Integrative approach for women with fibromyalgia in a Veterans Affairs Medical Center: An observational study.

Fibromyalgia, a complex condition characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain, presents a significant burden on individuals and healthcare systems. This observational study aims to explore the potential of an outpatient integrative care model for the management of fibromyalgia in women, focusing on personalized goals, patient education, non-pharmaceutical treatments, and lifestyle modifications. The primary objective is to assess patient satisfaction and its correlation with pain, quality of life, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. This pilot study seeks to determine the effectiveness of this model in the alleviation of fibromyalgia-related pain and the improvement of overall well-being. Twenty-five women diagnosed with fibromyalgia participated in a 14-week outpatient treatment program at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center, involving weekly patient-directed, integrative group visits and health coaching. Pre- and post-evaluation questionnaires were administered to assess patient satisfaction, patients' subjective sense of empowerment in the management of fibromyalgia, and symptom improvement (i.e., pain, quality of life, depression, and PTSD). In addition, the study evaluated the correlation of patient empowerment with symptom improvement. The integrative care model received high patient satisfaction, with a mean score of 8.04 out of 10. Significant pain reduction was observed based on the Numeric Rating Scale (n = 22, P < .001). Quality of life showed significant improvement according to the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (n = 24, P = .01). Furthermore, depression symptoms improved significantly, as assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire (n = 24, P = .04). However, there was no statistically significant change in PTSD scores (n = 22, P = .3). Patient empowerment was strongly correlated with pain reduction (n = 25, r = .78, P < .001), quality of life (n = 25, r = .57, P < .001), and improvement in depression symptoms (n = 22, r = .50, P = .004). Pairwise deletion was used for each outcome. This integrative care model demonstrated promising results in effectively managing fibromyalgia-related pain and enhancing quality of life and depression symptoms in women. This model presents a feasible and potentially effective treatment approach for fibromyalgia. Further research with larger sample sizes and control groups is warranted to validate these findings and encourage broader implementation.

Practical and Emotional Peer Support Tailored for Life's Challenges: Personalized Support for Progress Randomized Clinical Pilot Trial in a Veterans Health Administration Women's Clinic.

INTRODUCTION: Women Veterans experience a broad range of stressors (e.g., family, relationship, and financial) and high rates of mental health and physical health conditions, all of which contribute to high levels of stress. Personalized Support for Progress (PSP), an evidence-based intervention, is well suited to support women Veterans with high stress as it involves a card-sort task to prioritize concerns as well as pragmatic and emotional support to develop and implement a personalized plan addressing those concerns. Our aims were to explore the population and context for delivery and evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and utility of PSP delivered by a peer specialist to complement existing services in a Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Women's Wellness Center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled pilot trial compared treatment as usual plus PSP to treatment as usual and used the a priori Go/No-Go criteria to establish success for each outcome. We interviewed staff regarding the population and delivery context at a VHA Women's Wellness Center and analyzed interviews using a rapid qualitative approach. For the rapid qualitative analysis, we created templated summaries of each interview to identify key concepts within each a priori theme, reviewed each theme's content across all interviews, and finally reviewed key concepts across themes. We evaluated feasibility using recruitment and retention rates; acceptability via Veteran satisfaction, working relationship with the peer, and staff satisfaction; and utility based on the proportion of Veterans who experienced a large change in outcomes (e.g., stress, mental health symptoms, and quality of life). The Syracuse VA Human Subjects Institutional Review Board approved all procedures. RESULTS: Staff interviews highlight that women Veterans have numerous unmet social needs and concerns common among women which increase the complexity of their care; call for a supportive, consistent, trusting relationship with someone on their health care team; and require many resources (e.g., staff such as social workers, services such as legal support, and physical items such as diapers) to support their needs (some of which are available within VHA but may need support for staffing or access, and some of which are unavailable). Feasibility outcomes suggest a need to modify PSP and research methods to enhance intervention and assessment retention before the larger trial; the recruitment rate was acceptable by the end of the trial. Veteran acceptability of PSP was high. Veteran outcomes demonstrate promise for utility to improve stress, mental health symptoms, and quality of life for women Veterans. CONCLUSIONS: Given the high acceptability and promising outcomes for utility, changes to the design to enhance the feasibility outcomes which failed to meet the a priori Go/No-Go criteria are warranted. These outcomes support future trials of PSP within VHA Women's Wellness Centers.

Understanding Who Uses Whole Health Services: A Program Evaluation.

Background: The Veterans Health Administration is rolling out a Whole Health system of care as part of an enhanced focus on proactive, person-centered healthcare. Objective: Our program evaluation seeks to characterize what Veterans use Whole Health services, for what diagnoses they are seeking Whole Health services, and to examine "high utilizers" of Whole Health services. Methods: Data were collected on 174 Veterans using Whole Health services from December 2018 through March 2020 and consisted of chart review and self-report data. Results: Women were more likely than men Veterans to use individual only Whole Health services. High utilizers (the top 30% of the sample in Whole Health services used) were more likely to attend groups than the remainder of the sample. Conclusion: Future work should examine the community-building aspects of Whole Health and ways to create group programming tailored to women Veterans.