant and are less likely to be transplanted, with no differences in graft survival rates. The persistence of healthcare disparities continues to negatively impact African Americans.

Radiographic Hepatic Steatosis Is Not Associated With Key Clinical Outcomes Among Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome increases adverse outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Hepatic steatosis may increase risk of COVID-19 severity. Current studies evaluating steatosis lack reliable definitions. We aimed to evaluate the association of radiographic hepatic steatosis and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 severity in a diverse cohort. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with COVID-19 infection admitted to two US academic hospitals. Outcomes were length of stay, intensive care unit use, mechanical ventilation, and in-hospital mortality. We used Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous measures and Chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical measures. Multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses were used to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: Of the 319 patients, 14% had hepatic steatosis. There were no differences in length of stay (6 (4 - 16) vs. 9 (4 - 18) days, P = 0.6), intensive care unit (24% vs. 32%, P = 0.3), mechanical ventilation (28% vs. 38%, P = 0.32), or in-hospital mortality (7% vs. 17%, P = 0.12). After adjustment, there was no difference in length of stay (ß: -14.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): -30.5 - 1.77, P = 0.08), intensive care unit (odds ratio (OR): 0.31, 95% CI: 0.03 - 1.09, P = 0.06), mechanical ventilation (OR: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02 - 1.09, P = 0.06), or in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.06 - 1.16, P = 0.08) among patients with hepatic steatosis. CONCLUSION: Radiographic hepatic steatosis was not associated with worse outcomes among patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Potential Precursor to Bouveret's Syndrome.

Bouveret's syndrome is a rare complication of cholelithiasis. It is characterized by a gallstone entering the intestine through a cholecystoenteric fistula, impacting the duodenum and causing gastric outlet obstruction. Rarely, it presents with hematemesis and melena. The diagnosis involves computed tomography (CT) and the treatment depends on the patient's stability, the location of the obstruction, stone size, and the fistula. Endoscopy or minimally invasive lithotripsy can be considered initially. If this fails, surgical intervention is recommended. We present a case of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) preceding the development of Bouveret's syndrome.

The presence of diabetes impacts liver fibrosis and steatosis by transient elastography in a primary care population.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Noninvasive liver assessment in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in a primary care population identifies higher risk non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We aimed to evaluate the association of T2DM with liver fibrosis and steatosis by transient elastography (TE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of a TE referral program where primary care physicians were able to order TE. Patients with alcohol abuse were excluded. TE and Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) scores were obtained. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: 28% had T2DM. The mean TE score in T2DM patients was 8.3 (±6) kilopascal (kPa) and 6.4 (±3.7) kPa in those without T2DM (p = 0.0001). Those with T2DM had a higher CAP (322 ± 51 dB/m vs. 296 ± 57 dB/m, p < 0.0001). In multivariable analysis, T2DM was associated with TE score (ß: 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-3.1, p = 0.001) and CAP (ß: 2.8, 95% CI: 9.3-36.2, p = 0.001). Patients with T2DM had higher-risk TE scores and more steatosis by CAP. CONCLUSION: T2DM is associated with liver fibrosis and steatosis by TE within a primary care population. A TE referral pathway may be utilized for T2DM patients who are at higher risk of NAFLD and its complications.

Waitlist mortality and transplant free survival in Hispanic patients listed for liver transplant using the UNOS database.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: After the implementation of "Share 35", several concerns arose such as the potential to increase travel distance, costs, and decreased liver availability. These elements could have a negative impact on waitlist outcomes among ethnic minorities. We aimed to determine waitlist survival after the implementation of the Share 35 policy in non-Hispanic white and Hispanic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified non-Hispanic whites and Hispanics who were listed for liver transplantation from June 18th, 2013 to June 18, 2018. We excluded pediatric patients, patients with acute hepatic necrosis, re-transplants, multiorgan transplant, living donor, and exception cases. The primary outcome was death or removal from the waitlist due to clinical deterioration. We used competing risk analysis to compare waitlist survival between the two groups. RESULTS: There were 23,340 non-Hispanic whites and 4938 Hispanics listed for transplant. On competing risk analysis, Hispanic patients had a higher risk of being removed from the waitlist for death or clinical deterioration compared to their counterpart (SHR 1.23, 95% CI 1.13-1.34; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: After the implementation of Share 35, disparities are still present and continue to negatively impact outcomes in minority populations especially Hispanic patients.

Case of autoimmune hepatitis with overlap systemic lupus erythematosus.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an autoimmune liver disease characterised by the presence of autoantibodies including antinuclear antibodies, anti-smooth muscle antibody and hypergammaglobulinaemia. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic disease that can affect multiple organs. Coexistence of AIH and SLE as an overlap syndrome occurs in about 1%-2.6% of the AIH cases. Since both conditions share common autoimmune features, their coexistence can pose a diagnostic dilemma which can result in a delay in treatment. We present here a challenging case of a middle-aged woman with AIH in remission who later developed new-onset fatigue, pleural effusion and splenomegaly.

New OPTN Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplant (SLKT) Policy Improves Racial and Ethnic Disparities.

(1) Background: On 10 August 2017, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) adopted standardized eligibility criteria to properly determine which transplant candidates should undergo Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplant (SLKT). Racial and ethnic disparities have not been examined after 2017. Therefore, using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), we aim to evaluate post-graft survival outcomes among Caucasians, African Americans, and Hispanics. (2) Methods: Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models are used to compare post-transplant graft survival for Caucasians, African Americans (AAs), and Hispanics. Competing risk analysis is used to evaluate the cumulative incidence of death or re-transplantation with re-transplantation and death as competing risks. (3) Results: On multivariate Cox regression analysis, no differences in graft survival are found in AA (hazard ratio (HR): 1.30; 95% CI: 0.74-2.29 p = 0.354) or Hispanics (HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.70-2 p = 0.520) compared to Caucasians after 2017. On competing risk analysis of the risk of death with re-transplantation as a competing risk, no difference is found between ethnic minorities after 2017. There is a similar finding from competing risk analysis of the risk of re-transplantation with death as a competing risk. (4) Conclusion: After introducing standardized eligibility criteria for SLKT allocation, the post-graft survival outcomes remain similar between the different racial and ethnic groups, displaying the benefits of adopting such policy in 2017.

Osteoporosis in Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Prevalence, Impact and Management Challenges.

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic, cholestatic condition associated with symptoms that directly impact the quality of life in those afflicted with the disease. In addition to pruritus and fatigue, patients with PBC may develop metabolic bone disease from reduced bone density, such as osteopenia and osteoporosis. Osteoporosis increases the risk of fractures, as well as morbidity and mortality. The prevalence of osteoporosis in PBC is expected to increase in conjunction with the rising prevalence of PBC as a whole. Timely diagnosis, prevention and management of osteoporosis are crucial in order to optimize the quality of life. There is a paucity of data evaluating the management of osteoporosis in PBC. The optimal timing for diagnosis and monitoring is not yet established and is guided by expert opinion. National guidelines recommend screening for osteoporosis at the time of diagnosis of PBC. Monitoring strategies are based on results of initial screening and individual risk factors for bone disease. Identifying reduced bone density is imperative to institute timely preventive and treatment strategies. However, treatment remains challenging as efficacious therapies are currently lacking. The data on treatment of osteoporosis in PBC are mostly extrapolated from postmenopausal osteoporosis literature. However, this data has not directly translated to useful treatment strategies for PBC-related osteoporosis, partly because of the different pathophysiological mechanisms of the two diseases. The lack of useful preventive measures and efficacious treatment strategies remains the largest pitfall that challenges the management of patients with PBC. In this review, we comprehensively outline the epidemiology, clinical implications and challenges, as well as management strategies of PBC-related osteoporosis.