Real-life Perioperative Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy using the French National Registry: A Plea for Promotion of Centralized Care and Access to Minimally Invasive Approaches.

Radical prostatectomy (RP) can be performed using an open (ORP), laparoscopic (LRP) or robotic (RARP) approach. Most studies, even in experienced centers, have not provided solid evidence demonstrating better outcomes when using the robotic approach. In addition, one of the remaining concerns about RARP is its cost effectiveness, leading to no reimbursement for this surgical technique in some countries and thus health care inequality. We used data from a French national registry to improve knowledge of RP outcomes in a real-world scenario in order to guide and inform health care decision-makers. A total of 21 213 RP procedures were performed in 645 French centers in 2021 (ORP 20%, LRP 25%, and RARP 55% of cases). ORP was associated with longer hospital stay (p < 0.001), higher rates of postoperative complications (p < 0.001), fewer days out of hospital within 90 d of surgery (81.7 vs 83.6 vs 84.9 d for ORP vs LRP vs RARP; p < 0.00), and higher hospitalization costs (€2424 vs €1789 vs €1302). RARP is an optimal and cost-effective approach, with several advantages over ORP. Our data can be used by health care decision-makers to facilitate access to and reimbursement for the robotic approach for RP indications. PATIENT SUMMARY: For men with prostate cancer for whom surgery is recommended, surgeons can remove the prostate using open surgery or a keyhole approach with or without robot assistance. Open surgery has higher costs, more complications, and longer hospital stays.

Same-day-discharge Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Annual Countrywide Analysis.

There are no countrywide data regarding the utilization of same-day-discharge (SDD) surgery for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). We aimed to evaluate the annual number of SDD RARP procedures in France and to compare postoperative outcomes in SDD versus non-SDD centers. Data for all 9651 patients undergoing RARP in France in 2020 were extracted from the central database of the national healthcare system. Endpoints were length of hospital stay, patient age, center volume, lymph node dissection, and the hospital readmission rate. Overall, 184 SDD cases (1.9%) were reported in 14.2% of RARP centers. The annual RARP and SDD RARP caseload ranged from 41 to 485, and from one to 47, respectively, in SDD centers. SDD was significantly associated with higher-volume centers (p < 0.001). No difference in readmission rate (7.9% vs 5.1%; p = 0.141) was observed for SDD versus non-SDD centers. Direct stay costs were estimated at €1457 in SDD centers compared to €2021 in non-SDD centers. The main limitation is the lack of detailed patient characteristics and readmission causes. This annual nationwide analysis suggests that SDD RARP remains infrequently used in routine practice in France despite being associated with comparable short-term outcomes after RARP and potential cost benefits. PATIENT SUMMARY: We evaluated the use of robot-assisted removal of the prostate (RARP) with same-day hospital discharge in France for men with prostate cancer. In 2020, only 1.9% of the 9651 RARP procedures involved same-day discharge, even though the data show that this approach has lower costs and comparable safety.

Impact of Hospital volume on postoperative outcomes after radical prostatectomy: A 5-Year nationwide database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hospital volume is considered to be a quality measure for outcomes after major oncological surgery. However, countrywide data are lacking for radical prostatectomy (RP). OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of hospital volume on postoperative outcomes after RP performed using an open (ORP) versus a minimally invasive surgery (MIS, including pure and robot-assisted RP) approach. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data for patients undergoing RP in France from 2014 to 2019 were extracted from the central database of the national health care system. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Primary endpoints were length of hospital stay (LOS), complications (measured as severity index [SI] scores), and hospital readmission rates at 30 and 90 d. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median annual hospital volume was 19 RPs (interquartile range 1-40) in the overall cohort. MIS was associated with better outcomes than ORP. Greater hospital volume was correlated with shorter LOS (p < 0.001), high SI scores (SI3: p < 0.001; SI4: p < 0.001), and 30-d (p < 0.001) and 90-d readmission rates (p < 0.001). Incidence rates for SI3 and SI4 scores, and 30-d and 90-d readmission were 12.8 %, 5.8 %, 29.8 %, and 35.4 % in very low-volume centres (<10 annual cases) compared with 8.1 %, 1.9 %, 18.1 %, and 23.9 %, respectively, in other centres (all p < 0.001). Hospital volume was an independent risk factor for all outcomes after taking into account age, lymph node dissection, year of surgery, and surgical approach (ORP vs MIS). The main limitation is the lack of post-RP oncological and functional data. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide analysis of RP procedures shows a significant correlation between hospital volume and postoperative outcomes irrespective of the surgical approach. Very low case volume (<10 annual procedures per centre) is associated with the highest risk of complications, readmission, and prolonged LOS. Greater hospital volume is directly correlated with shorter LOS even beyond this threshold. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study we analysed the French nationwide database for removal of the prostate for prostate cancer. We found that the number of these cases that a hospital carries out per year was associated with outcomes after surgery, with better outcomes for higher annual case numbers.

Annual nationwide analysis of costs and post-operative outcomes after radical prostatectomy according to the surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, and robotic).

OBJECTIVE: Annual countrywide data are scarce when comparing surgical approaches in terms of hospital stay outcomes and costs for radical prostatectomy (RP). We aimed to assess the impact of surgical approach on post-operative outcomes and costs after RP by comparing open (ORP), laparoscopic (LRP), and robot-assisted (RARP) RP in the French healthcare system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from all patients undergoing RP in France in 2020 were extracted from the central database of the national healthcare system. Primary endpoints were length of hospital stay (LOS including intensive care unit (ICU) stay if present), complications (estimated by severity index), hospital readmission rates (at 30 and 90 days), and direct costs of initial stay. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 19,018 RPs were performed consisting in ORP in 21.1%, LRP in 27.6%, and RARP in 51.3% of cases. RARP was associated with higher center volume (p < 0.001), lower complication rates (p < 0.001), shorter LOS (p < 0.001), and lower readmission rates (p = 0.004). RARP was associated with reduced direct stay costs (2286 euros) compared with ORP (4298 euros) and LRP (3101 euros). The main cost driver was length of stay. The main limitations were the lack of mid-term data, readmission details, and cost variations due to surgery system. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide analysis demonstrates the benefits of RARP in terms of post-operative short-term outcomes. Higher costs related to the robotic system appear to be balanced by patient care improvements and reduced direct costs due to shorter LOS.

A 5-Year Contemporary Nationwide Evolution of the Radical Prostatectomy Landscape.

The evolution in the past decade of recommendations for prostate cancer (PCa) management, from screening to surgical treatment, may have affected the radical prostatectomy (RP) landscape. However, comprehensive data at a national level remain scarce. We extracted 5-yr data for RP patients in France from the central database of the national health care system. The primary endpoints were surgical approach (open [ORP], laparoscopic [LRP], and robot-assisted RP [RARP]), length of stay (LOS), and complication and readmission rates. The annual number of RPs was stable during the study period. The proportion of RARPs increased from 39.8% in 2015 to 52.6% in 2019, whereas the proportion of ORPs decreased from 34.4% to 24.5%. LOS continuously decreased over time irrespective of the surgical approach. The proportion of centres in the highest quartile of hospital volume increased from 22.0% to 28.3% (p = 0.006). LOS and complication and readmission rates were significantly lower (p < 0.001) in the LRP cohort at each time point. National trends confirmed that RARP progressively replaced ORP, with a stable number of annual RPs over time. Greater centralisation and better early postoperative outcomes were observed with laparoscopy. PATIENT SUMMARY: We reviewed French data for patients undergoing removal of the prostate for prostate cancer between 2015 and 2019. We found that robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery has increased over time and the length of hospital stays has decreased. Rates of complications and readmission were lower with minimally invasive surgery.