Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng ; 35(6): e3205, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30916467

RESUMO

The transversal screw was introduced in order to overcome some disadvantages of the transocclusal screw. However, its mechanical risk has not been studied sufficiently. The main purpose of this research was to assess and compare stress distribution in the screws and abutment of a single-crown implant with transversal and transocclusal screw models. Two 3D models were assembled to analyse a single-implant-supported prosthesis with transversal and transocclusal screws embedded in the jawbone. The crown was subjected to a static load of value 300 N with different levels of inclination. The transversal screw model, with an axial load of 15°, was the one with lowest stress values in all its components. However, the stress was greater with more inclined loads when compared with the transocclusal model. The prosthetic transversal screw showed much less stress than the rest of the components for any load inclination. The transversal screw design is the option with the lowest risk of mechanical complications, both in the prosthetic screw and in the abutment screw, when applying forces of lower inclination. The more oblique forces favoured a better biomechanical environment in the abutment and its screw in the transocclusal screw model.


Assuntos
Parafusos Ósseos , Implantes Dentários/efeitos adversos , Análise de Elementos Finitos , Desenho de Prótese , Osso Esponjoso/cirurgia , Osso Cortical/cirurgia , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , Estresse Mecânico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA