Split fertilizer nitrogen application with a cereal rye cover crop reduces tile nitrate loads in a corn-soybean rotation.

Splitting fertilizer nitrogen (N) applications and using cover crops are management strategies to reduce nitrate in tile drainage water. We investigated split fertilizer N applications to corn (Zea mays L.) on crop yields and tile nitrate loss in both corn and soybean (Glycine max L.) in rotation from 2016 through 2019. We evaluated the inclusion of cover crops in a split-N treatment. Fertilizer N treatments included 100% in the fall; 50% in the fall + 25% at planting + 25% at side-dress; 100% as spring preplant; 75% as spring preplant (reduced N rate); 50% as spring preplant + 50% at side-dress; and 50% as spring preplant + 50% at side-dress with a cover crop. We did not find significant differences between split and single full rate N application treatments for corn yields or tile nitrate loss; however, the reduced N rate treatment significantly decreased corn yield by 10%. Cumulative tile nitrate losses (over four seasons) ranged from 115 kg ha-1 for all of the N in the fall to 65 kg ha-1 for 50% as spring preplant + 50% at side-dress with a cover crop, a decrease of 43%. Tile nitrate loss responded similarly to (corn) N treatments under both corn and soybean, with 64% of the loss under corn and 36% under soybean. Our results suggest that decreasing the fertilizer N rate may impact corn yield more than nitrate loss, while split fertilizer N application with a cover crop has potential to reduce tile nitrate loss without decreasing crop yield.

An initiative to assess and improve the resources and patient care processes used among Chest Wall Injury Society collaborative centers study (CWIS-CC2).

BACKGROUND: Over the last two decades, the acute management of rib fractures has changed significantly. In 2021, the Chest Wall injury Society (CWIS) began recognizing centers that epitomize their mission as CWIS Collaborative Centers. The primary aim of this study was to determine the resources, surgical expertise, access to care, and institutional support that are present among centers. METHODS: A survey was performed including all CWIS Collaborative Centers evaluating the resources available at their hospital for the treatment of patients with chest wall injury. Data about each chest wall injury center care process, availability of resources, institutional support, research support, and educational offerings were recorded. RESULTS: Data were collected from 20 trauma centers resulting in an 80% response rate. These trauma centers were made up of 5 international and 15 US-based trauma centers. Eighty percent (16 of 20) have dedicated care team members for the evaluation and management of rib fractures. Twenty-five percent (5 of 20) have a dedicated rib fracture service with a separate call schedule. Staffing for chest wall injury clinics consists of a multidisciplinary team: with attending surgeons in all clinics, 80% (8 of 10) with advanced practice providers and 70% (7 of 10) with care coordinators. Forty percent (8 of 20) of centers have dedicated rib fracture research support, and 35% (7 of 20) have surgical stabilization of rib fracture (SSRF)-related grants. Forty percent (8 of 20) of centers have marketing support, and 30% (8 of 20) have a web page support to bring awareness to their center. At these trauma centers, a median of 4 (1-9) surgeons perform SSRFs. In the majority of trauma centers, the trauma surgeons perform SSRF. CONCLUSION: Considerable similarities and differences exist within these CWIS collaborative centers. These differences in resources are hypothesis generating in determining the optimal chest wall injury center. These findings may generate several patient care and team process questions to optimize patient care, patient experience, provider satisfaction, research productivity, education, and outreach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level V.

Atrial Cannulation During Resuscitative Clamshell Thoracotomy.

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative thoracotomy and clamshell thoracotomy are performed in the setting of traumatic arrest with the intent of controlling hemorrhage, relieving tamponade, and providing open chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Historically, return of spontaneous circulation rates for penetrating traumatic arrest as well as out of hospital survival have been reported as low as 40% and 10%. Vascular access can be challenging in patients who have undergone a traumatic arrest and can be a limiting step to effective resuscitation. Atrial cannulation is a well-established surgical technique in cardiac surgery. Herein, we present a case series detailing our application of this technique in the context of acute trauma resuscitation during clamshell thoracotomy for traumatic arrest in the emergency department. METHODS: A retrospective case series of atrial cannulation during traumatic arrest was conducted in Charlotte, NC at Carolinas Medical Center an urban level 1 trauma center. RESULTS: The mean rate of return of spontaneous circulation in our series, 60%, was greater than previously published upper limit of return of spontaneous circulation for penetrating causes of traumatic arrest. DISCUSSION: Intravenous access can be difficult to establish in the hypovolemic and exsanguinating patient. Traditional methods of vascular access may be insufficient in the setting of central vascular injury. Atrial appendage cannulation during atrial cannulation is a quick and reliable technique to achieve vascular access that employs common methods from cardiac surgery to improve resuscitation of traumatic arrest.

Emergencies do not shut down during a pandemic: COVID pandemic impact on Acute Care Surgery volume and mortality at a level I trauma center.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on volume and outcomes of Acute Care Surgery patients, and we hypothesized that inpatient mortality would increase due to COVID+ and resource constraints. METHODS: An American College of Surgeons verified Level I Trauma Center's trauma and operative emergency general surgery (EGS) registries were queried for all patients from Jan. 2019 to Dec. 2020. April 1st, 2020, was the demarcation date for pre- and during COVID pandemic. Primary outcome was inpatient mortality. RESULTS: There were 14,460 trauma and 3091 EGS patients, and month-over-month volumes of both remained similar (p > 0.05). Blunt trauma decreased by 7.4% and penetrating increased by 31%, with a concomitant 25% increase in initial operative management (p < 0.001). Despite this, trauma (3.7%) and EGS (2.9-3.0%) mortality rates remained stable which was confirmed on multivariate analysis; p > 0.05. COVID + mortality was 8.8% and 3.7% in trauma and EGS patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Acute Care Surgeons provided high quality care to trauma and EGS patients during the pandemic without allowing excess mortality despite many hardships and resource constraints.

Attention to detail: A dedicated rib fracture consultation service leads to earlier operation and improved clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) has been correlated with improved outcomes, including decreased length of stay (LOS). We hypothesized that an SSRF consultation service would increase the frequency of SSRF and improve outcomes. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed to compare outcomes before and after implementing an SSRF service. Primary outcome was time from admission to surgery; secondary outcomes included LOS, mortality and morphine milligram equivalents (MME) prescribed at discharge. RESULTS: 1865 patients met consultation criteria and 128 patients underwent SSRF. Mortality decreased (6.3% vs. 3%) and patients were prescribed fewer MME at discharge (328 MME vs. 124 MME) following implementation. For the operative cohort, time from admission to surgery decreased by 1.72 days and ICU LOS decreased by 2.6 days. CONCLUSION: Establishment of an SSRF service provides a mechanism to maximize capture and evaluation of operative candidates, provide earlier intervention, and improve patient outcomes. Additional study to determine which elements and techniques are most beneficial is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Ad astra per aspera (Through Hardships to the Stars): Lessons Learned from the First National Virtual APDS Meeting, 2020.

OBJECTIVE: After COVID-19 rendered in-person meetings for national societies impossible in the spring of 2020, the leadership of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS) innovated via a virtual format in order to hold its national meeting. DESIGN: APDS leadership pre-emptively considered factors that would be important to attendees including cost, value, time, professional commitments, education, sharing of relevant and current information, and networking. SETTING: The meeting was conducted using a variety of virtual formats including a web portal for entry, pre-ecorded poster and oral presentations on the APDS website, interactive panels via a web conferencing platform, and livestreaming. PARTICIPANTS: There were 298 registrants for the national meeting of the APDS, and 59 participants in the New Program Directors Workshop. The registrants and participants comprised medical students, residents, associate program directors, program directors, and others involved in surgical education nationally. RESULTS: There was no significant difference detected for high levels of participant satisfaction between 2019 and 2020 for the following items: overall program rating, topics and content meeting stated objectives, relevant content to educational needs, educational format conducive to learning, and agreement that the program will improve competence, performance, communication skills, patient outcomes, or processes of care/healthcare system performance. CONCLUSIONS: A virtual format for a national society meeting can provide education, engagement, and community, and the lessons learned by the APDS in the process can be used by other societies for utilization and further improvement.

Distractions During Patient Handoff: The Application-Based Messaging Volume on General Surgery Interns.

OBJECTIVE: Mobile phone-based paging systems have become increasingly common for communication within hospitals. Surgical interns receive the most pages, and our aim is to objectively quantify and evaluate this burden to allow for targeted improvement. DESIGN: We performed a retrospective review of our institutions mobile phone-based paging system data (Halo Health, Cincinnati, OH) from July 2019 to September 2019. SETTING: Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA. PARTICIPANTS: Seven general surgery postgraduate year (PGY) 1 residents. RESULTS: Forty-five thousand eight hundred and one messages met inclusion criteria, with 27,397 messages received and 18,404 sent. PGY 1 residents each received an average of 48 ± 41 messages per shift, with 8 ± 17 messages per day while off-duty. Night shifts averaged more messages than day shifts (80 ± 39 vs 38 ± 32, p < 0.0001), and had more shifts with high message volume (30% vs 11%, p = 0.0005). Evaluating the total number of messages received per minute of the day, the largest number of high-volume message intervals (21) occurred during patient handoff (1700-1900 hours). Most messages were sent by nursing staff (55.8%), followed by medical providers (38.2%). CONCLUSIONS: PGY 1 residents receive a large number of pages using a messaging application, with many occurring at critical times. Residents received a higher volume of pages on night shifts, during patient handoff, and while off-duty. Since most pages are from nursing staff, targeted education and preventative actions may help decrease the volume of pages during these critical times.

A Novel Immune Modulator for Patients With Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections (NSTI): Results of a Multicenter, Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial of Reltecimod (AB 103).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Reltecimod, a CD 28 T-lymphocyte receptor mimetic, inhibits T-cell stimulation by an array of bacterial pathogens. A previous phase 2 trial demonstrated improved resolution of organ dysfunction after NSTI. We hypothesized that early administration of reltecimod would improve outcome in severe NSTI. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of single dose reltecimod (0.5 mg/kg) administered within 6 hours of NSTI diagnosis at 65 of 93 study sites. Inclusion: surgical confirmation of NSTI and organ dysfunction [modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score (mSOFA) score ≥3]. Primary analysis was modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT), responder analysis using a previously validated composite endpoint, necrotizing infection clinical composite endpoint, defined as: alive at day 28, ≤3 debridements, no amputation beyond first operation, and day 14 mSOFA ≤1 with ≥3 point reduction (organ dysfunction resolution). A prespecified, per protocol (PP) analysis excluded 17 patients with major protocol violations before unblinding. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety patients were enrolled, mITT (Reltecimod 142, Placebo 148): mean age 55 ±â€Š15 years, 60% male, 42.4% diabetic, 28.6% perineal infection, screening mSOFA mean 5.5 ±â€Š2.4. Twenty-eight-day mortality was 15% in both groups. mITT necrotizing infection clinical composite endpoint success was 48.6% reltecimod versus 39.9% placebo, P = 0.135 and PP was 54.3% reltecimod versus 40.3% placebo, P = 0.021. Resolution of organ dysfunction was 65.1% reltecimod versus 52.6% placebo, P = 0.041, mITT and 70.9% versus 53.4%, P = 0.005, PP. CONCLUSION: Early administration of reltecimod in severe NSTI resulted in a significant improvement in the primary composite endpoint in the PP population but not in the mITT population. Reltecimod was associated with improved resolution of organ dysfunction and hospital discharge status.

Surgery Residents Spend Nearly 8 Months of Their 5-Year Training on the Electronic Health Record (EHR).

OBJECTIVE: Electronic health records (EHRs) are an integral part of the medical system and are used in all aspects of care. Despite multiple advantages of an EHR, concerns exist over the amount of time that residents spend on computers rather than in direct patient care. This study aims to quantify the time a general surgery resident spends on the EHR during their training. DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS: Active usage time data from our institution's EHR were extracted for 34 unique general surgery residents from October 2014 to June 2019. Career time on the EHR was calculated and a "work month" was defined as a 4-week period of 80 hours per week. SETTING: Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC. RESULTS: Total career EHR usage for a general surgery resident was 2512 continuous hours, corresponding to 31.4 work weeks or 7.9 work months. In total, 7133 charts were opened with an average of 20.5 minutes on the EHR per patient chart. Career time spent on specific tasks included: chart review 10.6 work weeks, documentation 10.4 work weeks, and order entry 5.4 work weeks. The total number of orders entered were 57,739 and total number of documents created were 9222. EHR time in all aspects, patient charts opened, documents created, and number of orders entered decreased as postgraduate year increased. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study quantifying the total time a general surgery resident spends on the EHR during their clinical training. Total EHR time equated to nearly 8 work months. General surgery residents spend considerable time on the EHR and this underscores the importance of implementing methods to improve EHR efficiency and maximize time for clinical training.

Surgery Resident Time Consumed by the Electronic Health Record.

OBJECTIVE: Time spent on the Electronic Health Record (EHR) influences surgical residents' clinical availability. Objective data assessing EHR usage among surgical residents are lacking and necessary. DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS: Active EHR usage data for 70 surgical residents were collected from April 2015 through April 2016. Active EHR usage was defined as more than 15 keystrokes, or 3 mouse clicks, or 1700 "mouse miles" per minute. Usage data of different specialties, interns (PGY 1), juniors (PGY 2, 3), and seniors (PGY 4, 5) were compared. SETTING: Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC. RESULTS: Interns spent more time than juniors on total EHR activities per day (134.5 vs 105.5 minutes, p < 0.001) and juniors spent more time per day than seniors (105.5 vs 78.7 minutes, p < 0.001). Among different EHR activities per patient, interns spent greater time than juniors on chart review (8.1 vs 6.2 minutes, p < 0.001), documentation (9.0 vs 6.5 minutes, p < 0.001), and orders (3.6 vs 3.0 minutes, p < 0.001). Juniors spent the same time as seniors on chart review (6.2 vs 6.5 minutes, p = 0.2). Juniors spent more time than seniors on documentation (6.5 vs 5.2 minutes, p < 0.001) and orders (3.0 vs 2.7 minutes, p < 0.05). Comparing EHR activities per patient among different specialties, General Surgery residents spent more time than Orthopedic residents on total EHR time (19.9 vs 15.9 minutes, p < 0.001), chart review (6.8 vs 5.7 minutes, p < 0.001), documentation (6.3 vs 5.6 minutes, p < 0.001), and orders (3.6 vs 2.6 minutes, p < 0.001). General Surgery residents spent less time than OB/GYN residents on total EHR time (19.9 vs 22 minutes, p < 0.01), chart review (6.8 vs. 7.5 minutes, p < 0.05), and documentation (6.3 vs 7.6 minutes, p < 0.001), but more time on orders (3.6 vs 2.9 minutes, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These are the first reported objective findings on surgical resident use of the EHR and may provide an opportunity for improvement in EHR training and usage.

Maximizing the Calm before the Storm: Tiered Surgical Response Plan for Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19).

The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) was first diagnosed in Wuhan, China in December 2019 and has now spread throughout the world, being verified by the World Health Organization as a pandemic on March 11. This had led to the calling of a national emergency on March 13 in the US. Many hospitals, healthcare networks, and specifically, departments of surgery, are asking the same questions about how to cope and plan for surge capacity, personnel attrition, novel infrastructure utilization, and resource exhaustion. Herein, we present a tiered plan for surgical department planning based on incident command levels. This includes acute care surgeon deployment (given their critical care training and vertically integrated position in the hospital), recommended infrastructure and transfer utilization, triage principles, and faculty, resident, and advanced care practitioner deployment.

Underrepresented Minorities in General Surgery Residency: Analysis of Interviewed Applicants, Residents, and Core Teaching Faculty.

BACKGROUND: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires diversity in residency. The self-identified race/ethnicities of general surgery applicants, residents, and core teaching faculty were assessed to evaluate underrepresented minority (URM) representation in surgery residency programs and to determine the impact of URM faculty and residents on URM applicants' selection for interview or match. STUDY DESIGN: Data from the 2018 application cycle were collated for 10 general surgery programs. Applicants without a self-identified race/ethnicity were excluded. URMs were defined as those identifying as black/African American, Hispanic/Latino/of Spanish origin, and American Indian/Alaskan Native/Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander-Samoan. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests and a multivariate model. RESULTS: Ten surgery residency programs received 9,143 applications from 3,067 unique applicants. Applications from white, Asian, Hispanic/Latino, black/African American, and American Indian applicants constituted 66%, 19%, 8%, 7% and 1%, respectively, of those applications selected to interview and 66%, 13%, 11%, 8%, and 2%, respectively, of applications resulting in a match. Among programs' 272 core faculty and 318 current residents, 10% and 21%, respectively, were identified as URMs. As faculty diversity increased, there was no difference in selection to interview for URM (odds ratio [OR] 0.83; 95% CI 0.54 to 1.28, per 10% increase in faculty diversity) or non-URM applicants (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.81). Similarly, greater URM representation among current residents did not affect the likelihood of being selected for an interview for URM (OR 1.20; 95%CI 0.90 to 1.61) vs non-URM applicants (OR 1.28; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.45). Current resident and faculty URM representation was correlated (r = 0.8; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Programs with a greater proportion of URM core faculty or residents did not select a greater proportion of URM applicants for interview. However, core faculty and resident racial diversity were correlated. Recruitment of racially/ethnically diverse trainees and faculty will require ongoing analysis to develop effective recruitment strategies.

Underrepresented Minorities are Underrepresented Among General Surgery Applicants Selected to Interview.

OBJECTIVE: Diversity is an ill-defined entity in general surgery training. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education recently proposed new common program requirements including verbiage requiring diversity in residency. "Recruiting" for diversity can be challenging within the constraints of geographic preference, type of program, and applicant qualifications. In addition, the Match process adds further uncertainty. We sought to study the self-identified racial/ethnic distribution of general surgery applicants to better ascertain the characteristics of underrepresented minorities (URM) within the general surgery applicant pool. DESIGN: Program-specific data from the Electronic Residency Application Service was collated for the 2018 medical student application cycle. Data were abstracted for all participating programs' applicants and those selected to interview. Applicants who did not enter a self-identified race/ethnicity were excluded from analysis. URM were defined as those identifying as Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino/of Spanish origin, American Indian/Alaskan Native, or Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander-Samoan. Appropriate statistical analyses were accomplished. SETTING: Ten general surgery residency programs-5 independent programs and 5 university programs. PARTICIPANTS: Residency applicants to the participating general surgery residency programs. RESULTS: Ten surgery residency programs received 10,312 applications from 3192 unique applicants. Seven hundred and seventy-eight applications did not include a self-identified race/ethnicity and were excluded from analysis. The racial/ethnic makeup of applicants in this study cohort was similar to that from 2017 to 2018 Electronic Residency Application Service data of 4262 total applicants to categorical general surgery. Programs received a median of 1085 (range: 485-1264) applications each and altogether selected 617 unique applicants for interviews. Overall, 2148 applicants graduated from US medical schools, and of those, 595 (28%) were offered interviews. The mean age of applicants was 28.8 ± 3.8 years and 1316 (41%) were female. Hispanic/Latino/of Spanish origin, Black, and American Indian/Alaskan Native/Hawaiian/Pacific Islander-Samoan applicants constituted 12%, 8%, and 1% of total applicants, but only 8%, 6%, and 1% of those selected for interview. Overall, 29% of applicants had United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 scores ≤220; 37 (6%) of those selected for interviews had a USMLE Step 1 score of ≤220. A higher proportion of URM applicants had USMLE scores ≤220 compared to White and Asian applicants. Non-white self-identification was a significant independent predictor of a lower likelihood of interview selection. Female gender, USMLE Step 1 score >220, and graduating from a US medical school were associated with an increased likelihood of being selected to interview. CONCLUSIONS: URM applicants represented a disproportionately smaller percentage of applicants selected for interview. USMLE Step 1 scores were lower among the URM applicants. Training programs that use discreet USMLE cutoffs are likely excluding URM at a higher rate than their non-URM applicants. Attempts to recruit racially/ethnically diverse trainees should include program-level analysis to determine disparities and a focused strategy to interview applicants who might be overlooked by conventional screening tools.

Multiple-Institution Comparison of Resident and Faculty Perceptions of Burnout and Depression During Surgical Training.

Importance: Prior studies demonstrate a high prevalence of burnout and depression among surgeons. Limited data exist regarding how these conditions are perceived by the surgical community. Objectives: To measure prevalence of burnout and depression among general surgery trainees and to characterize how residents and attendings perceive these conditions. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used unique, anonymous surveys for residents and attendings that were administered via a web-based platform from November 1, 2016, through March 31, 2017. All residents and attendings in the 6 general surgery training programs in North Carolina were invited to participate. Main Outcomes and Measures: The prevalence of burnout and depression among residents was assessed using validated tools. Burnout was defined by high emotional exhaustion or depersonalization on the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Depression was defined by a score of 10 or greater on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Linear and logistic regression models were used to assess predictive factors for burnout and depression. Residents' and attendings' perceptions of these conditions were analyzed for significant similarities and differences. Results: In this study, a total of 92 residents and 55 attendings responded. Fifty-eight of 77 residents with complete responses (75%) met criteria for burnout, and 30 of 76 (39%) met criteria for depression. Of those with burnout, 28 of 58 (48%) were at elevated risk of depression (P = .03). Nine of 77 residents (12%) had suicidal ideation in the past 2 weeks. Most residents (40 of 76 [53%]) correctly estimated that more than 50% of residents had burnout, whereas only 13 of 56 attendings (23%) correctly estimated this prevalence (P < .001). Forty-two of 83 residents (51%) and 42 of 56 attendings (75%) underestimated the true prevalence of depression (P = .002). Sixty-six of 73 residents (90%) and 40 of 51 attendings (78%) identified the same top 3 barriers to seeking care for burnout: inability to take time off to seek treatment, avoidance or denial of the problem, and negative stigma toward those seeking care. Conclusions and Relevance: The prevalence of burnout and depression was high among general surgery residents in this study. Attendings and residents underestimated the prevalence of these conditions but acknowledged common barriers to seeking care. Discrepancies in actual and perceived levels of burnout and depression may hinder wellness interventions. Increasing understanding of these perceptions offers an opportunity to develop practical solutions.

An Innovative, No-cost, Evidence-Based Smartphone Platform for Resident Evaluation.

PURPOSE: Timely performance evaluation and feedback are critical to resident development. However, formulating and delivering this information disrupts physician workflow, leading to low participation. This study was designed to determine if a locally developed smartphone platform would integrate regular evaluation into daily processes and thus increase faculty participation in timely resident evaluation. METHODS: Formal, documented resident operative and patient interaction evaluations were compiled over an 8-month study period. The study was divided into two 4-month phases. No changes to the existing evaluation methods were made during Phase 1. Phase 2 began after a washout period of 2 weeks and coincided with the launch of a smartphone-based platform. The platform uses a combination of Likert scale questions and the Dreyfus model of skill acquisition to describe competence levels in technical and nontechnical skills. The instrument inflicts minimal effect on surgeon workflow, with the aim of integrating resident evaluation into daily processes. The number of different faculty members performing evaluations, resident level (postgraduate year), type of interaction or procedure, and competency data were compiled. All evaluations were tracked by the program director as they were automatically uploaded into a database. Faculty members were introduced to the new platform at the beginning of Phase 2, and previous methods of evaluation continued to be encouraged and were considered valid throughout both phases of the study. Data were analyzed using Fisher exact test for specific PGY level, and chi-square test was used for overall program analysis. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Total faculty engagement, that is, number of faculty members completing evaluations, increased from 13% (5/38) in Phase 1 to 53% (20/38) in Phase 2. During Phase 1, all evaluations consisted of online forms through the department's established system or e-mails to the program director. Evaluations were completed in 0.9% (15/1599) of cases residents completed in Phase 1 versus 12% (217/1812) of those in Phase 2. During Phase 2, evaluations were conducted exclusively using the new platform. This was done based on participant's choice. Total numbers of residents and core faculty members did not change between Phases 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: A smartphone-based platform can be created with existing technology at no cost. It is adaptable and can be updated in real-time and can employ validated scales to build an evaluation portfolio for learners assessing technical and nontechnical skills. Furthermore, and perhaps most importantly, it can be designed to integrate into existing workflow patterns to increase faculty participation.