Isavuconazole use and TDM in real-world pediatric practice.

Isavuconazole (ISA) is approved for treating invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis in adults, but its use in children remains off-label. We report on the use of ISA in real-world pediatric practice with 15 patients receiving ISA for treatment of invasive fungal infections. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was performed in all patients, with 52/111 (46.8%) Ctrough determinations out of range, thus supporting the need for TDM in children, especially those receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

Scientific evidence of the duration of antibiotic treatment in intra-abdominal infections with surgical focus control.

A non-systematic review of the published scientific evidence has been carried out on the duration of empirical antibiotic treatment in surgical intra-abdominal infections (IIA) with effective focus control. Given the progressive increase in antibiotic resistance, it is urgent to have strategies to reduce the pressure on the microbiota. The American guidelines made by Mazuski et al. of 20171, as the central axis in the recommendations of the duration of empirical antibiotic treatment in intra-abdominal infections with control of the focus and a bibliographic search of all the articles that contained the keywords in Pubmed and Google Scholar is added. 21 articles referring to the duration of empirical antibiotic treatment in intra-abdominal infection with control of the focus are collected. With the American guidelines and these articles, a proposal is prepared for the duration of empirical antibiotic treatment in patients without risk factors between 24 and 72 h. And in those who present risk factors, it should be individualized with active monitoring every 24 h of fever, paralytic ileus and leukocytosis (FIL), before an early detection of complications or the need for changes in antibiotic treatment. Short treatments are just as effective as those of longer durations and are associated with fewer adverse effects, therefore, daily adjusting and reassessing the duration of empirical antibiotic treatment is essential for better practice.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban versus Acenocoumarol in the Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation in Spain.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate, from the Spanish National Health System perspective, the cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban (20 mg/day) versus use of acenocoumarol (5 mg/day) for the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) at moderate to high risk for stroke. Methods: A Markov model was designed and populated with local cost estimates, efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in stroke prevention in NVAF compared with adjusted-dose warfarin clinical results from the pivotal phase III ROCKET AF trial and utility values obtained from the literature. Warfarin and acenocoumarol were assumed to have therapeutic equivalence. Results: Rivaroxaban treatment was associated with fewer ischemic strokes and systemic embolisms (0.289 vs. 0.300 events), intracranial bleeds (0.051 vs. 0.067), and myocardial infarctions (0.088 vs. 0.102) per patient compared with acenocoumarol. Over a lifetime time horizon, rivaroxaban led to a reduction of 0.041 life-threatening events per patient, and increases of 0.103 life-years and 0.155 quality-adjusted lifeyears (QALYs) versus acenocoumarol treatment. This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €7045 per QALY and €10 602 per life-year gained. Sensitivity analysis indicated that these results were robust and that rivaroxaban is cost-effective compared with acenocoumarol in 89.4% of cases should a willingness-to-pay threshold of €30 000/QALY gained be considered. Conclusions: The present analysis suggests that rivaroxaban is a cost-effective alternative to acenocoumarol therapy for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolisms in patients with NVAF in the Spanish healthcare setting.

[Differential pharmacokinetic characteristics of micafungin. Experience in special populations]. / Características farmacocinéticas diferenciales de micafungina. Experiencia en poblaciones especiales.

Currently, three echinocandins are available for the treatment of fungal infections. Micafungin is the latest drug to be incorporated into this group of antifungal agents. Although the mechanism of action of micafungin is similar to that of other echinocandins, this molecule has certain pharmacokinetic characteristics that distinguish it from other drugs in this group. Nowadays, there is wide information on the pharmacokinetic behavior of micafungin, mainly from patients included in clinical trials. However, there is far less knowledge of the pharmacokinetics of this echinocandin in special populations. The aim of the current review was to analyze the available information on the pharmacokinetics of micafungin in pediatric patients, the elderly, patients with renal insufficiency or liver failure, and transplant recipient.

[Pharmacoeconomics of therapy in invasive candidiasis]. / Farmacoeconomía del tratamiento de las candidiasis invasoras.

BACKGROUND: Invasive candidiasis episodes have increased during last years and they have been related with high rates of crude mortality. Invasive candidiasis-related deaths have not diminished significantly with the introduction of antifungals in the past decade. Finantial managers are worried about extra costs from acquisition of new antifungal agents. AIM: This review includes the main studies age-stratified to assess different variables related to the economic burden of invasive candidiasis. METHODS: Systematic review of biomedic databases including Medline, PubMed and EMBASE. RESULTS: The studies show hospital stay as the main variable related with higher impact in the increase of invasive candidiasis costs. Acquisition costs of antifungals have a very low impact in the invasive candidiasis costs. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacoeconomics applied in candidiasis invasive therapy must avoid assessing acquisition costs of antifungals exclusively, needing to include both direct and indirect costs associated with this fungal infection. The cost of antifungal acquisition represents a low impact in the overall economic burden of this fungal infection. Further pharmacoeconomics evaluations should be performed including similar definitions to decrease the possible bias in results interpretation.