Peritoneal Ultrafiltration in the Long-Term Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure Refractory to Pharmacological Therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Despite continuous improvement in the treatment, heart failure (HF) is a growing health problem and a major cause of mortality and morbidity in the world. There is some positive experience with the removal of the fluid excess via peritoneum in those patients, regardless of their renal function. The aim of this single center pilot study was to assess the efficacy of peritoneal ultra filtration (PUF) with a nightly 12-h exchange in the long-term treatment of refractory HF. METHODS: The study included patients with chronic HF resistant to updated HF therapy (pharmacological and devices if applicable), who had experienced at least three hospitalizations due to HF during the preceding year and were disqualified from heart transplantation. All of them were treated with nightly 12-h 7.5% icodextrin exchange. RESULTS: There were 15 patients (13 men), aged 72 ± 9 years, with charlson comorbidity index (CCI) 9 ± 1.2, NYHA class IV (11 patients) or III (4 patients), and eGFR 32 ± 11 ml/min/1.73m2. They were followed up for 24 ± 8 months (range 12-43, median 26 months). During the 1st year, all patients improved their NYHA functional class from 3.7 ± 0.5 to 2.6 ± 0.5; P = 0.0005, with stable (34.3 ± 12.4, and 35.6 ± 16.5%, respectively) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter decreased from 27.8 ± 2.7 to 24.4 ± 3.4 mm; P = 0.09. Daily diuresis increased from 867 ± 413 to 1221 ± 680 ml; P = 0.25, while the dose of furosemide could be reduced from 620 ± 256 to 360 ± 110 mg/d; P = 0.0005, however, the kidney function deteriorated, with eGFR drop from 32 ± 11 to 25.6 ± 13 ml/min/1.73m2; P = 0.01). HF-related hospitalizations decreased from 8.9 ± 2.8 days/month to 1.5 ± 1.2 days/month (P = 0.003). Mechanical peritoneal dialysis complications occurred in five patients and infectious complications in four (peritonitis rate 1 per 72 patient-month). Patient survival was 93% at 1 year and 73% at 2 year. Technique survival was 100%. CONCLUSION: In patients with refractory HF, PUF with one overnight icodextrin exchange appears to be a promising therapeutic option as an adjunct to pharmacological management of those who are not transplant candidates. It should be emphasized that the treatment can have a great impact on the quality of life and the total costs of treating these patients.

Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis as a Bridge to Definitive Chronic Renal Replacement Therapy: Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.

Background: The peritoneal dialysis (PD) urgent-start pathway, without typical 2-week break-in period, was meant for late-referral patients able and prone to join PD-first program, with its main advantages such as: keeping the vascular system intact, preserving their residual renal function and retaining life-style flexibility. We compared the short- and long-term outcomes of consecutive 35 patients after urgent- and 94 patients after the planned start of PD as the first choice. Methods: The study included all incident end-stage renal disease patients starting PD program between January 2005 and December 2015, classified into two groups: those with urgent (unplanned) and those with elective (planned) start. Urgent PD was initiated as an overnight automatic procedure (APD) with dwell volume gradually increased, and after 2-3 weeks, target PD method was established. Results: The mean time between catheter implantation and PD start was 3.5 ± 2.3 in urgent and 16.2 ± 1.7 days in planned-start groups (p < 0.00001). 51% of the patients in the urgent-start group required PD during first 48 h after catheter insertion. Mean follow-up of 17.6 ± 11.09 months (median: 19.0) was in the urgent-start group and 28.6 ± 26.6 months (median: 19.5) in the planned-start group. The early mechanical complications were observed more often in the urgent-start group (29 vs. 4%, p = 0.00005). The only significant predictors of early mechanical complications were serum albumin (p = 0.02) and time between the catheter insertion and PD start. The first year patient survival and technique survival censored for death and kidney transplantation were not significantly different between groups. In Cox proportional analysis the independent risk factors for patient survival as well as for method and patient survival appeared Charlson Comorbidity Index CCI (HR 1.4; p = 0.01 and 1.24; p = 0.02) and time from catheter implantation to PD start with HR 5.11; p = 0.03 and 4.29; p = 0.04 for <2 days, while time >14 days lost its predictive value (p = 0.07). Conclusion: Peritoneal dialysis may be a feasible and safe alternative to HD in patients who need to start dialysis urgently without established dialysis access, with an acceptable complications rates, as well as patient and technique survival.

Renal amyloidosis in Whipple disease: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Whipple disease is a rare systemic infection caused by Tropheryma whippelii that usually manifests with joint pain, weight loss, diarrhoea and abdominal pain. However, in some cases the infection may involve other organs and tissues. CASE PRESENTATION: We report on a 44-year-old man with Whipple disease which led to renal amyloidosis and end-stage renal failure. In this case, the patient was diagnosed with Whipple disease and commenced on a 12-month trimetoprime-sulfametoxasole therapy with good result. Six months after cessation of therapy the patient was readmitted to hospital due to signs of renal failure. An urgent kidney biopsy was performed which revealed secondary amyloidosis. Despite intensive immunosuppressive treatment, renal parameters gradually deteriorated and haemodialysis was started eventually. Three months later the patient's general condition dramatically worsened with bloody diarrhoea, bilious vomiting and progressive malnutrition. The repeated endoscopic examination confirmed severe recurrence of Whipple disease. Ceftriaxone and total parenteral nutrition was started what greatly improved patient's state. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge based on systematic review, this is the first case report on Whipple disease complicated by secondary amyloidosis and kidney failure maintained on permanent renal replacement therapy. It is strongly suspected that the use of immunosuppressive treatment in such cases may exacerbate the course of Whipple disease and cause life-threatening complications.

[Fungal peritonitis in patients on peritoneal dialysis]. / Grzybicze zapalenie otrzewnej u chorych ze schylkowa niewydolnoscia nerek leczonych dializa otrzewnowa.

UNLABELLED: Fungal peritonitis is a serious complication causes significant morbidity and mortality for patients on peritoneal dialysis. We reviewed our fungal peritonitis cases to analyse clinical features, treatment and predisposing factors. METHODS: Records of all peritonitis episodes were reviewed. Fungal peritonitis was diagnosed based on positive fungal culture in suitable media of the effluent. RESULTS: Between January 2001 and June 2006, 98 patients were treated with peritoneal dialysis. During this period 102 peritonitis episodes was noticed, four of them (3,9%) was caused by fungi. The most common pathogen was Candida sp. Preceding treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics was revealed in all cases, three of them due to bacterial peritonitis. One patient died due to sepsis, three was moved to hemodialysis. CONCLUSIONS: Fungal peritonitis is rare, but serious complication it patients treated with peritoneal dialysis. Preceding broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy is the main risk factor for the development of this complication. Early Tenckhoff catheter removal and prophylaxis (antifungal treatment, education, coexisting diseases treatment) may be beneficial for peritoneal dialysis patients with fungal peritonitis.