Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Refract Surg ; 34(4): 254-259, 2018 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29634840

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To identify tomographic variables best suited for detecting keratoconus before manifestation of ectatic changes and showing disease progression in the early stage. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with diagnosed unilateral keratoconus were followed up for their fellow eye, which had not yet shown any ectatic changes, to determine initial change indicators toward keratoconus disease. Variables were compared to 50 normal eyes without any known disease. A following receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to reveal the variables best used to discriminate healthy eyes from early ectatic eyes. RESULTS: The calculated mean difference of the cylinder for total corneal refractive power was only 0.07 ± 0.32 diopters (D) (anterior astigmatism = 0.12 ± 0.28 D and posterior astigmatism = 0.02 ± 0.10 D). ROC revealed the index of height decentration with an area under the curve of 0.788 ± 0.054 as the most suitable to differentiate between eyes of healthy patients and the non-ectatic eye of patients with asymmetrical keratoconus, followed by the index of vertical asymmetry of 0.772 ± 0.057 and a keratoconus index of 0.743 ± 0.062. However, with progression of the eyes into early ectactic stages, the ROC showed the highest area under the curve for D-index (0.876 ± 0.039), followed by index of height decentration (0.855 ± 0.046) and index of vertical asymmetry (0.842 ± 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Early stages of keratoconus are hard to diagnose and best results can be achieved by using index of height decentration and index of vertical asymmetry. As the disease progresses, D-index is better suited to diagnose an ectasia. Astigmatism, keratometry, and pachymetry barely change in the early stages, so these values are not as fitting as corneal elevation parameters for early diagnosis. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(4):254-259.].


Assuntos
Córnea/patologia , Ceratocone/diagnóstico , Adulto , Paquimetria Corneana , Topografia da Córnea/métodos , Dilatação Patológica , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Ceratocone/classificação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Curva ROC , Tomografia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA