Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Multidiscip Healthc ; 17: 601-607, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38343754

RESUMO

Purpose: Providing effective tobacco dependence treatments to hospitalized patients remains a challenge. Prior to 2021, the Rochester Model program used staff nurses for both bedside and post-discharge counseling necessary to maintain abstinence. When nurse shortages and elevated job stress occurred during the COVID Pandemic, we proposed that medical students learn to counsel patients at the bedside and after discharge. Patients and Methods: Due to COVID restrictions, first- and second-year medical students trained using remote Zoom sessions. The total training time was 2.5 hr without role-play or additional evaluations. A survey measured the students' satisfaction, confidence, and counseling barriers. A smoking patient on a participating hospital unit can enroll in the program. Students delivered bedside counseling, then provided follow-up treatment and outcome calls along with New York State Quitline counselors. Results: The survey demonstrated that 89% of the students were satisfied with the training. The bedside counseling confidence was greater than the phone counseling confidence. All students felt the program experience has value to them as future physicians. 124 smoking patients enrolled, and outcomes followed out to 6 months. The 7-day point prevalence quit rates using the as-treated (patients contacted) analysis were 57% at 4 weeks, 48% at 3 months, and 43% at 6 months. The 7-day point prevalence quit rates using the intent-to-treat (all patients) analysis were 31% at 4 weeks, 16% at 3 months and 14% at 6 months. Conclusion: Medical students given minimal training are effective tobacco cessation counselors at no cost to the hospital system. The Rochester Model program using student counseling benefits patients, the students, and the health-care system.

2.
J Multidiscip Healthc ; 16: 905-911, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37038455

RESUMO

Purpose: Delivering evidence-based tobacco dependence treatments to hospital patients in real-world settings continues to be a challenge. To achieve long-term abstinence, a program should provide both bedside counseling and post-discharge contacts. These program features are necessary but difficult to implement due to lack of training, time and low administrative support. The Rochester Model is a tobacco treatment program using existing staff and medical students to reduce the barriers for treating hospitalized smokers. Patients and Methods: Any smoking patient admitted to a participating hospital unit can participate. Staff nurses, mid-level providers and physicians deliver the counseling steps during the admission. Nurses hold two bedside counseling sessions, while providers give quitting advice and encourage pharmacotherapy. Nurses also contribute as unit champions and post-discharge call counselors. New York State quit line counselors combined with a University of Rochester call team fulfill the post-discharge calls. The latter call team is composed of staff nurses, respiratory therapists and medical students. Results: The number of smoking patients screened was 2610 while 385 enrolled after a proof-of-concept period. The 7-day point prevalence quit rates using the as treated (patients contacted) analysis is 50% at 4 weeks, 42% at 3 months and 38% at 6 months. The 7-day point prevalence quit rates using the intent-to-treat (all patients) analysis is 23% at 4 weeks, 16% at 3 months and 14% at 6 months. Conclusion: Preliminary data on the Rochester Model is showing an effective yet affordable tobacco treatment program using hospital staff and medical students. Nurses serve as bedside counselors, unit champions and post-discharge call counselors. Hospitals, even with limited resources, can implement tobacco treatment programs using existing staff.

3.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 12(4): 4060-75, 2015 Apr 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25872018

RESUMO

Tobacco use is increasing globally, particularly in low and middle-income countries like the Dominican Republic (DR) where data have been lacking. Health care worker (HCW) interventions improve quit rates; asking patients about tobacco use at each visit is an evidence-based first step. This study provides the first quantitative examination of knowledge, attitudes and practices of DR HCWs regarding tobacco use. All HCWs (N = 153) in 7 economically disadvantaged DR communities were targeted with anonymous surveys. Approximately 70% (N = 107) completed the primary outcome item, asking about tobacco use at each encounter. Despite >85% strongly agreeing that they should ask about tobacco use at each encounter, only 48.6% reported doing so. While most (94.39%) strongly agreed that smoking is harmful, knowledge of specific health consequences varied from 98.13% for lung cancer to 41.12% for otitis media. Few received training in tobacco intervention (38.32%). Exploratory analyses revealed that always asking even if patients are healthy, strongly agreeing that tobacco causes cardiac disease, and always advising smoke-free homes were associated with always asking. Overall, results demonstrate a disconnect between HCW belief and practice. Though most agreed that always asking about tobacco was important, fewer than half did so. Gaps in HCW knowledge and practices suggest a need for education and policy/infrastructure support. To our knowledge, this is the first reported survey of DR HCWs regarding tobacco, and provides a foundation for future tobacco control in the DR.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Áreas de Pobreza , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Tabagismo/diagnóstico , Países em Desenvolvimento , República Dominicana , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Pessoal de Saúde/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Tabagismo/complicações , Tabagismo/terapia
4.
Postgrad Med ; 114(2): 45-8, 51-4, 2003 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12926176

RESUMO

Cigarette smoking continues to be a national healthcare crisis and is responsible for unacceptable levels of suffering, disease, and death. The barriers to effective intervention such as training, time, and reimbursement are formidable, although the situation is improving as the proper behavioral approaches and medications become clearly defined. Application of these practical points is an acquired skill that takes time. Incorporating these suggestions into daily practice ensures that your smoking patients have the best opportunity to quit and the highest level of care.


Assuntos
Medicina Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Tabagismo/terapia , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/normas , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Estados Unidos , United States Public Health Service/normas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA