Vilaprisan for the treatment of symptomatic endometriosis: results from a terminated phase 2b randomized controlled trial.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of vilaprisan vs. placebo in participants with symptomatic endometriosis. Design: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase 2b trial (NCT03573336). The initially planned sample size was 315 patients. Recruitment was paused to assess long-term toxicity findings in rodents; although the findings were assessed as likely to be of limited clinical relevance in humans, the study was closed by the sponsor. During the pause, enrolled patients completed 3 or 6 months of treatment per their assigned regimen. Setting: University hospitals, a regional hospital, and a private clinic. Patients: Premenopausal adults with confirmed endometriosis and moderate-to-severe pelvic pain (≥4/10 on a numerical rating scale) were enrolled. Inclusion required protocol adherence, including ≥24 diary entries, and an average pain score of ≥3.5. Intervention: Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive vilaprisan (2 mg), vilaprisan (4 mg), or placebo. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was a change in the 7-day mean "worst pain" (per the endometriosis symptom diary item 1) from baseline to month 3. All analyses were descriptive only. Results: Eight participants were randomly assigned to treatment before the study pause: 6 received vilaprisan (4 mg, n = 4 and 2 mg, n = 2), and 2 received placebo. The 6 vilaprisan recipients experienced an improvement in endometriosis-associated pelvic pain, whereas the 2 placebo recipients experienced no change or increased pain; all 8 participants had decreased use of pain medication. Bleeding intensity decreased from baseline in the vilaprisan group. Conclusion: The study findings suggest that vilaprisan may improve outcomes in patients with endometriosis. Further studies in larger populations would be needed to accurately assess treatment effects. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT03573336.

Quantitative Systems Toxicology Identifies Independent Mechanisms for Hepatotoxicity and Bilirubin Elevations Due to AKR1C3 Inhibitor BAY1128688.

BAY1128688 is a selective inhibitor of AKR1C3, investigated recently in a trial that was prematurely terminated due to drug-induced liver injury. These unexpected observations prompted use of the quantitative systems toxicology model, DILIsym, to determine possible mechanisms of hepatotoxicity. Using mechanistic in vitro toxicity data as well as clinical exposure data, DILIsym predicted the potential for BAY1128688 to cause liver toxicity (elevations in serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT)) and elevations in serum bilirubin. Initial simulations overpredicted hepatotoxicity and bilirubin elevations, so the BAY1128688 representation within DILIsym underwent optimization. The liver partition coefficient Kp was altered to align simulated bilirubin elevations with those observed clinically. Altering the mode of bile acid canalicular and basolateral efflux inhibition was necessary to accurately predict ALT elevations. Optimization results support that bilirubin elevations observed early during treatment are due to altered bilirubin metabolism and transporter inhibition, which is independent of liver injury. The modeling further supports that on-treatment ALT elevations result from inhibition of bile acid transporters, particularly the bile salt excretory pump, leading to accumulation of toxic bile acids. The predicted dose-dependent intrinsic hepatotoxicity may increase patient susceptibility to an adaptive immune response, accounting for ALT elevations observed after completion of treatment. These BAY1128688 simulations provide insight into the mechanisms behind hepatotoxicity and bilirubin elevations and may inform the potential risk posed by future compounds.

Efficacy and safety of vilaprisan in women with uterine fibroids: data from the ASTEROID 3 randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Vilaprisan is a highly potent selective progesterone receptor modulator shown to reduce heavy menstrual bleeding, induce amenorrhea, and diminish uterine fibroid volume in phase 2 studies. The objective of ASTEROID 3 was to demonstrate the superiority of vilaprisan compared with placebo in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding in women with uterine fibroids. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase 3 study. SETTING: Hospitals and medical centers. PATIENT(S): Women with ≥1 uterine fibroid of ≥3 cm and heavy menstrual bleeding of >80 mL/cycle. INTERVENTION(S): Women were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment arms, which were planned to comprise 2 treatment periods of 12 weeks, each with vilaprisan (2 mg/d) or placebo that were continuous or separated by a break of one bleed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Amenorrhea (primary end point; <2 mL in the last 28 days of treatment) and heavy menstrual bleeding response (key secondary end point; <80 mL/cycle and >50% reduction in bleeding from baseline) were measured with the alkaline hematin method. Change in volume of the 3 largest fibroids from baseline to end of treatment was assessed by ultrasound. Safety was monitored throughout the study. RESULT(S): Overall, 75 women completed the first 12 weeks of treatment. Statistically significant and clinically meaningful differences were observed between the vilaprisan- and placebo-treated groups in both the full analysis and per-protocol sets. In the per-protocol set (n = 36 and n = 12 for the vilaprisan and placebo groups, respectively), amenorrhea was observed more frequently in women treated with vilaprisan than in those who received placebo (83.3% vs. 0%, P<.0001), with a median time to onset of 3 days in the vilaprisan group. Similarly, more vilaprisan- than placebo-treated women achieved a response in heavy menstrual bleeding (91.7% vs. 25.0%, P<.0001). Serious adverse events were reported for 22 (27.8%) of 79 women and were evenly distributed among the 4 groups receiving vilaprisan and/or placebo. None of these events led to study discontinuation or were related to the liver, and no new safety findings were identified compared with the earlier phase 2 ASTEROID studies. CONCLUSION(S): Vilaprisan is efficacious and well tolerated over 12 weeks in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids. Further investigations of the long-term efficacy and safety of vilaprisan are warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03400943 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Hepatotoxicity of AKR1C3 Inhibitor BAY1128688: Findings from an Early Terminated Phase IIa Trial for the Treatment of Endometriosis.

INTRODUCTION: BAY1128688 is a selective inhibitor of aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C3 (AKR1C3), an enzyme implicated in the pathology of endometriosis and other disorders. In vivo animal studies suggested a potential therapeutic application of BAY1128688 in treating endometriosis. Early clinical studies in healthy volunteers supported the start of phase IIa. OBJECTIVE: This manuscript reports the results of a clinical trial (AKRENDO1) assessing the effects of BAY1128688 in adult premenopausal women with endometriosis-related pain symptoms over a 12-week treatment period. METHODS: Participants in this placebo-controlled, multicenter phase IIa clinical trial (NCT03373422) were randomized into one of five BAY1128688 treatment groups: 3 mg once daily (OD), 10 mg OD, 30 mg OD, 30 mg twice daily (BID), 60 mg BID; or a placebo group. The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of BAY1128688 were investigated. RESULTS: Dose-/exposure-dependent hepatotoxicity was observed following BAY1128688 treatment, characterized by elevations in serum alanine transferase (ALT) occurring at around 12 weeks of treatment and prompting premature trial termination. The reduced number of valid trial completers precludes conclusions regarding treatment efficacy. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of BAY1128688 among participants with endometriosis were comparable with those previously found in healthy volunteers and were not predictive of the subsequent ALT elevations observed. CONCLUSIONS: The hepatotoxicity of BAY1128688 observed in AKRENDO1 was not predicted by animal studies nor by studies in healthy volunteers. However, in vitro interactions of BAY1128688 with bile salt transporters indicated a potential risk factor for hepatotoxicity at higher doses. This highlights the importance of in vitro mechanistic and transporter interaction studies in the assessment of hepatoxicity risk and suggests further mechanistic understanding is required. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03373422 (date registered: November 23, 2017).

Endometrial hyperplasia in pre-menopausal women: A systematic review of incidence, prevalence, and risk factors.

OBJECTIVES: Hormonal therapies have been associated with a range of effects on the endometrium, including endometrial hyperplasia (EH). With many medicinal products being developed for pre-menopausal women, epidemiological data regarding the population background risk could meaningfully supplement comparative risk data gathered in clinical trials. However, epidemiological studies on EH often focus on post-menopausal women. We aimed to assess the available observational evidence on the incidence and prevalence of EH among pre-menopausal women and to investigate the influence of specific risk factors. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted systematic literature searches on 27 August 2021, using the Embase and PubMed databases. Searches were designed to identify studies of EH epidemiology, published in English on or after 1 January 1995, in populations of predominantly pre-menopausal women. Studies were required to report diagnostic histopathology data for at least 500 women. Relevant outcomes were the prevalence and incidence of EH, and/or the impact of pre-specified risk factors including age, body mass index (BMI) and diabetes mellitus. RESULTS: In total, 3785 records were screened, and 31 references, describing 29 different studies, were included in the review. The incidence of EH among pre-menopausal women increased with age and was as high as 121 and 270 cases per 100,000 woman-years in South Korean women aged 46-50 years and US women aged 45-49 years, respectively. The prevalence of EH was highly dependent on the population studied. Estimates of EH prevalence in 14 studies of pre-menopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) ranged from 3.4% to 265%, higher than the reported prevalence in two studies of women with infertility (0.9% and 3.0%). Studies of risk factors found increasing age, BMI and diabetes to be associated with an increased prevalence of EH. CONCLUSIONS: Published data on the epidemiology of EH in pre-menopausal women are heterogeneous, with considerable variation in study methodology and populations, and in how EH subtypes are reported. The main factors affecting the reported prevalence and incidence of EH are the reason a biopsy was performed - particularly whether patients had AUB, a key symptom associated with EH - and the presence of known risk factors.

Efficacy and safety of vilaprisan in women with uterine fibroids: Data from the phase 2b randomized controlled trial ASTEROID 2.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of vilaprisan compared with placebo in the management of the symptoms of uterine fibroids (UF), with a secondary objective to provide a descriptive comparison with ulipristal acetate. STUDY DESIGN: The randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, multicenter ASTEROID 2 trial assessed the efficacy and safety of vilaprisan versus placebo and ulipristal acetate for two 12-week treatment periods in women with ≥1 UF experiencing heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). The primary endpoint compared the efficacy of vilaprisan with placebo at 12 weeks, assessed as the absence of bleeding/spotting by bleeding diary. Secondary endpoints compared the efficacy of vilaprisan with ulipristal acetate. Results of the first 12-week treatment period are reported here. RESULTS: Women (mean age 42.5 years) were enrolled from 1 June 2015. At baseline, mean menstrual blood loss per 28 days was 214.1 mL and the volume of the three largest UF was 106.2 mL. In total, 155 women completed the initial 12-week treatment period. Complete absence of bleeding/spotting until the end of the 12-week treatment period was achieved by 62.9 % of women receiving vilaprisan versus 0.0 % with placebo (p < .001); 55.4 % of women treated with ulipristal acetate reported absence of bleeding/spotting. The predefined HMB response (<80 mL and >50 % reduction from baseline during the last 28 days of treatment) was observed in 95.7 % of subjects treated with vilaprisan and 86.5 % of subjects treated with ulipristal acetate. Vilaprisan and ulipristal acetate treatment reduced the sum of the volume of the three largest UF by 29.9 % and 23.8 %, respectively, whereas an increase of 6.3 % was observed in the placebo group. No safety concerns, including multiple laboratory parameters, were identified. CONCLUSION: Daily administration of vilaprisan 2 mg induced amenorrhea, controlled bleeding, decreased UF size, and was well tolerated in women with HMB associated with UF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02465814 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02465814.

Vilaprisan in women with uterine fibroids: the randomized phase 2b ASTEROID 1 study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of four vilaprisan doses (0.5-4.0 mg) in women with uterine fibroids. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. SETTING: Ninety-eight centers in 12 countries. PATIENT(S): Women aged 18-50 years with uterine fibroids and heavy menstrual bleeding were randomized equally to oral vilaprisan at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, or 4.0 mg or placebo once daily. INTERVENTION(S): Treatment for 12 weeks, 24-week follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary end point was absence of scheduled or unscheduled bleeding/spotting. Key secondary efficacy end points included volume of menstrual blood loss and change in fibroid volume. RESULT(S): A total of 309 patients were randomized, and 300 received treatment. Complete absence of bleeding/spotting was observed in 30%, 56%, 54%, and 60% of patients in the vilaprisan 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 mg groups, respectively, versus 1.7% with placebo. After 12 weeks, >83% of women achieved amenorrhea (<2 mL/28 days) with ≥1.0 mg vilaprisan versus 9% with placebo. Heavy menstrual bleeding stopped (but returned at a lower volume after treatment cessation) with ≥1.0 mg vilaprisan treatment. Reductions in fibroid volume of up to 41% were observed. Most patients receiving vilaprisan reported improvements in symptom severity. No safety concerns were identified in general safety, endometrial safety (by biopsy), laboratory values, and ultrasound examinations. CONCLUSION(S): ASTEROID 1 supports the efficacy of vilaprisan for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids. Daily oral treatment with vilaprisan 0.5-4.0 mg was well tolerated, and vilaprisan 2.0 mg once daily has been selected for further investigation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02131662.

Efficacy, safety and tolerability of the CCR1 antagonist BAY 86-5047 for the treatment of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Antagonism of CC chemokine receptor type 1 (CCR1) may provide a novel treatment approach for women with symptomatic endometriosis. Studies of CCR1 antagonists in these patients have not been reported. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Women (n = 110; 18-45 years) with symptomatic endometriosis were randomized to BAY 86-5047 or placebo for 12 weeks. Pelvic pain was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and women recorded the intake of pain medication in a diary. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of the absolute change in VAS score and the cumulative change in consumption of analgesics between baseline and the end of treatment. Safety assessments included adverse events, blood and urine evaluation and electrocardiography. RESULTS: Mean VAS scores decreased from 64.8 mm at baseline to 49.2 mm at week 12 in the BAY 86-5047 group and from 67.2 mm to 47.8 mm in the placebo group. The proportion of women using analgesics decreased from 33.9% to 11.5% or from 44.4% to 15.4% for patients who received BAY 86-5047 or placebo, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups in terms of change in VAS scores (p = 0.45) or intake of analgesics (p = 0.82). A three-step sensitivity analysis failed to show superiority of BAY 86-5047 over placebo (p = 0.67). BAY 86-5047 was well tolerated and no significant safety concerns arose during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, BAY 86-5047 is unlikely to be useful in the treatment of women with endometriosis-associated pelvic pain.