Evaluation of Cardiovascular Risk in People with Type 1 Diabetes: A Comprehensive and Specific Proposed Practical Approach.

People living with type 1 diabetes (T1D) have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), and it is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in this population. CVD risk increases with each uncontrolled risk factor, even in individuals with good glycaemic control. Recommendations for assessing CVD risk in the T1D population are extended from those for type 2 diabetes (T2D) even though the physiopathology and underlying mechanisms of atherosclerosis in T1D are poorly understood and differ from those in T2D. Unlike the assessment of microvascular complications, which is well established in T1D, this is far from being the case for the comorbidities and risk associated with CVD. Aside from classical cardiovascular comorbidities, carotid ultrasound can be useful to stratify CVD risk. The utilization of specific risk scales such as the Steno Type 1 Risk Engine can help to more accurately classify cardiovascular risk in these individuals. The cornerstones of the management of cardiovascular risk in T1D are the promotion of the Mediterranean diet, tight glycaemic control (glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) < 7%), blood pressure < 130/80 mmHg in most patients, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol < 100 mg/dL in moderate-risk individuals, < 70 mg/dL in high-risk individuals, and < 55 mg/dL in very high-risk individuals. Conventional medical follow-up of patients with T1D should be individualized (approximately 2-3 visits per year), and a carotid ultrasound evaluation is recommended every 5 years in the absence of significant preclinical atherosclerosis or more often in those with severe preclinical atherosclerosis. Antithrombotic therapy is recommended in those receiving secondary prevention, those with stenosis > 50% in any arterial bed, and those with an impaired ankle-brachial index. This document is a proposal of a practical approach for the evaluation, classification, and management of CVD risk in individuals living with T1D.

Impact of an advanced hybrid closed-loop system on glycemic control throughout the menstrual cycle in women with type 1 diabetes prone to hypoglycemia.

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) on glycemic control throughout the menstrual cycle (MC) in women with type 1 diabetes (T1D). We included 39 pairs of spontaneous MC from 13 participants, before and after switching from sensor-augmented pump to AHCL. Baseline time below range <70 mg/dL (TBR<70) was significantly higher during the mid-follicular phase than during late luteal phase (5.7±5.0% vs. 4.1±3.0%), but similar time in range 70-180 mg/dL (TIR) was observed throughout the MC. After switching to AHCL, a reduction in TBR<70 and an increase in TIR were observed in all phases. Phase-dependent changes in insulin infusion were detected and pre-existing differences in TBR<70 were eradicated (3.5±3.2% vs. 3.0±3.0%). However, TIR became significantly higher during the early follicular than during the late luteal phase (79.1±9.3% vs. 74.5±10.0%). In conclusion, AHCL improved glycemic control throughout the MC, but performance differed according to phase.

Effectiveness of flash glucose monitoring in patients with type 1 diabetes and recurrent hypoglycemia between early and late stages after flash glucose monitoring initiation.

AIMS: Evaluate the effectiveness of reimbursed flash glucose monitoring with optional alarms (FGM) in preventing severe hypoglycemia (SH) and reducing hypoglycemia exposure in T1D patients prone to hypoglycemia. METHODS: Ambispective study in T1D patients treated with multiple daily injections (MDI) and prone to hypoglycemia, initiating reimbursed FGM (FreeStyle Libre 2). The primary outcome was the number of SH events (requiring third party assistance) and main secondary outcomes were time below range < 70 (TBR < 70) and < 54 mg/dL (TBR < 54), impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (IAH) and quality of life (QoL). Logistic regression models were constructed to explore variables associated with success of the intervention. RESULTS: We included 110 patients (52.7 % women, mean age 47.8 ± 17.0 years). SH events at 1-year follow-up decreased from 0.3 ± 0.6 to 0.03 ± 0.2 (p < 0.001). Significant reductions in patients presenting an SH (26.4 % vs. 2.9 %, p < 0.001) and IAH (47.1 % vs. 25.9 %, p = 0.002) were observed, as well as improvements in QoL. TBR < 70 and TBR < 54 were not significantly reduced. Baseline GMI was inversely associated with a decrease in TBR < 70 [OR 0.37 (0.15-0.93)] and directly with an increase in time in range 70-180 mg/dL [OR 2.10 (1.03-4.28)]. CONCLUSIONS: FGM decreased SH and improved hypoglycemia awareness and QoL. Initial tight glycemic control was associated with a decrease in hypoglycemia, while patients with suboptimal control reduced hyperglycemia.