Risk of school exclusion among adolescents receiving social care or special educational needs services: A whole-population administrative data cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Exclusion from school is associated with health, well-being and social detriments and disproportionately affects vulnerable children. No study in England has examined the total cumulative risk of exclusion across secondary school among children with a history of children's social care (CSC) or special educational needs (SEN). OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of any secondary school exclusion among adolescents receiving CSC or SEN services compared with their peers. METHODS: An administrative data cohort study comparing children in English state schools (n = 1,031,500) with no history of CSC or SEN provision with children who had received different levels of CSC and SEN in combination. Outcomes were proportions of students with any fixed-term or permanent exclusion in years 7 to 9 (age 11 to 14) and years 10 to 11 (age 14 to 16). RESULTS: Overall, 13 % of children were excluded at least once across years 7 to 11. CSC exposure was associated with exclusion risk: 32 % of children in need (or formerly in need) and 40 % of current or former children looked after and those subject to child protection plans were excluded at least once across years 7 to 11, compared to 12 % of the non-exposed group. After adjusting for confounders, children with SEN history were more at risk of exclusion, regardless of CSC exposure category (except for exclusions among children looked after during years 10 to 11). Rates of exclusion varied significantly between local authorities. CONCLUSIONS: Large inequalities in school exclusion rates between CSC-exposed and unexposed children were observed, with even higher rates observed for children with SEN history. These inequalities undermine the right to education of these vulnerable groups of children.

What makes administrative data "research-ready"? A systematic review and thematic analysis of published literature.

Introduction: Administrative data are a valuable research resource, but are under-utilised in the UK due to governance, technical and other barriers (e.g., the time and effort taken to gain secure data access). In recent years, there has been considerable government investment in making administrative data "research-ready", but there is no definition of what this term means. A common understanding of what constitutes research-ready administrative data is needed to establish clear principles and frameworks for their development and the realisation of their full research potential. Objective: To define the characteristics of research-ready administrative data based on a systematic review and synthesis of existing literature. Methods: On 29th June 2021, we systematically searched seven electronic databases for (1) peer-reviewed literature (2) related to research-ready administrative data (3) written in the English language. Following supplementary searches and snowball screening, we conducted a thematic analysis of the identified relevant literature. Results: Overall, we screened 2,375 records and identified 38 relevant studies published between 2012 and 2021. Most related to administrative data from the UK and US and particularly to health data. The term research-ready was used inconsistently in the literature and there was some conflation with the concept of data being ready for statistical analysis. From the thematic analysis, we identified five defining characteristics of research-ready administrative data: (a) accessible, (b) broad, (c) curated, (d) documented and (e) enhanced for research purposes. Conclusions: Our proposed characteristics of research-ready administrative data could act as a starting point to help data owners and researchers develop common principles and standards. In the more immediate term, the proposed characteristics are a useful framework for cataloguing existing research-ready administrative databases and relevant resources that can support their development.

Evaluation of pushing out of children from all English state schools: Administrative data cohort study of children receiving social care and their peers.

BACKGROUND: Pushing out (off-rolling) occurs where pupils are illegally excluded from school. Those receiving children's social care (CSC) services (children in need (CiN), on child protection plans (CPPs) or looked after (CLA)) are thought to be at increased risk, but limited evidence inhibits understanding of this phenomenon. The extent of pushing out can be inferred from non-enrolment in administrative data. OBJECTIVE: To estimate proportions of children not enrolled across secondary school (aged 11-16, up to year 11) and to explore the association between CSC history and non-enrolment in year 10/11. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: >1 M pupils in year 7 (aged 11/12) in English state schools, 2011/12 and 2012/13. METHODS: We estimated the proportion of children not enrolled across years 8 to 11, disaggregated by CSC history. We assessed with regression modelling the association between CSC history and non-enrolment in years 10/11. RESULTS: Of children without CSC history, 3.8% had ≥1 year not enrolled by year 11. This was higher in those with a history CiN (8.1%), CPP (9.4%) or CLA (10.4%) status. The odds of non-enrolment in years 10/11 were higher among those with CLA history vs non-exposed peers (OR 4.76, 95% CI 4.49-5.05) as well as in those with CPP history (3.60, 3.39-3.81) and CiN history (2.53, 2.49-2.58). History of special educational needs further increased non-enrolment odds, including after confounder adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Findings imply that children with CSC history are more likely to be pushed out from school than children without, especially those with special educational needs.