Evaluation of pharmacist-led transition of care program in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMTs), initiated in-hospital and continued during the transition to outpatient care, are paramount to successful outcomes for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Incomplete discharge medication prescribing and delayed follow-up lead to worse cardiovascular outcomes. OBJECTIVES: We investigated a system of care using inpatient and outpatient clinical pharmacists to close GDMT gaps, ensure seamless transition to outpatient care, improve patient education, and optimize therapies. METHODS: We conducted a pre-post cohort analysis of patients with ACS pre- versus post-intervention to compare process metrics and key outcomes using electronic health record data. RESULTS: There were 181 and 135 patients in the pre- and post-intervention cohorts, respectively. Patients post-intervention were significantly more likely to have appropriately-timed follow-up visits scheduled with cardiology (79% vs. 51%, P < 0.0001) and primary care (57% vs. 43%, P = 0.01), to be discharged with prescriptions for P2Y12 inhibitors (87% vs. 64%, P < 0.0001), high dose statins (86% vs. 70%, P = 0.001), and beta blockers (87% vs. 76%, P = 0.01), and significantly less likely to have 30-day all-cause hospital readmissions (4% vs. 12%, P = 0.02) and emergency department (ED) visits (10% vs. 18%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The integration of advanced practicing pharmacists into a cardiology team at transition and post-hospitalization resulted in improved rates of posthospital follow-up visits, optimization of GDMT medications, and significantly lower 30-day hospital readmission and ED utilization.

Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism Treatment With Anti-Xa Versus Weight-Based Enoxaparin: A Retrospective Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a complication of cancer, for which low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) remains the preferred anticoagulant. Enoxaparin is traditionally dosed using weight. In certain populations, monitoring anti-Xa levels for therapeutic effect provides pharmacokinetic guidance for dose adjustments. There is a paucity of data regarding anti-Xa-directed enoxaparin dosing for treatment of VTE in patients with cancer. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate efficacy (recurrent VTE) and safety (major bleed) between enoxaparin anti-Xa-guided dose adjustments and weight-based dosing in patients with cancer-associated VTE. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective cohort study examined patients treated with enoxaparin for cancer-associated VTE using data from electronic health records. RESULTS: There were 674 patients who met the inclusion criteria, with 283 receiving anti-Xa-directed dose adjustments. Recurrent VTE, major bleed, or all-cause death occurred in 102 of 283 patients (36%) in the anti-Xa cohort and 166 of 391 patients (42.5%) in the weight-based cohort (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.57-0.93; P = 0.01). When death was removed from the composite end point, there was no significant difference between the cohorts in recurrent VTE or major bleed (HR = 1.18; P = 0.38). In the anti-Xa cohort, a total of 1584 anti-Xa peak levels were collected, with 1324 (83.6%) drawn correctly in relation to enoxaparin administration. Of those, 714 (53.9%) were within therapeutic range. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Patients with cancer receiving anti-Xa-guided enoxaparin dose adjustments for initial VTE, compared with weight-based dosing, had no significant difference in the rate of recurrent VTE or major bleed.

Pharmacy-Mediated Antiplatelet Management Protocol Compared to One-time Platelet Function Testing Prior to Pipeline Embolization of Cerebral Aneurysms: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: There is ongoing controversy regarding the optimal antiplatelet regimen, and extent or even need for platelet function testing surrounding Pipeline flow diverter (Medtronic Inc, Dublin, Ireland) embolization of cerebral aneurysms. OBJECTIVE: To compare a unique pharmacy-mediated antiplatelet medication management protocol to a 1-time platelet function testing strategy prior to Pipeline placement. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with cerebral aneurysms who underwent Pipeline embolization at 2 academic institutions was performed. The first line antiplatelet regimen consisted of aspirin and clopidogrel at both institutions. At institution A, the pharmacy-mediated antiplatelet medication management protocol consisted of repeat platelet function testing using VerifyNow (Accriva Diagnostics, San Diego, California), and dosing adjustments prior to and after Pipeline placement. At institution B, a 1-time platelet function test using light transmission aggregometry was obtained prior to Pipeline placement. Both strategies were compared using propensity score matching. RESULTS: A total of 63 and 165 Pipeline embolization procedures were performed at institutions A and B, respectively. Baseline characteristics differed in aneurysm location and aneurysm maximal diameter. Propensity score matching resulted in 25 matched pairs and demonstrated that the number of procedures in which the patient was switched to an alternative platelet agent was significantly smaller at institution A. There were no differences between the sites with regard to aneurysm occlusion rate, the incidence of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications, and modified Rankin scale at last follow-up after propensity score matching. CONCLUSION: Pharmacy-mediated antiplatelet management using VerifyNow is a safe and efficacious alternative to a more traditional approach, and significantly reduces the need to utilize other, potentially more expensive antiplatelet agents.