Purification of In Vivo or In Vitro-Assembled RNA-Protein Complexes by RNA Centric Methods.

Throughout their entire life cycle, RNAs are associated with RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), forming ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes with highly dynamic compositions and very diverse functions in RNA metabolism, including splicing, translational regulation, ribosome assembly. Many RNPs remain poorly characterized due to the challenges inherent in their purification and subsequent biochemical characterization. Therefore, developing methods to isolate specific RNA-protein complexes is an important initial step toward understanding their function. Many elegant methodologies have been developed to isolate RNPs. This chapter describes different approaches and methods devised for RNA-specific purification of a target RNP. We focused on general methods for selecting RNPs that target a given RNA under conditions favourable for the copurification of associated factors including RNAs and protein components of the RNP.

Immunoprecipitation Methods to Isolate Messenger Ribonucleoprotein Complexes (mRNP).

Throughout their life cycle, messenger RNAs (mRNAs) associate with proteins to form ribonucleoproteins (mRNPs). Each mRNA is part of multiple successive mRNP complexes that participate in their biogenesis, cellular localization, translation and decay. The dynamic composition of mRNP complexes and their structural remodelling play crucial roles in the control of gene expression. Studying the endogenous composition of different mRNP complexes is a major challenge. In this chapter, we describe the variety of protein-centric immunoprecipitation methods available for the identification of mRNP complexes and the requirements for their experimental settings.

eIF3 interacts with histone H4 messenger RNA to regulate its translation.

In eukaryotes, various alternative translation initiation mechanisms have been unveiled for the translation of specific mRNAs. Some do not conform to the conventional scanning-initiation model. Translation initiation of histone H4 mRNA combines both canonical (cap-dependent) and viral initiation strategies (no-scanning, internal recruitment of initiation factors). Specific H4 mRNA structures tether the translation machinery directly onto the initiation codon and allow massive production of histone H4 during the S phase of the cell cycle. The human eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3), composed of 13 subunits (a-m), was shown to selectively recruit and control the expression of several cellular mRNAs. Whether eIF3 mediates H4 mRNA translation remains to be elucidated. Here, we report that eIF3 binds to a stem-loop structure (eIF3-BS) located in the coding region of H4 mRNA. Combining cross-linking and ribonucleoprotein immunoprecipitation experiments in vivo and in vitro, we also found that eIF3 binds to H1, H2A, H2B, and H3 histone mRNAs. We identified direct contacts between eIF3c, d, e, g subunits, and histone mRNAs but observed distinct interaction patterns to each histone mRNA. Our results show that eIF3 depletion in vivo reduces histone mRNA binding and modulates histone neosynthesis, suggesting that synthesis of histones is sensitive to the levels of eIF3. Thus, we provide evidence that eIF3 acts as a regulator of histone translation.

Tracking the m7G-cap during translation initiation by crosslinking methods.

In eukaryotes, cap-dependent translation initiation is a sophisticated process that requires numerous trans-acting factors, the eukaryotic Initiation Factors (eIFs). Their main function is to assist the ribosome for accurate AUG start codon recognition. The whole process requires a 5'-3' scanning step and is therefore highly dynamic. Therefore translation requires a complex interplay between eIFs through assembly/release cycles. Here, we describe an original approach to assess the dynamic features of translation initiation. The principle is to use the m7Gcap located at the 5' extremity of mRNAs as a tracker to monitor RNA and protein components that are in its vicinity. Cap-binding molecules are trapped by chemical and UV crosslinking. The combination of cap crosslinking methods in cell-free translation systems with the use of specific translation inhibitors for different steps such as edeine, GMP-PNP or cycloheximide allowed assessing the cap fate during eukaryotic translation. Here, we followed the position of the cap in the histone H4 mRNA and the cap binding proteins during H4 mRNA translation.

The IRES5'UTR of the dicistrovirus cricket paralysis virus is a type III IRES containing an essential pseudoknot structure.

Cricket paralysis virus (CrPV) is a dicistrovirus. Its positive-sense single-stranded RNA genome contains two internal ribosomal entry sites (IRESs). The 5' untranslated region (5'UTR) IRES5'UTR mediates translation of non-structural proteins encoded by ORF1 whereas the well-known intergenic region (IGR) IRESIGR is required for translation of structural proteins from open reading frame 2 in the late phase of infection. Concerted action of both IRES is essential for host translation shut-off and viral translation. IRESIGR has been extensively studied, in contrast the IRES5'UTR remains largely unexplored. Here, we define the minimal IRES element required for efficient translation initiation in drosophila S2 cell-free extracts. We show that IRES5'UTR promotes direct recruitment of the ribosome on the cognate viral AUG start codon without any scanning step, using a Hepatitis-C virus-related translation initiation mechanism. Mass spectrometry analysis revealed that IRES5'UTR recruits eukaryotic initiation factor 3, confirming that it belongs to type III class of IRES elements. Using Selective 2'-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension and DMS probing, we established a secondary structure model of 5'UTR and of the minimal IRES5'UTR. The IRES5'UTR contains a pseudoknot structure that is essential for proper folding and ribosome recruitment. Overall, our results pave the way for studies addressing the synergy and interplay between the two IRES from CrPV.