RESUMO
Suturing is an essential skill in dentistry and not one easily acquired. The COVID-19 pandemic prompted a change to the use of Thiel cadavers and online resources with the aim of improving skill acquisition using the best model available. This study investigated the utility of the Thiel cadaver for teaching suturing skills and the potential impact of the lockdown. Fifty-seven year 4 students attended a teaching session. Student views on this teaching were explored via a questionnaire survey and qualitative data collected from a focus group. Data were analysed using an inductive approach. The response rate was 53% (30 students) for the questionnaire with 9 students participating in the focus group. Independent feedback was provided by two members of the teaching staff. Online video resources were very well received by the students with 97% agreeing that it was useful preparation. Ninety percent (90%) thought that the cadaveric model was suitable for this teaching and realistic. Positive emergent themes from the focus group centred on the use of the cadaveric model and the positive and relaxed teaching and learning environment. Staff perceived this model as superior to previously used models. There were no reported negative pandemic impacts and the cadaver model was well received.
RESUMO
Aim To determine the accuracy of using saliva and oral cytology swabs in the diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) by detecting aberrantly hypermethylated DNA.Data sources Electronic databases including PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science with no language or article restrictions. Additionally, LILACS database, OpenGrey and Google Scholar were searched.Study selection Studies published since the first report proposing DNA hypermethylation for head and neck carcinomas in 2001 until 2020 were included. The diagnoses of oral cancer were limited to OSCC. Authors screened titles and abstracts for relevance, before further screening of full texts and a consensus for inclusion was reached. Qualitative analysis was conducted on 22 studies, and 11 were selected for meta-analysis.Data analysis Diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis was performed using a series of investigations including the Haldane-Anscombe correction, forest plots, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and Deeks' funnel plots. Differences in the pooled estimates of the application of both single and combined hypermethylation markers were assessed using Cochran's Q test and Higgins' I2 test. Random-effects meta-regression analysis was used to evaluate the effects of variation in sensitivity and false-positive rates, and to identify sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses removed outliers.Results All studies suggest that DNA hypermethylation can discriminate between OSCC and premalignant conditions or normal mucosa. Using summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curves, the sensitivity of combined markers was higher than single markers, and specificity of both combined and single markers was comparable. The biomarkers evaluated had fair-to-excellent sensitivity and good-to-excellent specificity for discriminating OSCC from premalignant and normal mucosa. Four studies included in the review suggest that this method of detection is more applicable to patients who smoke due to increased hypermethylation rates.Conclusion Hypermethylation markers using saliva and oral swabs are more specific than sensitive for OSCC diagnosis. Combining different genes within the biomarker panel can improve diagnostic test accuracy. However, more blinded evaluation study designs with less bias which replicate real-world application are required to endorse the use of saliva sampling and oral swabs in oral oncology.