Engaging community members in cancer research: an assessment of an NCI-designated cancer center.

PURPOSE: Despite the importance of engaging community members in research, multiple barriers exist. We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation to understand the opportunities and challenges of engaging community members in basic, clinical, translational, and population science research. METHODS: We designed a survey and an interview guide based on the constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Surveys were distributed electronically to all cancer center investigators and interviews were conducted virtually with a select group of basic, clinical, and population science investigators. Survey data (n = 77) were analyzed across all respondents using frequency counts and mean scores; bivariate analyses examined differences in responses by research program affiliation, gender, race, and faculty rank. Interviews (n = 16) were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using a reflective thematic approach. RESULTS: There was strong agreement among investigators that "Community engagement in research will help the SKCC address cancer disparities in the catchment area" (M 4.2, SD 0.9) and less agreement with items such as "I know how to find and connect with community members who I can engage in my research" (M 2.5, SD 1.3). Investigators mentioned challenges in communicating complex science to a lay audience but were open to training and workshops to acquire skills needed to integrate community members into their research. CONCLUSION: Cancer centers should develop and promote training and collaborative opportunities for investigators and community members. Overcoming challenges will lead to more patient- and community-centered cancer research in the future.

Impact of histology on survival in retroperitoneal sarcomas.

BACKGROUND: The current American Joint Committee on Cancer AJCC staging system applies to all soft-tissue sarcomas and does not allow for consideration of many features unique to retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPSs). The aim of this study was to analyze factors predictive of recurrence and survival for patients with resected RPSs. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with primary RPS who underwent resection. A 3-tiered histological classification was examined: atypical lipomatous tumors (ALTs), non-ALT liposarcomas (LPSs), and other. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify factors associated with differences in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) among groups. RESULTS: Sixty RPS patients were analyzed: 16 patients (27%) had ALTs, 7 patients (12%) had LPSs, and 37 patients (62%) had other histologies. A comparison of the 3 groups showed a significant difference in OS among groups (P < .017). High-grade tumors favored shorter DFS (P = .06) but were not associated with decreased OS when compared with low-grade tumors (P = .86). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support an alternative staging system for RPS, inclusive of histology, which may prove useful in operative planning and prognostication.

Weight lifting in women with breast-cancer-related lymphedema.

BACKGROUND: Weight lifting has generally been proscribed for women with breast-cancer-related lymphedema, preventing them from obtaining the well-established health benefits of weight lifting, including increases in bone density. METHODS: We performed a randomized, controlled trial of twice-weekly progressive weight lifting involving 141 breast-cancer survivors with stable lymphedema of the arm. The primary outcome was the change in arm and hand swelling at 1 year, as measured through displaced water volume of the affected and unaffected limbs. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of exacerbations of lymphedema, number and severity of lymphedema symptoms, and muscle strength. Participants were required to wear a well-fitted compression garment while weight lifting. RESULTS: The proportion of women who had an increase of 5% or more in limb swelling was similar in the weight-lifting group (11%) and the control group (12%) (cumulative incidence ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 1.13). As compared with the control group, the weight-lifting group had greater improvements in self-reported severity of lymphedema symptoms (P=0.03) and upper- and lower-body strength (P<0.001 for both comparisons) and a lower incidence of lymphedema exacerbations as assessed by a certified lymphedema specialist (14% vs. 29%, P=0.04). There were no serious adverse events related to the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: In breast-cancer survivors with lymphedema, slowly progressive weight lifting had no significant effect on limb swelling and resulted in a decreased incidence of exacerbations of lymphedema, reduced symptoms, and increased strength. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00194363.)

Anal incontinence-sphincter ani repair: indications, techniques, outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Fecal incontinence is a debilitating problem that has many different causes. There also are many treatments options, from behavioral modification to sphincteroplasty to artificial anal sphincter and colostomy. In a society with an aging population, fecal incontinence is an ever-increasing problem and will continue to grow. DISCUSSION: Treatment plans need to be individually tailored for each patient. The surgeon should be proficient in different types of procedures and match the procedure with the needs of the patient. Long-term follow-up of these patients must continue to help us better serve this patient population.