Breast Conserving Therapy for Patients With Prior Cosmetic Implant-Based Breast Augmentation: Outcomes and Comparison Against a Matched Cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Controversy exists regarding potential increased toxic effects in patients with cosmetic implant-based augmentation (CIBA) who receive radiation therapy. We evaluated acute and chronic toxic effects associated with radiation therapy in women with prior CIBA treated with whole-breast irradiation (WBI) as part of breast conserving therapy (BCT) and compared these results against a cohort of patients without prior breast augmentation who received similar therapy. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to identify patients with a prior history of CIBA who subsequently underwent BCT with WBI. The control group consisted of consecutively treated patients without prior CIBA who also underwent BCT with WBI. Analyses included a comparison of baseline and treatment-associated factors between the augmentation and control groups, evaluation of toxic effects between both groups, and multivariable analysis of factors associated with the receipt of additional surgery following radiation. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with prior CIBA and 135 consecutively treated patients without CIBA were identified. Patients with prior CIBA were treated from 2006 through 2019, and patients without CIBA were treated from 2016 through 2019, though treatment characteristics and median follow-up time were similar between the two groups. Patients with prior CIBA were significantly less likely to experience acute moist desquamation (0% vs. 18%; P = .005). There were otherwise no statistically significant differences in acute (≤ 6 months) or chronic (> 6 months) toxic effects between the two groups. Rates of excellent/good chronic cosmetic outcome were 89% for the CIBA group and 97% in the control group (P = .094). On multivariable analysis, patients without prior CIBA (OR = 0.04; CI = 0.01-0.13; P < .001) and patients treated with moderately hypofractionated irradiation (OR = 0.08; CI = 0.02-0.23; P < .001) were significantly less likely to undergo additional surgery following receipt of WBI. Two patients experienced implant loss following radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: WBI as part of BCT in patients with prior implant-based breast augmentation appears safe and is associated with favorable cosmetic outcomes. There was an increased need for additional surgery in patients with prior CIBA, but rates of acute and chronic toxic effects appeared similar to those in nonaugmented patients.

Breast Irradiation Is Well Tolerated in Carriers of a Pathogenic ATM Variant.

PURPOSE: There are mixed and limited data regarding radiation therapy (RT) tolerance in carriers of a germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) ATM variant. We investigated RT-related toxic effects in carriers of an ATM variant who received treatment for breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified 71 patients treated with adjuvant RT for breast cancer who were carriers of a variant in ATM: 15 were classified as P/LP and 56 classified as variants of unknown significance (VUS). We additionally identified 205 consecutively treated patients during a similar timeframe who were either confirmed ATM wild type or had no prior genetic testing. RT plans were reviewed. Acute and chronic toxic effects were evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 criteria. Fisher's exact tests for count data were performed to compare toxic effects between the cohorts (P/LP vs VUS vs control). Wilcoxon rank-sum testing was performed to assess for differences in patient characteristics. RESULTS: The median toxicity follow-up was 19.4 months; median follow-up for the subcohorts was 13.3 months (P/LP), 12.6 months (VUS), and 23.3 months (control). There were no significant differences in radiation plan heterogeneity, receipt of a boost, or size of breast/chest wall planning target volume. There was greater use of hypofractionated RT in the control cohort (P = .023). After accounting for patient- and treatment-related factors that may affect toxic effects, we found no significant differences with respect to acute dermatitis, hyperpigmentation, moist desquamation, breast/chest wall pain, or breast edema. Additionally, we found no significant differences with respect to chronic breast/chest wall pain, induration, telangiectasia, or cosmetic outcome. CONCLUSIONS: RT as part of the management of breast cancer was well tolerated in carriers of a P/LP ATM variant, with toxic effect profiles that were similar to those seen in patients without known ATM mutations. High rates of excellent or good cosmesis were observed in carriers of a P/LP ATM variant who underwent breast conservation.

Normal Tissue Integral Dose as a Result of Prostate Radiation Therapy: A Quantitative Comparison Between High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy and Modern External Beam Radiation Therapy Techniques.

Purpose: Quantification of integral radiation dose delivered during treatment for prostate cancer is lacking. We performed a comparative quantification of dose to nontarget body tissues delivered via 4 common radiation techniques: conventional volumetric modulated arc therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, pencil-beam scanning proton therapy, and high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Methods and Materials: Plans for each radiation technique were generated for 10 patients with typical anatomy. For brachytherapy plans, virtual needles were placed to achieve standard dosimetry. Standard planning target volume margins or robustness margins were applied as appropriate. A "normal tissue" structure (entire computed tomography simulation volume minus planning target volume) was generated for integral dose computation. Dose-volume histogram parameters for targets and normal structures were tabulated. Normal tissue integral dose was calculated by multiplying normal tissue volume by mean dose. Results: Normal tissue integral dose was lowest for brachytherapy. Pencil-beam scanning protons, stereotactic body radiation therapy, and brachytherapy resulted in 17%, 57%, and 91% absolute reductions compared with standard volumetric modulated arc therapy, respectively. Mean nontarget tissues receiving 25%, 50%, and 75% of the prescription dose were reduced by 85%, 76%, and 83% for brachytherapy relative to volumetric modulated arc therapy, by 79%, 64%, and 74% relative to stereotactic body radiation therapy, and 73%, 60%, and 81% relative to proton therapy. All reductions observed using brachytherapy were statistically significant. Conclusions: High-dose-rate brachytherapy is an effective technique for reducing dose to nontarget body tissues relative to volumetric modulated arc therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, and pencil-beam scanning proton therapy.

Trimodality therapy for patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: A comprehensive surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis.

PURPOSE: Debate exists regarding the optimal management for patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent inclusion of chemotherapeutic data in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database has made it possible to identify patients with NSCLC who received chemotherapy. We hypothesized that patients with stage III NSCLC experience improved overall survival from trimodality therapy (TMT) versus definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT) alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the overall survival of stage III NSCLC patients based on the receipt of TMT versus CRT alone. This included crude and adjusted univariate models as well as crude and doubly robust adjusted multivariable analyses, both utilizing propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting. Factors included in the multivariable analyses included: age, sex, marital status, income, date of diagnosis, primary site, histology, grade, T stage, N stage, and intended treatment. Planned subset analyses were performed for stage III(N2) patients. RESULTS: Adult patients with stage III NSCLC (N = 9008) from the SEER database were included in our analyses. In our univariate analyses, an overall survival benefit was observed for TMT versus CRT (CrudeHR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.55-0.61, p < 0.001; AdjHR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.54-0.61, p < 0.001). This persisted in both crude and doubly robust multivariable analyses (CrudeHR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.53-0.61, p < 0.001; AdjHR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.53-0.59, p < 0.001). Patients with stage III(N2) disease also demonstrated a significant benefit to OS with TMT versus CRT alone. CONCLUSION: The significant difference in overall survival seen with TMT suggests this may be an effective treatment approach for select patients.

Dose to the Left Anterior Descending Artery Correlates With Cardiac Events After Irradiation for Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: Although global heart dose has been associated with late cardiac toxic effects in patients who received radiation therapy for breast cancer, data detailing the clinical significance of cardiac substructure dosimetry are limited. We investigated whether dose to the left anterior descending artery (LAD) correlates with adverse cardiac events. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified 375 consecutively treated female patients from 2012 to 2018 who received left-sided breast or chest wall irradiation (with or without regional nodal irradiation). Medical records were queried to identify cardiac events after radiation therapy. Mean and maximum LAD and heart doses (LAD Dmean, LAD Dmax, heart Dmean, and heart Dmax) were calculated and converted to 2-Gy equivalent doses (EQD2). Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to determine association with cardiac toxic effects. Potential dose thresholds for each of the 4 dose parameters were identified by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, after which Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare cardiac event-free survival based on these constraints. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 48 months. Thirty-six patients experienced a cardiac event, and 23 patients experienced a major cardiac event. On univariate and multivariable analyses, increased LAD Dmean, LAD Dmax, and heart Dmean were associated with increased risk of any cardiac event and a major cardiac event. ROC curve analysis identified a threshold LAD Dmean EQD2 of 2.8 Gy (area under the ROC curve, 0.69), above which the risk for any cardiac event was higher (P = .001). Similar results were seen when stratifying by LAD Dmax EQD2 of 6.7 Gy (P = .005) and heart Dmean EQD2 of 0.8 Gy (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Dose to the LAD correlated with adverse cardiac events in this cohort. Contouring and minimizing dose to the LAD should be considered for patients receiving radiation therapy for left-sided breast cancer.

Correlation between tumor voxel dose response matrix and tumor biomarker profile in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: We have developed a novel imaging analysis procedure that is highly predictive of local failure after chemoradiation in head and neck cancer. In this study we investigated whether any pretreatment biomarkers correlated with key imaging parameters. METHODS: Pretreatment biopsy material was available for 28 patients entered into an institutional trial of adaptive radiotherapy in which FDG-PET images were collected weekly during treatment. The biopsies were immunohistochemically stained for CD44, EGFR, GLUT1, ALDH1, Ki-67 and p53 and quantified using image analysis. Expression levels were correlated with previously derived imaging parameters, the pretreatment SUVmax and the dose response matrix (DRM). RESULTS: The different parameters of the SUVmax and DRM did not correlate with each other. We observed a positive and highly significant (p = 0.0088) correlation between CD44 expression and volume of tumor with a DRM greater than 0.8. We found no correlation between any DRM parameter and GLUT1, p53, Ki-67 and EGFR or ALDH1. GLUT1 expression did correlate with the maximum SUV0 and the volume of tumor with an SUV0 greater than 20. CONCLUSIONS: The pretreatment SUVmax and DRM are independent imaging parameters that combine to predict local recurrence. The significant correlation between CD44 expression, a known cancer stem cell (CSC) marker, and volume of tumor with a DRM greater than 0.8 is consistent with concept that specific foci of cells are responsible for tumor recurrence and that CSCs may be randomly distributed in tumors in specific niches. Dose painting these small areas may lead to improved tumor control.