RESUMO
Abdominal pain secondary to chronic pancreatitis (CP) is difficult to manage and often requires chronic oral opioid therapy (OOT). Targeted drug delivery (TDD) allows for a diminished dose of opioid intake and improved pain levels. TDD has been used in different pain syndromes with only limited reports in CP. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to perform a retrospective review of CP patients treated with TDD versus OOT to compare chronic pain control and consumed morphine-equivalent doses. METHODS: Patients receiving TDD between September 2011 and August 2018 were included. All patients were weaned off oral opioids one week before intrathecal trial and pump implantation. Patients with intrathecal trials providing at least 50% pain relief underwent pump implantation. Data were collected while on OOT and at two weeks, three months, and nine months post-implant. Data were analyzed with Microsoft Excel 365 MSO using means and standard deviations. P-values were calculated using a two-tailed student's t-test with paired two-sample means. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were analyzed. Pre-trial average pain score was 6.5/10 with a mean improvement with trials greater than 71%. The mean chronic baseline oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME) was 188. The mean MME on TDD at two weeks (0.36), three months (1.39), and nine months (2.47) were significantly lower than OOT. Mean pain scores were 6, 4.9, and 5.6 at two weeks, three months, and nine months, respectively, compared to 6.5 on OOT. DISCUSSION: The results of this study indicate that TDD provides improved pain control with significantly lower opioid doses.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the volar Henry and dorsal Thompson approaches with respect to outcomes and complications for proximal third radial shaft fractures. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients with proximal third radial shaft fractures ± associated ulna fractures (OTA/AO 2R1 ± 2U1) treated operatively at 11 trauma centers were included. INTERVENTION: Patient demographics and injury, fracture, and surgical data were recorded. Final range of motion and complications of infection, neurologic injury, compartment syndrome, and malunion/nonunion were compared for volar versus dorsal approaches. MAIN OUTCOME: The main outcome was difference in complications between patients treated with volar versus dorsal approach. RESULTS: At an average follow-up of 292 days, 202 patients (range, 18-84 years) with proximal third radial shaft fractures were followed through union or nonunion. One hundred fifty-five patients were fixed via volar and 47 via dorsal approach. Patients treated via dorsal approach had fractures that were on average 16 mm more proximal than those approached volarly, which did not translate to more screw fixation proximal to the fracture. Complications occurred in 11% of volar and 21% of dorsal approaches with no statistical difference. CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistical difference in complication rates between volar and dorsal approaches. Specifically, fixation to the level of the tuberosity is safely accomplished via the volar approach. This series demonstrates the safety of the volar Henry approach for proximal third radial shaft fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.