Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Popul Health Manag ; 25(4): 433-440, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34851742

RESUMO

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) affects 31.5 million adults in the United States and is commonly treated in primary care settings. One promising approach to comprehensive care is to focus on an all-or-none diabetes bundle measure, which ensures each patient meets a set of guideline-recommended measures. This requires a practice-level coordinated strategy. The purpose of this initiative was to help health care organizations (HCOs) improve the care and outcomes of patients with T2DM using an all-or-none bundle measure. This observational study was carried out in the context of a national best practices learning Collaborative that implemented targeted interventions in primary care settings and measured success using an all-or-none bundle measure. Ten AMGA member-HCOs, across 8 states, treating nearly 300,000 adult patients with T2DM in primary care participated. The primary measure, the Together 2 Goal® Core Bundle, included hemoglobin A1c (A1c) control (<8%), blood pressure (BP) control (<140/90 mmHg), lipid management (prescribed a statin), and medical attention for nephropathy. All 10 HCOs improved the Core Bundle measure during the 12-month Collaborative. The rate for the Core Bundle improved from 40.2% to 42.8%, an absolute increase of 2.6% (P < 0.001). In addition, 9 HCOs improved BP control, 8 improved lipid management, 6 improved attention to nephropathy, and 4 improved A1c control. Implementing interventions in primary care settings was successful in achieving comprehensive care for an estimated additional 7700 people living with T2DM who met all 4 components of the bundle measure during the 12-month intervention period.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Adulto , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Humanos , Lipídeos , Estados Unidos
2.
Ann Emerg Med ; 76(3S): S73-S77, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32928466

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The mutual distrust, in part caused by misunderstanding and bias, between sickle cell disease (SCD) patients and their emergency department (ED) providers has been widely documented in the SCD literature. This study seeks to illustrate the perceptions and experiences of adult sickle cell patients who have had at least 1 ED experience in the last 2 years. METHODS: Qsource, a nonprofit health care consultancy based in Tennessee, used photovoice, a qualitative research method, to facilitate the representation of patients' experiences in living with SCD. Photovoice has participants document their experiences through photography and then, as a group, discuss and analyze the emotional state behind the photographs. Eight participants with SCD took 25 photographs during 4 weeks. Then, in a 2-hour critical dialogue, participants identified recurring themes through consensus. RESULTS: Participants identified 6 themes that emerged from their discussion: unpredictability of SCD, fickleness of time, coping with pain, proximity to death, avoidance of the ED, and need for improved communication. They expressed their wish to be active participants in their care, and many described a fear of death, which is exacerbated by a lack of control in the ED setting. CONCLUSION: Factors such as poor patient experience and misunderstanding may contribute to delays in seeking care for SCD patients. This may, in turn, escalate pain crises and increase the likelihood of hospital admission. We believe that photovoice may be a new means to educate ED providers on SCD patient perceptions, ultimately resulting in better ED care.


Assuntos
Anemia Falciforme/terapia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Adulto , Anemia Falciforme/psicologia , Comunicação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Fotografação , Relações Médico-Paciente , Pesquisa Qualitativa
3.
Health Mark Q ; 31(2): 97-114, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24878401

RESUMO

This study extends previous efforts to validate the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers & Systems Hospital Survey (HCAHPS) instrument. Data from two non-profit hospitals are used to explore psychometric properties of the HCAHPS measures. The findings raise concerns that HCAHPS measures may not meet the standards for reliability and validity. The results are mixed in terms of the impact of HCAHPS dimensions on overall quality ratings of hospitals. Implications of the results are discussed and future research avenues are offered regarding the use and further refinement of the HCAHPS measures.


Assuntos
Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Hospitais/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Humanos , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso/normas , Satisfação do Paciente , Relações Profissional-Paciente , Psicometria , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA