Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Anesth Analg ; 91(4): 876-81, 2000 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11004041

RESUMO

The use of an ilioinguinal-hypogastric nerve block (IHNB) as part of a monitored anesthesia care (MAC) technique has been associated with a rapid recovery profile for outpatients undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy procedures. This study was designed to compare the cost-effectiveness of an IHNB-MAC technique with standardized general and spinal anesthetics techniques for inguinal herniorrhaphy in the ambulatory setting. We randomly assigned 81 consenting outpatients to receive IHNB-MAC, general anesthesia, or spinal anesthesia. We evaluated recovery times, 24-h postoperative side effects and associated incremental costs. Compared with general and spinal anesthesia, patients receiving IHNB-MAC had the shortest time-to-home readiness (133+/-68 min vs. 171+/-40 and 280+/-83 min), lowest pain score at discharge (15+/-14 mm vs. 39+/-28 and 34+/-32 mm), and highest satisfaction at 24-h follow-up (75% vs. 36% and 64%). The total anesthetic costs were also the least in the IHNB-MAC group ($132.73+/-33.80 vs. $172.67+/-29.82 and $164.97+/-31.03). We concluded that IHNB-MAC is the most cost-effective anesthetic technique for outpatients undergoing unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy with respect to speed of recovery, patient comfort, and associated incremental costs.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/economia , Período de Recuperação da Anestesia , Anestesia Geral/economia , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Raquianestesia/efeitos adversos , Raquianestesia/economia , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Bupivacaína/administração & dosagem , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Fentanila/administração & dosagem , Seguimentos , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Canal Inguinal/inervação , Lidocaína/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Bloqueio Nervoso/efeitos adversos , Bloqueio Nervoso/economia , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/classificação , Alta do Paciente , Satisfação do Paciente , Propofol/administração & dosagem , Respiração/efeitos dos fármacos , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Anesth Analg ; 91(3): 596-600, 2000 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10960383

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: We evaluated the spontaneous recovery characteristics of rapacuronium during desflurane-, sevoflurane-, or propofol-based anesthesia in 51 consenting women undergoing laparoscopic tubal ligation procedures. After the induction of the anesthesia with standardized doses of propofol and fentanyl, 1.5 mg/kg IV rapacuronium was administered to facilitate tracheal intubation. Patients were randomized to receive either 1 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration of desflurane, 1 minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane, or 100 microg. kg(-1). min(-1) propofol infusion in combination with 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen for maintenance of anesthesia. Neuromuscular blockade was monitored at the wrist by using electromyography. The degree of maximum blockade and the times for first twitch recovery (T(1)) to 5%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 90%, as well as the recovery index, were similar in all three anesthetic groups. However, recovery times for the train-of-four ratio to achieve 0.7 and 0.8 were significantly longer with desflurane (44.4 +/- 18.9 and 53.5 +/- 22.4 min) and sevoflurane (44.8 +/- 15.1 and 53.2 +/- 15.8 min) compared with propofol (31.8 +/- 5.3 and 36.5 +/- 6.5 min). Eight patients (16%) required a maintenance dose of 0.5 mg/kg rapacuronium and reversal of rapacuronium residual block occurred in three (6%) patients. We conclude that spontaneous recovery after an intubating dose of 1.5 mg/kg rapacuronium was significantly prolonged by both desflurane and sevoflurane compared with propofol-based anesthesia. Routine monitoring of neuromuscular activity is recommended even when a single bolus dose of rapacuronium is administered during ambulatory anesthesia. IMPLICATIONS: When administered for laparoscopic surgery, the duration of action of an intubating dose of rapacuronium was prolonged 40%-50% by desflurane and sevoflurane, respectively, (versus propofol). Monitoring recovery of neuromuscular blockade produced by rapacuronium is particularly important when desflurane or sevoflurane is administered to ensure that an adequate recovery (train-of-four > or = 0.8) is achieved by the end of anesthesia.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Anestésicos Inalatórios , Anestésicos Intravenosos , Isoflurano/análogos & derivados , Laparoscopia , Éteres Metílicos , Fármacos Neuromusculares não Despolarizantes , Propofol , Brometo de Vecurônio/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Desflurano , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Estudos Prospectivos , Sevoflurano , Esterilização Tubária
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA