Acute Liver Failure Guidelines.

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a rare, acute, potentially reversible condition resulting in severe liver impairment and rapid clinical deterioration in patients without preexisting liver disease. Due to the rarity of this condition, published studies are limited by the use of retrospective or prospective cohorts and lack of randomized controlled trials. Current guidelines represent the suggested approach to the identification, treatment, and management of ALF and represent the official practice recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. The scientific evidence was reviewed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation process to develop recommendations. When no robust evidence was available, expert opinions were summarized using Key Concepts. Considering the variety of clinical presentations of ALF, individualization of care should be applied in specific clinical scenarios.

Outcomes following liver transplant for alcohol-associated liver disease: comparing alcohol-associated hepatitis and cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplant (LT) is a highly effective therapy for refractory severe alcohol-associated hepatitis (SAH), but optimal selection criteria remain unknown. We aim to evaluate the outcomes of patients who received LT for alcohol-associated liver disease at our center following the introduction of updated selection criteria, including the removal of the minimum sobriety requirement. METHODS: Data were collected on all patients who underwent LT for alcohol-associated liver disease from January 1, 2018, to September 30, 2020. Patients were divided into SAH and cirrhosis cohorts based on disease phenotype. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three patients underwent LT for alcohol-associated liver disease, including 89 (72.4%) for cirrhosis and 34 (27.6%) for SAH. There was no difference in 1- (97.1 ± 2.9% vs. 97.7 ± 1.6%, p = 0.97) and 3-year (97.1 ± 2.9% vs. 92.4 ± 3.4%, p = 0.97) survival between SAH and cirrhosis cohorts. Return to alcohol use was more frequent in the SAH cohort at 1 year (29.4 ± 7.8% vs. 11.4 ± 3.4%, p = 0.005) and 3 years (45.1 ± 8.7% vs. 21.0 ± 6.2%, p = 0.005) including higher frequencies of both slips and problematic drinking. Unsuccessful alcohol use counseling (HR 3.42, 95% CI 1.12-10.5) and prior alcohol support meetings (HR 3.01, 95% CI 1.03-8.83) predicted a return to harmful alcohol use patterns in early LT recipients. Both duration of sobriety (c-statistic 0.32 (95% CI 0.34-0.43) and SALT score (c-statistic 0.47, 95% CI 0.34-0.60) were independently poor predictors of return to harmful drinking. CONCLUSION: Survival following LT was excellent in both SAH and cirrhosis cohorts. Higher rates of return to alcohol use highlight the importance of further individualized refinement of selection criteria and improved support following LT.

High Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Delta Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio Are Associated with Increased Mortality in Patients with Hepatocellular Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been proposed as a prognostic biomarker for cirrhosis and non-liver malignancies. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of NLR in a diverse cohort of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with HCC between 2008 and 2017 at two large US health systems. We used Cox proportional hazard and multivariable ordinal logistic regression models to identify factors associated with overall survival and response to first HCC treatment, respectively. Primary variables of interest were baseline NLR and delta NLR, defined as the difference between pre- and post-treatment NLR. RESULTS: Among 1019 HCC patients, baseline NLR was < 5 in 815 (80.0%) and ≥ 5 in 204 (20.0%). Patients with NLR ≥ 5 had a higher proportion of infiltrative tumors (36.2% vs 22.3%), macrovascular invasion (39.6% vs 25.5%), metastatic disease (20.6% vs 11.4%), and AFP > 200 ng/mL (45.6% vs 33.8%). Baseline NLR ≥ 5 was independently associated with higher mortality (median survival 4.3 vs 15.1 months; adjusted HR 1.70, 95%CI 1.41-2.06), with differences in survival consistent across BCLC stages. After adjusting for baseline covariates including NLR, delta NLR > 0.26 was also independently associated with increased mortality (HR 1.42, 95%CI 1.14-1.78). In a secondary analysis, high NLR was associated with lower odds of response to HCC treatment (20.2% vs 31.6%; adjusted OR 0.55, 95%CI 0.32-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: In a large Western cohort of patients with HCC, high baseline NLR and delta NLR were independent predictors of mortality. IMPACT: NLR is an inexpensive test that may be a useful component of future HCC prognostic models.

More Than a Rash: Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation.

Recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplant is uncommon in patients who have favorable pretransplant characteristics. We present a 56-year-old man with a history of liver transplant 8 weeks prior for hepatitis C cirrhosis and HCC who presented for shortness of breath. He was found to have a microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and an erythematous, nodular skin rash on his left lower abdomen. Biopsy of the skin rash would demonstrate metastatic HCC, determined to be the cause of hemolysis as well. Recurrent malignancy should be considered in patients with a history of HCC who present with new, unexplained skin nodules.

Two-stage liver transplant for ruptured hepatic adenoma: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Only one case of liver transplantation for hepatic adenoma has previously been reported for patients with rupture and uncontrolled hemorrhage. We present the case of a massive ruptured hepatic adenoma with persistent hemorrhagic shock and toxic liver syndrome which resulted in a two-stage liver transplantation. This is the first case of a two-stage liver transplantation performed for a ruptured hepatic adenoma. CASE SUMMARY: A 23 years old African American female with a history of pre-diabetes and oral contraceptive presented to an outside facility complaining of right-sided chest pain and emesis for one day. She was found to be in hemorrhagic shock due to a massive ruptured hepatic hepatic adenoma. She underwent repeated embolizations with interventional radiology with ongoing hemorrhage and the development of renal failure, hepatic failure, and hemodynamic instability, known as toxic liver syndrome. In the setting of uncontrolled hemorrhage and toxic liver syndrome, a hepatectomy with porto-caval anastomosis was performed with liver transplantation 15 h later. She tolerated the anhepatic stage well, and has done well over one year later. CONCLUSION: When toxic liver syndrome is recognized, liver transplantation with or without hepatectomy should be considered before the patient becomes unstable.

Outcomes of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation: implications for patient selection.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Rates of simultaneous liver kidney (SLK) transplantation have continued to increase despite lack of clear allocation guidelines and outcomes data. The organ procurement and transplantation network (OPTN)/UNOS board approved a new SLK allocation policy to standardize medical eligibility and optimize organ utilization. This review highlights the rationale behind these new selection criteria and posttransplant outcomes in various patient populations. RECENT FINDINGS: Uniform criteria for SLK transplantation were adopted in August 2017 and state SLK should be reserved for select patients with cirrhosis who have chronic kidney disease for longer than 3 months, sustained acute kidney injury, or particular metabolic diseases. Many patients who previously underwent SLK did not meet these criteria, reducing organ availability for patients awaiting kidney-alone transplantation. The new criteria includes a 'safety net' policy allowing for renal transplant priority for liver-alone recipients who do not meet criteria for SLK but fail to have renal recovery within the first year. SUMMARY: The new SLK allocation policy was adopted to avoid kidney transplantation in those patients who have a significant chance of recovering renal function post-liver transplant and those with a poor chance of survival in whom SLK is futile.

α-Glutathione S-Transferase: A New Biomarker for Liver Injury?

BACKGROUND: Serum alanine and aspartate aminotransferases (ALT/AST) have been the gold standard for detection and quantification of liver injury for over 6 decades, but have relatively long half-lives (T½) (literature estimates approximately 17 and 47 h, respectively) and thus do not reflect immediate changes in liver injury or recovery. A new point-of-care immunoassay for α-glutathione S-transferase (α-GST) measures this cytosolic liver enzyme with a predicted T½ of 60-90 min based on preliminary studies and might enable earlier detection of improving or worsening liver injury than conventional enzyme testing. METHODS: Serial serum samples collected daily from 31 patients enrolled in the Acute Liver Failure Study Group, with acetaminophen (APAP) toxicity, drug-induced liver injury, ischemic hepatopathy (IH), or autoimmune hepatitis were analyzed to determine α-GST using the Qualigen FastPack® α-GST Assay (Carlsbad), a chemiluminescent immunoassay using a paramagnetic particle matrix with an upper limit of normal of 11 ng/mL. AST and ALT values were obtained from the medical record and have an upper limit of normal of 40 IU/L. The T½ values for α-GST, AST, and ALT were calculated from the peak value for APAP and IH etiologies considered as single time point injuries, using an exponential trendline equation of the serial values. RESULTS: Median α-GST for all etiologies were increased on day 1, returning to normal by day 3, whereas median AST and ALT values did not return to normal, even at day 7. The median T½ for α-GST, AST, and ALT were 6.4, 22.2, and 33.9 h, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: α-GST is a more responsive marker of liver injury/recovery, allowing for more rapid real-time assessment of improvement or worsening of liver disease.

Liver injury from herbals and dietary supplements in the U.S. Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network.

UNLABELLED: The Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) studies hepatotoxicity caused by conventional medications as well as herbals and dietary supplements (HDS). To characterize hepatotoxicity and its outcomes from HDS versus medications, patients with hepatotoxicity attributed to medications or HDS were enrolled prospectively between 2004 and 2013. The study took place among eight U.S. referral centers that are part of the DILIN. Consecutive patients with liver injury referred to a DILIN center were eligible. The final sample comprised 130 (15.5%) of all subjects enrolled (839) who were judged to have experienced liver injury caused by HDS. Hepatotoxicity caused by HDS was evaluated by expert opinion. Demographic and clinical characteristics and outcome assessments, including death and liver transplantation (LT), were ascertained. Cases were stratified and compared according to the type of agent implicated in liver injury; 45 had injury caused by bodybuilding HDS, 85 by nonbodybuilding HDS, and 709 by medications. Liver injury caused by HDS increased from 7% to 20% (P < 0.001) during the study period. Bodybuilding HDS caused prolonged jaundice (median, 91 days) in young men, but did not result in any fatalities or LT. The remaining HDS cases presented as hepatocellular injury, predominantly in middle-aged women, and, more frequently, led to death or transplantation, compared to injury from medications (13% vs. 3%; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of liver injury cases attributed to HDS in DILIN has increased significantly. Liver injury from nonbodybuilding HDS is more severe than from bodybuilding HDS or medications, as evidenced by differences in unfavorable outcomes (death and transplantation). (Hepatology 2014;60:1399-1408).

Drug-induced liver injury.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains an important disease in clinical practice. It is difficult to predict, diagnose and manage. Studies in the peer-reviewed literature in the last 2 years, focusing on the diagnosis, prediction and management of DILI will be reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS: Antibiotics remain the most common drug causing DILI in the United States and Europe. Expert opinion may still be the better method of diagnosing DILI compared with an objective tool such as the Roussel-Uclaf Causality Assessment Method. Hepatitis E represents an alternative diagnosis to some cases of presumed drug hepatotoxicity. There is ongoing research into the genetics of the pathophysiology and susceptibility of DILI. A genome-wide association study confirmed the association between human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II and susceptibility to coamoxiclav (amoxicillin-clavulanic acid) induced DILI. There is new information on the protective effect of HLA-DRB1*07 family of alleles. MicroRNAs are a potential marker of DILI. Keratin variants may predict outcome of acute liver failure. N-acetylcysteine may be protective against DILI while taking antituberculosis medication. SUMMARY: Recent findings in the genetics of pathophysiology and susceptibility of DILI can help with predicting and avoiding DILI in clinical practice and provide the foundation for ongoing research.

Gastric bypass surgery improves metabolic and hepatic abnormalities associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Most patients with extreme obesity have nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Although gastric bypass (GBP) surgery is the most common bariatric operation performed in obese patients in the United States, the effect of GBP surgery-induced weight loss on the metabolic and hepatic abnormalities associated with NAFLD are not clear. METHODS: Whole-body glucose, fatty acid and lipoprotein kinetics, liver histology, and hepatic cellular factors involved in inflammation and fibrogenesis were evaluated in 7 extremely obese subjects (body mass index, 58 +/- 4 kg/m(2)) before and 1 year after GBP surgery. RESULTS: At 1 year after surgery, subjects lost 29% +/- 5% of initial body weight (P < .01); palmitate rate of appearance in plasma, an index of adipose tissue lipolysis, decreased by 47% +/- 4% (P < .01); endogenous glucose production rate decreased by 27% +/- 7% (P < .01); and very-low-density lipoprotein-triglyceride secretion rate decreased by 44% +/- 9% (P < .05). In addition, GBP surgery-induced weight loss decreased hepatic steatosis but did not change standard histologic assessments of inflammation and fibrosis. However, there was a marked decrease in hepatic factors involved in regulating fibrogenesis (collagen-alpha1(I), transforming growth factor-beta1, alpha-smooth muscle actin, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 expression and alpha-smooth muscle actin content) and inflammation (macrophage chemoattractant protein 1 and interleukin 8 expression) (P < .05, compared with values before weight loss). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that weight loss induced by GBP surgery normalizes the metabolic abnormalities involved in the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of NAFLD and decreases the hepatic expression of factors involved in the progression of liver inflammation and fibrosis.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is a clinicopathologic syndrome that encompasses several clinical entities. The spectrum of conditions ranges from simple steatosis to steatohepatitis, fibrosis and end stage liver disease. The condition was originally described in obese, diabetic, middle-aged females without a history of significant alcohol use with liver histology consistent with alcoholic hepatitis. It is known that this entity occurs without any particular sex predilection, in lean individuals, as well as an increasing number of obese children. Other terms have been used to describe this clinical entity such as alcohol-like hepatitis, pseudo-alcoholic hepatitis, diabetic hepatitis and steatonecrosis. Ludwig and colleagues introduced the term nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) to describe patients fitting the picture of alcoholic hepatitis but without a history of significant alcohol abuse. The term nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is used more frequently to include the spectrum of conditions that range from steatosis through steatohepatitis, fibrosis and cirrhosis. NASH is reserved for patients with steatohepatitis and fibrosis. NAFLD is now being recognized as the most common cause of elevated liver enzymes in the United States. Although the exact etiology of NAFLD is not known, it may be caused by insulin resistance coupled with increased oxidative stress to the hepatocytes. No specific therapy has been approved for this condition and the mainstay of management is weight loss.

Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus in the Liver Transplant Recipient.

Significant necroinflammatory and/or fibrotic histologic changes should prompt consideration of antiviral therapy in liver transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis C. Depending on the patient, consideration of lower-dose pegylated interferon initially, with an increase to standard doses over the course of 1 month, may improve patient compliance and tolerance. The use of growth factors to prevent anemia and leukopenia is encouraged. Liver transplant recipients should be treated for at least 1 year, until data are available on optimal duration of therapy in non-genotype 1 patients in this patient subpopulation.