Lipoprotein Lp(a) in lipoprotein spectrum indentified by Lipoprint LDL system.

OBJECTIVE: Identification of lipoprotein subfractions in lipoprotein profile by Lipoprint LDL system, where a lipoprotein(a), an independent risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease, migrates with. The concentration of lipoprotein(a) in serum over 0.3 g/l increases the risk of athero-thrombosis and a brain stroke. The persons with increased levels of lipoprotein(a) and contemporarily increased cholesterol level in serum, are at increased risk of the inception of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular event even 3-times. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a general group of subjects with increased serum concentration of lipoprotein(a) a lipoprotein profile analysis was performed. The general group of subjects was divided into two groups: subgroup with the lipoprotein(a) concentration in the range between 0.3-0.8 g/l and a subgroup with the lipoprotein(a) concentration over 0.8 g/l, to learn if the lipoprotein(a) particles of different serum concentration and different size do not migrate in different positions of the lipoprotein spectrum. For the analysis of serum lipoproteins an innovated electrophoresis method on polyacrylamide gel (PAG) - Lipoprint LDL system USA, was used. Lipids: a total cholesterol and triglycerides in serum were analysed by an enzymatic method CHOD PAP (Roche Diagnostics, FRG), lipoprotein(a) was analysed by an immuno-nephelometric method (Roche Diagnostics, FRG). RESULTS: In the Lipoprint LDL system using a polyacrylamide gel (PAG) for the lipoprotein separation, lipoprotein(a) migrates in the position IDL2-IDL3. In the band of IDL2 a high Lp(a) values can be identified, when the increment of IDL2 subfraction is over the value of 0.015 g/l, i.e. 15 mg/dl (reference range for IDL2) and when the increment of IDL3 subfraction is over the value of 25 mg/dl, i.e. 0.025 g/l (reference range for IDL3). CONCLUSIONS: A clear contribution of new method is: identification of the lipoprotein subpopulations where the lipoprotein(a) migrates with different migration position for the mild increased lipoprotein(a) concentration and high lipoprotein(a) concentration in serum was not confirmed.

Lipoprotein profile in patients who survive a stroke.

OBJECTIVE: In the subjects, who survived a stroke, an atherogenic lipoprotein profile phenotype B, was identified and a predominance of atherogenic lipoproteins of the lipoprotein families, VLDL and LDL, in the lipoprotein spectrum, was confirmed. The higher total cholesterol, triglycerides, and low HDL concentrations were accompanied by high serum levels of small dense LDL - strong atherogenic subfractions of the LDL family. High LDL2 also contributes to the creation of the atherogenic lipoprotein profile. Conversely, decreased serum concentration of LDL1 suggests, that the LDL1 subfraction does not contribute to the creation of an atherogenic lipoprotein profile of specific individuals, i.e., those who survived a stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A quantitative analysis of serum lipoproteins in a group of stroke patients, and in a group of healthy normolipidemic volunteers, without signs of clinically manifested impairment of the cardiovascular system, was performed. For the analysis of plasma lipoproteins, an innovative electrophoresis method was used, on polyacrylamide gel (PAG) - the Lipoprint LDL system, (Quantimetrix corp., CA, USA). With regard to lipids, total cholesterol and triglycerides in serum were analyzed with an enzymatic CHOD PAP method (Roche Diagnostics, FRG). A new parameter, the score for anti-atherogenic risk (SAAR), was calculated as the ratio between non-atherogenic to atherogenic serum lipoproteins in examined subjects. RESULTS: An atherogenic lipoprotein profile phenotyp B was identified in the individuals who survived a stroke. There were increased concentrations of total cholesterol, triglycerides (p<0.001), and atherogenic lipoproteins: VLDL (p<0.001), total LDL, LDL2 (p<0.0001) and LDL3-7 (p<0.01), in the group of stroke patients, compared to the control group. The LDL1 subfraction, like HDL, was decreased and did not contribute to the formation of the atherogenic lipoprotein spectrum in stroke-surviving individuals. Therefore, it can be assumed that the LDL1 subfraction is not an atherogenic part of the LDL family, which was usually considered to be an atherogenic lipoprotein part of the lipoprotein spectrum. Decreased SAAR values - score of anti-atherogenic risk, was confirmed in the stroke surviving individuals, compared to the controls, with high statistical significance (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The advantages of this new method include: (i) Identification of an atherogenic and a non-atherogenic lipoprotein profile, in the serum of examined individuals. (ii) Identification of an atherogenic normopidemic lipoprotein profile; phenotype B in subjects who survived a stroke. (iii) Introduction of new risk measure, the score for anti-atherogenic risk (SAAR), to estimate the atherogenic risk of examined individuals. (iv) Declaration of an atherogenic lipoprotein profile is definitive when small dense LDL are present in serum. It is valid for hyperlipidemia and for normolipidemia as well. (v) Selection of optimal therapeutic measures, including removal of atherogenic lipoproteins, as a part of a complex therapeutic approach, and the secondary prevention of a relapsing ischemic cerebral-vascular event.

HDL subfractions analysis: a new laboratory diagnostic assay for patients with cardiovascular diseases and dyslipoproteinemia.

OBJECTIVE: The HDL family forms a protective part of plasma lipoproteins. It consists of large HDL, intermediate HDL, and small HDL subclasses. The large HDL and intermediate HDL subclasses are considered anti-atherogenic parts of the HDL family. The atherogenicity of the small HDL subclass is currently the subject of much discussion. In the patient group with the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (arterial hypertension, coronary heart disease) and in individuals with a non-atherogenic hypercholesterolemia, a type of lipoprotein profile (either a non-atherogenic phenotype A, or an atherogenic phenotype B) was identified, and a concentration of small dense LDL (sdLDL) was analyzed. The aim of this study was to identify the major representative of the HDL subclasses in the individuals with cardiovascular diseases, who had an atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype B, and in the individuals with the diagnosis of non-atherogenic hyper-betalipoproteinemia LDL1,2, who had a non-atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype A. METHODS: Identification of the specific lipoprotein phenotype and a quantitative analysis of small dense LDL was performed by an electrophoresis method on polyacrylamide gel (PAG), using the Lipoprint LDL system. For a quantitative analysis of HDL subclasses, i.e., large HDL, intermediatete HDL, and small HDL, in subjects with newly diagnosed cardiovascular diseases (arterial hypertension and coronary heart disease), and in subjects with a non-atherogenic hypercholesterolemia (hyper-betalipoproteinemia LDL1,2), we used an innovative electrophoresis method on polyacrylamide gel (PAG), the Lipoprint HDL system. With regard to lipids, total cholesterol and triglycerides in plasma were analyzed by an enzymatic CHOD PAP method. A control group consisted of a group of healthy normolipidemic volunteers without signs of clinically manifested impairment of the cardiovascular system. RESULTS: In the patient group with the diagnosis of arterial hypertension (p<0.0002) and coronary heart disease (p<0.0001), (both are classified as cardiovascular diseases), the large HDL subclass was significantly decreased and the small HDL subclass was increased (p<0.0001). The concentration of the intermediate HDL subclass did not differ from that of the control group. These results were in accordance with an atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype B in individuals with the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases, where, using a Lipoprint LDL analysis, a high concentration of atherogenic small dense LDL (p<0.0001) was found. Thus, it seems that the small HDL subclass represents an atherogenic part of the HDL family. Conversely, an increased concentration of total HDL (p<0.0001), large HDL (p<0.005), and intermediate HDL subclasses (p<0.0001) was found in a group of subjects with a non-atherogenic hyper-betalipoproteinemia LDL1,2.The concentration of the small HDL subclass did not differ from that of the control group. In this non-atherogenic lipoprotein profile, only traces of atherogenic small dense LDL were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The advantages of this new method includes: (i) Identification of ten HDL subfractions with Lipoprint HDL analysis (large HDL1-3, intermediate HDL 4-7, and small HDL 8-10) . (ii) Discovery of a high concentration of small HDL in plasma lipoproteins in patients with cardovascular diseases with an atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype B, confirms that the atherogenic subclass of HDL family is attributable to small HDL. (iii) Presence of a low concentration of small HDL in non-atherogenic hypercholesterolemia also confirms the atherogenic characteristics of the small HDL subclass per se. (iv) Presence of small dense LDL is definitive to diagnose an atherogenic lipoprotein profile. It is valid for hyperlipidemia and for normolipidemia as well.

Hyper-betalipoproteinemia LDL 1,2: a newly identified nonatherogenic hypercholesterolemia in a group of hypercholesterolemic subjects.

OBJECTIVE: The identification of a non-atherogenic and an atherogenic lipoprotein profile, non-athero phenotype A vs. athero phenotype B, in a group of hypercholesterolemic subjects reveals newly discovered non-atherogenic hypercholesterolemia. Individuals with this type of hypercholesterolemia, or hyper-betalipoproteinemia LDL1,2, are probably not at increased risk to develop a premature atherothrombosis or a sudden cardiovascular event. Examined individuals with hyper-betalipoproteinemia LDL1,2 were divided into two subgroups: individuals under 40 years of age, and older individuals between 46 and 71 years of age. Subjects in the under 40 years of age group did not have any apparent clinical or laboratory-proven impairment of the cardiovascular system. The older subjects with hyper-betalipoproteinemia and a non-atherogenic lipoprotein profile had only mild signs of clinically irrelevant aortic valve sclerosis. METHODS: A quantitative analysis of the lipoprotein spectrum in plasma in a group of hypercholesterolemic subjects was performed. An innovative electrophoresis method on polyacrylamide gel (PAG) was used for the analysis of plasma lipoproteins and for the identification of atherogenic vs. non-atherogenic lipoproteins in plasma. With regard to lipids, total cholesterol and triglycerides in plasma were analyzed with an enzymatic CHOD PAP method (Roche Diagnostics, FRG). A new parameter, the score for anti-atherogenic Risk (SAAR), was calculated as the ratio between non-atherogenic to atherogenic plasma lipoproteins in the examined subjects. RESULTS: There was a high concentration of LDL1, and LDL2 subfractions (p<0.0001), and an extremely low concentration of LDL3-7 (p<0.0001) in the non-atherogenic lipoprotein profile of hyper-betalipoproteinemia LDL1,2 compared to the control group. Higher concentrations (p<0.0001) of lipids and lipoproteins in the non-atherogenic hypercholesterolemia, compared to the control group, were also found. The hyper-betalipoproteinemia LDL1,2 was also characterized by high SAAR values. There was found a higher concentration of HDL large and HDL intermediate subfractions in hypercholesterolemic subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The advantages of this new diagnostic method include: (i) identification of the existence of a non-atherogenic hyper-betalipoproteinemia LDL1,2 in examined hypercholesterolemic subjects with untreated hypercholesterolemia (ii) introduction of a new risk measure, the score for anti-atherogenic risk (SAAR), for the estimation of atherogenic/anti-atherogenic risk. (iii) the presence of small dense LDL in plasma is decisive for the declaration of an atherogenic lipoprotein profile. It is valid for hyperlipidemia and for normolipidemia as well.

Atherogenic normolipidemia - a new phenomenon in the lipoprotein profile of clinically healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: The identification of an atherogenic and a non-atherogenic lipoprotein profile, athero phenotype B vs. non-athero phenotype A, in a group of healthy normolipidemic subjects reveals a new clinical phenomenon in lipoprotein profiles, an atherogenic normolipidemia. Individuals with atherogenic normolipidemia are at increased risk to develop premature atherothrombosis and experience a sudden cardiovascular event. METHODS: A quantitative analysis of non-atherogenic and atherogenic lipoproteins in plasma in a group of healthy normolipidemic volunteers who had no clinical signs of cardiovascular system impairment was performed. An innovative electrophoresis method on polyacrylamide gel (PAG) (Lipoprint LDL System, USA) was used for the analysis of plasma lipoproteins. With regard to lipids, total cholesterol and triglycerides in plasma were analyzed with an enzymatic method, CHOD PAP (Roche Diagnostics, FRG). Prostacyclin and thromboxane A2 were analyzed with an ELISA analysis (DRG USA). A new parameter, the score for anti-atherogenic risk (SAAR), was calculated as the ratio between non-atherogenic to atherogenic plasma lipoproteins in examined subjects. RESULTS: There was a high concentration of LDL3-7 subfraction (p<0.0001) and a slowly increasing triglyceride concentration (p<0.05) in the atherogenic subgroup. The non-atherogenic subgroup of healthy subjects was characterized by high SAAR scores, as well as a low concentration of LDL3-7 subfractions (p<0.0001). Other statistically significant differences between the atherogenic and non-atherogenic subgroup, including total cholesterol, prostanoid parameters (prostacyklin, thromboxane A2), and lipoproteins values, were not confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: The advantages of this new method include: (i) identification of an atherogenic and a nonatherogenic lipoprotein profile in an individual's plasma (ii) identification of an atherogenic normolipidemic lipoprotein profile in plasma (iii) introduction of a new risk measure, the score for anti-atherogenic risk (SAAR), for an estimation of a patient's atherogenic risk of atherothrombosis development. (iv) the presence of small dense LDL in plasma is decisive for declaration of an atherogenic lipoprotein profile. It is valid for hyperlipidemia and for normolipidemia as well.

Glucocorticosteroids modify Langerhans cells to produce TGF-ß and expand regulatory T cells.

Although glucocorticosteroids (GCSs) have been used for many decades in transplantation and (auto)inflammatory diseases, the exact mechanisms responsible for their immunosuppressive properties are not fully understood. The purpose of this study was to characterize the effects of oral GCSs on the cutaneous immune response. We analyzed, by immunofluorescence staining and quantitative RT-PCR, residual skin biopsy material from a clinical study in which we had used oral GCS as positive control for determining the effects of candidate anti-inflammatory compounds on epicutaneous patch tests of Ni-allergic patients. Expectedly, oral GCS treatment led to a reduction of clinical symptoms and infiltrating leukocytes. Notably, we observed increased numbers of dermal FOXP3(+)CD25(+) T cells and epidermal Langerhans cells (LCs) that were associated with upregulated mRNA expression of TGF-ß in lesions of GCS-treated Ni-allergic patients. To investigate this phenomenon further, we exposed purified LCs to GCS. They exhibited, in contrast to GCS-nonexposed LCs, 1) a more immature phenotype, 2) higher intracellular amounts of TGF-ß, and 3) increased receptor activator for NF-κB expression, conditions that reportedly favor the expansion of regulatory T cells (Tregs). Indeed, we observed an enhancement of functionally suppressive FOXP3(+) T cells when CD3(+) cells were incubated with GCS-pretreated LCs. The expansion of Tregs was inhibited by TGF-ß blockage alone, and their suppressive activity was neutralized by a combination of anti-TGF-ß and anti-IL-10 Abs. Our data show that systemically applied GCSs endow LCs with Treg-promoting properties and thus shed new light on the mechanisms of GCS-mediated immunosuppression.