Telehealth's New Horizon: Providing Smart Hospital-Level Care in the Home.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, medical providers have expanded telehealth into daily practice, with many medical and behavioral health care visits provided remotely over video or through phone. The telehealth market was already facilitating home health care with increasing levels of sophistication before COVID-19. Among the emerging telehealth practices, telephysical therapy; teleneurology; telemental health; chronic care management of congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes; home hospice; home mechanical ventilation; and home dialysis are some of the most prominent. Home telehealth helps streamline hospital/clinic operations and ensure the safety of health care workers and patients. The authors recommend that we expand home telehealth to a comprehensive delivery of medical care across a distributed network of hospitals and homes, linking patients to health care workers through the Internet of Medical Things using in-home equipment, including smart medical monitoring devices to create a "medical smart home." This expanded telehealth capability will help doctors care for patients flexibly, remotely, and safely as a part of standard operations and during emergencies such as a pandemic. This model of "telehomecare" is already being implemented, as shown herein with examples. The authors envision a future in which providers and hospitals transition medical care delivery to the home just as, during the COVID-19 pandemic, students adapted to distance learning and adults transitioned to remote work from home. Many of our homes in the future may have a "smart medical suite" as well as a "smart home office."

Comparison between epidural and opioid analgesia for infants undergoing major abdominal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Epidural analgesia is considered optimal for postoperative pain management after major abdominal surgery. The potential to decrease anesthetic and opioid exposure is particularly desirable for infants, given their vulnerability to respiratory depression and concern for anesthetic neurotoxicity. We reviewed our experience with infants undergoing major abdominal surgery to determine if epidural catheter use decreased anesthetic and opioid exposure and improved postoperative analgesia. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included infants (<12 months) who underwent exploratory laparotomy, ureteral reimplantation, or bladder exstrophy repair between November 2011 and November 2014. Primary outcomes of anesthetic exposure (mean endtidal sevoflurane) and intraoperative opioid administration were compared between infants who received epidural catheters and those who did not. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain and sedation scores and morphine equivalents administered 0-24 and 24-48 hours after surgery. RESULTS: Of 158 eligible infants, 82 were included and 47 received epidurals. Patients with epidurals underwent bladder exstrophy repair (N = 9), ureteral reimplantation (N = 8), and exploratory laparotomy (N = 30). Infants with epidurals received less intraoperative fentanyl (2.6 mcg/kg (0,4.5) vs 3.3 mcg/kg (2.4,5.8), P = 0.019) and morphine (6% (3/47) vs 26% (9/35), P = 0.014) in univariate analysis. After controlling for age and emergency surgery, differences in long-acting opioid administration persisted, with significantly less morphine given in the epidural group (OR 0.181; 95% CI 0.035-0.925; P = 0.040). Mean endtidal sevoflurane concentrations were similar between groups. There was no significant difference in postoperative median morphine equivalents. CONCLUSION: Placement of epidural catheters in infants undergoing major abdominal surgery is associated with decreased long-acting opioid requirements intraoperatively. Epidural placement does not preclude opioid exposure however, as opioids may be administered for indications other than nociceptive pain in the difficult-to-assess postoperative infant. Further prospective studies are warranted to better quantify the effect of epidural analgesia on intraoperative anesthetic exposure in infants.

Case series of 331 cases of sugammadex compared to neostigmine in patients under 2 years of age.

BACKGROUND: Sugammadex is a novel neuromuscular blockade reversal agent approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2015, but little literature exists for patients less than 2 years of age. AIMS: The aims of this study were to: describe a cohort of patients 2 years old and younger who received sugammadex; describe any adverse effects of sugammadex in this age group; compare time from end of surgery to out of operating room for sugammadex versus neostigmine; compare time between last dose of neuromuscular blocking drug and reversal; and use train-of-four data to assess reversal. METHODS: Chart review of the medical record and the anesthesia information system captured all patients in this age cohort who received sugammadex or neostigmine over a two-year period. Adverse medication events were pulled from a mandatory quality improvement field in the electronic anesthesia record. T-tests were used for analyses. RESULTS: No adverse effects were reported with 331 doses of sugammadex. The average time in minutes between end of surgery and out of operating room was similar for neostigmine (19.6) versus sugammadex (19.4) (mean difference 0.2, 95% CI -1.5-1.8, P = 0.85). The average time in minutes between last dose of neuromuscular blocking drug and reversal agent was longer for neostigmine (103) than for sugammadex (84) (mean difference 19, 95% CI 13-26, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Sugammadex administration in this young population did not result in any adverse effects. It appears to be equally effective as neostigmine in patients under 2 years of age.

Variability in opioid prescribing for children undergoing ambulatory surgery in the United States.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We attempted to describe the opioid prescribing patterns for ambulatory pediatric surgery in the United States from 2007 to 2014. DESIGN: Retrospective database review. SETTING: Operating room ambulatory encounters as determined by the Truven Health Marketscan Commercial Claims and Encounters database. PATIENTS: A total of 929,874 ambulatory surgical encounters were identified in patients <18years of age and, of these, 439,286 encounters generated an analgesic prescription. INTERVENTIONS: N/A MEASUREMENTS: The analgesic prescription was described in terms of the type of opioid along with the inclusion of acetaminophen and/or NSAIDs. MAIN RESULTS: The probability of receiving a post-operative analgesic prescription increased with age, ranging from 18.2% of infants to 71.7% of teens. Acetaminophen with codeine (APAP/C) was the most common drug for infants (63.8%), while acetaminophen with hydrocodone (APAP/H) was the most common analgesic prescription for teens (53.6%). APAP/C and APAP/H were the predominant drugs used for all procedure types. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial variability in analgesic prescribing at the level of the procedure performed, both in terms of the probability of receiving a prescription and in which drugs were prescribed. We observed significant age and procedure-based variability in opioid prescribing following pediatric ambulatory surgery.

Outcomes of a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis for medication errors in pediatric anesthesia.

The Institute of Medicine has called for development of strategies to prevent medication errors, which are one important cause of preventable harm. Although the field of anesthesiology is considered a leader in patient safety, recent data suggest high medication error rates in anesthesia practice. Unfortunately, few error prevention strategies for anesthesia providers have been implemented. Using Toyota Production System quality improvement methodology, a multidisciplinary team observed 133 h of medication practice in the operating room at a tertiary care freestanding children's hospital. A failure mode and effects analysis was conducted to systematically deconstruct and evaluate each medication handling process step and score possible failure modes to quantify areas of risk. A bundle of five targeted countermeasures were identified and implemented over 12 months. Improvements in syringe labeling (73 to 96%), standardization of medication organization in the anesthesia workspace (0 to 100%), and two-provider infusion checks (23 to 59%) were observed. Medication error reporting improved during the project and was subsequently maintained. After intervention, the median medication error rate decreased from 1.56 to 0.95 per 1000 anesthetics. The frequency of medication error harm events reaching the patient also decreased. Systematic evaluation and standardization of medication handling processes by anesthesia providers in the operating room can decrease medication errors and improve patient safety.

Assessing the Impact of the Anesthesia Medication Template on Medication Errors During Anesthesia: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Medication errors continue to be a significant source of patient harm in the operating room with few concrete countermeasures. The organization and identification of medication syringes may have an impact on the commission of medication errors in anesthesia, so a team of physicians and designers at the University of Washington created the Anesthesia Medication Template (AMT) to define a formal way of organizing the anesthesia workspace. The purpose of this study is to assess the ability of the AMT to reduce perioperative medication errors by anesthesia providers. METHODS: This study evaluated the AMT in 2 phases: (1) 41 anesthesia providers administered medications in 2 prospective, randomized operating room simulations with or without the AMT, while medication errors were directly observed; and (2) around 200 providers prospectively self-reported medication errors from all anesthetizing locations during a 2-year period at Seattle Children's Hospital, an academic, pediatric medical center. RESULTS: In simulated emergencies, the odds of medication dosing errors using the AMT were 0.21 times the odds of medication dosing errors without AMT (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07, 0.66), controlling for scenario, session, training level, and years at training level. During the year after implementation of the AMT, the mean monthly error rate for all reported medication errors that reached patients decreased from 1.24 (95% CI, 0.85-1.79) to 0.65 (95% CI, 0.39-1.09) errors per 1000 anesthetics. The mean monthly error rate of reported swap, preparation, miscalculation, and timing errors decreased from 0.97 (95% CI, 0.64-1.48) to 0.35 (95% CI, 0.17-0.70) errors per 1000 anesthetics. Medication errors that resulted in patient harm did not change after implementation of the AMT. CONCLUSIONS: Standardizing medication organization with the AMT is an intuitive, low-cost strategy with the potential to improve patient safety through reducing medication errors by anesthesia providers.