Impact on direct and indirect costs of switching patients with inflammatory bowel disease from intravenous to subcutaneous infliximab (CT-P13).

BACKGROUND: We aim to compare the real-life direct and indirect costs of switching patients from intravenous to subcutaneous (SC) CT-P13, an infliximab biosimilar, in a tertiary UK Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) centre. METHODS: All adult patients with IBD on standard dosing CT-P13 (5 mg/kg 8 weekly) were eligible to switch. Of 169 patients eligible to switch to SC CT-P13, 98 (58%) switched within 3 months and one moved out of area. RESULTS: Total annual intravenous cost for 168 patients was £689 507.04 (direct=£653 671.20, indirect=£35 835.84). After the switch, as-treated analysis demonstrated total annual cost for 168 patients (70 intravenous and 98 SC) was £674 922.83 (direct = £654 563, indirect = £20 359.83) resulting in £891.80 higher cost to healthcare providers. Intention to treat analysis showed a total annual cost of £665 961.01 (direct = £655 200, indirect = £10 761.01) resulting in £1528.80 higher cost to healthcare providers. However, in each scenario, the significant decrease in indirect costs resulted in lower total costs after switching to SC CT-P13. CONCLUSIONS: Our real-world analysis demonstrates switching from intravenous to SC CT-P13 is broadly cost neutral to healthcare providers. SC preparations have marginally higher direct costs, switching allows for efficient use of intravenous infusion units and reduces costs to patients.

Uptake of a Switching Program for Patients Receiving Intravenous Infliximab and Vedolizumab to Subcutaneous Preparations.

BACKGROUND: Recent trials support the clinical efficacy and safety of subcutaneous infliximab (IFX) or vedolizumab (VDZ) for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). We evaluated the uptake and rationale for choosing to switch from intravenous infusions to subcutaneous injections. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all adult patients receiving standard dosing IFX or VDZ maintenance therapy to investigate uptake of subcutaneous injections and the rationale for switching to subcutaneous injections. RESULTS: Of 232 eligible patients (total = 258: IFX = 190, VDZ = 68, and no longer eligible = 26), 58% of patients on IFX and 59% of patients on VDZ chose to switch to subcutaneous treatment. Age, sex, diagnosis, drug, line of treatment, and duration of treatment were not predictors for willingness to switch. Questionnaire responses (n = 51) demonstrate that the decision to switch was not influenced by COVID-19 exposure risk, impact on wider IBD service provision, impact on patient mental health, financial savings, seeking support following a switch, or a sense of independence managing IBD. Switchers (68%) were more motivated by time savings than non-switchers (25%; p = 0.0042). CONCLUSIONS: Switch uptake rates were 58%, with 90% of patients eligible to switch. Switch decision was influenced by time savings for patients but not by other patient-related factors.

Efficacy, tolerability, and predictors of response to infliximab therapy for Crohn's disease: a large single centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab is licenced for use in Crohn's disease (CD). Trial data demonstrate that infliximab is effective for inducing remission of active CD, healing fistulising CD, and preventing relapse once in remission. However, long-term data regarding efficacy, safety, and predictors of response are still emerging. AIM: To examine these issues in a large cohort of patients who received infliximab for CD. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed for 210 patients receiving infliximab for luminal or fistulising CD. Response to infliximab induction therapy, and sustained clinical benefit, were assessed by a decrease in Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) of ≥ 2 points. Remission was defined as an HBI ≤ 4. Physician's global assessment was used where HBI could not be obtained. Demographic and disease factors that may predict response to therapy were analysed by Kaplan-Meier plots and univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 173 (82.4%) patients responded to infliximab induction, with 114 (65.9%) achieving sustained clinical benefit. Almost 40% of the study cohort had an HBI ≤ 4, indicating remission, at last point of follow-up (median 24 months). Concomitant immunosuppression predicted sustained clinical benefit in the first 6 months of therapy (P=0.03). An inflammatory disease phenotype (P=0.04 univariate analysis, P=0.03 Kaplan Meier analysis) and male gender (P=0.03) also predicted sustained clinical benefit. Episodic therapy was associated with an increased likelihood of secondary non-response. Adverse events, including malignancies, were few. CONCLUSION: In this single centre study, infliximab was efficacious and well-tolerated in CD.

Adalimumab as second line anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha therapy for Crohn's disease: A single centre experience.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Non-response, loss of response, or intolerance to anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) therapy is well recognised in Crohn's disease (CD) patients. Data concerning outcomes following the use of a second anti-TNFα therapy, particularly in patients who do not respond to a first anti-TNFα agent, are still emerging. The aim of this study was to assess response and tolerability to adalimumab following infliximab failure in a single centre cohort of CD patients. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on 44 patients who received adalimumab therapy following infliximab failure. Initial response to adalimumab therapy at 6weeks following induction was defined using a two point decrease in the Harvey-Bradshaw Index, with remission at this point defined using a Harvey Bradshaw index≤4. Sustained clinical benefit at the last point of follow up was determined using a physician's global assessment. Corticosteroid-free sustained clinical benefit was also assessed at this point. RESULTS: Thirty-four (77%) patients had initial response to adalimumab therapy, with 28 (64%) having sustained clinical benefit. Corticosteroid-free sustained clinical benefit was achieved in nine (53%) of 17 patients requiring steroids at commencement of adalimumab. Four (44%) of the 9 patients who were primary non-responders to infliximab responded to adalimumab. The majority of CD patients who failed adalimumab therapy required surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Second-line anti-TNFα therapy with adalimumab is effective at both inducing remission and maintaining response in CD patients who have failed infliximab, regardless of the reason for infliximab failure.