Coronary artery bypass surgery within 48 hours after cardiac arrest due to acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: Cardiac arrest (CA) in patients with acute myocardial infarction is associated with a poor prognosis. Due to the additional trauma, risk of stroke and lack of data, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a controversial revascularization strategy for patients who cannot be treated percutaneously. Against this background, we investigated the outcome of patients from our department with acute myocardial infarction undergoing CABG after CA. METHODS: Between January 2001 and January 2015, 129 patients with preoperative CA due to acute myocardial infarction underwent CABG at our institution within 48 h after the CA had occurred. Predictors of in-hospital and long-term mortality were analysed. Neurological outcome according to cerebral performance category scale was investigated. RESULTS: Sixty CA (47%) events occurred out-of-hospital. Ventricular fibrillation was the major underlying arrhythmia ( n = 92, 71%). The mean age was 65 ± 10 years. Eighty-four patients (65%) were diagnosed with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and 108 patients (84%) had 3-vessel coronary artery disease. Forty-three cases (33%) underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. The median time to CABG was 4 (range 0.2-4) h. Complete revascularization was achieved in 106 patients (83%). The stroke rate was 9% ( n = 11) and hypoxic brain damage occurred in 16 patients (12%). Nine subjects (7%) needed extracorporeal life support. Four intraoperative deaths (3%) occurred; the 30-day mortality rate was 23% ( n = 30); the mortality rate during follow-up was 30% ( n = 27). A total of 79% ( n = 70) of patients discharged alive showed good neurological outcome according to the cerebral performance category scale. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the reluctance to expose patients with CA to early CABG, our data indicate that the operative strategy may not be as unfavourable as suspected.

What change in outcomes after cardiac arrest is necessary to change practice? Results of an international survey.

BACKGROUND: Efficient trials of interventions for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) should have adequate but not excess power to detect a difference in outcomes. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) is the threshold value in outcomes observed in a trial at which providers should choose to adopt a treatment. There has been limited assessment of MCID for outcomes after OHCA. Therefore, we conducted an international survey of individuals interested in cardiac resuscitation to define the MCID for a range of outcomes after OHCA. METHODS: A brief survey instrument was developed and modified by consensus. Included were open-ended responses. The survey included an illustrative example of a hypothetical randomized study with distributions of outcomes based on those in a public use datafile from a previous trial. Elicited information included the minimum significant difference required in an outcome to change clinical practice. The population of interest was emergency physicians or other practitioners of acute cardiovascular research. RESULTS: Usable responses were obtained from 160 respondents (50% of surveyed) in 46 countries (79% of surveyed). MCIDs tended to increase as baseline outcomes increased. For a population of patients with 25% survival to discharge and 20% favorable neurologic status at discharge, the MCID were median 5 (interquartile range [IQR] 3, 10) percent for survival to discharge; median 5 (IQR 2, 10) percent for favorable neurologic status at discharge, median 4 (IQR 2, 9) days of ICU-free survival and median 4 (IQR 2, 8) days of hospital-free survival. CONCLUSION: Reported MCIDs for outcomes after OHCA vary according to the outcome considered as well as the baseline rate of achieving it. MCIDs of ICU-free survival or hospital-free survival may be useful to accelerate the rate of evidence-based change in resuscitation care.