The Tennessee Heart Health Network effectiveness study: A stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of statewide quality improvement cooperative participation on cardiovascular outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the primary cause of premature morbidity and mortality in the United States and Tennessee ranks among the highest in CVD events. While patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) evidence-based approaches that reach beyond the traditional doctor-patient visit hold promise to improve CVD care and prevent serious complications, most primary care providers lack time, knowledge, and infrastructure to implement these proven approaches. Statewide primary care quality improvement (QI) collaboratives hold potential to help address primary care needs, however, little is known regarding their effectiveness in improving uptake of PCOR evidence-based population health approaches and improving CVD outcomes. This study describes the design and implementation of a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of participation in a statewide quality improvement cooperative (The Tennessee Heart Health Network [TN-HHN]) on cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN: The TN-HHN Effectiveness Study randomized 77 practices to 4 waves (i.e., clusters), with each wave beginning three months after the start of the prior wave and lasting for 18 months. All practice clusters received one of three Network interventions, and outcomes are measured for each three months both in the control phase and the intervention phase. Primary outcomes include Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services measures for aspirin use, blood pressure control, cholesterol control, and smoking cessation (ABCS). CONCLUSIONS: This trial, upon its conclusion, will allow us to assess the effect of participation in a statewide quality improvement cooperative on cardiovascular outcomes as well as key contributors to successful practice transformation.

Building Statewide Quality Improvement Capacity to Improve Cardiovascular Care and Health Equity: Lessons from the Tennessee Heart Health Network.

DRIVING FORCES: Many states with high rates of cardiovascular disease (CVD) lack statewide quality improvement (QI) infrastructure (for example, resources, leadership, community) to address relevant health needs of the population. Academic health centers are well positioned to play a central role in addressing this deficiency. This article describes early experience and lessons learned in building statewide QI infrastructure through the Tennessee Heart Health Network (Network). APPROACH: A statewide, multistakeholder network composed of primary care practices (PCPs), health systems, health plans, QI organizations, patients, and academic institutions was led by the University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC), an academic health center, to improve cardiovascular health by supporting dissemination and implementation of patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) evidence-based interventions in primary care. PCPs were required to select and implement at least one of three interventions (health coaching, tailored health-related text messaging, and pharmacist-physician collaboration). OUTCOMES AND KEY INSIGHTS: Thirty statewide organizational partners joined the Network in year one, including 18 health systems representing 77 PCPs (30.0% of 257 potentially eligible PCPs identified) with approximately 300,000 patients. The organizational partners share EHRs for the ongoing tracking and reporting of key health metrics, including hypertension control and delivery of tobacco cessation counseling. Of the 77 PCPs, 62 continue participation after year two (80.5% retention). Main barriers to participation and reasons for discontinuing participation included reluctance to share data and changes in leadership at the health system level. These 62 PCPs selected the following interventions to implement: health coaching (41.9%), tailored health-related text messages (48.4%), and pharmacist-physician collaboration (40.3%). CONCLUSION AND WHAT'S NEXT: Academic health centers have broad reach and high acceptability by diverse stakeholders. Tennessee's experience illustrates how academic health centers can serve as platforms for building a statewide infrastructure for disseminating, implementing, and sustaining QI interventions at the practice level. Assessment of Network impact is ongoing.

Factors Associated With Myocardial Infarction in a Rural Population With Peripheral Arterial Diseases.

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) studies in rural populations are limited. The incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) is higher in patients with PAD. This study examined the association between sociodemographic and clinical risk factors and MI in patients with PAD in Central Appalachia, comprising of 230 counties across six states in the United States. Data from electronic medical records of 13,455 patients with PAD were extracted from a large health system in Central Appalachia. Bivariate and logistic regression analyses were conducted. The final sample consisted of 5574 patients with PAD, of whom 24.85% were also diagnosed with MI. The mean age was 71 ± 11.23 years, and the majority were male (56.40%). After adjusting for confounders, patients with hypertension had three times higher odds of MI (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] = 3.21; 95% CI: 2.50-4.14) compared with those without hypertension. The likelihood of MI increased by 51% among patients with diabetes (aOR = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.33-1.71), 34% among ever-smokers (aOR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.18-1.52), and 45% in males (aOR = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.27-1.65). Hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and male sex were identified as significant risk factors for MI. Screening and effective management of these risk factors in rural areas could potentially prevent MI incidence among patients with PAD.

Perspectives on Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Qualitative Study of Early Diagnosis and Treatment and the Impact of Health Disparities.

Lower-extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD), the accumulation of atherosclerotic plaque in the arteries of the legs, causes substantial morbidity and mortality. Frequent under- and delayed diagnosis result in poor outcomes, disproportionately affecting individuals from racial and ethnic minority groups. To understand barriers to early detection and treatment and factors contributing to disparities, American Medical Group Association (AMGA) conducted roundtable discussions and semistructured interviews in 2021. Eighteen participants discussed PAD evaluation, diagnosis, early medical management, and disparities in care. A qualitative case study approach and data reduction methods were used to generate themes, draw conclusions, and make actionable recommendations. Identified themes included lack of (1) prioritization of PAD for population health; (2) engagement of primary care providers in early evaluation and referral; (3) "ownership" of lower-extremity PAD within health systems; and (4) focus on disparities in care. Participant solutions included (1) financial impact of early PAD management, in the context of value-based payment; (2) embedding an advanced practice provider into a vascular surgery practice to facilitate evaluation and provide medical therapy; and (3) leveraging care coordination, multidisciplinary clinics, and telehealth technology to provide comprehensive care for patients with PAD and address disparities. A deliberate focused effort is necessary to close gaps and the accompanying disparities in early evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment for people with lower-extremity PAD. The authors describe 3 models that can be emulated to improve care for this high-risk population. With improved reimbursement and better medical therapies, now is the time to focus on early diagnosis and management of PAD.

Successful Implementation of an All-or-None Diabetes Measure in 10 US Health Systems.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) affects 31.5 million adults in the United States and is commonly treated in primary care settings. One promising approach to comprehensive care is to focus on an all-or-none diabetes bundle measure, which ensures each patient meets a set of guideline-recommended measures. This requires a practice-level coordinated strategy. The purpose of this initiative was to help health care organizations (HCOs) improve the care and outcomes of patients with T2DM using an all-or-none bundle measure. This observational study was carried out in the context of a national best practices learning Collaborative that implemented targeted interventions in primary care settings and measured success using an all-or-none bundle measure. Ten AMGA member-HCOs, across 8 states, treating nearly 300,000 adult patients with T2DM in primary care participated. The primary measure, the Together 2 Goal® Core Bundle, included hemoglobin A1c (A1c) control (<8%), blood pressure (BP) control (<140/90 mmHg), lipid management (prescribed a statin), and medical attention for nephropathy. All 10 HCOs improved the Core Bundle measure during the 12-month Collaborative. The rate for the Core Bundle improved from 40.2% to 42.8%, an absolute increase of 2.6% (P < 0.001). In addition, 9 HCOs improved BP control, 8 improved lipid management, 6 improved attention to nephropathy, and 4 improved A1c control. Implementing interventions in primary care settings was successful in achieving comprehensive care for an estimated additional 7700 people living with T2DM who met all 4 components of the bundle measure during the 12-month intervention period.

Let Their Voices Be Seen.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The mutual distrust, in part caused by misunderstanding and bias, between sickle cell disease (SCD) patients and their emergency department (ED) providers has been widely documented in the SCD literature. This study seeks to illustrate the perceptions and experiences of adult sickle cell patients who have had at least 1 ED experience in the last 2 years. METHODS: Qsource, a nonprofit health care consultancy based in Tennessee, used photovoice, a qualitative research method, to facilitate the representation of patients' experiences in living with SCD. Photovoice has participants document their experiences through photography and then, as a group, discuss and analyze the emotional state behind the photographs. Eight participants with SCD took 25 photographs during 4 weeks. Then, in a 2-hour critical dialogue, participants identified recurring themes through consensus. RESULTS: Participants identified 6 themes that emerged from their discussion: unpredictability of SCD, fickleness of time, coping with pain, proximity to death, avoidance of the ED, and need for improved communication. They expressed their wish to be active participants in their care, and many described a fear of death, which is exacerbated by a lack of control in the ED setting. CONCLUSION: Factors such as poor patient experience and misunderstanding may contribute to delays in seeking care for SCD patients. This may, in turn, escalate pain crises and increase the likelihood of hospital admission. We believe that photovoice may be a new means to educate ED providers on SCD patient perceptions, ultimately resulting in better ED care.

Measuring patient-perceived hospital service quality: validity and managerial usefulness of HCAHPS scales.

This study extends previous efforts to validate the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers & Systems Hospital Survey (HCAHPS) instrument. Data from two non-profit hospitals are used to explore psychometric properties of the HCAHPS measures. The findings raise concerns that HCAHPS measures may not meet the standards for reliability and validity. The results are mixed in terms of the impact of HCAHPS dimensions on overall quality ratings of hospitals. Implications of the results are discussed and future research avenues are offered regarding the use and further refinement of the HCAHPS measures.